Open Access

Vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGF-B) is up-regulated and exogenous VEGF-B is neuroprotective in a culture model of Parkinson's disease

Contributed equally
Molecular Neurodegeneration20094:49

https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-4-49

Received: 3 June 2009

Accepted: 10 December 2009

Published: 10 December 2009

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) results from the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and the consequent deficit of dopamine released in the striatum. Current oral dopamine replacement or surgical therapies do not address the underlying issue of neurodegeneration, they neither slow nor halt disease. Neurotrophic factors have shown preclinical promise, but the choice of an appropriate growth factor as well as the delivery has proven difficult. In this study, we used a rotenone rat midbrain culture model to identify genes that are changed after addition of the neurotoxin. (1) We challenged rat midbrain cultures with rotenone (20 nM), a pesticide that has been shown to be toxic for dopaminergic neurons and that has been a well-characterized model of PD. A gene chip array analysis demonstrated that several genes were up-regulated after the rotenone treatment. Interestingly transcriptional activation of vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGF-B) was evident, while vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) levels remained unaltered. The results from the gene chip array experiment were verified with real time PCR and semi-quantitative western analysis using β-actin as the internal standard. (2) We have also found evidence that exogenously applied VEGF-B performed as a neuroprotective agent facilitating neuron survival in an even more severe rotenone culture model of PD (40 nM rotenone). VEGF-B has very recently been added to the list of trophic factors that reduce effects of neurodegeneration, as was shown in an in vivo model of motor neuron degeneration, while lacking potential adverse angiogenic activity. The data of an in vivo protective effect on motor neurons taken together with the presented results demonstrate that VEGF-B is a new candidate trophic factor distinct from the GDNF family of trophic factors. VEGF-B is activated by neurodegenerative challenges to the midbrain, and exogenous application of VEGF-B has a neuroprotective effect in a culture model of PD. Strengthening this natural protective response by either adding exogenous VEGF-B or up-regulating the endogenous VEGF-B levels may have the potential to be a disease modifying therapy for PD. We conclude that the growth factor VEGF-B can improve neuronal survival in a culture model of PD.

Findings

The two most pressing therapeutic challenges in PD are to (1) provide a stable level of dopamine replacement and (2) slow disease progression [14]. Neurotrophic growth factors such as the glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), neurturin, FGF-2 and others, have shown great promise in experimental models of PD [5, 6]. The hope is that using these factors in human PD could provide a potent disease-modifying therapy; however, clinical development of these agents is problematic [5]. Intracerebroventricular administration of GDNF via a micro pump [7] and neurturin delivery via viral vector-mediated gene transfer [8] ultimately failed in Phase II clinical trials. These disappointing results despite robust preclinical data could be due to problems with the delivery method or choice of neurotrophic factor.

One path to identify new potential modifiers of PD is by using gene chip arrays utilizing in vitro and in vivo models of PD. In this study, to identify candidate genes, we challenged rat midbrain cultures with rotenone, a pesticide that has been shown to be toxic for dopaminergic neurons and that has been a well-characterized model of PD [9, 10].

Timed-pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized by exposure to CO2 and sacrificed. Fetuses were removed at E17, anesthetized by cooling on ice, decapitated, and the midbrain was dissected. Details of the methods have been reported [11, 12]. Tissue culture media and sera were obtained from Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY. The procedure was approved by the IACUC at the University of Arizona and conformed to the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health. The number of animals used and their suffering was minimized. We developed protocols in vitro using rotenone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to produce damage to dopaminergic neurons by adding it at the indicated concentrations at day 6 in culture. In previous work [11], an initial rotenone concentration response curve was established and the LD50 for 5 day exposure was found to be 25-50 nM. We chose to look at a slightly lower concentration of rotenone (20 nM), since we were interested in changes in mRNA before the cells are lost. We isolated the mRNA of 11 day old cultures 5 days after the rotenone challenge, and of untreated control cultures, before performing a gene array analysis (n = 3 separate experiments). The RNA isolation was done with the Qiagen RNA kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), using the manufacturers protocol. The gene array analysis was carried out using the GeneChip Rat Genome 230 2.0 Array (Affymetrics, Santa Clara, CA) and standard procedure. Data was analysed using the limma software package [13, 14].

