Angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan, reduces MPTP-induced degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in substantia nigra
© Grammatopoulos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 11 September 2006
Accepted: 15 January 2007
Published: 15 January 2007
Recent attention has focused on understanding the role of the brain-renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) in stroke and neurodegenerative diseases. Direct evidence of a role for the brain-RAS in Parkinson's disease (PD) comes from studies demonstrating the neuroprotective effect of RAS inhibitors in several neurotoxin based PD models. In this study, we show that an antagonist of the angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT1) receptor, losartan, protects dopaminergic (DA) neurons against 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) toxicity both in primary ventral mesencephalic (VM) cultures as well as in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) of C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 1).
In the presence of exogenous Ang II, losartan reduced MPP+ (5 μM) induced DA neuronal loss by 72% in vitro. Mice challenged with MPTP showed a 62% reduction in the number of DA neurons in the SNpc and a 71% decrease in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunostaining of the striatum, whereas daily treatment with losartan lessened MPTP-induced loss of DA neurons to 25% and reduced the decrease in striatal TH+ immunostaining to 34% of control.
Our study demonstrates that the brain-RAS plays an important neuroprotective role in the MPTP model of PD and points to AT1 receptor as a potential novel target for neuroprotection.
Parkinson's disease (PD) was originally described in 1817 by James Parkinson and since then there has been much progress in determining the etiology of the disease . There is now clear evidence showing that the primary pathological feature of PD is the loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) . Insights into the mechanisms responsible for PD have come from epidemiological studies and through animal models of DA neurodegeneration [3–5]. Treatment of rodents and non-human primates with neurotoxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), 6-hydroxydopamine [6, 7] and rotenone  have helped us understand that oxidative stress, mitochondrial respiration dysfunction and protein aggregation are primary mediators of the dopaminergic neurodegeneration . Even with some understanding of how DA neurons are lost in PD, there is still no effective therapy to halt or slow down the progression of the disease. Several clinical studies have promised the development of new therapies for prevention of dopaminergic neurodegeneration, such as through the use of resagiline, co-enzyme Q10, memantine and others . However, additional research is needed to identify new molecular targets, which may help find ways to prevent or reduce the DA neuronal loss in PD. This study explores the hypothesis that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a potential target for preventing the loss of DA neurons.
The renin-angiotensin system is best known for its role in regulating blood pressure, activation of sympathetic pathways, stimulation of vasopressin release, regulating drinking behavior and cerebral blood flow [11, 12]. Only recently has it been discovered that all the required components of the RAS, such as renin, angiotensinogen, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), angiotensin II (Ang II) and the Ang II (AT) receptors, are present in the mammalian brain [13, 14]. Ang II is the primary agonist of the RAS and has similar affinities for the two primary AT receptors, AT1 and AT2. The AT1 receptor was originally identified by the selective binding of a non-peptide receptor antagonist, 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxy-methyl-1-[(2'-(1H)-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]imidazol potassium salt (DuP 753, losartan), whereas the AT2, receptor was identified by the selective binding of a non-peptide receptor antagonist, PD123319 . Both the AT1 and AT2 receptors are known to be members of the seven-transmembrane spanning G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily . AT1 receptor signaling activates kinases through a protein kinase C (PKC) pathway and AT2 receptor signaling activates phosphatases through a phospholipase-2 (PLA2) pathway. The two receptor types have been suggested to have opposing actions .
Angiotensin II protects dopaminergic neurons in vitro from MPP+ toxicity only in the presence of the AT1receptor antagonist losartan
In an effort to determine whether AT receptor activation affects the resistance of DA neurons to MPP+ toxicity, VM cultures were treated with Ang II (100 nM) prior to the addition of MPP+ (1–100 μM). Select VM cultures were also pretreated with the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (1 μM) and/or the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 (1 μM), prior to the addition of Ang II (Fig. 2). TH+ neuronal counts were determined 48 hrs after the addition of MPP+. MPP+ dose response conditions were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Newman-Keuls post-hoc test. This analysis showed that MPP+-treated VM cultures pretreated with Ang II (100 nM), in the presence of losartan (1 μM), had a statistically significant reduction in DA neuronal loss when compared to MPP+ exposed VM cultures pretreated with Ang II alone or in the presence of PD123319 (Fig. 2). VM cultures treated with Ang II and losartan showed a 71.6 ± 6% and 48.3 ± 10% reduction in MPP+-induced DA neuronal loss when compared to 5 μM and 10 μM MPP+ alone treated VM cultures, respectively (Fig. 2). In combination, both AT receptor antagonists in the presence of Ang II (100 nM) did not significantly alter MPP+ toxicity. Ang II alone or in the presence of PD123319, did not provide significant neuroprotection (Fig. 2). Both AT receptor antagonists, in the absence of exogenous Ang II, also did not affect MPP+ toxicity (data not shown). In addition, VM cultures treated with Ang II (100 nM) and losartan (1 μM) 15 to 60 min after the addition of MPP+ (10 μM) and assayed 48 hrs later, were not neuroprotected against MPP+ (data not shown). This suggests that modification of downstream signaling of the angiotensin pathway is required prior to neurotoxin exposure.
