Synaptophysin depletion and intraneuronal Aβ in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures from huAPP transgenic mice
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 3 December 2015
Accepted: 1 June 2016
Published: 10 June 2016
To date, there are no effective disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In order to develop new therapeutics for stages where they are most likely to be effective, it is important to identify the first pathological alterations in the disease cascade. Changes in Aβ concentration have long been reported as one of the first steps, but understanding the source, and earliest consequences, of pathology requires a model system that represents all major CNS cell types, is amenable to repeated observation and sampling, and can be readily manipulated. In this regard, long term organotypic hippocampal slice cultures (OHSCs) from neonatal amyloid mice offer an excellent compromise between in vivo and primary culture studies, largely retaining the cellular composition and neuronal architecture of the in vivo hippocampus, but with the in vitro advantages of accessibility to live imaging, sampling and intervention.
Here, we report the development and characterisation of progressive pathological changes in an organotypic model from TgCRND8 mice. Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 rise progressively in transgenic slice culture medium and stabilise when regular feeding balances continued production. In contrast, intraneuronal Aβ continues to accumulate in close correlation with a specific decline in presynaptic proteins and puncta. Plaque pathology is not evident even when Aβ1-42 is increased by pharmacological manipulation (using calpain inhibitor 1), indicating that soluble Aβ species, or other APP processing products, are sufficient to cause the initial synaptic changes.
Organotypic brain slices from TgCRND8 mice represent an important new system for understanding mechanisms of Aβ generation, release and progressive toxicity. The pathology observed in these cultures will allow for rapid assessment of disease modifying compounds in a system amenable to manipulation and observation.
The progressive, permanent loss of neurons in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) means the potential for effective intervention declines as the disease advances . Examining AD pathology at a late stage also makes identifying the primary drivers of the disease cascade challenging, as pivotal processes are masked by a melee of downstream consequences . Taken together, it is clear that for effective therapeutics to be developed, we must observe, and target, the disease in its initiating phase. Synaptic dysfunction has long been noted as one of the earliest hallmarks of AD , occurring in advance of neuronal death [3, 4] and correlating best with soluble, rather than plaque-forming, Aβ . Within as little as 2 years of clinical onset, cortical synapse density can be reduced by 35 % in patients , such loss of synapses being the best correlate of clinical outcome . Presynaptic terminals seem especially vulnerable at this stage; synaptophysin , rab3a [9, 10], and synaptobrevin  are all significantly depleted in early AD brain tissue . Despite other limitations, familial AD (FAD) mouse models recapitulate the synaptic alterations of the early stages of AD. As in human patients, there is a plaque-independent loss of synaptophysin-immunoreactive presynaptic boutons [12–14] as well as disruption of essential presynaptic components within early dystrophic axons . Direct readouts of synaptic function also reveal deficits; LTP showing more rapid decay in FAD mice . Such alterations occur in models lacking tau pathology, demonstrating alterations in Aβ processing, at least in the presence of wild-type murine tau , are sufficient to cause some synaptic deficits.
Investigation of the relationship between Aβ and early synaptic deficits would be facilitated by a model system amenable to repeated sampling, imaging and manipulation. While outer cortical layers of FAD mouse brain can be imaged using a cranial window [18, 19], key areas of pathology such as the hippocampus cannot. Instead, a major, terminal operation is needed to reach them, limiting observations to a single occasion . Delivery of drugs is also limited by the blood brain barrier or by the acute and invasive nature of intracerebroventricular delivery. In vitro models, particularly of primary cortical neurons, bypass many of these issues, but fail to account for the complexity of the mammalian brain, its specialised neuronal circuits and variety of interacting cell types. Organotypic Hippocampal Slice Cultures (OHSCs) fill an important gap between these two systems. Whilst maintaining a complete hippocampal circuit and associated cell populations for several weeks, they allow for a level of experimental manipulation and accessibility that is unobtainable in vivo . Screening for potential disease-altering compounds is made easier by the lack of blood-brain barrier or any systemic effects, and the ability to completely alter the extracellular environment in a matter of seconds. By adding (or removing) test compounds at different time points, their ability to prevent, halt or reverse pathology can be easily assessed. As such, OHSCs present an ideal platform to both observe and manipulate the amyloid cascade.
OHSCs from FAD mice have been surprisingly underused in the AD research field, especially to study progressive pathology caused by endogenously produced Aβ. Some studies have focused on applying synthetic Aβ (in various aggregation states) to acute cultures from non-transgenic animals. Such work has highlighted the importance of oligomeric Aβ in AD pathology, due to its enhanced ability to suppress of LTP , cause neuronal death  and alter dendritic spine density . Other work has focussed on understanding plaque formation and dissolution, showing, for example, that microglia from adult FAD mice (when compared to juveniles or WT controls) are ineffective at clearing synthetic Aβ fibrils , and that neprilysin, insulysin and matrix metalloproteinases can aid clearance of plaques already present in slices prepared from adults . Occasional studies using OHSCs from FAD mice have used a single timepoint to focus on dendritic spine or branching alterations following transduction with human tau [27, 28] or manipulation of tau pathology through pharmacological means . There is also little known about presynaptic pathology in OHSCs, despite reports of extensive axonal swelling and synaptophysin depletion in FAD mice in vivo [15, 30] and in patients .