Thirty-eight genes were up-regulated (using adjusted P = 0.025 and B = 2.5 as cutoff value; Table 1) after the rotenone treatment, and transcriptional activation of VEGF-B, but not of VEGF-A was evident. The results from the gene chip array experiment were verified with real time PCR (Figure 1), using β-actin as internal standard. Oligonucleotide primer sets that had been previously optimized for quantitative PCR. The PCR was perfomed on an ABI 7300 system (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA).
Figure 1

Up-regulation of VEGF-B transcript, but not of VEGF-A transcript, after rotenone (20 nM) treatment of midbrain cultures. The fold-increase of transcript vs. control as determined with real time PCR is shown as mean ± s.e.m for VEGF-B (black bar) and VEGF-A (shaded bar); n = 7 separate experiments. Mean fold changes in rotenone-treated cultures compared to control (± s.e.m.) were: VEGF-B = 1.65 ± 0.29; P = 0.026; VEGF-A = 1.25 ± 0.20; P = 0.40. Statistical significance was determined by a two-tail t test of ΔΔCt and difference from control is depicted by an asterisk. Oligonucleotide Primers from Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA were used: VEGF-A (Rn01511602_m1); VEGF-B (Rn01454585_g1); β-actin (Rn00667869_m1). The TaqMan® MGB probe used at a concentration of 5 μM, comprised of a FAM™ reporter dye at the 5' end and a nonfluorescent quencher at the 3' end of the probe. The solution also contained the necessary primers at a concentration of 18 μM each.

Table 1

List of the highest up-regulated genes in the gene array after rotenone treatment

gene_id

ID

adj. P value

B value

Atf5

NM_172336

3.39E-05

9.733544

RGD1561519_predicted

NM_001109112

0.003306

6.712279

Asns

U07201

0.003466

6.388728

LOC690315

NM_001109577

0.004486

5.986556

Slc7a5

NM_017353

0.006186

5.572276

Sdf2l1_predicted

NM_001109433

0.007716

5.109109

Lce1s_predicted

XM_001066389

0.007716

5.029038

Slc7a3

NM_017217

0.0086

4.713449

Klhl6_predicted

NM_001105867

0.0086

4.684208

Ns5atp9

NM_201418

0.008757

4.59833

Mrc1_predicted

NM_001106123

0.009356

4.427766

Lrrc33

NM_001024995

0.009356

4.41691

LOC290651

NM_001013880

0.010522

4.201058

Pycs_predicted

NM_001108524

0.010522

4.140525

Vegfb

NM_053549

0.010522

4.090442

Shmt2

NM_001008322

0.010522

4.077214

Ncf1

NM_053734

0.010522

4.063953

Aldh1l2_predicted

XM_235005

0.01345

3.812624

Mmp9

NM_031055

0.015332

3.603003

Dnajc3

NM_022232

0.015332

3.583457

Dpp7

NM_031973

0.015332

3.516206

Hmgcr

NM_013134

0.015332

3.509113

Gpnmb

NM_133298

0.015786

3.39472

Cndp2

NM_001010920

0.015786

3.37061

Pcp4

M24852

0.015786

3.355451

LOC680308

NM_001109398

0.016276

3.29948

Txnip

NM_001008767

0.017441

3.210653

Eprs

NM_001024238

0.018104

3.150337

Tm6sf1_predicted

NM_001108490

0.019731

3.047957

Calr

NM_022399

0.020863

2.959711

RGD1564553_predicted

XM_577290

0.021343

2.854501

Yars

NM_001025696

0.02214

2.778994

RGD1564228_predicted

XM_001081442

0.02214

2.776624

Igf1

NM_178866

0.022922

2.701602

Hexb

NM_001011946

0.022922

2.681626

Myo1f_predicted

NM_001108076

0.023081

2.655012

Cd180_predicted

NM_001106405

0.024702

2.574536

Cd68

NM_001031638

0.025665

2.501227

List of the top 38 up-regulated genes in the gene array after rotenone treatment (genes with significance values of both the adjusted P ≤ 0.025 and the false discovery rate log-odds score B>2.5 were included in the Table; n = 3 separate experiments). The P value is based upon a t test of the average ratio of expression values for the treated and untreated samples and adjusted for multiple testing using the false discovery rate, as implemented in the Bioconductor limma library http://www.bioconductor.org. B is the false discovery rate expressed as a log odds score, so B = 3 means that there is 5% chance of being incorrect. VEGF-B is ranked 15th highest, and the B = 4.09 correlates to >98% chance that treatment is different form control. MMP9 is ranked 19th, and the B value = 3.60 correlates to >97% chance that treatment is different form control.