In vitro AT receptor expression profile in primary VM cultures
AT1 receptors were co-expressed in cells immunopositive for nestin (neural progenitors), GFAP (astrocytes), NeuN and MAP2 (neurons) (Fig. 3a). AT2 receptors were expressed in nestin, GFAP, NeuN and MAP2 stained cells (Fig. 3b). Approximately half of all cells showed double labeling for both AT receptors (Fig. 3c).
In vivo AT receptor expression profile in dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc)
Losartan protects SNpc dopaminergic neurons from MPTP toxicity
Losartan protects striatal nerve terminals from MPTP-induced toxicity
Losartan does not interfere with transport of MPTP into the brain and its conversion to MPP+in C57BL/6 mice
Losartan does not interfere with the metabolism and uptake of MPTP.
(a) MPP+ levels in the striatum and substantia nigra of C57BL/6 mice
0.27 ± 0.03 μg MPP+/g tissue
0.28 ± 0.12 μg MPP+/g tissue
0.26+0.04 μg MPP+/g tissue
0.22 ± 0.05 μg MPP+/g tissue
(b) Dopamine uptake in ventral mesencephalic cultures
68.1 ± 11.2 fmol/sec
Losartan (1 μM)
72.7 ± 7.9 fmol/sec
Losartan (10 μM)
76.2 ± 14.5 fmol/sec
Losartan does not interfere with dopamine uptake in VM cultures
To rule out the possibility that losartan-mediated neuroprotection was a result of inhibition of the dopamine transporter (DAT) and subsequent reduction of MPP+ entry into DA neurons, VM cultures were treated with losartan (1 and 10 μM) and DA uptake levels were determined. Losartan (1 and 10 μM) did not alter DA uptake in VM cultures (Table 1). This demonstrates that losartan does not interfere with the function of the DAT.
Losartan reduces arterial blood pressure in C57BL/6 mice
Losartan reduces arterial blood pressure in C57BL/6 mice.
Std. error of mean (SEM)
Sample size (N)
Std. error of mean (SEM)
Sample size (N)
The primary goal of this study was to determine if manipulation of brain-RAS with the AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan, could prevent the DA neuronal loss caused by the parkinsonism-inducing neurotoxin, MPTP. Losartan in the presence of exogenous Ang II in vitro, was able to significantly reduce the loss of DA neurons induced by MPP+. These results are in agreement with our earlier findings demonstrating that antagonism of the AT1 receptor with losartan could protect cultured DA neurons from rotenone toxicity . In the current study, we also showed that pretreatment of MPTP-lesioned adult C57BL/6 mice with losartan significantly reduced the loss of DA neurons in the SNpc as well as partially spared striatal TH+ terminals.
The brain-RAS has already been identified to have a potential beneficial and therapeutic value as a target against stroke. Several recent studies have shown that peripheral treatment with AT1 receptor antagonists is protective against ischemia and reduce the cortical volume of the ischemic lesion [36, 37]. We have recently demonstrated that Ang II, through the actions of the AT2 receptor, protects primary cortical neuronal cultures from hypoxic injury [19, 38]. In addition, we also demonstrated that the AT2 receptor-mediated neuroprotection is dependent on the delayed rectifier K+ channel, Na+/Ca+2 exchanger and Na+/K+ATPase . And although we have not yet conclusively identified the mechanism(s) of Ang II-mediated DA neuroprotection, our previous work, as well as studies by others, provide some insight into potential mechanisms.
Several groups have suggested a role for the brain-RAS in PD. A genetic study has implicated polymorphisms of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene as a risk factor for PD . In addition, postmortem studies have shown the loss of both AT1 and AT2 receptor binding sites from the SN in PD patients, suggesting that PD-induced neurodegeneration may involve AT receptor expressing cells . The brain-RAS is also involved in maintaining TH transcription and catecholamine synthesis [26–30]. In this study, we observed that almost all DA neurons express the AT1 receptor and to a lesser extent they express the AT2 receptor, both in vitro and in vivo. Because of the low level of AT2 receptor immunostaining, we confirmed the presence of Atgr2 mRNA in TH+ neurons by real-time RT-PCR. The immunohistochemical analysis also revealed that all other cell types examined express both AT receptor subtypes in vitro. These results suggest that the observed in vivo neuroprotection may be mediated through the antagonism of the AT1 receptor and potentially the subsequent activation of the AT2 receptor by Ang II endogenously present in the brain. These data are in agreement with our previous findings which suggest a negative role for the AT1 receptor and a neuroprotective role for the AT2 receptor which under normal conditions is masked by the opposing role of the AT1 receptor . An alternative hypothesis is that because DA neurons have low levels of the AT2 receptor, it is possible that the observed neuroprotection may be due to the inhibition of downstream signaling of the AT1 receptors directly in DA neurons and the preferential activation of AT2 receptors in supporting cells, which then indirectly protect the neurons. In support of the indirect theory, astrocytes are known to produce factors such as glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and mesencephalic astrocytes-derived neurotrophic factor (MANF), two highly potent neurotrophic factors for DA neurons [40, 41]. It should be noted that because losartan did reduce the mean arterial BP in mice, we could not exclude the possibility that the reduction in BP may be contributing to losartan's neuroprotective actions in vivo. Further research is needed to answer many of these questions.