Here we describe an OHSC model from TgCRND8 mice  as a tool to explore the early and progressive effects of Aβ in central nervous system (CNS) tissue. We used this strain because amyloid pathology and axonal swelling begin within two months in vivo . This is broadly within the timeframe for which OHSCs can be maintained , so we hypothesised that early stages of pathology caused by endogenous APP processing products should be detectable. We show that the transgenic slices are viable for in excess of 8 weeks, retain all major CNS cell types and rapidly release soluble Aβ into the culture medium, the production rate of which can be manipulated pharmacologically. While there is no plaque pathology, there is a striking accumulation of intraneuronal Aβ (at least some of it axonal), far more than in vivo, accompanied by a specific and progressive decline in presynaptic proteins. This is now an excellent experimental model for understanding the mechanism of progressive Aβ-induced synapse dysfunction and how it can be prevented.
TgCRND8 mice , overexpressing human APP with Swedish (K670N/M671L) and Indiana (V717F) FAD mutations, were maintained as heterozygotes on a 62.5:37.5 sv129: C57BL/6 background, generating transgenic and wild-type (WT) littermate controls. Thy1-mitoCFP  mice were also maintained as heterozygotes on a C57BL/6 background and females were crossed with TgCRND8 males to generate double transgenic mice. Animals were kept on a 12:12hs light: dark cycle at a constant temperature of 19 °C in a pathogen-free environment. All animal work was approved by the Babraham Institute Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body and UK Home Office, and carried out in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986, under Project Licence 70/7620.
Organotypic slice cultures
Organotypic cultures of the hippocampus and surrounding cortex were taken from humanely sacrificed P6-P9 mouse pups of either sex according to the method described by de Simoni et al. . Briefly, brains were rapidly removed and kept in dissection buffer (EBSS+ 25 mM HEPES+ 1 X Penicillin/Streptomycin) on ice. From this point, until plating, all equipment and tissue was kept ice cold. Brains were bisected at the midline then the cut sides glued (Loctite), face down onto a vibratome stage and flooded with dissection media. 350 μm sagittal slices (6 per brain) were taken using a Leica VT1000S Vibratome; the hippocampus with surrounding cortex was dissected out using sterile syringe needles whilst the slice was lying on the vibratome blade. The dissected slices were then transferred (using a sterile 3 ml plastic pipette- modified to widen the opening) to Falcon tubes full of ice-cold dissection medium and stored until plating. To plate, slices were transferred (3 slices from the same brain per dish) onto sterile 0.4 μm pore membranes (Millipore PICM0RG50) in 35 mm culture dishes (Nunc). Inserts were kept in 1 ml of maintenance medium (50 % MEM with Glutamax-1 (Life Tech:42360-024), 25 % Heat-inactivated horse serum (Life Tech: 26050-070 ), 23 % EBSS (Life Tech: 24010-043), 0.65 % D-Glucose (Sigma:G8270) , 2 % Penicillin-Streptomycin (Life Tech: 15140-122)and 6 units/ml Nystatin (Sigma: N1638) )and cultures were maintained in incubators at 37 °C, 5 % CO2 for up to 12 weeks. Two 100 % medium exchanges occurred (5 hs after plating and 4 div) and a 50 % media exchange occurred each week thereafter.
Aβ ELISA and drug treatments
To determine levels of human Aβ1-40 or Aβ1-42 in the slice culture medium, samples were analysed using commercially available ELISA kits (Life Tech: KHB3441/KHB3481). Briefly, culture medium was diluted to bring the expected concentration within the range of the standard curve before being incubated with Aβ detection antibody for 3 hs at room temperature. After washing, samples were incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody for 30mins, washed, and then incubated with stabilised chromogen for 30mins. The reaction was stopped using an acid-based stop solution and absorbance read at 450 nm using a PheraStar FS plate reader. Samples were run with a standard curve (4-parameter fit) to obtain a concentration readout in pg/ml.
For quantifying Aβ within the slice tissue, material from a single culture membrane (3 slices) was homogenised in 10 μL 5 M Guanidine Hydrochloride supplemented with 1x Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) for 3-4 hs at room temperature (RT). The sample was then frozen at -20 °C until use. Prior to running in the ELISA, the homogenate was diluted 1:50 in ice cold reaction buffer (Dulbecco’s PBS + 0.03 % Tween + 5 % BSA supplemented with 1x Protease Inhibitor Cocktail) and centrifuged for 20mins at 4 °C at 16,000 x g. The supernatant was then diluted before undergoing ELISA readout as for the media samples. Readout is given as pg of Aβ per slice.
To determine how drug treatment influenced Aβ accumulation, slices were moved to fresh maintenance media for 24 hs. 50 μl of conditioned culture medium was then taken and frozen at -20 °C to act as baseline production readout. Calpain Inhibitor 1 (Sigma: A6185)) or DMSO control was then applied to the culture, with 50 μl of the treated medium dropped onto the slices to ensure complete drug infusion. The medium on top rapidly soaks through the slice, so the oxygen exchange is not hindered during this time. 50 μl aliquots of culture medium are then taken every 24 hs to monitor Aβ production, with readouts normalised to the original 24 h baseline. All drug experiments were run in triplicate, with 3 independent membranes from different mice used per experiment.
