Skip to main content
Fig. 9 | Molecular Neurodegeneration

Fig. 9

From: Neuroprotection by WldS depends on retinal ganglion cell type and age in glaucoma

Fig. 9

Aging Reduces the Neuroprotective Capacity of WldS+/+. A IOP of aged WT (circles) and WldS+/+ (squares) mice before (day 0) and after (days ≥1) a single unilateral injection of microbeads (blue symbols) or equivalent volume of saline (beige symbols). Microbeads elevated IOP by 29.5% in aged WT (19.45 ± 1.5 vs. 15.01 ± 1.3 mmHg, p < 0.001) and 29.7% in WldS+/+ eyes compared to saline-injected eyes (19.23 ± 1.6 vs. 14.82 ± 1.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). B, C Example coronal sections (top) of the SC after intravitreal injection of CTB-488 (green) into saline- and microbead eyes of aged WT (B) and WldS+/+ mice (C). Transport deficits are indicated by dashed lines. Retinotopic maps (bottom) recreated from SC sections with optic disc indicated by white filled circles. Scale bar = 500 μm. D Quantification of anterograde axon transport to the SC. Data from young (1.5–2.5 months old) animals are replotted from Fig. 8C for comparison. We did not detect a difference in the percent of intact transport to the SCs corresponding to saline eyes of young vs. aged WT and WldS+/+ animals (p = 0.60). For aged animals, IOP elevation decreased transport in WT (p < 0.001) and WldS+/+ mice (p = 0.03) when compared to respective saline eyes. Axon transport of aged WldS+/+ microbead-injected eyes was greater than that observed in SC of aged WT microbead eyes (p = 0.001). E Quantification of Δ spatial acuity. Data for young animals replotted from Fig. 8D for comparison. Spatial acuity linearly diminishes over the duration of IOP elevation in aged WT (R2 = 0.74, p = 0.0064) and WldS+/+ mice (R2 = 0.81, p = 0.0058). Statistics: Student’s t-test (A), Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s post hoc (D) Linear mixed model (E), Linear regression (E). Multiple comparison significance indicators: * Young WT vs. Young WldS+/+; # Aged WT vs. Young WldS+/+; ^ Young WldS+/+ vs. Aged WldS+/+ (E). Data presented = mean ± SEM

Back to article page