A recent observation by Rodriguez-Pallares et al  describes that developing rat DA neurons derived from E14 VM express the AT2 receptor. Our study extends these findings and quantitates the proportion of DA neurons that express the AT2 receptor, both in VM cultures (65%) and in the SNpc of C57BL/6 mice (45%). We also now report expression of the AT2 receptor on nestin positive VM precursors. Our observation of abundance of the AT2 receptor on immature cells is corroborated by others, who have reported that during development AT2 receptor expression levels are high in the brain but significantly decrease during adulthood . More direct evidence for a role of the brain-RAS in PD comes from studies examining the neuroprotective effects of ACE inhibitors in 6-hydroxydopamine and MPTP-induced neurotoxicity rodent models [32–35]. ACE inhibitors prevent the formation of Ang II from the decapeptide Ang I, which results in indiscriminate reduction in signaling at all AT receptors, including a potential beneficial AT2 effect. Our study demonstrates that similar neuroprotection can be obtained by selective antagonism of the AT1 receptor, in the absence of disruption of Ang II generation and its activity at other AT receptors. One possible mechanism for the neuroprotective effects resulting from inhibiting the AT1 receptor might relate to oxyradical generation. Activation of the AT1 receptor can lead to upregulation of NADPH oxidase, a mechanism for generation of superoxide and elevation of oxidative stress .
In addition, the AT1 receptor has been shown to induce an upregulation of TH, which may result in higher levels of DA [26–28]. Studies have suggested that elevated DA levels may lead to DA quinones, which can mediate oxidative stress. Additional processes that might contribute to susceptibility of DA neurons in PD include: (1) toxicity of tetrahydrobiopterin (an obligatory cofactor for TH) via increased DA production and the cofactor's autooxidation  and (2) increasing catecholamine concentrations via overexpression of α-synuclein and resulting disruption of vesicular pH that perturbs the ability of vesicles to store neurotransmitters . Others however argue that elevated DA actually inhibits formation of α-synuclein aggregates  and that depletion of DA in vivo does not protect from acute toxicity of MPTP . Taken together, these findings have to be interpreted in the context of variations in the models, neurotransmitter concentrations, and time scales, all of which affect the outcome. Nonetheless, most of these studies point to a likely central role for DA in the pathogenesis of PD.
While it may be beneficial to prevent AT1 receptor signaling through the use of ACE inhibitors, the reduction of Ang II in the brain will also prevent the neuroprotective actions of AT2 receptor-mediated signaling. The beneficial attributes of the AT2 receptor can be seen in studies describing how the AT2 receptor counteracts the actions of the AT1 receptor by means of its downstream signaling cascades or provide neuroprotection against mitochondrial toxins when unopposed by the AT1 receptor through the use of specific receptor antagonists targeting the AT1 receptor [15, 19, 38, 39]. In addition, recent studies have also shown a relationship between metabolites of Ang II, such as angiotensin IV, which is believed to be the agonist for the AT4 receptor and is suggested to have a role in memory [24, 44–47].
In this study, we demonstrate that antagonism of the AT1 receptor can protect dopaminergic neurons from a neurotoxin based in vivo PD model. While we are actively investigating the role of the brain-RAS in PD, the angiotensin system may have a role in other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Huntington's disease [22, 48]. Additional research will be needed to completely understand the roles of this system in the brain.
Ventral mesencephalic culture
Rat ventral mesencephalic (VM) tissues from E15 Sprague Dawley embryos were dissected into Ca+2/Mg+2 – free Hank's buffered salt solution (HBSS), mechanically dispersed and centrifuged . The cells were resuspended in F12 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Sigma). Viability was determined using trypan blue exclusion. Cells were seeded at a density of 6 × 104 viable cells/cm2 on polyethylenimine (1 μg/ml) pre-coated 96- and 12-well culture plates or 8-chambered glass slides and incubated for 6 days at 5% CO2/37°C. Half of the medium was changed every 3–4 days. After 6 days of growth, primary VM cultures consist of approximately 55% neurons, 45% type 1 astrocytes and <1% other cell types, as determined by immunohistochemical analysis . Dopaminergic (TH+) neurons represented 2–5% of total cells in VM cultures.
Ventral mesencephalic culture treatments
VM cultures were exposed to the parkinsonism-inducing neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) (1–100 μM) (Sigma) for 48 hr at 37°C and then processed for analysis. In Ang II-treated cultures, the octapeptide (1–100 nM) (Sigma) was added either 30 min prior or 15, 30 or 60 min after MPP+ treatment. In an effort to determine AT receptor subtype specificity, VM cultures were pretreated with 2-n-Butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxy-methyl-1-[(2'-(1H)-tetrazol-5-yl)biph enyl-4-yl)methyl]imidazol potassium salt (DuP 753, losartan) (1 μM) (AT1 receptor antagonist) (Du Pont/Merck, Wilmington, DE) or PD123319 (1 μM) (AT2 receptor antagonist) (Sigma) or both, 15 min prior to the addition of Ang II [19, 20]. Cells were exposed to the treatment agents for the duration of the experiment. VM cultures were then washed with PBS and fixed by the addition of 4% paraformaldehyde until analyzed.
Animals and treatments
Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were used. Mice (n = 4–5 per group) received subcutaneous (200 μl) injections of 2-n-Butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxy-methyl-1-[(2'-(1H)-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]imidazol potassium salt (DuP 753, losartan) (90 mg/kg) (100 mg tablets, Du Pont/Merck, Wilmington, DE; dissolved in saline and filtered through a 0.2 μm filter) daily for 16 days, beginning two days prior to the first MPTP injection (Fig. 1). It is expected that the current dosing of losartan should result in greater than 60% inhibition of AT1 receptors in the brain . Control animals received saline injections. Losartan and saline control treated mice received four intraperitoneal injections of MPTP-hydrochloride (20 mg/kg of free base; Sigma) in saline at 2-hour intervals on day 3 followed by a single intraperitoneal injection of MPTP-hydrochloride (20 mg/kg) on day 9, and were sacrificed 7 days after the last MPTP injection . Control mice received saline injections. This protocol is in accordance with the NIH guidelines for use of live animals and was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center.
For immunohistochemical analysis, animals were perfused with 20 ml of saline followed by 20 ml of freshly made 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were then removed and stored in 4% paraformaldehyde until analyzed. Fixed VM cultures or 40 μm brain sections were incubated with an appropriate primary antibody overnight at 4°C, followed by 1 hr incubation with a secondary antibody at room temperature. To identify DA neurons, a polyclonal (rabbit) anti-TH antibody (1:500) (Pel-Freez, Rogers, AR) was used. TH+ cells were visualized by nickel-enhanced DAB staining (Pierce) using a Vectastain kit (Vector laboratories, Burlingame, CA) or by immunofluorescence using an appropriate secondary antibody. Different cell types in the cultures were identified with a polyclonal (mouse) anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (1:200) for astrocytes, a polyclonal (mouse) anti-nestin (1:400) for neural progenitors, and a polyclonal (mouse) anti-microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) (1:200) or a polyclonal (mouse) anti-neuronal nuclear protein (NeuN) (1:200) for neuronal cell types (Chemicon, Temecula, CA). To determine AT receptor subtypes, a commercially available polyclonal (rabbit) anti-AT1 (N-10) (1:50) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc), polyclonal (goat) anti-AT2 (H-143) (1:50) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc), polyclonal anti-AT1(rabbit) (18801) (1:200) (Abcam), polyclonal (rabbit) anti-AT2 (C-18) (1:100) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc) or a polyclonal anti-AT2 (rabbit) (19134) (1:200) (Abcam) antibodies were used [19, 20]. Secondary antibodies used were Alexa 488-conjugated (donkey) anti-goat IgG (1:1000), Alexa 488-conjugated (donkey) anti-rabbit IgG (1:1000), Alexa 594-conjugated (donkey) anti-rabbit IgG (1:1000) and Alexa 594-conjugated (donkey) anti-mouse IgG (1:1000) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Total cells were visualized by Hoechst stained nuclei. Double and triple staining was done consecutively. Stained cultures were visualized by light and/or fluorescence microscopy using Zeiss or Nikon microscopes. For AT receptor profile counts in vitro, a total of 700 TH+ cells co-labeled for AT1 or AT2 receptor were counted from a minimum of 3 fields. For the in vivo AT receptor profile, TH+ cells co-labeled for AT1 or AT2 receptor were counted from the SNpc of 3 coronal sections. To determine the number of total cells in the SNpc, selected sections were defatted, rehydrated through descending alcohol concentrations, stained in cresyl violet acetate for 1 minute followed by acetic formalin, then dehydrated and cleared in xylene before coverslipping in Permount. Quantification of VM culture TH+ cells' survival was done by a blinded observer who counted all the positively stained cells having a distinct nucleus and visible neurites in the entire well. Each experimental condition in vitro represents 4–6 independent experiments.
Measurements of striatal MPP+levels
HPLC with UV detection (wavelength = 295 nm) was used to measure striatal MPP+ levels . Mice were injected subcutaneously (n = 3) daily with losartan (90 mg/kg) or saline for 3 days. On day 3, mice were injected 4 times every 2 hours intraperitoneally with saline or MPTP-hydrochloride (20 mg/kg). Sixty minutes after the last MPTP injection mice were sacrificed and the brains were immediately removed. The substantia nigra (SN) and striatum were dissected out on ice and rapidly frozen on dry ice and stored at -80°C until analysis. On the day of the assay, SN and striatum were prepared by sonicating the tissue samples in 9% (wt/vol) of 5% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma) containing 5 μg/ml of 4-phenylpyridine (Sigma), as an internal standard. After centrifugation, 50 μl of supernatant were injected onto a cation-exchange C18 column (Alltech). The mobile phase consisted of 89% (v/v) 50 mM KH2PO4 (pH 3 adjusted with H3PO4) and 11% (v/v) acetonitrile. The flow rate was 1.5 ml/min.
Dopamine uptake measurements
Dissociated mesencephalic neurons were grown as described above. The neurons were rinsed and then assayed at 37°C in Krebs-Ringer HEPES buffer (KRH; 120 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.2 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM Mg SO4, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) supplemented with 10 μM pargyline, 10 μM ascorbic acid, and 10 μM catechol. Assays (1 ml) included 100 nM [3H] DA. Nonspecific [3H] DA accumulation was determined in the presence of 1 mM (-) cocaine hydrochloride. After 10 min of incubation at 37°C, uptake was terminated by quickly washing the neurons three times with 1 ml of ice-cold KRH. Neurons were then solubilized in 0.5 ml of 3% trichloroacetic acid for 60 min with gentle shaking. Accumulated [3H] DA was determined by liquid scintillation counting (n = 3) .
Animal blood pressure measurements
Losartan (0.18 mg/mL) was administered through the drinking water and tail artery blood pressures were recorded non-invasively from awake animals. Animals were placed in a restraining tube heated to 37°C, and a pressure cuff and piezoelectric transducer were secured to the rostral base of the tail (PowerLab, AD Instruments). Animals were conditioned for ten to fifteen minutes by inflating the pressure cuff to 200 mmHg once every minute. Post-conditioning pulse and cuff pressure recordings were simultaneously acquired for up to 45 min at one reading per minute. Motion artifact detected by the pulse transducer during cuff deflation served as grounds for elimination of data points. Systolic and diastolic pressures were determined offline (Chart, AD Instruments). Systolic pressure was defined as cuff pressure upon first detection of pulse during deflation. Diastolic pressure was defined as cuff pressure when the pulse reading resumed normal amplitude (n = 4, >32 readings per animal).
Stereological analysis of TH+neurons and Nissl-stained cells in the SNpc
TH+ neuronal counts and coefficient of variance (CV) values for all animal groups.
Striatal TH+staining densitometry
Striatal sections were stained for TH as described above. Digital images were taken of each striatal section (3 sections per animal counting both the left and right striatum, n = 4–5 animals/group) using a Nikon Eclipse 800 microscope and a CCD camera with Spot software. TH+ staining densities were then analyzed using Adobe Photoshop software. Cortical areas (background) densitometry readings were subtracted from the measured densitometry of striatal areas. Measurements are represented as percent of control densities from saline-treated animals and are represented as mean ± SEM. Densitometric quantification of striatal TH+ staining was done by a blinded observer.
Laser capture microdissection (LCM)
Twelve-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were euthanized using CO2 asphyxiation. The brains were removed and immediately frozen in isopentane on dry ice. Brains were then stored at -80°C until analysis. Brains were then cut on a cryostat and 10 μm coronal sections were mounted on uncoated slides and stored at -80°C. Slides were allowed to briefly reach room temperature and were stained for TH using a rapid staining protocol to minimize mRNA degradation. Briefly, slides were fixed in acetone (40 seconds), washed briefly 3 times in phosphate buffer (PB; pH = 7.4), followed by a 5 min incubation with a mouse-anti-TH antibody (Sigma, 1:1000) diluted in PB. Slides were washed 3 times with PB, followed by 5 minute incubation with a Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Labs, 1:500) diluted in PB. Slides were washed twice in PB and then dehydrated in ethanol (50%, 70%, 95%, and 100%), (10 seconds each) and delipidated in xylene (40 seconds). Slides were then allowed to air dry. All procedures were carried out in an RNAse-free environment.
Tyrosine hydroxylase positive cells of the SNpc and VTA were visualized and dissected using a PixCell laser capture microscope under a 20× objective with an infrared diode laser (Arcturus Engineering, Santa Clara, CA). Approximately 500 TH positive cells per animal from the SNpc or VTA we isolated on a single LCM HS cap (Arcturuss Arcturus Engineering, Santa Clara, CA). RNAs were isolated using a PicoPure RNA Isolation kit (Arcturus, Mountain View, CA, USA) according to manufacturer's guidelines, and subjected to DNAse treatment (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA).
List of primers used for Real Time RT-PCR.
Western immunoblot analysis
The expression of AT1 and AT2 receptors was examined in an immortalized mesencephalic dopaminergic cell line, N27 . N27 cells were thawed into RPMI 1640 media containing 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Cells were collected in lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) with 1% SDS. After sonication, the lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 45 min at 4°C, and the proteins in the supernatant were separated on 4–12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel. After transfer to PVDF membranes, the proteins were probed for AT1 receptors (Santa Cruz polyclonal sc-1173 or Abcam polyclonal ab 18801, 1:500 dilution), AT2 receptors (Santa Cruz polyclonal sc-9040 or Abcam polyclonal ab 19134, 1:500 dilution). Secondary, alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-rabbit (1:5000; Sigma) and anti-mouse (1:10,000, Jackson ImmunoResearch) antibodies were followed by Lumi-Phos (Pierce) for chemiluminescence detection. Blots were stripped and reprobed for β-actin (Sigma, 1:10,000) to confirm equal protein loading on the gel.
Data were analyzed using Statistica software. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Newman-Keuls multiple comparison tests. Differences in mean values were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. All data were obtained from at least three independent experiments and are represented as a mean ± SEM.
angiotensin converting enzyme
- Ang II:
analysis of variance
- AT1 receptor:
Ang II type 1 receptor
gene encoding AT2 receptor
coefficient of error
coefficient of variance
dopamine or dopaminergic
embryonic day 15
glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor
glial fibrillary acidic protein
G-protein coupled receptor
Hank's buffered salt solution
laser capture microdissection
mesencephalic astrocytes-derived neurotrophic factor
microtubule-associated protein 2
neuronal nuclear protein
National Institutes of Health
protein kinase C
reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
substantia nigra pars compacta
ventral tagmental area.
Supported by the NIH Training Grant (T32 AA07464), Integrated Neuroscience Initiative on Alcoholism (INIA) AA13473, and Minority Summer Alcohol Research Program sponsored by the Department of Pharmacology. We thank Dr. Curt Freed for his comments on the manuscript and Cindy Hutt for her technical assistance. The authors are also indebted to Dr. Boris Tabakoff, Dr. Nancy Zahniser, Dr. Joe Gal, Dr. John Gerber, Dr. James West and Dr. David Standaert for use of their equipment.
- Parkinson J: An essay on the shaking palsy. Edited by: Neely, Jones. 1817, London: printed by Whittingham and Rowland for SherwoodGoogle Scholar
- Hornykiewicz O: Dopamine (3-hydroxytyramine) and brain function. Pharmacol Rev. 1966, 18: 925-64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dauer W, Przedborski S: Parkinson's disease: mechanisms and models. Neuron. 2003, 39: 889-909. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00568-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allam MF, Castillo AS, Navajas RS: Parkinson's disease risk factors: genetic, environmental, or both?. Neurol Res. 2005, 27: 206-8. 10.1179/016164105X22057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Twelves D, Perkins KS, Counsell C: Systematic review of incidence studies of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2003, 18: 19-31. 10.1002/mds.10305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Przedborski S, Vila M: The 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model: a tool to explore the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2003, 991: 189-98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wichmann T, DeLong MR: Pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease: the MPTP primate model of the human disorder. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2003, 991: 199-213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Betarbet R, Sherer TB, MacKenzie G, Garcia-Osuna M, Panov AV, Greenamyre JT: Chronic systemic pesticide exposure reproduces features of Parkinson's disease. Nat Neurosci. 2000, 3: 1301-6. 10.1038/81834.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dawson TM, Dawson VL: Molecular pathways of neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. Science. 2003, 302: 819-22. 10.1126/science.1087753.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olanow WC, Jankovic J: Neuroprotective therapy in Parkinson's disease and motor complications: A search for a pathogenesis-targeted, disease-modifying strategy. Mov Disord. 2005, 20 (Suppl 11): S13-S10.Google Scholar
- Phillips MI: Functions of angiotensin in the central nervous system. Annu Rev Physiol. 1987, 49: 413-35. 10.1146/annurev.ph.49.030187.002213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wright JW, Harding JW: Brain angiotensin receptor subtypes in the control of physiological and behavioral responses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1994, 18: 21-53. 10.1016/0149-7634(94)90034-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lippoldt A, Paul M, Fuxe K, Ganten D: The brain renin-angiotensin system: molecular mechanisms of cell to cell interactions. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1995, 17: 251-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phillips MI, Speakman EA, Kimura B: Levels of angiotensin and molecular biology of the tissue renin angiotensin systems. Regul Pept. 1993, 22: 1-20. 10.1016/0167-0115(93)90403-U.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gasparo MD, Catt KJ, Inagami T, Wright JW, Unger TH: International union of pharmacology XXIII. The angiotensin II receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2000, 52: 415-472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inagami T, Eguchi S, Numaguchi K, Motley ED, Tang H, Matsumoto T, Yamakawa T: Cross-talk between angiotensin II receptors and the tyrosine kinases and phosphatases. Am Soc Nephrol. 1999, 11: S57-61.Google Scholar
- Constantinescu CS, Goodman DB, Grossman RI, Mannon LJ, Cohen JA: Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1997, 54: 1012-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ge J, Barnes NM: Alterations in angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptor subtype levels in brain regions from patients with neurodegenerative disorders. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996, 297: 299-306. 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00762-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grammatopoulos T, Morris K, Ferguson P, Weyhenmeyer J: Angiotensin protects cortical neurons from hypoxic-induced apoptosis via the angiotensin type 2 receptor. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2002, 99: 114-24. 10.1016/S0169-328X(02)00101-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grammatopoulos TN, Ahmadi F, Jones SM, Rariss MW, Weyhenmeyer JA, Zawada WM: Angiotensin II protects cultures midbrain dopaminergic neurons against rotenone-induced cell death. Brain Res. 2005, 1045: 64-71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thone-Reineke C, Zimmermann M, Neumann C, Krikov M, Li J, Gerova N, Unger T: Are Angiotensin receptor blockers neuroprotective?. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2004, 6: 257-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Unger T: Inhibiting renin-angiotensin in the brain: the possible therapeutic implications. Blood Press. 2001, 1: 12-6. 10.1080/080370501750066453.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wakutani Y, Kowa H, Kusumi M, Yamagata K, Wada-Isoe K, Adachi Y, Takeshima T, Urakami K, Nakashima K: Genetic analysis of vascular factors in Alzheimer's disease. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2002, 977: 232-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wright JW, Harding JW: The brain angiotensin system and extracellular matrix molecules in neural plasticity, learning, and memory. Prog Neurobiol. 2004, 72: 263-93. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin JJ, Yueh KC, Chang DC, Lin SZ: Association between genetic polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2002, 199: 25-9. 10.1016/S0022-510X(02)00081-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armando I, Jezova M, Bregonzio C, Baiardi G, Saavedra JM: Angiotensin II AT1 and AT2 receptor types regulate basal and stress-induced adrenomedullary catecholamine production through transcriptional regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2004, 1018: 302-9. 10.1196/annals.1296.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glass MJ, Huang J, Speth RC, Iadecola C, Pickel VM: Angiotensin II AT-1A receptor immunolabeling in rat medial nucleus tractus solitarius neurons: subcellular targeting and relationships with catecholamines. Neuroscience. 2005, 130: 713-23. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.08.057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma FY, Grattan DR, Bobrovskaya L, Dunkley PR, Bunn SJ: Angiotensin II regulates tyrosine hydroxylase activity and mRNA expression in rat mediobasal hypothalamic cultures: the role of specific protein kinases. J Neurochem. 2004, 90: 431-41. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02492.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogier M, Bezin L, Cottet-Emard JM, Bader M, Vincent M, Pequignot JM, McGregor J, Bricca G: Delayed maturation of catecholamine phenotype in nucleus tractus solitarius of rats with glial angiotensinogen depletion. Hypertension. 2003, 42: 978-84. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000094982.97568.65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu D, Yang H, Shaw G, Raizada MK: Angiotensin II-induced nuclear targeting of the angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor in brain neurons. endocrinology. 1998, 139: 365-75. 10.1210/en.139.1.365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Pallares J, Quiroz CR, Parga JA, Guerra MJ, Labandeira-Garcia JL: Angiotensin II increases differentiation of dopaminergic neurons from mesencephalic precursors via angiotensin type 2 receptors. Eur J Neurosci. 2004, 20: 1489-98. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03621.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jenkins TA, Wong JY, Howells DW, Mendelsohn FA, Chai SY: Effect of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on striatal dopamine content in the MPTP-treated mouse. J Neurochem. 1999, 73: 214-9. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730214.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurosaki R, Muramatsu Y, Kato H, Watanabe Y, Imai Y, Itoyama Y, Araki T: Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril on interneurons in MPTP-treated mice. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005, 15: 57-67. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.05.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurosaki R, Muramatsu Y, Imai Y, Kato H, Araki T: Neuroprotective effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril in MPTP-treated mice. Neurol Res. 2004, 26: 644-57. 10.1179/016164104225015949.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lopez-Real A, Rey P, Soto-Otero R, Mendez-Alvarez E, Labandeira-Garcia JL: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition reduces oxidative stress and protects dopaminergic neurons in a 6-hydroxydopamine rat model of parkinsonism. J Neurosci Res. 2005, 81: 865-873. 10.1002/jnr.20598.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Groth W, Blume A, Gohlke P, Unger T, Culman J: Chronic pretreatment with candesartan improves recovery from focal cerebral ischaemia in rats. J Hypertens. 2003, 21: 2175-82. 10.1097/00004872-200311000-00028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lou M, Blume A, Zhao Y, Gohlke P, Deuschl G, Herdegen T, Culman J: Sustained blockade of brain AT1 receptors before and after focal cerebral ischemia alleviates neurologic deficits and reduces neuronal injury, poptosis, and inflammatory responses in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004, 24: 536-47. 10.1097/00004647-200405000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grammatopoulos TN, Morris K, Bachar C, Moore S, Andres R, Weyhenmeyer JA: Angiotensin II attenuates chemical hypoxia-induced caspase-3 activation in primary cortical neuronal cultures. Brain Res Bull. 2004, 62: 297-303. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2003.09.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grammatopoulos TN, Johnson V, Moore SA, Andres R, Weyhenmeyer JA: Angiotensin type 2 receptor neuroprotection against chemical hypoxia is dependent on the delayed rectifier K+ channel, Na+/Ca2+ exchanger and Na+/K+ ATPase in primary cortical cultures. Neurosci Res. 2004, 50: 299-306. 10.1016/j.neures.2004.07.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koyama Y, Egawa H, Osakada M, Baba A, Matsuda T: Increase by FK960, a novel cognitive enhancer, in glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor production in cultured rat astrocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004, 68: 275-82. 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.03.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petrova P, Raibekas A, Pevsner J, Vigo N, Anafi M, Moore MK, Peaire AE, Shridhar V, Smith DI, Kelly J, Durocher Y, Commissiong JW: MANF: a new mesencephalic, astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor with selectivity for dopaminergic neurons. J Mol Neurosci. 2003, 20: 173-88. 10.1385/JMN:20:2:173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hohle S, Blume A, Lebrun C, Culman J, Unger T: Angiotensin receptors in the brain. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995, 77: 306-15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang G, Anrather J, Huang J, Speth RC, Pickel VM, Iadecola C: NADPH oxidase contributes to angiotensin II signaling in the nucleus tractus solitarius. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 5516-24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1176-04.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davis CJ, Kramar EA, De A, Meighan PC, Simasko SM, Wright JW, Harding JW: AT4 receptor activation increases intracellular calcium influx and induces a non-N-methyl-D-aspartate dependent form of long-term potentiation. Neuroscience. 2006, 137: 1369-79. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chai SY, Fernando R, Peck G, Ye SY, Mendelsohn FA, Jenkins TA, Albiston AL: The angiotensin IV/AT4 receptor. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004, 61: 2728-37. 10.1007/s00018-004-4246-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pederson ES, Krishnan R, Harding JW, Wright JW: A role for the angiotensin AT4 receptor subtype in overcoming scopolamine-induced spatial memory deficits. Regul Pept. 2001, 102: 147-56. 10.1016/S0167-0115(01)00312-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wright JW, Stubley L, Pederson ES, Kramar EA, Hanesworth JM, Harding JW: Contributions of the brain angiotensin IV-AT4 receptor subtype system to spatial learning. J Neurosci. 1999, 19: 3952-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hemming ML, Selkoe DJ: Amyloid beta-protein is degraded by cellular angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and elevated by an ACE inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 37644-50. 10.1074/jbc.M508460200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunnett SB, Boulton AA, Baker GB: Neural transplantation methods. neuromethods. 2000, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 36: 3-25.Google Scholar
- Ahmadi FA, Linseman DA, Grammatopoulos TN, Jones SM, Bouchard RJ, Freed CR, Heidenreich KA, Zawada WM: The pesticide rotenone induces caspase-3-mediated apoptosis in ventral mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons. J Neurochem. 2003, 87: 914-21. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02068.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang JM, Tan J, Leenen FH: Central nervous system blockade by peripheral administration of AT1 receptor blockers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2003, 41: 593-9. 10.1097/00005344-200304000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee SY, Moon Y, Hee Choi D, Jin Choi H, Hwang O: Particular vulnerability of rat mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons to tetrahydrobiopterin: Relevance to Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2007, 25: 112-20. 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.08.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mosharov EV, Staal RG, Bove J, Prou D, Hananiya A, Markov D, Poulsen N, Larsen KE, Moore CM, Troyer MD, Edwards RH, Przedborski S, Sulzer D: Alpha-synuclein overexpression increases cytosolic catecholamine concentration. J Neurosci. 2006, 26: 9304-11. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-06.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazzulli JR, Mishizen AJ, Giasson BI, Lynch DR, Thomas SA, Nakashima A, Nagatsu T, Ota A, Ischiropoulos H: Cytosolic catechols inhibit alpha-synuclein aggregation and facilitate the formation of intracellular soluble oligomeric intermediates. J Neurosci. 2006, 26: 10068-78. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0896-06.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hasbani DM, Perez FA, Palmiter RD, O'Malley KL: Dopamine depletion does not protect against acute 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine toxicity in vivo. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 9428-33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0130-05.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Przedborski S, Jackson-Lewis V, Yokoyama R, Shibata T, Dawson VL, Dawson TM: Role of neuronal nitric oxide in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 4565-71. 10.1073/pnas.93.10.4565.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanania T, Zahniser NR: Locomotor activity induced by noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists versus dopamine transporter inhibitors: opposite strain differences in inbred long-sleep and short-sleep mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002, 26: 431-40. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2002.tb02558.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hof PR, Warren YG, Bloom FE, Belichenko PV, Celio MR: Comparative cytoarchitectonic atlas of the C57BL/6 and 129/Sv mouse brains. 2000, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Gundersen HJG: Stereology of arbitrary particles. A review of unbiased number and size estimators and the presentation of some new ones, in memory of William R. Thompson. J Microsc. 1986, 143: 3-45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- West MJ, Slomianka L, Gundersen HJG: Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in the subdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator. Anat Rec. 1991, 231: 482-497. 10.1002/ar.1092310411.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Srivastava R, Brouillet E, Beal MF, Storey E, Hyman BT: Blockade of 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion (MPP+) nigral toxicity in the rat by prior decortication or MK-801 treatment: a stereological estimate of neuronal loss. Neurobiol Aging. 1993, 14: 295-301. 10.1016/0197-4580(93)90114-Q.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Primer3. [http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer/primer3_www.cgi]
- Prasad KN, Carvalho E, Kentroti S, Edwards-Prasad J, Freed C, Vernadakis A: Establishment and characterization of immortalized clonal cell lines from fetal rat mesencephalic tissue. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1994, 30A: 596-603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.