Membranes were transferred into 6 well plates and slices were fixed for 20mins in 4 % paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS (applied both above and below the membrane insert). To reduce the volumes required for subsequent steps, the membranes were cut free of the plastic inserts and the sections of membrane containing the slices were transferred, using forceps, to individual wells in a 24 well plate. Slices were washed twice in TBS, blocked for 1 h in blocking solution (TBS with 0.5 % Triton X-100 and 3 % Goat Serum) then incubated in 200 μl primary antibody diluted in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C with shaking. Slices were washed 3 times in TBS before being incubated (2 hs, RT in the dark) with Alexa488, 568 or 647 conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies-diluted 1:250 in blocking solution). After a final 3 TBS washes, some slices were counterstained with Thioflavin S, BTA-1, Nissl or Hoechst. Images were captured using a Nikon Confocal Microscope. Primary antibodies used: mouse Tuj1 (Covance 1:1000), rabbit Tuj1 (Sigma 1:500), chicken Tuj1 (Abcam:1:1000) rabbit NFL (Millipore 1:250), mouse MOAB2 (pan specific to Aβ- Millipore 1:1000), rabbit GFAP (Abcam 1:1000), mouse synaptophysin (Dako 1:1000), rabbit PSD95 (Abcam 1:500), rabbit tau (Dako 1:1000), rabbit Iba1 (Wako 1:500) rabbit calbindin and rabbit parvalbumin (Kind gifts from Dr P Emson 1:1000).
Quantification of Aβ positive swellings
To quantify the degree of Aβ positive swellings in OHSCs of different ages, x20 images of MOAB2 staining in the CA1 region were captured (blinded to culture age and using identical microscope settings for each image) then processed using Fijix64 image analysis software . The MOAB2 (red) channel was isolated and the image threshold manually adjusted to remove background (thresholding was performed blind to culture age, with the original image open in parallel, to ensure the thresholded image accurately represented visible staining). The plugin “despeckle” was applied to remove isolated pixel noise before the “Analyze particles” plugin was run. “Total particle count” results were compared between slices of different ages.
Synaptic marker image capture, processing and puncta quantification
5-week old TgCRND8 and WT slices were imaged according to the synapse quantification protocol adapted from Ippolito and Eroglu [36–38]. Briefly, slices were stained for PSD95 (secondary labelled Alexa-568) and Synaptophysin (secondary labelled Alexa-488) according to the standard immunofluorescence protocol described above. Using a Zeiss 780 confocal x63 oil-immersion objective, image stacks from the CA1 (location of Aβ- positive axonal swellings in TgCRND8 cultures) and CA3 (largely swelling-free) fields were collected. For each slice, the chosen field was imaged using serial optical sections at 0.33 μm for a total of 15 sections (total depth of 5 μm). Maximal intensity projections (MIPs) were generated from 3 consecutive optical sections, resulting in 5 images each displaying 1 μm depth per field section in a slice. Quantification was performed using an imageJ 1.29 plugin [36, 39, 40] (available from email@example.com). Briefly, 33 μm x 33 μm regions of interest were randomly selected from each MIP and the “Puncta Analyzer” plugin run. Red (PSD95) and green (Synaptophysin) channels were manually thresholded to highlight visible puncta without the introduction of background noise. The plugin provides quantitative data for puncta number in each channel, as well as the number of colocalised puncta. 8 membranes per genotype (from different mice) were analysed, the MIP values from individual slices on the same membrane averaged to give an overall “membrane average”. Throughout image collection and analysis, the experimenter was blind to slice genotype.
Slices were scraped off the membrane, treated with 2x Laemelli buffer + 10 % 2-mercaptethanol (250 μL per 3 slices) vortexed, boiled, then frozen at -20 °C until use. For use, most samples were further diluted 1:2 and loaded 8 μl per lane in a precast 4-20 % gradient gel (Bio-rad). To detect the weaker signal for PSD95, 15 μl of undiluted sample was loaded. After incubation in primary antibody overnight, blots were probed with 1:5000 mouse-700 (Life Technologies) and rabbit-800 (LI-COR) secondary antibodies then imaged using a LI-COR Odyssey detection system. Band intensity (IKK) was quantified using Odyssey software then normalised to Tuj1 signal. Primary antibodies used: mouse synaptophysin (Abcam: 1:1000), rabbit tuj1 (Sigma: 1:2500), rabbit PSD95 (Abcam: 1:500), mouse VAMP2 (Synaptic Systems: 1:10,000) and mouse RT97 (Kind gift from Dr Diane Hanger 1:500). Tuj1-normalised protein expression was then compared between WT and TgCRND8 cultures, TgCRND8 values expressed as a percentage of the WT average.
Analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism software. To assess calpain inhibitor dose response and Aβ swelling count data, one way ANOVAs with Dunnett or Tukey post hoc tests (respectively) were used. For synaptic protein western blot and calpain inhibitor treatment effects, two way ANOVAs with Sidak post hoc tests were conducted. For synaptic puncta counts, Student’s t-tests were used. Results are expressed as mean +/- standard error.
Slices from TgCRND8 mice survive in excess of 7 weeks in vitro, demonstrate preserved architecture and possess the expected range of cell types
Aβ1-42 is continuously released into the culture medium
Aβ1-40 predominates in the culture medium, but the 42:40 ratio is higher in slice tissue
We compared the ratio of Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 in both slice tissue and culture medium from TgCRND8 slices (Fig. 2b). The Aβ1-42 isoform is generally considered more pathogenic than Aβ1-40 and is the more abundant of these two species in adult TgCRND8 mouse brain . As such, we were surprised to note that Aβ1-40 is the predominant species within the slice culture medium between 2 and 7 weeks in vitro. Interestingly, whilst Aβ1-40 remains predominant in the slice tissue, the Aβ1-42:Aβ1-40 ratio is significantly higher in slice tissue when compared to the culture medium (p < 0.0001), with a strong trend for this difference to increase with the age of the slice (p = 0.055) . The higher Aβ1-42:Aβ1-40 ratio in the tissue indicates that Aβ1-42 has a greater propensity to be retained within the slice. This could be due to the increased aggregation tendency of this isoform preventing escape into the medium. The Aβ1-42:Aβ1-40 ratio in the slices is, however, still less than is seen at equivalent timepoints in vivo (0.74 at 4 weeks, 0.93 at 6 weeks ) demonstrating a diversion from the in vivo pathogenic time course. This could be seen as the slice modelling only the earliest stages of the disease, or accumulation of Aβ1-40 occurring more in slice medium due to lack of a vascular system to clear it. We also found that the total Aβ detected in the slice tissue is only 0.1 % of the amount of Aβ detected in the medium (data not shown), implying that any Aβ produced is very rapidly released into the extracellular environment.
Intra-axonal Aβ accumulation in TgCRND8 slices
Staining with thioflavin S or BTA-1 (a sensitive thioflavin derivative) did not reveal convincing presence of extracellular Aβ deposition or plaque formation up to 12 weeks in vitro (data not shown). This is in contrast to the robust plaque development seen by 9 weeks in vivo  which is not accompanied by extensive intracellular Aβ staining. The conversion from extracellular to intracellular Aβ accumulation in TgCRND8 OHSCs represents an important difference between this model and in vivo.
The production of Aβ1-42 is increased by calpain inhibition
TgCRND8 slices undergo age-dependent depletion of presynaptic proteins
TgCRND8 slices show region specific reduction in pre-synaptic puncta and in PSD95/SYP colocalisation
Here we describe how long term OHSCs from TgCRND8 mice can be used as a model of Aβ pathology, revealing novel aspects of the disease mechanism that are not easily studied in vivo. We can now explore, in a system highly amenable to manipulation and analysis: release of Aβ, loss of presynaptic proteins, loss of SYP/PSD95 colocalisation and the accumulation of intraneuronal Aβ. We have also seen that addition of calpain inhibitor 1 enhances Aβ production in this model, potentially opening doors to examine how pathological outcomes change with rising Aβ. Whilst the nature and time course of pathology shows some interesting differences from that seen in vivo, long term OHSCs from TgCRND8 mice represent an exciting new tool for research into the early consequences of progressive accumulation of Aβ and other consequences of APP processing.
Loss of presynaptic proteins and puncta correlates spatially and temporally with the appearance of intraneuronal Aβ
Loss of presynaptic proteins is thought to be one of the earliest (and most clinically relevant) changes in human AD [2, 51] with some reports indicating it precedes extensive postsynaptic changes . In TgCRND8 OHSCs, the presynaptic proteins synaptophysin and VAMP2 are depleted when compared to WT controls. This corresponds to a region-specific loss of presynaptic puncta, consistent with loss of synapses. Our finding that PSD-95 protein and puncta are not depleted supports the notion that presynaptic changes can precede other alterations [52–54]. The preservation of axon-specific phosphorylated neurofilament also supports localised changes in the immediate presynaptic compartment, and not a wider loss of axons at this stage.
A key future direction will be to determine the cause of the presynaptic changes in the TgCRND8 slices. As plaques do not develop during the experimental timecourse (see below), they are not needed to drive synaptic alterations. Indeed, the lack of tau pathology in TgCRND8 mice also rules out neurofibrillary tangles as a necessary cause of the presynaptic protein depletion we see. Whilst the observed synapse effects are clearly dependent on the huAPP transgene, it is important to remember that OHSCs undergo a period of synaptic reorganisation in culture following the significant tissue injury at the time of slice generation that does not occur in vivo. In WT rat OHSCs, it has been shown that within the first 2 weeks in vitro, the maximal evoked EPSP increases, plateauing between 10 and 15 days in vitro, likely representing an increase in synaptic connections . APP overexpression has been shown to have a negative effect on synapse development in vitro [56, 57] so it is possible that the TgCRND8 slices have a reduced capacity for this repair that at least partly underlies the lower presynaptic protein levels.
A clear difference between the WT and TgCRND8 OHSCs that associates both temporally and spatially with the synaptic changes is the gradual appearance of Aβ-containing swellings, most commonly located in the alveus adjacent to CA1. There is an increase in the presence of such structures between 2 and 5 weeks in vitro, which closely parallels the development of presynaptic protein deficiency. The loss of synaptic structures, as measured by PSD95/SYP puncta colocalisation, also spatially correlates with the regions affected by Aβ positive swellings. Previous studies have shown that intraneuronal Aβ accumulation in synaptic compartments is directly associated with abnormal cellular morphology  whilst another study found that reducing the intraneuronal pool of Aβ through synaptic activation was protective against loss of synaptic proteins . The role of intraneuronal Aβ in pathogenesis has been a controversial topic [43, 60], so the experimental system we report, in which Aβ generation and its release through synaptic activity can be readily manipulated, will be useful in resolving its importance in the disease process.
Intraneuronal Aβ in axonal swellings
Whilst many FAD mouse models have been reported to develop pre-plaque intraneuronal Aβ pathology, [60–63] it is particularly interesting that the appearance of such striking Aβ positive swellings in TgCRND8 OHSCs differs from the corresponding in vivo phenotype in these animals. Whilst adult TgCRND8 mice usually show APP immunoreactivity within dystrophic axons  and there is some evidence for lysosomal Aβ accumulation in older mice , extensive intra-axonal accumulations such as the ones found in the OHSCs are not seen at any age studied in this strain  (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Interestingly, a similar phenomenon has been reported in whole brain slices from adult APP_SDI mice; a failure to develop plaques, but appearance of atypical intraneuronal Aβ staining . This suggests that a hippocampus in slice culture is more prone to retain Aβ within cells than in vivo so it will be interesting to investigate the mechanism that underlies this difference. The appearance of swellings in WT cultures (albeit without Aβ accumulation) could indicate this is a result of axonal damage during the slice procedure, or another consequence of the slice culture system. Similarly, intraneuronal Aβ accumulation is commonly observed in axonal injury after brain trauma. Studies in humans , pigs  and rats  have all reported that injured, swollen or broken axons can act as sites of Aβ accumulation- particularly in axonal end bulbs. The nature of the OHSC is such that axotomy of certain populations of neurons is unavoidable. Whilst there is evidence for re-organisation and recovery in this model , it may be that in the TgCRND8 cultures (which will already have elevated levels of both APP and Aβ) this injury further seeds accumulation of Aβ. However, as it takes over 3 weeks for the intraneuronal Aβ to accumulate, any link to the initial injury appears likely to involve additional steps.
A further possibility is, due to lack of sequestration in plaques, the OHSCs may be bathed in relatively high concentrations of soluble Aβ when compared to adult brain. There is evidence to suggest that neurons can actively uptake Aβ, with the axon being highlighted as a potential point of entry . Indeed, application of synthetic Aβ to OHSCs from WT rats resulted in intraneuronal accumulation of this peptide in CA1 , the same region that is heavily affected in our TgCRND8 OHSCs. Perhaps this region is rendered more vulnerable during the slice procedure resulting in enhanced uptake of exogenous Aβ than would be seen in vivo.
Whatever the cause of the intraneuronal Aβ accumulations in OHSCs, the fact that it differs from the in vivo phenotype will help us to understand the factors that govern the balance between intracellular and extracellular amyloid pathology. By studying the balance between Aβ in the tissue and the medium it should also be possible to investigate factors that influence its rate of extrusion. As both aspects of pathology are present in sporadic human AD [58, 71, 72] understanding the mechanisms of each could assist in developing effective therapeutic interventions.
TgCRND8 OHSCs do not develop plaques
An unexpected finding in TgCRND8 OHSCs is that plaques fail to develop even after 12 weeks in vitro, over 4 weeks after such pathology would develop in vivo [15, 32]. A potential explanation for this is that the large volumes of culture medium relative to the small quantity of slice tissue washes Aβ from the slices more effectively than vascular perfusion, preventing the seeding of plaques. Alternatively, it could be that the microglia in the OHSCs are more effective at preventing plaque formation, perhaps as a result of activation from the initial slice preparation. A recent paper demonstrated that microglia from juvenile 5xFAD mice or WT controls are highly effective at clearing synthetic Aβ fibrils applied to WT OHSCs, whilst adult 5xFAD microglia cannot prevent the formation of aggregates . It may be that in the long term OHSCs, a more juvenile microglial phenotype is maintained, thus preventing plaque deposition. Understanding exactly how the slice system differs to in vivo will, once again, assist in unpicking the mechanisms behind AD pathology.
A model for studying pre-plaque Aβ dynamics
Whilst plaque development is not observed, TgCRND8 OHSCs’ rapid and sustained production of soluble Aβ peptides is easily detected. This system is ideal for examining the effects of early rises in Aβ on the hippocampus in a pre-plaque forming stage. We have also demonstrated that the production rate of Aβ in OHSCs can be bidirectionally manipulated through pharmacological means. Addition of 20 μM Calpain Inhibitor 1 doubles Aβ in the medium relative to control, whilst addition of 50 μM or more supresses production (consistent with previous findings in APP transfected 293 cells ). Whilst therapies would seek to reduce the rate of accumulation of Aβ there are clear experimental advantages in being able to increase its generation to explore mechanisms in a model system. As well as potentially permitting earlier observation of defects in culture, it allows determination of whether the severity directly correlates with soluble Aβ concentration in the environment or whether changes proceed to completion after Aβ passes a threshold level. This distinction is vital for effective therapeutic targeting.
Additional uses of the model
The OHSC model we describe has many potential uses in studying the mechanism of amyloid pathology and developing therapeutics, but also a number of limitations. Slice preparation involves massive tissue damage, resulting in axotomy, cell death and activation of inflammatory cells. Plaque pathology does not develop, and there is increased intra-axonal Aβ beyond that seen in vivo. There is also a gradual over proliferation of non-neuronal cells, no vascular system and no electrical input from other brain regions. It should also be remembered that the slices are generated from juvenile mice, where many cells have yet to reach their mature phenotypes.
However, the progressive changes we report in long term TgCRND8 OHSCs have significant potential to be of use to the AD research field. For example, the rapid production of soluble Aβ species from these slices could be utilised as a source of pathogenic amyloid peptides without presupposing which of them is/are the most toxic. These could then be introduced exogenously into other experimental systems such as primary neuronal cultures, or OHSCs of a different genotype, avoiding the use of supraphysiological concentrations of synthetic peptides. This system should also enable studies examining the spread of pathological proteins, and screening, at least at a secondary stage, for compounds that will block Aβ generation or release, or block synaptophysin depletion.