To further validate these results a semi-quantitative western analysis was conducted. This experiment demonstrated an increase in protein expression of VEGF-B relative to the housekeeping β-actin protein after rotenone reaching significance at 25 nM rotenone. The highest rotenone concentration (40 nM) did lead to the highest expression of VEGF-B (Figure 2A and 2B).
Figure 2

Semi-quantitative western analysis of VEGF-B expression. Midbrain cultures were exposed to 3 concentration of rotenone (16 nM, 25 nM and 40 nM) for 5 days. Protein was isolated and a western analysis was performed using a procedure previously published [32]. We used the expression of the house keeping β-actin protein (anti-β-actin antibody from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as the internal standard for the relative quantification of VEGF-B protein levels (anti-VEGF-B antibody from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). A concentration-dependent increase in VEGF-B protein level was evident. In (A) example western blots for VEGF-B (on the left) and β-actin (on the right) are shown; the samples were run in triplicate. This was repeated with 3 separate preparations. The summary graph in (B) depicts the mean relative VEGF-B level (± s.e.m.) that was determined by densitometry using Image-J (Wayne Rasband, Bethesda, MD). Statistical significant differences from control were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by a Fisher LSD post hoc test, and are depicted by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.001). 40 nM rotenone induced a significantly greater increase than 16 nM and 25 nM rotenone (*P < 0.05). The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software, version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

With all techniques we saw a significant increase of VEGF-B after rotenone challenge, while there wass no significant change in VEGF-A mRNA level. This struck our interest in light of the recently published results from Poesen et al., 2008 [15], proving VEGF-B to be an inducible trophic factor in a model of neurodegeneration of motor neurons.

VEGF-B is a member of the VEGF-family of trophic factors [16, 17]. VEGF-A is the best studied member due to its strong angiogenic activity and potential for cardiovascular and cancer research [18]. VEGF-A is up-regulated in the substantia nigra but not in the striatum of PD patients [19]. VEGF-B, on the other hand, stimulates proliferation of neuronal cultures in vitro [20], and has not been investigated in PD. VEGF-B has also recently been shown to be neuroprotective in motor neuron degeneration in vivo [15]. It had previously been shown to inhibit apoptosis and having only minimal angiogenic activity [21] while being critical to survival of the blood vessels [22]. This is important since efforts to use VEGF-A as a neurotrophic or a neuroprotective factor had been hampered by the strong angiogenic activity. Although neuroprotective effects of VEGF-A expressed by cells or viral vectors in models of PD were reported [2325], they were over-shadowed by detrimental effects such as edema, ventriculomegaly [26] and disruption of the blood brain barrier [27]. These negative side effects were not seen when using VEGF-B in vivo [15]. Interestingly, the neuroprotective effect of VEGF-B in vivo was also restricted to pathological conditions. Mice lacking VEGF-B displayed normal motor behavior, but, when challenged in a model of neurodegeneration, they displayed a more severe form of motor degeneration [15]. Loss of VEGF-B also enlarges stroke [20]. These data suggest that VEGF-B plays a role in compensations for natural disease processes of the nervous system. It does so by binding to its only receptor VEGFR1 [18], a receptor with not yet delineated downstream signaling events. Further analysis of our gene array data showed the only up-regulated gene with known interaction with VEGF-B was matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9). VEGFR1 signaling has been previously linked to the induction of MMP9 in lung endothelial cells [28] suggesting a potential role of MMP9 in the effects of VEGF-B that should be further investigated.

The fact that dopaminergic neurons make up less than 5% of the cells in our midbrain preparation argues against an up-regulation of VEGF-B only in dopaminergic neurons. We therefore hypothesize that the VEGF-B may be released by the astroglia in the preparation rather than the dopaminergic neurons themselves. Further evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from recent experiments where rotenone treatment in vivo did not cause transcriptional activation of VEGF-B in dopaminergic neurons analyzed after laser-capture microdissection [29]. In addition, under healthy conditions, motor neurons express VEGF-B to maintain neuroprotection in an autocrine manner, whereas astrocytes may express VEGF-B after injury to maintain survival in a paracrine manner [15]. A similar paracrine scenario is possible in the PD-like neurodegeneration induced in our model system. This hypothesis should be tested in the future. Taken together with our data showing an up-regulation of VEGF-B after rotenone challenge to rat midbrain cultures, these data lead to our hypothesis that VEGF-B may act as an endogenous trophic factor against the neurodegenerative insult in a model of PD.

