Skip to main content

Table 1 Dendritic simplification in an ex vivo model of Alzheimer’s disease. Summary representation of the effect of the expressed construct, the genotype of the mouse and pharmacological treatments on total path length (A) and number of branching points (B). Statistical evaluation was performed using two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test for comparison of the two genotypes under control conditions (untreated), and one way ANOVA with post hoc Fisher’s LSD test for multiple comparisons of drug treatments or different tau constructs. P values, which represent statistical significance (p≤0.05) are indicated in bold, except when the alpha level of ANOVA was above 0.05

From: Region-specific dendritic simplification induced by Aβ, mediated by tau via dysregulation of microtubule dynamics: a mechanistic distinct event from other neurodegenerative processes

A. Total path length

Construct

Condition

Region

Genotype

Mice (n)

Cells (n)

Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) in mm

Student’s test

  

p values (B6 vs. APP)

EGFP

untreated

CA1

B6

5

9

3.113±0.465

p = 0.775

EGFP

untreated

CA1

APPSDL

5

5

3.364±0.707

EGFP

untreated

CA3

B6

7

8

4.490±0.292

p = 0.401

EGFP

untreated

CA3

APPSDL

5

7

4.187±0.202

EGFP

untreated

DG

B6

6

6

1.223±0.232

p = 0.275

EGFP

untreated

DG

APPSDL

5

7

0.911±0.161

EGFP-htau

untreated

CA1

B6

4

7

3.996±0.237

p = 0.0003

EGFP-htau

untreated

CA1

APPSDL

6

8

2.491±0.163

EGFP-htau

untreated

CA3

B6

5

6

4.344±0.423

p = 0.428

EGFP-htau

untreated

CA3

APPSDL

5

6

3.920±0.283

EGFP-htau

untreated

DG

B6

5

10

0.813±0.071

p = 0.888

EGFP-htau

untreated

DG

APPSDL

7

17

0.826±0.051

Construct

Condition

Region

Genotype

Mice (n)

Cells (n)

Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) in mm

One way ANOVA (together with EGFP-htau untreated, both genotypes, same region)

p values (B6 vs. APP)

p values ( vs. untreated EGFP-htau same region and same genotype)

EGFP-htau

DAPT

CA1

B6

4

6

3.691±0.154

F (3,24) = 14.05 ; p < 0.0001

p = 0.0440

p = 0.2657

EGFP-htau

DAPT

CA1

APPSDL

4

7

3.122±0.154

p = 0.0182

EGFP-htau

DAPT

CA3

B6

5

6

3.122±0.258

F (3,22) = 3.634 ; p = 0.0287

p = 0.8981

p = 0.0133

EGFP-htau

DAPT

CA3

APPSDL

4

8

3.177±0.249

p = 0.0940

EGFP-htau

CPP

CA1

B6

5

7

3.671±0.289

F (3,25) = 7.781 ; p = 0.0008

p = 0.2469

p = 0.3517

EGFP-htau

CPP

CA1

APPSDL

6

7

3.265±0.263

p = 0.0279

EGFP-htau

CPP

CA3

B6

6

6

3.714±0.293

F (3,23) = 0.5765 ; p = 0.6363

p = 0.8658

p = 0.2483

EGFP-htau

CPP

CA3

APPSDL

7

9

3.797±0.357

p = 0.8023

EGFP-htau

EpoD

CA1

B6

7

8

3.038±0.288

F (3,27) = 7.040 ; p = 0.0012

p = 0.5142

p = 0.0092

EGFP-htau

EpoD

CA1

APPSDL

8

8

2.820±0.241

p = 0.3273

EGFP-htau

EpoD

CA3

B6

7

8

3.603±0.186

F (3,23) = 5.757 ; p = 0.0043

p = 0.0416

p = 0.0527

EGFP-htau

EpoD

CA3

APPSDL

7

7

2.853±0.126

p = 0.0089

EGFP-Ala htau

untreated

CA1

B6

5

7

2.797±0.268

F (3,24) = 8.839 ; p = 0.0004

p = 0.1005

p = 0.0011

EGFP-Ala htau

untreated

CA1

APPSDL

4

6

3.370±0.249

p = 0.0125

EGFP-Ala htau

untreated

CA3

B6

5

6

2.912±0.224

F (3,20) = 4.276 ; p = 0.0174

p = 0.8829

p = 0.0076

EGFP-Ala htau

untreated

CA3

APPSDL

4

6

2.984±0.396

p = 0.0667

EGFP-PHP htau

untreated

CA1

B6

4

7

3.342±0.298

F (3,24) = 5.250 ; p = 0.0063

p = 0.6532

p = 0.1107

EGFP-PHP htau

untreated

CA1

APPSDL

4

6

3.155±0.429

p = 0.1091

EGFP-PHP htau

untreated

CA3

B6

5

6

3.578±0.450

F (3,20) = 2.724 ; p = 0.0714

p = 0.1941

p = 0.1722

EGFP-PHP htau

untreated

CA3

APPSDL

4

6

2.851±0.352

p = 0.0621

Construct

Condition

Region

Genotype

Mice (n)

Cells (n)

Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) in mm

One way ANOVA (together with EGFP untreated, both genotypes, same region)

p values (B6 vs. APP)

p values ( vs. untreated EGFP same region and genotype)

EGFP

CPP

CA1

B6

6

7

3.597±0.207

F (3,23) = 0.4707 ; p = 0.7056

p = 0.7702

p = 0.4144

EGFP

CPP

CA1

APPSDL

6

6

3.787±0.334

p = 0.5514

EGFP

CPP

CA3

B6

5

5

3.603±0.244

F (3,22) = 2.806 ; p = 0.0634

p = 0.7762

p = 0.0473

EGFP

CPP

CA3

APPSDL

5

6

3.474±0.382

p = 0.0974

EGFP

EpoD

CA1

B6

6

6

3.110±0.307

F (3,23) = 0.2951 ; p = 0.8285

p = 0.4532

p = 0.9960

EGFP

EpoD

CA1

APPSDL

7

7

3.591±0.168

p = 0.7353

EGFP

EpoD

CA3

B6

6

6

2.995±0.268

F (3,23) = 5.693 ; p = 0.0046

p = 0.0438

p = 0.0006

EGFP

EpoD

CA3

APPSDL

6

6

3.851±0.287

p = 0.3939

B. Number of branching points

Construct

Condition

Region

Genotype

Mice (n)

Cells (n)

Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number)

Student’s t test

  

p values (B6 vs. APP)

EGFP

untreated

CA1

B6

5

9

31±4.11

p = 0.571

EGFP

untreated

CA1

APPSDL

5

5

36±7.22

EGFP

untreated

CA3

B6

7

8

39±3.83

p = 0.203

EGFP

untreated

CA3

APPSDL

5

7

33±1.90

EGFP

untreated

DG

B6

6

6

11±2.68

p = 0.261

EGFP

untreated

DG

APPSDL

5

7

7±0.57

EGFP-htau

untreated

CA1

B6

4

7

36±3.58

p = 0.016

EGFP-htau

untreated

CA1

APPSDL

6

8

23±3.05

EGFP-htau

untreated

CA3

B6

5

6

40±3.24

p = 0.185

EGFP-htau

untreated

CA3

APPSDL

5

6

34±2.24

EGFP-htau

untreated

DG

B6

5

10

8±4.49

p = 0.933

EGFP-htau

untreated

DG

APPSDL

7

17

8±2.73

Construct

Condition

Region

Genotype

Mice (n)

Cells (n)

Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number)

One way ANOVA (together with EGFP-htau untreated, both genotypes, same region)

p values (B6 vs. APP)

p values ( vs. untreated EGFP-htau same region and genotype)

EGFP-htau

DAPT

CA1

B6

4

6

36±2.11

F (3,24) = 4.920 ; p = 0.0084

p = 0.2443

P > 0.9999

EGFP-htau

DAPT

CA1

APPSDL

4

7

31±2.00

p = 0.0511

EGFP-htau

DAPT

CA3

B6

5

6

30±1.95

F (3,22) = 8.519 ; p = 0.0006

p = 0.1167

p = 0.0058

EGFP-htau

DAPT

CA3

APPSDL

4

8

25±1.51

p = 0.0076

EGFP-htau

CPP

CA1

B6

5

7

32±4.34

F (3,25) = 2.434 ; p = 0.0885

p = 0.4497

p = 0.4497

EGFP-htau

CPP

CA1

APPSDL

6

7

28±3.53

p = 0.3310

EGFP-htau

CPP

CA3

B6

6

6

32±2.77

F (3,23) = 5.381 ; p = 0.0059

p = 0.1041

p = 0.0509

EGFP-htau

CPP

CA3

APPSDL

7

9

26±2.19

p = 0.0339

EGFP-htau

EpoD

CA1

B6

7

8

27±1.83

F (3,27) = 4.824 ; p = 0.0081

p = 0.5753

p = 0.0203

EGFP-htau

EpoD

CA1

APPSDL

8

8

25±1.31

p = 0.5753

EGFP-htau

EpoD

CA3

B6

7

8

29±2.86

F (3,23) = 4.362 ; p = 0.0143

p = 0.4458

p = 0.0120

EGFP-htau

EpoD

CA3

APPSDL

7

7

26±2.93

p = 0.0668

EGFP-Ala htau

untreated

CA1

B6

5

7

26±3.41

F (3,24) = 3.655 ; p = 0.0266

p = 0.1135

p = 0.0430

EGFP-Ala htau

untreated

CA1

APPSDL

4

6

34±3.12

p = 0.0288

EGFP-Ala htau

untreated

CA3

B6

5

6

25±3.06

F (3,20) = 4.572 ; p = 0.0135

p = 0.5032

p = 0.0028

EGFP-Ala htau

untreated

CA3

APPSDL

4

6

28±3.72

p = 0.1878

EGFP-PHP htau

untreated

CA1

B6

4

7

32±3.28

F (3,24) = 3.736 ; p = 0.0246

p = 0.1469

p = 0.3815

EGFP-PHP htau

untreated

CA1

APPSDL

4

6

25±2.45

p = 0.6630

EGFP-PHP htau

untreated

CA3

B6

5

6

38±6.57

F (3,20) = 0.6744 ; p = 0.5778

p = 0.3253

p = 0.7762

EGFP-PHP htau

untreated

CA3

APPSDL

4

6

31±6.14

p = 0.6702

Construct

Condition

Region

Genotype

Mice (n)

Cells (n)

Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number)

One way ANOVA (together with EGFP untreated, both genotypes, same region)

p values (B6 vs. APP)

p values ( vs. untreated EGFP same region and genotype)

EGFP

CPP

CA1

B6

6

7

34±3.15

F (3,23) = 0.3279 ; p = 0.8052

p = 0.7518

p = 0.6011

EGFP

CPP

CA1

APPSDL

6

6

36±2.74

p > 0.9999

EGFP

CPP

CA3

B6

5

5

33±3.24

F (3,22) = 2.872 ; p = 0.0594

p = 0.1730

p = 0.2132

EGFP

CPP

CA3

APPSDL

5

6

26±3.16

p = 0.1396

EGFP

EpoD

CA1

B6

6

6

25±2.16

F (3,23) = 1.069 ; p = 0.3814

p = 0.3033

p = 0.2778

EGFP

EpoD

CA1

APPSDL

7

7

31±0.57

p = 0.4130

EGFP

EpoD

CA3

B6

6

6

23±3.24

F (3,23) = 4.970 ; p = 0.0084

p = 0.0141

p = 0.0010

EGFP

EpoD

CA3

APPSDL

6

6

35±1.99

p = 0.6501