The ability to repeatedly image, or live image, OHSCs is also important. Unlike the in vivo hippocampus, which is difficult to image even using multiphoton microscopy, we have been able to observe live cells such as microglia (stained using isolectin B4 conjugated to Alexa fluora568 (Life Technologies)) (Additional file 2: Figure S2a) and the axonal transport of mitochondria in OHSCs expressing mito-CFP (Additional file 3). We find that axons from the dentate gyrus are easily located with this genetic label (Additional file 2: Figure S2b-c) and repeat imaging of the same slices is possible. Mitochondrial or other axonal transport dynamics have been implicated many times in the pathogenesis of AD. Further work will be needed to develop this transport imaging for quantitative assessment, but probing for differences in the TgCRND8 slices has the potential to enhance understanding in a way that would not be possible in vivo.
In summary, we report the first characterisation of progressive deficiencies in OHSCs from a huAPP mouse model. This reveals both similarities and differences from observations made in the same mouse strain in vivo, thus validating this system as a model for some aspects of pathogenesis. The model will be particularly useful for understanding disease mechanism, both because it can be readily manipulated, repeatedly sampled and imaged, and because the observed differences from in vivo pathology provides a basis for understanding why these occur (for example, the shift from plaques to intraneuronal Aβ). This experimental system also has important potential as a drug-screening platform. Here, candidate drugs can be readily delivered and monitored, and their effects on all relevant cell types and neuronal circuits observed, thus filling a vital gap between primary culture and in vivo studies. We expect this OHSC model will find many applications in AD research.
AD, Alzheimer’s Disease; Aβ, Amyloid-beta; CNS, Central Nervous System; MIP, Maximum Intensity Projection; OHSC, Organotypic hippocampal slice culture; PSD95, Post synaptic density 95; SYP, Synaptophysin; VAMP2, Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2; WT, Wild-type
This work was supported by Alzheimer’s Research UK studentship ARUK-PhD2013-13. We would like to thank Simon Walker and Hanneke Okkenhaug for imaging advice, Anna De Simoni for technical advice, Anne Segonds-Pichon for assistance with statistical analysis, Simon Andrews for assistance with image J plugins for counting Aβ positive swellings and Prof. Eroglu for providing the synaptic puncta image J plugin. Thanks also to Robert Adalbert for his neuroanatomical advice.
Study concept and design: CH and MC. Acquisition of data: CH. Statistical analysis: CH. Analysis and interpretation of the data: CH and MC. Drafting of the manuscript: CH and MC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Gómez-Isla T, Hollister R, West H, Mui S, Growdon JH, Petersen RC, et al. Neuronal loss correlates with but exceeds neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:17–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002;298:789–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lacor PN. Advances on the understanding of the origins of synaptic pathology in AD. Curr Genomics. 2007;8:486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Serrano-Pozo A, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Hyman BT. Neuropathological alterations in Alzheimer Disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2011;1:a006189.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lue L-F, Kuo Y-M, Roher AE, Brachova L, Shen Y, Sue L, et al. Soluble amyloid β peptide concentration as a predictor of synaptic change in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:853–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Davies C. A quantitative morphometric analysis of the neuronal and synaptic content of the frontal and temporal cortex in patients with Alzhimer’s Disease. J Neurol Sci. 1987;78(2):151–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R, et al. Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:572–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masliah E, Mallory M, Alford M, DeTeresa R, Hansen LA, McKeel DW, et al. Altered expression of synaptic proteins occurs early during progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2001;56:127–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blennow K, Bogdanovic N, Alafuzoff I, Ekman R, Davidsson P. Synaptic pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: relation to severity of dementia, but not to senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, or the ApoE4 allele. J Neural Transm. 1996;103:603–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sze C-I, Bi H, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Filley CM, Martin LJ. Selective regional loss of exocytotic presynaptic vesicle proteins in Alzheimer’s disease brains. J Neurol Sci. 2000;175:81–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Honer WG. Pathology of presynaptic proteins in Alzheimer’s disease: more than simple loss of terminals. Mol Cell Basis Synaptic Loss Dysfunct Alzheimers Dis. 2003;24:1047–62.Google Scholar
- Hsia AY, Masliah E, McConlogue L, Yu G-Q, Tatsuno G, Hu K, et al. Plaque-independent disruption of neural circuits in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3228–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mucke L, Masliah E, Yu G-Q, Mallory M, Rockenstein EM, Tatsuno G, et al. High-level neuronal expression of Aβ1–42 in wild-type human amyloid protein precursor transgenic mice: synaptotoxicity without plaque formation. J Neurosci. 2000;20:4050–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rutten BP, Van der Kolk NM, Schafer S, van Zandvoort MA, Bayer TA, Steinbusch HW, et al. Age-Related Loss of Synaptophysin Immunoreactive Presynaptic Boutons within the Hippocampus of APP751 SL, PS1 M146L, and APP751 SL/PS1 M146L Transgenic Mice. Am J Pathol. 2005;167:161–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Adalbert R, Nogradi A, Babetto E, Janeckova L, Walker SA, Kerschensteiner M, et al. Severely dystrophic axons at amyloid plaques remain continuous and connected to viable cell bodies. Brain. 2008;132:402–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larson J, Lynch G, Games D, Seubert P. Alterations in synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices from young and aged PDAPP mice. Brain Res. 1999;840:23–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shipton OA, Leitz JR, Dworzak J, Acton CEJ, Tunbridge EM, Denk F, et al. Tau protein is required for amyloid -induced impairment of Hippocampal long-term potentiation. J Neurosci. 