We investigated the trophic activity further by adding exogenous VEGF-B167 (0.5-50 ng/ml; R&D-Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN) to midbrain cultures on day 6 (VEGF-B167 is the more abundant of 2 splice isoforms, VEGF-B186 being the other). The cultures were fixed on day 11 and dopaminergic cells were analyzed by tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunocytochemical staining [11]. Neuronal numbers were determined by visual observation of randomly chosen fields at 400× magnification, viewed with fluorescent optics to determine immunostained dopaminergic neurons and with phase contrast to determine total cell number. We saw a mean treatment effect of 30% increase in TH-positive cell number per culture dish as compared to the untreated cells, with a trend apparent at 2.5 ng/ml, and statistical significance at 10 ng/ml. The mean effect remained the same at the highest tested concentration at 50 ng/ml (Figure 3A). An experiment using 5 ng/ml of VEGF-B186 showed also a significant effect (data not shown). This is likely due to improvement in the native in vitro survival of the dopaminergic neurons under artificial culture conditions. Over the course of time in vitro, the total number of neurons usually decreases. This is characteristic of primary neurons in culture and likely reflects normal developmental apoptosis and the absence of the full complement of neurotrophic factors. A less likely explanation could be stimulation of neurogenesis, but this has not been demonstrated in the substantia nigra as it has been for the subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus [30]. In a second series of experiments we tested additional exogenous VEGF-B in the midbrain culture model using a severe challenge. Exposure to rotenone (40 nM) for 5 days in culture led to a significant reduction of TH-positive neurons per culture dish by 50% (P < 0.05). A neuroprotective effect against the rotenone challenge on TH-positive neurons was evident (Figure 3B) with pretreatment with VEGF-B167 (22.5 ng/ml) 1 hour prior to the toxin.
Figure 3

(A) Neurotrophic effect of VEGF-B 167 on cultured rat midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Mean count (± s.e.m.) of TH-positive neurons after immunocytochemical staining is plotted. Fluorescent images were acquired digitally on an Olympus IX70 inverted microscope and camera using Olympus MagnaFire software. Morphometric analysis was carried out using Image-J (Wayne Rasband, Bethesda, MD). Antibodies were obtained from Chemicon, Temecula, CA. As compared to untreated control cultures (n = 22 culture dishes) a significant increase in the TH-positive neuron number per culture dish after addition of VEGF-B was apparent. The effect of VEGF-B on TH-positive cell number was concentration dependent. At 0.5 ng/ml (n = 8) no change was noticeable. At 2.5 ng/ml (n = 6) and 5 ng/ml (n = 10) a trend was evident, that reached a statistical significant level at 10 ng/ml (n = 12) and 22.5 ng/ml (n = 11). The mean effect remained the same at the highest tested concentration at 50 ng/ml (n = 4, P = 0.051). Culture dishes were from 5 separate preparations. Data are plotted as mean ± s.e.m. (*P < 0.05; one-way ANOVA followed by a Games-Howell post hoc test to account for small group size and heterogeneity of variance). The statistical significant differences from control are depicted by asterisks. (B) Neuroprotective effect of VEGF-B in a severe rotenone rat midbrain in vitro PD model. As compared to the untreated control cultures (n = 17; black bar) the TH-positive neuron number was reduced after addition of rotenone (40 nM; n = 11; gray bar on the left), this cell loss was rescued by adding 22.5 ng/ml VEGF-B167 (VEGF-B+40 nM rotenone; n = 9; gray patterned bar on the right) prior to rotenone (22.5 ng/ml VEGF-B only cultures; n = 9; black patterned bar). Data are plotted as mean ± s.e.m. (*P < 0.05; one-way ANOVA followed by a Fisher LSD post hoc test). The statistical significant difference from control is depicted by an asterisk. Culture dishes from 5 separate preparations were used.

Neurotrophic factors are promising agents to provide disease modification for PD. This report demonstrates that VEGF-B is a new candidate trophic factor distinct from the GDNF-family of trophic factors, and is activated by neurodegenerative challenges to the midbrain. Strengthening this natural protective response by either adding exogenous VEGF-B or up-regulating the endogenous VEGF-B levels may have the potential to be a disease modifying therapy for PD. Based on the literature, the VEGF-B186 isoform is more diffusible than VEGF-B167 in vivo [15, 31], and therefore may have a greater therapeutic potential. We conclude that the growth factor VEGF-B can improve neuronal survival in a culture model of PD.

Notes

Abbreviations

VEGF-A: 

vascular endothelial growth factor A

VEGF-B: 

vascular endothelial growth factor B

VEGFR1: 

vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1

GDNF: 

glial-derived neurotrophic factor

TH: 

tyrosine hydroxylase

PD: 

Parkinson's disease

MMP9: 

matrix metallopeptidase 9

IACUC: 

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Alexander D. McCourt and Brandon J. Yee for expert technical assistance; as well as Dr. David Mount at the Bioinformatics Shared Service, Arizona Cancer Center, and the Arizona Research Laboratories, Division of Biotechnology, Genomic Analysis and Technology Core Facility http://uagc.arl.arizona.edu/ for conducting the gene array analysis and the real time PCR. This work was supported by grants from the University of Arizona UPERRC program (S.J.S.) and the Arizona Biomedical Research Council (T.F.)

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Department of Neurology

References

  1. Obeso JA, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Rodriguez M, Lanciego JL, Artieda J, Gonzalo N, Olanow CW: Pathophysiology of the basal ganglia in Parkinson's disease. Trends Neurosci. 2000, 23 (10 Suppl): S8-S19. 10.1016/S1471-1931(00)00028-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stocchi F, Olanow CW: Neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease: clinical trials. Ann Neurol. 2003, 53 Suppl 3: S87-S97. 10.1002/ana.10488. discussion S97-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fahn S, Sulzer D: Neurodegeneration and neuroprotection in Parkinson disease. NeuroRx. 2004, 1 (1): 139-154. 10.1602/neurorx.1.1.139.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Savitt JM, Dawson VL, Dawson TD: Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson's disease: molecules to medicine. J Clin Invest. 2006, 116 (7): 1744-1754. 10.1172/JCI29178.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Peterson AL, Nutt JG: Treatment of Parkinson's disease with trophic factors. Neurotherapeutics. 2008, 5 (2): 270-280. 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.02.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Grothe C, Timmer M: The physiological and pharmacological role of basic fibroblast growth factor in the dopaminergic nigrostriatal system. Brain Res Rev. 2007, 54 (1): 80-91. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.12.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kirik D, Georgievska B, Björklund A: Localized striatal delivery of GDNF as a treatment for Parkinson disease. Nature Neurosci. 2004, 7 (2): 105-110. 10.1038/nn1175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ceregene Announces Clinical Data from Phase 2 Clinical Trial of CERE-120 for Parkinson's Disease. [http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/130981.php]
  9. Bove J, Prou D, Perier C, Przedborski S: Toxin-Induced Models of Parkinson's Disease. NeuroRx. 2005, 2: 484-494. 10.1602/neurorx.2.3.484.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Meredith GE, Sonsalla PK, Chesselet MF: Animal models of Parkinson's disease progression. Acta Neuropathol. 2008, 115 (4): 385-398. 10.1007/s00401-008-0350-x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Falk T, Zhang S, Sherman SJ: Pigment epithelium derived factor (PEDF) is neurotrophic and neuroprotective in two in vitro models of Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett. 2009, 458: 49-52. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.04.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McKay BS, Goodman B, Falk T, Sherman SJ: Retinal pigment epithelial cell transplantation could provide trophic support in Parkinson's disease: results from an in vitro model system. Exp Neurol. 2006, 201 (1): 234-243. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.04.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mount D: Bioinformatics: sequence and genome analysis. 2004, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Sec.Google Scholar
  14. Smyth GK: Limma: linear models for microarray data. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor. Edited by: Gentleman R, Carey V, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W. 2005, New York: Springer, 397-420. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Poesen K, Lambrechts D, Van Damme P, Dhondt J, Bender F, Frank N, Bogaert E, Claes B, Heylen L, Verheyen A, Raes K, Tjwa M, Eriksson U, Shibuya M, Nuydens R, Bosch Van Den L, Meert T, D'Hooge R, Sendtner M, Robberecht W, Carmeliet P: Novel role for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-1 and its ligand VEGF-B in motor neuron degeneration. J Neurosci. 2008, 28 (42): 10451-10459. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1092-08.2008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosenstein JM, Krum JM: New roles for VEGF in nervous tissue--beyond blood vessels. Exp Neurol. 2004, 187: 246-253. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.01.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Roya H, Bhardwaja S, Ylä-Herttuala S: Biology of vascular endothelial growth factors. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580: 2879-2887. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.087.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Olsson AK, Dimberg A, Kreuger J, Claesson-Welsh L: VEGF receptor signalling - in control of vascular function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7 (5): 359-371. 10.1038/nrm1911.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wada K, Arai H, Takanashi M, Fukae J, Oizumi H, Yasuda T, Mizuno Y, Mochizuki H: Expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in Parkinson's disease. Neuroreport. 2006, 17 (7): 705-709. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000215769.71657.65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun Y, Jin K, Childs JT, Xie L, Mao XO, Greenberg DA: Increased severity of cerebral ischemic injury in vascular endothelial growth factor-B-deficient mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004, 24: 1146-1152. 10.1097/01.WCB.0000134477.38980.38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Y, Zhang F, Nagai N, Tang Z, Zhang S, Scotney P, Lennartsson J, Zhu C, Qu Y, Fang C, Hua J, Matsuo O, Fong GH, Ding H, Cao Y, Becker KG, Nash A, Heldin CH, Li X: VEGF-B inhibits apoptosis via VEGFR-1-mediated suppression of the expression of BH3-only protein genes in mice and rats. J Clin Invest. 2008, 118: 913-923. 10.1172/JCI33637C1.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang F, Tang Z, Hou X, Lennartsson J, Li Y, Koch AW, Scotney P, Lee C, Arjunan P, Dong L, Kumar A, Rissanen TT, Wang B, Nagai N, Fons P, Fariss R, Zhang Y, Wawrousek E, Tansey G, Raber J, Fong GH, Ding H, Greenberg DA, Becker KG, Herbert JM, Nash A, Yla-Herttuala S, Cao Y, Watts RJ, Li X: VEGF-B is dispensable for blood vessel growth but critical for their survival, and VEGF-B targeting inhibits pathological angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (15): 6152-6157. 10.1073/pnas.0813061106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pitzer MR, Sortwell CE, Daley BF, McGuire SO, Marchionini D, Fleming M, Collier TJ: Angiogenic and neurotrophic effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF165): studies of grafted and cultured embryonic ventral mesencephalic cells. Exp Neurol. 2003, 182: 435-445. 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00100-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yasuhara T, Shingo T, Kobayashi K, Takeuchi A, Yano A, Muraoka K, Matsui T, Miyoshi Y, Hamada H, Date I: Neuroprotective effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) upon dopaminergic neurons in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Eur J Neurosci. 2004, 19 (6): 1494-1504. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03254.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tian YY, Tan CJ, Wang JN, Feng Y, Chen XW, Wang L, Qiao X, Sun SG: Favorable effects of VEGF gene transfer on a rat model of Parkinson disease using adeno-associated viral vectors. Neurosci Lett. 2007, 421 (3): 239-244. 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.05.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrigan MR, Ennis SR, Sullivan SE, Keep RF: Effects of intraventricular infusion of vascular endothelial growth factor on cerebral blood flow, edema, and infarct volume. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003, 145: 49-53. 10.1007/s00701-002-1035-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rite I, Machado A, Cano J, Venero JL: Blood-brain barrier disruption induces in vivo degeneration of nigral dopaminergic neurons. J Neurochem. 2007, 101 (6): 1567-1582. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04567.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferrara N: Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004, 25 (4): 581-611. 10.1210/er.2003-0027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Meurers BH, Zhu C, Fernagut PO, Richter F, Hsia YC, Fleming SM, Oh M, Elashoff D, Dicarlo CD, Seaman RL, Chesselet MF: Low dose rotenone treatment causes selective transcriptional activation of cell death related pathways in dopaminergic neurons in vivo. Neurobiol Dis. 2009, 33 (2): 182-192. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.10.001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun Y, Kunlin J, Childs JT, Xie L, Mao XO, Greenberg DA: Vascular endothelial growth factor-B (VEGFB) stimulates neurogenesis: Evidence from knockout mice and growth factor administration. Develop Biol. 2006, 289: 329-335. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.10.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Olofsson B, Pajusola K, von Euler G, Chilov D, Alitalo K, Eriksson U: Genomic organization of the mouse and human genes for vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGF-B) and characterization of a second splice isoform. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 19310-19317. 10.1074/jbc.271.32.19310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Falk T, Xie JY, Zhang SL, Kennedy J, Bennett J, Yool AJ, Sherman SJ: Over-expression of the potassium channel Kir2.3 using the dopamine-1 receptor promoter selectively inhibits striatal neurons. Neuroscience. 2008, 155 (1): 114-127. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.04.075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Falk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement