Mass spectrometry quantification of clusterin in the human brain
© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 June 2012
Accepted: 14 August 2012
Published: 20 August 2012
Skip to main content
© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 June 2012
Accepted: 14 August 2012
Published: 20 August 2012
The multifunctional glycoprotein clusterin has been associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Further investigation to define the role of clusterin in AD phenotypes would be aided by the development of techniques to quantify level, potential post-translational modifications, and isoforms of clusterin. We have developed a quantitative technique based on multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry to measure clusterin in human postmortem brain tissues.
A stable isotope-labeled concatenated peptide (QconCAT) bearing selected peptides from clusterin was expressed with an in vitro translation system and purified. This clusterin QconCAT was validated for use as an internal standard for clusterin quantification using MRM mass spectrometry. Measurements were performed on the human postmortem frontal and temporal cortex from control and severe AD cases. During brain tissues processing, 1% SDS was used in the homogenization buffer to preserve potential post-translational modifications of clusterin. However, MRM quantifications in the brain did not suggest phosphorylation of Thr393, Ser394, and Ser396 residues reported for clusterin in serum. MRM quantifications in the frontal cortex demonstrated significantly higher (P < 0.01) level of clusterin in severe AD group (39.1 ± 9.1 pmol/mg tissue protein) in comparison to control group (25.4 ± 4.4 pmol/mg tissue protein). In the temporal cortex, the clusterin levels were not significantly different, 29.0 ± 7.9 pmol/mg tissue protein and 28.0 ± 8.4 pmol/mg tissue protein in control and severe AD groups, respectively.
The proposed protocol is a universal quantitative technique to assess expression level of clusterin. It is expected that application of this protocol to quantification of various clusterin isoforms and potential post-translational modifications will be helpful in addressing the role of clusterin in AD.
Genome-wide associated studies have linked the CLU gene with the risk of developing late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [1, 2]. CLU encodes clusterin, a multifunctional glycoprotein, whose involvement in AD has been discussed since increased clusterin expression in AD hippocampus was first reported two decades ago . Subsequent Western blot and ELISA quantifications pointed to increased levels of clusterin in AD hippocampus and in frontal cortex , cerebrospinal fluid , and plasma . However, other Western blot studies demonstrated that levels of clusterin did not differ significantly between control and AD cases in the frontal cortex, temporal cortex, or thalamus in postmortem human brain [7, 8]. The explanation for these differences is unclear, but might originate from the variety of clusterin antibodies used and availability of clusterin epitopes in the different biological samples examined. The challenge of understanding the role of clusterin in AD goes beyond the quantification of protein levels. Clusterin has alternative splicing variants, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and post-translational modifications [9, 10], which are difficult to ascertain with immunological methods and likely associated with development of AD. Overall, the availability of a reliable quantitative approach is needed to facilitate clarification of the role of clusterin in AD.
The application of multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mass spectrometry to proteomics has greatly enhanced the selectivity and accuracy of protein quantification. Absolute quantification using MRM assay relies on isotope-labeled internal standards, which can be peptides , concatenated peptides (QconCAT) , or full-length proteins . However, utilization of any of these internal standards has limitations. Isotope-labeled peptides provide the most high-throughput analysis, although have the highest chance of serious quantitative discrepancies between analyte and standard. Isotope-labeled full-length proteins are perfectly quantitative as internal standards, but do not support high-throughput analysis due to poor availability. QconCATs have a strong potential to be perfectly quantitative and support high-throughput analysis at the same time [14, 15].
QconCATs are similar to analyte proteins, but not identical. Potentially, this can result in incomplete proteolysis of either the QconCATs or the analyte proteins and therefore affect quantification. There are two main determinants of the rate of proteolysis. First is the composition of amino acid residues around the cleavage site. The second is the tight folding of some proteins that makes them intrinsically resistant to proteolysis. We addressed these issues by (i) incorporating into the QconCATs the original flanking sequences from the proteins that surround the tryptic fragments (Q-peptides) to create an identical amino acid composition around the cleavage site, and (ii) initial treatment of biological samples with a SDS-containing buffer to completely unfold proteins. SDS in the homogenization buffer has the added advantage of preserving post-translational modifications that may be present in target proteins. The final optimized protocol was used to assess the levels of clusterin and levels of potential clusterin phosphorylation in the specimens of human brain from control and severe AD donors. The data obtained expand our understanding of the role(s) clusterin may play in AD.
where A is the analyte peak area, S is the standard peak area, and α is the isotope incorporation factor. The equation functions to shift the light component of the Q peptide from the analyte peak area to the standard peak area proportionally based on the isotope incorporation factor.
Peptides and MRM transitions used for the quantification of clusterin
MRM transitions (m/z)
ASSIIDELFQDR (Q1 ,light)
ASSIIDELFQDR (Q1 ,heavy)
ELDESLQVAER (Q4 ,light)
ELDESLQVAER (Q4 ,heavy)
VTTVASHTSDSDVPSGVTEVVVK (Q5 ,light)
VTTVASHTSDSDVPSGVTEVVVK (Q5 ,heavy)
QconCATs are artificial proteins, which are not expected to be folded into higher order structures. Nevertheless, on the level of QconCAT design, we selected only those peptides from clusterin which are not involved in β-sheet formation in the native clusterin to avoid a potential resistance to proteolysis. To ensure full unfolding of the native clusterin and equal proteolytic rates for analyte (native clusterin) and internal standard (clusterin QconCAT), 25 mM NH4HCO3 containing 1% (m/V) SDS was selected as a homogenization buffer for tissue processing. In addition, SDS-containing buffer for biological sample processing immediately terminates any enzymatic reactions that can change the levels of present post-translational modifications. After supplementation with QconCAT and alkylation of Cys residues, samples were precipitated with chloroform/methanol to remove SDS, biological lipids, and by-products of alkylation. The resulting pellet of pure and fully unfolded proteins was further proteolysed and analyzed by MRM.
Validation of proteolytic digestion
Recombinant clusterin/QconCAT clusterin (pmol/pmol)
1.2 ± 0.1
2.4 ± 0.2
1.3 ± 0.2
1.9 ± 0.3
1.2 ± 0.2
2.4 ± 0.3
Quantification of clusterin in the human brain tissues
Clusterin, pmol/mg tissue protein
26.0 ± 4.2
39.6 ± 9.0
29.5 ± 7.4
24.2 ± 8.5
24.8 ± 4.7
38.6 ± 9.3
27.8 ± 7.9
29.3 ± 7.7
25.4 ± 4.4
39.1 ± 9.1
29.0 ± 7.9
28.0 ± 8.4
The second important observation is that the level of clusterin in frontal cortex is significantly higher (P < 0.01) in severe AD (39.1 ± 9.1 pmol/mg tissue protein) in comparison to control (25.4 ± 4.4 pmol/mg tissue protein) while the clusterin levels in the temporal cortex are not significantly different, 29.0 ± 7.9 pmol/mg tissue protein and 28.0 ± 8.4 pmol/mg tissue protein in control and severe AD groups, respectively. These quantifications point to a selective increase of clusterin level in the specific region of AD brain.
We have developed an antibody-free protocol for clusterin quantification in tissue samples. The protocol includes tissue homogenization in 1% SDS that will be helpful in discovery and validation of clusterin isoforms and post-translational modifications. The subsequent chloroform/methanol precipitation is a simple approach to remove SDS before trypsinolysis and MRM. In addition, we have used isotope-labeled QconCAT with original flanking regions for every Q-peptide and demonstrated that this internal standard entirely matched to full-length clusterin in the MRM quantitative assay. Subsequent measurements of clusterin in frontal and temporal cortex from control and severe AD donors showed that the proposed protocol can be used to address the role of clusterin in AD.
Expressway cell-free E.coli expression system was from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). L-[13C6,15 N2]lysine and L-[13C6,15 N4]arginine (>95% purity) were from Spectral Stable Isotopes (Columbia, MD). The DC Protein Assay kit was from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA). Sequencing grade modified trypsin was obtained from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). Recombinant human clusterin (purity > 95%) was from ProSpec-Tany Technogene, Ness Ziona, Israel. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
A synthetic gene encoding 131 amino acids composed of the sequence MQDHFSRASSIIDELFQDRFFTREPDRFFTREPQDTYHYLPFSLPHRRPHFFFFSLPHRRPHFFFPKSRIVRSQAKLRRELDESLQVAERLTRKYNDQYYLRVTTVASHTSDSDVPSGVTEVVVKLFDSDP was synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, Iowa). The underlined segments represent the signature proteotypic peptides of clusterin (Q-peptides). The synthetic clusterin gene was cloned into the pEXP5CT/TOPO expression vector in-frame to the C-terminal His6-tag. Stable isotope-labeled clusterin QconCAT was expressed using an in vitro translation kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacture's protocol. L-[13C6,15 N2]lysine and L-[13C6,15 N4]arginine were added to the amino acid mixture to replace unlabeled lysine and arginine. After in vitro translation, the labeled clusterin QconCAT was purified by nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin in batch mode (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Finally the purified QconCAT was loaded onto the SpinTrap G-25 spin column (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) to exchange buffer into 25 mM NH4HCO3 with 1% (m/V) SDS. The protein concentration of clusterin QconCAT was measured in the presence of 1% (m/V) SDS using the DC protein Assay kit and bovine serum albumin as a standard. The final clusterin QconCAT was aliquoted and kept frozen at −80°C.
Samples of frontal cortex were received from the Washington University School of Medicine Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. Samples of temporal cortex were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Center, Boston University. All brain specimens were collected from de-identified donors following informed consent of the respective families.
The minced brain tissue was placed in 25 mM NH4HCO3/1% (m/V) SDS and homogenized by sonication at 30 W using five 10 s continuous cycles (Sonicator 3000, Misonix Inc., Farmingdale, NY). The homogenate was centrifuged at 2000 g for 5 min to remove tissue debris. The supernatant was used to measure total protein concentration in the presence of 1% SDS using the DC protein Assay kit and bovine serum albumin as a standard. The supernatant was then aliquoted 0.2 mg of total tissue protein per tube and kept frozen at −80°C. During the following experiments, samples of 0.2 mg of total tissue protein were supplemented with 20 mM DTT and various amounts of labeled clusterin QconCAT, ranging from 0.1 pmol to 10 pmol per sample. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 60 min to allow reduction of cysteines and was then treated with 50 mM iodoacetamide for another 60 min. Alkylated samples were precipitated with chloroform/methanol . The protein pellets obtained were sonicated in 100 μL of 25 mM NH4HCO3 and treated with trypsin for 15 h at 37°C. The substrate/trypsin ratio was 50:1 (m/m). After trypsinolysis, the samples were dried using a vacuum centrifuge (Vacufuge, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany).
Instrumental analyses were performed on a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (4000 QTRAP, ABI/MDS-Sciex) coupled to an Eksigent nanoLC-2D system (Dublin, CA). Separation of peptides was performed with an Eksigent cHiPLC- nanoflex system equipped with a nano cHiPLC column, 15 cm x 75 μm, packed with ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ, 3 μm (Dr. Maisch, Germany). Peptides were eluted over a 29 min-gradient from 15% to 35% acetonitrile, containing 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The column effluent was continuously directed into the nanospray source of the mass spectrometer. All acquisition methods used the following parameters: an ion spray voltage of 2200 V, curtain gas of 105 kPa (15 psi), source gas of 140 kPa (20 psi), interface heating temperature of 170°C, declustering potential of 76 V for +2 precursor ions and 65 V for +3 precursor ions, collision energy of 30 V for +2 precursor ions and 22 V for +3 precursor ions, and collision cell exit potential of 16 V for +2 precursor ions and 13 V for +3 precursor ions. The dwell time for all transitions was 40 ms.
The initial list of MRM transitions was selected as described  and was experimentally screened for the three most intensive transitions per peptide. These transitions were further used for quantification. The relative ratios of the three transitions monitored in the 25 mM NH4HCO3 for labeled clusterin QconCAT were similar to those observed by spiking labeled clusterin QconCAT into the biological samples. This indicated no significant interference for the quantification based on selected transitions. The identities of the measured peptides were confirmed based on the retention time of the three MRM peaks from a given peptide and the ratio among the three MRM peaks. The reported value for each group was the mean and SD of each biological replicate using all peptide transitions.
This work was supported in part by the Washington University School of Medicine Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center grant (P50 AG05681). Certain commercial materials, instruments, and equipment are identified in this manuscript in order to specify the experimental procedure as completely as possible. In no case does such identification imply a recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology nor does it imply that the materials, instruments, or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.