2011;31:1688–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garcia-Alloza M, Robbins EM, Zhang-Nunes SX, Purcell SM, Betensky RA, Raju S, et al. Characterization of amyloid deposition in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;24:516–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyer-Luehmann M, Spires-Jones TL, Prada C, Garcia-Alloza M, de Calignon A, Rozkalne A, et al. Rapid appearance and local toxicity of amyloid-β plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2008;451:720–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Busche MA, Chen X, Henning HA, Reichwald J, Staufenbiel M, Sakmann B, et al. Critical role of soluble amyloid- for early hippocampal hyperactivity in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:8740–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Holopainen IE. Organotypic Hippocampal slice cultures: a model system to study basic cellular and molecular mechanisms of neuronal cell death, neuroprotection, and synaptic plasticity. Neurochem Res. 2005;30:1521–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Q. Block of Long-Term Potentiation by Naturally Secreted and Synthetic Amyloid -Peptide in Hippocampal Slices Is Mediated via Activation of the Kinases c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5, and p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase as well as Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Type 5. J Neurosci. 2004;24:3370–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alberdi E, Sánchez-Gómez MV, Cavaliere F, Pérez-Samartín A, Zugaza JL, Trullas R, et al. Amyloid β oligomers induce Ca2+ dysregulation and neuronal death through activation of ionotropic glutamate receptors. Cell Calcium. 2010;47:264–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selkoe DJ. Soluble oligomers of the amyloid β-protein impair synaptic plasticity and behavior. Behav Brain Res. 2008;192:106–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hellwig S, Masuch A, Nestel S, Katzmarski N, Meyer-Luehmann M, Biber K. Forebrain microglia from wild-type but not adult 5xFAD mice prevent amyloid-β plaque formation in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14624.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Humpel C. Organotypic vibrosections from whole brain adult Alzheimer mice (overexpressing amyloid-precursor-protein with the Swedish-Dutch-Iowa mutations) as a model to study clearance of beta-amyloid plaques. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:47.Google Scholar
- Golovyashkina N, Penazzi L, Ballatore C, Smith AB, Bakota L, Brandt R. Region-specific dendritic simplification induced by Aβ, mediated by tau via dysregulation of microtubule dynamics: a mechanistic distinct event from other neurodegenerative processes. Mol. Neurodegener. 2015;10:60.Google Scholar
- Tackenberg C, Grinschgl S, Trutzel A, Santuccione AC, Frey MC, Konietzko U, et al. NMDA receptor subunit composition determines beta-amyloid-induced neurodegeneration and synaptic loss. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e608.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tseng BP, Green KN, Chan JL, Blurton-Jones M, LaFerla FM. Aβ inhibits the proteasome and enhances amyloid and tau accumulation. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29:1607–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spires TL. Dendritic spine abnormalities in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice demonstrated by gene transfer and intravital multiphoton microscopy. J Neurosci. 2005;25:7278–87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stokin GB, Lillo C, Falzone TL, Brusch RG, Rockenstein E, Mount SL, et al. Axonopathy and transport deficits early in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Science. 2005;307:1282–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chishti MA. Early-onset amyloid deposition and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice expressing a double mutant form of amyloid precursor protein 695. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:21562–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Simoni A, Yu LM. Preparation of organotypic hippocampal slice cultures: interface method. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1439–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Misgeld T, Kerschensteiner M, Bareyre FM, Burgess RW, Lichtman JW. Imaging axonal transport of mitochondria in vivo. Nat Meth. 2007;4:559–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Meth. 2012;9:676–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ippolito DM, Eroglu C. Quantifying Synapses: an Immunocytochemistry-based Assay to Quantify SynapseNumber. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE. 2010;2270.Google Scholar
- Risher WC, Patel S, Kim IH, Uezu A, Bhagat S, Wilton DK, et al. Astrocytes refine cortical connectivity at dendritic spines. Luo L, editor. eLife. 2014;3:e04047.Google Scholar
- McKinstry SU, Karadeniz YB, Worthington AK, Hayrapetyan VY, Ozlu MI, Serafin-Molina K, et al. Huntingtin is required for normal excitatory synapse development in cortical and striatal circuits. J Neurosci. 2014;34:9455–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schindelin J, Rueden CT, Hiner MC, Eliceiri KW. The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2015;82:518–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth. 2012;9:671–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lazarov O, Lee M, Peterson DA, Sisodia SS. Evidence that synaptically released β-amyloid accumulates as extracellular deposits in the hippocampus of transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2002;22:9785–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheng JG, Price DL, Koliatsos VE. Disruption of corticocortical connections ameliorates amyloid burden in terminal fields in a transgenic model of Aβ amyloidosis. J Neurosci. 2002;22:9794–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Youmans KL, Tai LM, Kanekiyo T, Stine Jr WB, Michon S-C, Nwabuisi-Heath E, et al. Intraneuronal Aβ detection in 5xFAD mice by a new Aβ-specific antibody. Mol. Neurodegener. 2012;7:1–14.Google Scholar
- Website: © 2015 Allen Institute for Brain Science. Allen Mouse Brain Atlas [Internet]. Available from:http://mouse.brain-map.org.
- Seress L, Gulyás AI, Freund TF. Pyramidal neurons are immunoreactive for calbindin D28k in the CA1 subfield of the human hippocampus. Neurosci Lett. 1992;138:257–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knowles WD, Schwartzkroin PA. Axonal ramifications of hippocampal Ca1 pyramidal cells. J Neurosci. 1981;1:1236–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Song L, Parker EM. Calpain Inhibitor I Increases β-Amyloid Peptide Production by Inhibiting the Degradation of the Substrate of γ -Secretase: evidence that substrate availability limits -amyloid peptide production. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:8966–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koffie RM, Hyman BT, Spires-Jones TL. Alzheimer’s disease: synapses gone cold. Mol Neurodegener. 2011;6:63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sheng M, Sabatini BL, Südhof TC. Synapses and Alzheimer’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4:a005777.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Herrera-Molina R, Sarto-Jackson I, Montenegro-Venegas C, Heine M, Smalla K-H, Seidenbecher CI, et al. Structure of Excitatory Synapses and GABAA Receptor Localization at Inhibitory Synapses Are Regulated by Neuroplastin-65. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:8973–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sze C-I, Troncoso JC, Kawas C, Mouton P, Price DL, Martin LJ. Loss of the Presynaptic Vesicle Protein Synaptophysin in Hippocampus Correlates with Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer Disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1997;56:933–44.Google Scholar
- Yuki D, Sugiura Y, Zaima N, Akatsu H, Takei S, Yao I, et al. DHA-PC and PSD-95 decrease after loss of synaptophysin and before neuronal loss in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Love S, Siew LK, Dawbarn D, Wilcock GK, Ben-Shlomo Y, Allen SJ. Premorbid effects of APOE on synaptic proteins in human temporal neocortex. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:797–803.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trujillo-Estrada L, Dávila JC, Sánchez-Mejias E, Sánchez-Varo R, Gomez-Arboledas A, Vizuete M, et al. Early Neuronal Loss and Axonal/Presynaptic Damage is Associated with Accelerated Amyloid-β Accumulation in AβPP/PS1 Alzheimer’s Disease Mice Subiculum. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42:521–41.Google Scholar
- Muller D, Buchs P-A, Stoppini L. Time course of synaptic development in hippocampal organotypic cultures. Dev Brain Res. 1993;71:93–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Almeida CG, Tampellini D, Takahashi RH, Greengard P, Lin MT, Snyder EM, et al. Beta-amyloid accumulation in APP mutant neurons reduces PSD-95 and GluR1 in synapses. Neurobiol Dis. 2005;20:187–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Priller C, Bauer T, Mitteregger G, Krebs B, Kretzschmar HA, Herms J. Synapse Formation and Function Is Modulated by the Amyloid Precursor Protein. J Neurosci. 2006;26:7212–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi RH, Milner TA, Li F, Nam EE, Edgar MA, Yamaguchi H, et al. Intraneuronal Alzheimer Aβ42 Accumulates in Multivesicular Bodies and Is Associated with Synaptic Pathology. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:1869–79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tampellini D, Rahman N, Gallo EF, Huang Z, Dumont M, Capetillo-Zarate E, et al. Synaptic Activity Reduces Intraneuronal A, Promotes APP Transport to Synapses, and Protects against A -Related Synaptic Alterations. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9704–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Christensen DZ, Huettenrauch M, Mitkovski M, Pradier L, Wirths O. Axonal degeneration in an Alzheimer mouse model is PS1 gene dose dependent and linked to intraneuronal Aβ accumulation. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:139Google Scholar
- Bayer TA, Wirths O. Review on the APP/PS1KI mouse model: intraneuronal Aβ accumulation triggers axonopathy, neuron loss and working memory impairment. Genes Brain Behav. 2008;7:6–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Wirths O, Theil S, Gerth J, Bayer TA, Walter J. Early intraneuronal accumulation and increased aggregation of phosphorylated Abeta in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2013;125:699–709.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wirths O, Multhaup G, Czech C, Feldmann N, Blanchard V, Tremp G, et al. Intraneuronal APP/Aβ Trafficking and Plaque Formation in β-Amyloid Precursor Protein and Presenilin-1 Transgenic Mice. Brain Pathol. 2002;12:275–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang D-S, Stavrides P, Mohan PS, Kaushik S, Kumar A, Ohno M, et al. Reversal of autophagy dysfunction in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease ameliorates amyloid pathologies and memory deficits. Brain. 2011;134:258–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith DH, Chen X, Iwata A, Graham DI. Amyloid β accumulation in axons after traumatic brain injury in humans. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:1072–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen X-H, Siman R, Iwata A, Meaney DF, Trojanowski JQ, Smith DH. Long-term accumulation of amyloid-β, β-secretase, presenilin-1, and caspase-3 in damaged axons following brain trauma. Am J Pathol. 2004;165:357–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Iwata A, Chen X-H, McIntosh TK, Browne KD, Smith DH. Long-Term Accumulation of Amyloid-β in Axons Following Brain Trauma Without Persistent Upregulation of Amyloid Precursor Protein Genes. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61:1056–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cho S, Wood A, Bowlby MR. Brain slices as models for neurodegenerative disease and screening platforms to identify novel therapeutics. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2007;5:19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mohamed A, Posse de Chaves E. Aβ Internalization by Neurons and Glia. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;2011:127984.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bahr BA, Hoffman KB, Yang AJ, Hess US, Glabe CG, Lynch G. Amyloid β protein is internalized selectively by hippocampal field CA1 and causes neurons to accumulate amyloidogenic carboxyterminal fragments of the amyloid precursor protein. J Comp Neurol. 1998;397:139–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gouras GK, Tsai J, Naslund J, Vincent B, Edgar M, Checler F, et al. Intraneuronal Aβ42 Accumulation in Human Brain. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:15–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- LaFerla FM, Green KN, Oddo S. Intracellular amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:499–509.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar