Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Fibroblast bioenergetics to classify amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients

Molecular Neurodegeneration volume 12, Article number: 76 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate cellular bioenergetics in primary skin fibroblasts derived from patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and to determine if they can be used as classifiers for patient stratification.

Methods

We assembled a collection of unprecedented size of fibroblasts from patients with sporadic ALS (sALS, n = 171), primary lateral sclerosis (PLS, n = 34), ALS/PLS with C9orf72 mutations (n = 13), and healthy controls (n = 91). In search for novel ALS classifiers, we performed extensive studies of fibroblast bioenergetics, including mitochondrial membrane potential, respiration, glycolysis, and ATP content. Next, we developed a machine learning approach to determine whether fibroblast bioenergetic features could be used to stratify patients.

Results

Compared to controls, sALS and PLS fibroblasts had higher average mitochondrial membrane potential, respiration, and glycolysis, suggesting that they were in a hypermetabolic state. Only membrane potential was elevated in C9Orf72 lines. ATP steady state levels did not correlate with respiration and glycolysis in sALS and PLS lines. Based on bioenergetic profiles, a support vector machine (SVM) was trained to classify sALS and PLS with 99% specificity and 70% sensitivity.

Conclusions

sALS, PLS, and C9Orf72 fibroblasts share hypermetabolic features, while presenting differences of bioenergetics. The absence of correlation between energy metabolism activation and ATP levels in sALS and PLS fibroblasts suggests that in these cells hypermetabolism is a mechanism to adapt to energy dissipation. Results from SVM support the use of metabolic characteristics of ALS fibroblasts and multivariate analysis to develop classifiers for patient stratification.

Background

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common form of adult onset motor neuron disease, with a yearly incidence rate of 1–2.6 cases per 100,000. ALS leads to death within 3–5 years from disease onset [1]. Typical ALS is characterized by a rapidly progressive loss of upper and lower motor neurons. However, milder forms of the disease, such as primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), cause only upper motor neuron degeneration [2]. Unfortunately, most ALS clinical trials have been unsuccessful [3], and as a result there are only two currently approved drugs for ALS, Riluzole and Edaravone, both of which only prolong life by a few months. The ineffectiveness of candidate therapies, the heterogeneity of the disease phenotype, and the diversity of ALS-linked genes support the emerging concept that distinct pathogenic mechanisms may participate in the development of ALS. For this reason, research efforts are increasingly concentrated on finding biomarkers that allow stratifying patients into groups better suited for targeted clinical trials.

Recently, a number of candidate biomarkers have been proposed, including some obtained by neuroimaging [4, 5], electrical impedance myography [6], and proteomics of cerebrospinal fluid [7,8,9,10]. However, despite their potential link to disease pathogenesis, complex cellular functions have not yet been explored as ALS biomarkers. Clearly, functional measures in living cells from affected tissues, such as the spinal cord, could be problematic, but one could envision that more accessible cell types could serve as surrogate samples. In ALS, skin fibroblasts display numerous abnormalities [11,12,13,14], many of which are shared with motor neurons [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. This suggests that these apparently unaffected cells may share common pathogenic pathways with motor neurons. Furthermore, fibroblasts can be propagated in culture, frozen, and stored almost indefinitely, and transformed in cell types that are severely affected by the disease, such as motor neurons and astrocytes [28]. Furthermore, fibroblasts derived from ALS patients were used to generate a tissue-engineered skin model, which recapitulated many of the skin alterations found in ALS [29, 30]. Therefore, studying complex functional measures in fibroblasts from ALS patients could provide a promising source of new classifiers.

Here, we have investigated a large cohort of ALS fibroblasts and characterized their bioenergetic properties. We used a battery of assays to study cellular energy metabolism, and found a hypermetabolic phenotype in ALS, involving both oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis. Importantly, using a machine learning approach on bioenergetic profiles, we provide a proof of concept that fibroblast bioenergetic markers could differentiate between ALS and PLS, and could therefore be proposed as tools for discriminating among different forms of ALS.

Methods

Chemicals

All chemicals used were form Sigma (St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise specified.

Skin biopsy and fibroblast cultures

After informed consent, a punch skin biopsy was obtained from the volar part of the forearm. Skin biopsies were de-identified to protect patients’ identity. Fibroblast samples were provided to our laboratory as coded samples. Some lines were obtained from the NINDS catalog of motor neuron disease fibroblasts. Skin fibroblasts were cultured as described previously [31] in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) supplemented with 25 mM glucose, 4 mM glutamine, 1 mM pyruvate, and 10% fetal bovine serum (hereafter growth medium). All cultured fibroblast lines were studied at passages ranging between 5 and 10. We have not observed loss of contact inhibition in any of the lines or apparent differences in growth between any of the groups.

Measurements of TMRM and MTG fluorescence

Skin fibroblasts were seeded at the density of 1.5 × 104 cells/well in replicates of eights in 96-well tissue culture plates in growth medium and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The following day, cells were washed and loaded with 50 nM of the potentiometric dye Tetramethylrhodamine-methyl-ester (TMRM, 544ex, 590em; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 450 nM MitoTracker Green (MTG, 490ex, 516em; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at 37 °C in phenol-free DMEM containing 5 mM glucose, 4 mM glutamine, and 1 mM pyruvate. Samples were incubated in the absence or the presence of 2 μM cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) to completely depolarize mitochondria and obtain background TMRM and MTG fluorescence. After washing with DMEM, MTG and TMRM fluorescence were simultaneously recorded in a plate reader equipped with a polychromator (Spectramax M5; Molecular Devices Sunnyvale, CA). Background fluorescence was subtracted from the total fluorescence. MTG and TMRM fluorescence values were expressed as relative fluorescence units per milligram of total cellular proteins measured with the DC Protein Assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA).

Measurement of ATP content

Fibroblasts were seeded at the density of 1.5 × 104 cells/well in replicates of nines in 96-well tissue culture plates in growth medium incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The next day cells were incubated in triplicates in DMEM containing 5 mM glucose, 4 mM glutamine, and 1 mM pyruvate (ATP baseline), or DMEM containing 4 mM glutamine, 1 mM pyruvate, and 5 mM 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) to bock glycolysis (ATP 2DG), or DMEM containing 5 mM glucose, 4 mM glutamine, 1 mM pyruvate, and 1 μM oligomycin to block the mitochondrial ATPase (ATP Oligo). After 90 min incubation, cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in 30 μl tichloroacetic acid (2.5% W/V) on ice for 30 min. Following lysis, 20 μl aliquots were transferred into a separate plate for protein determination (DC Protein Assay). 45 μl Tris-acetate buffer (400 mM, pH = 8.0) was added to the remaining lysate. Cellular ATP content was measured after addition of 20 μl of luciferase reagent (Promega, Madison, WI) in a luminescence plate reader (Spectramax M5). Luminescence values were normalized against an ATP standard.

Measurements of oxygen consumption and extracellular acidification

Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) were measured with a XF96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Cell lines were seeded in 12 wells of a XF 96-well cell culture microplate (Agilent) at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well (cells reach confluency on the experimental day) in 200 μL of growth medium and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. After replacing the growth medium with 200 μL of XF Assay Medium (Agilent) supplemented with 5 mM glucose, 1 mM pyruvate and 4 mM glutamine, pre-warmed at 37 °C, cells were degassed for 1 h before starting the assay procedure, in a non-CO2 incubator. OCR and ECAR were recorded at baseline followed by sequential additions of 1 μM oligomycin, 2 μM FCCP and 0.5 μM Antimycin A plus 0.5 μM Rotenone. Non-mitochondrial oxygen consumption (in the presence of AA + Rot) was subtracted from all OCR values and technical replicates outside of two standard deviations of the means were discarded for both ECAR and OCR. Values were normalized by the mean protein value of each line. The measurement of OCR and ECAR in galactose medium was performed as described above, with the exception that the growth medium and assay medium contained no glucose and was supplemented with 5 mM galactose.

Lactate excretion rate measurement

Lactate production was measured using a kit (EnzyFluoTM L-lactate Assay Kit (EFLLC-100), BioAssay Systems) based on a fluorescent probe linked to NADH generated from lactate. Cell lines were seeded in XF 96-well cell culture microplates as described for OCR and ECAR measurements. On the experimental day, the growth medium was replaced with 200 μL of XF Assay Medium supplemented with 5 mM glucose, 1 mM pyruvate and 4 mM glutamine, pre-warmed at 37 °C. Cells were allowed to excrete lactate by incubation for 210 min at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Aliquots of the medium were then collected, and diluted 5 fold for the assay. Lactate standards diluted in Assay medium were used for quantification.

Statistical analyses

Bioenergetic features were tested for normality by D’Agostino-Pearson test (scipy v0.15.1; www.scipy.org), which combines skewness and kurtosis to produce an omnibus test of normality. Since none of the parameters passed the normality test, we used non-parametric tests. Differences amongst groups were compared using Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test, as post hoc analysis (scipy v0.15.1). Correlations amongst bioenergetic features were tested using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. The p-values of correlations were adjusted for multiple comparisons by Benjamini-Hochberg correction with a false discovery rate set to <0.05. Data in the text are presented as % average (±95% confidence intervals of the differences). There were no correlations between any of the measured bioenergetics parameters and patient age, sex, or cell line passage number. Therefore, no adjustment for these parameters was necessary.

Support vector machines

The complexity and performance of the SVM model is controlled by tunable parameters (class weights, kernels, penalties and gamma values). For each classification problem (i.e., control vs. disease, sALS vs. PLS), we tested an array of 1120 different sets of model parameters (grid search). A less complex model would have lower performance, but a more complex one would “overfit” the data, and the resulting decision boundary would follow the noise of the samples rather than inherent patterns that generalize well to the population. To find the best performing SVM that does not overfit, we used the well-established metod of k-fold cross-validation as a measure model performance: first the data was randomly divided into 10 sets, then for each set of model parameters the SVM was trained on 9 and validated on one set of the data. This step was repeated 10 times, using a different set as the validation set each time. Model performance was calculated as the average of the 10 validation performances (% accuracy). Fitting SVMs and generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed using scikit-learn v0.18 (www.scikit-learn.org). ROC curves are the averages of the 10 cross-validation sets.

Results

Clinical features of study subjects

Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the sALS, PLS, C9Orf72, and control subjects whose de-identified fibroblasts were utilized for this study. sALS patients (n = 171) were clinically defined based on definite or probable ALS diagnosis. sALS patients did not have family history of ALS are were negative for SOD1 and C9orf72 mutations. PLS patients (n = 34) were clinically defined on the basis of pure upper motor neuron disease, >5 years after symptom onset, normal electromyogram, and no definable causes. As expected, there were more males in both the sALS and PLS groups, consistent with higher frequency of the disease in males [32]. Also predictably, the rate of progression (i.e., the rate at which the ALS Functional Rating Scale, ALSFRS, worsens) and the forced vital capacity (FVC) decline were significantly less severe in the PLS group than in sALS (mean: 17.7%, CI: 7.2 to 27.7%, p = 1.9E-18 and mean: 117.8%, CI: 107.1 to 128.1%, p = 2.9E-4 respectively), consistent with the milder phenotype in PLS. The age of disease onset was significantly earlier in the PLS group (mean: 89.6%, CI: 84.2 to 95.0%, p = 6.1E-05). We included in the study fibroblasts from patients with C9orf72 expansion who had ALS (n = 12) or PLS (n = 1). However, we did not compare the clinical features of the genetically defined C9orf72 group, because of the relatively low number of samples available.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of study subjects
Full size table

Bioenergetic characterization of sALS, PLS, and C9Orf72 fibroblasts

To generate a comprehensive bioenergetic profile of fibroblast lines in disease and control groups we measured the following parameters: mitochondrial membrane potential, cellular ATP content, cell respiration, and glycolysis. The fluorescence intensity of tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM), an indicator of mitochondrial membrane potential, was significantly higher in all disease groups relative to controls (sALS mean: 127.6%, CI: 112.5 to 142.8%; PLS mean: 165.1%, CI: 142.1 to 189.3%; C9Orf72 mean: 155.1%, CI: 125.5 to 191.5%, Fig. 1a). To determine whether increased mitochondrial membrane potential could be attributed to differences in mitochondrial content, we measured the fluorescence of MitoTrackerGreen (MTG), a dye that is trapped and enriched in mitochondria, with minimal dependence on membrane potential [31], and can therefore be used as a readout of mitochondrial content. sALS and C9Orf72 lines showed no differences in MTG fluorescence relative to controls (Fig. 1b), whereas PLS had a significant decrease in MTG fluorescence (mean: 62.1%, CI: 36.3 to 88.8%). Since increased TMRM fluorescence in sALS and PLS was not matched by proportional increases in MTG fluorescence, we inferred that higher TMRM fluorescence was attributable to increased mitochondrial membrane potential, and not to mitochondrial content. Note that the number of samples tested for TMRM and MTG fluorescence was smaller than the total number of sALS lines available, because a subset of them were assessed for these two bioenergetic parameters in a previous study, which also indicated higher TMRM values in a smaller cohort of sALS and PLS lines [31].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Higher mitochondrial membrane potential in fibroblasts from patients with motor neuron disease. Scatter plots of TMRM a Control mean: 743.4, SD: 298.5; sALS mean: 948.3, SD: 380.3, PLS mean: 1227.3, SD: 456.7, C9Orf72 mean: 1153.0, SD: 397.5) and MTG b Control mean: 5080.9, SD: 2886.7, sALS mean: 5918.7, SD: 3939.6, PLS mean: 3153.6, SD: 2813.2; C9Orf72 mean: 5616.9, SD: 5911.8) values in sALS, PLS, C9Orf72, and control fibroblast lines. Middle bars represent the average values and error bars show standard deviations. RFU: relative fluorescence units. p-values are indicated where there was a significant difference between two groups. n.s.: no significant difference. n = 127 sALS, n = 33 PLS, n = 10 C9Orf72, n = 41 controls

Full size image

Next, we measured mitochondrial OCR (Fig. 2a, blue curve) using flux analysis. In this experiment, baseline OCR is first measured, followed by the addition of the ATPase inhibitor oligomycin, which decreases OCR, as the proton motive force cannot be used for ATP production. The oligomycin sensitive OCR is calculated by subtracting oligomycin OCR rate from baseline. Then, the proton motive force is dissipated using the uncoupler FCCP, which allows the respiratory chain to consume oxygen at its fastest rate. The FCCP OCR rate is considered as maximal respiratory capacity, and the spare respiratory capacity is calculated as the difference between maximal and baseline OCR. Lastly, a mixture of the respiratory chain complex III and I inhibitors (Antimycin A and Rotenone, AA + Rot, respectively) are added to assess non-mitochondrial respiration, which is considered as background.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Higher oxygen consumption rates in sALS and PLS fibroblasts. a Schematic illustration of a typical flux experiment and the calculated metrics (1: OCR baseline, 2: oligomycin sensitive rate, 3: spare respiratory capacity, 4: maximal respiratory capacity, 5: ECAR baseline, 6: ECAR AA-Rot). B-E: scatter plots of OCR baseline b Control mean: 2606.9, SD: 1290.5; sALS mean: 3224.0, SD: 1864.5; PLS mean: 4504.6, SD: 3259.3; C9Orf72 mean: 3338.2, SD: 1450.7), oligomycin sensitive rate c Control mean: 2248.2, SD: 1193.9; sALS mean: 2707.6, SD: 1656.9; PLS mean: 3947.9, SD: 2892.3; C9Orf72 mean: 2900.4, SD: 1251.4), maximal respiratory capacity d Control mean: 3784.6, SD: 2166.9; sALS mean: 4445.7, SD: 3048.2; PLS mean: 6797.1, SD: 4247.2; C9Orf72 mean: 4443.5, SD: 2339.5), spare respiratory capacity e Control mean: 1177.7, SD: 1187.2; sALS mean: 1221.7, SD: 1476.5; PLS mean: 2292.5, SD: 1563.6; C9Orf72 mean: 1105.3, SD: 1195.8). Values are shown comparing sALS, PLS, C9Orf72, and control lines. Middle bars represent the average values and error bars show standard deviations. p-values are indicated where there was a significant difference between two groups. n.s.: no significant difference. n = 171 sALS; n = 34 PLS, n = 13 C9Orf72, n = 91 controls

Full size image

Relative to controls, sALS and PLS had elevated baseline OCR (sALS mean: 123.7%, CI: 109.1 to 138.9%; PLS mean: 172.8%, CI: 131.6 to 216.4%, Fig. 2b), oligomycin sensitive OCR (sALS mean: 120.4%, CI: 105.3 to 136.0%; PLS mean: 175.6%, CI: 134.5 to 220.5%, Fig. 2c), and maximal respiratory capacity (sALS mean: 117.5%, CI: 100.8 to 135.0%; PLS mean: 179.6%, CI: 142.0 to 220.4%, Fig. 2d). Spare respiratory capacity was only significantly elevated in PLS lines (mean: 194.7%, CI: 149.4 to 243.7%, Fig. 2e). Comparing sALS, PLS and C9Orf72, there was no difference in baseline OCR and oligomycin sensitive respiration, but relative to PLS sALS had lower maximal capacity (mean: 65.4%, CI: 43.0 to 85.8%), and both sALS and C9Orf72 had lower spare respiratory capacity (sALS: mean: 53.3%, CI: 27.7 to 76.9%; C9Orf72: mean: 48.2%, CI: 12.9 to 83.3% Fig. 2e).

In parallel to OCR, the flux analyzer allows for measurement of ECAR (Fig. 2a, red curve). Relative to controls, both sALS and PLS cells had higher baseline ECAR (sALS: mean: 124.6%, CI: 111.0 to 138.0%; PLS: mean: 192.0%, CI: 157.4 to 230.5%, Fig. 3a). ECAR AA + Rot (i.e., maximal ECAR when the respiratory chain is fully inhibited) was also higher (sALS: mean: 118.8%, CI: 17.0 to 130.5%; PLS: mean: 186.1%, CI: 153.5 to 222.9%, Fig. 3b). Moreover, PLS had higher ECAR baseline (mean: 154.1%, CI: 126.5 to 185.1%, Fig. 3a) and ECAR AA + Rot (mean: 156.6%, CI: 129.9 to 187.3%, Fig. 3b) than sALS.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Higher extracellular acidification rates in sALS and PLS fibroblasts. Scatter plots of ECAR baseline a Control mean: 2035.9, SD: 987.4; sALS mean: 2536.0, SD: 1237.8; PLS mean: 3909.1, SD: 2175.4; C9Orf72 mean: 3381.9, SD: 2988.0), ECAR AA-Rot b Control mean: 2631.1, SD: 1164.4; sALS mean: 3126.2, SD: 1366.6; PLS mean: 4895.2, SD: 2661.5; C9Orf72 mean: 3426.1, SD: 2425.9), and OCR base/ECAR base c Control mean: 1.5, SD: 0.8; sALS mean: 1.4, SD: 0.7; PLS mean: 1.2, SD: 0.6; C9Orf72 mean: 1.8, SD: 1.7) values are shown comparing sALS, PLS, C9Orf72, and control lines. The method by which features were calculated is illustrated in Fig. 2a. Middle bars represent the average values and error bars show standard deviations. p-values are indicated where there was a significant difference between two groups. n.s.: no significant difference. n = 171 sALS; n = 34 PLS, n = 13 C9Orf72, n = 91 controls

Full size image

Taken together, these results showed that sALS and PLS fibroblasts upregulate both oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis. Furthermore, the extent of relative OCR and ECAR increase was similar in the two groups, suggesting that both bioenergetic pathways are similarly upregulated. This was confirmed by calculating the ratio between OCR baseline and ECAR baseline, which was not different among the groups (Fig. 3c), indicating that there was no metabolic shift towards either glycolysis or oxidative phosphorylation. Of note, in highly aerobic states, CO2 production from mitochondria can contribute to ECAR. However, it was empirically determined that in cells with low baseline OCR/ECAR ratio (e.g., < 4) CO2 has a negligible contribution to ECAR [33]. Since in fibroblasts the average OCR/ECAR ratio was approximately 1.5, the CO2 contribution to ECAR was likely not significant, suggesting that glycolysis was the major contributor to ECAR. Furthermore, since under conditions of full respiratory chain inhibition CO2 production in the Krebs cycle is strongly attenuated, the interpretation of higher glycolysis is also supported by the higher ECAR values in sALS and PLS after AA + Rot addition. To test experimentally the assumption that ECAR reflects lactate excretion we measured lactate production rates in a subset of 12 sALS, 12 PLS, and 12 control lines, under baseline conditions. Lactate production rate and ECAR baseline were significantly correlated (p = 0.02, data not shown), indicating that medium acidification reflects lactate excretion. Collectively, these results suggest that sALS and PLS fibroblasts have a hypermetabolic phenotype involving both oxidative phosphorylation and anaerobic glycolysis.

Next, we measured cellular steady-state ATP levels at baseline and after 90 min treatment with either 2DG to inhibit glycolysis or oligomycin to inhibit mitochondrial ATP production. In sALS, we found higher baseline ATP content compared to controls (mean: 114.9%, CI: 13.6 to 125.8%, Fig. 4a). Interestingly, PLS fibroblasts did not show higher ATP content, despite having the highest average respiration and glycolytic fluxes among all groups. The decline in ATP content after 2DG (ATP 2DG delta) was greater in sALS relative to controls (mean: 117.5%, CI: 106.4 to 128.7%, Fig. 4b). However, neither PLS nor C9Orf72 lines had ATP 2DG delta greater than controls. When oxidative phosphorylation was inhibited (ATP Oligo delta), we observed no significant decline in ATP content in controls or sALS, while PLS showed a small but significant decline (−8.9%, Fig. 4c). Overall, these results suggest that sALS lines are more dependent on glucose utilization for ATP maintenance than controls, PLS or C9Orf72. Additionally, PLS is the only group that exhibits dependency on oxidative phosphorylation for ATP maintenance.

Fig. 4
figure 4

ATP content in sALS and PLS fibroblasts. Scatter plots of baseline ATP content a Control mean: 271.6, SD: 113.7; sALS mean: 312.1, SD: 122.2; PLS mean: 271.1, SD: 103.2; C9Orf72 mean: 296.1, SD: 103.8), ATP content lost after 2DG treatment b Control mean: 201.2, SD: 87.8; sALS mean: 236.4, SD: 92.1; PLS mean: 220.1, SD: 81.4; C9Orf72 mean: 234.7, SD: 94.6), and ATP content lost after oligomycin treatment c Control mean: -17.3, SD: 78.1; sALS mean: -16.6, SD: 72.4; PLS mean: 24.1, SD: 60.2; C9Orf72 mean: 18.6, SD: 55.1) are shown comparing sALS, PLS, C9Orf72, and control lines. Groups were compared using Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunn’s post hoc analysis. Middle bars represent the average values and error bars show standard deviations. p-values are indicated where there was a significant difference between two groups. n.s.: no significant difference. n = 171 sALS; n = 34 PLS, n = 13 C9Orf72, n = 91 controls

Full size image

We performed correlation analyses of bioenergetic parameters of fibroblasts to assess if the interdependence of the parameters differed among groups (Table 2). The underlying assumption was that parameters would correlate when they were co-regulated. First, these analyses confirmed that all groups were dependent on glycolysis for energy production, as baseline ATP and sensitivity to 2DG (ATP 2DG delta) were strongly correlated. Second, the maximal glycolytic rate (ECAR AA-Rot) significantly correlated with the maximal OCR rate (OCR Max) in both sALS and PLS. Similarly, there was a direct correlation between OCR baseline and ECAR baseline in sALS and PLS, but not in controls. Taken together, these correlations suggest that in sALS and PLS lines glycolytic and oxidative fluxes are co-regulated. Despite these similarities, there were also differences between sALS and PLS. For example, only in PLS there was a negative correlation between the OCR/ECAR ratio and ATP content. Furthermore, only PLS cells showed a negative correlation between OCR/ECAR ratio and ATP 2DG delta.

Table 2 Correlations among bioenergetics features
Full size table

To test the ability of fibroblasts to respond to forced oxidative metabolism we grew a subset of lines in medium containing galactose instead of glucose for 24 h. In these conditions, fibroblasts are forced to oxidize glycolysis-derived pyruvate for energy production, because galactose is not converted to glucose-6P as efficiently as glucose [34]. We tested the 12 controls, 12 sALS, and 12 PLS lines that had ECAR and OCR values closest to the average of their respective groups. As expected, in galactose medium baseline OCR was faster than in glucose medium (compare Additional file 1: Figure S1A and Figure 2B), while ECAR was lower (compare Additional file 1: Figure S1E and Figure 3A). This was also apparent from the increase of the OCR/ECAR ratio from approximately 1.5 in glucose to 3.5 in galactose (compare Additional file 1: Figure S1F and Figure 3C). The differences in baseline OCR and ECAR between sALS and controls, PLS and controls, and sALS and PLS that was observed in glucose was not detected in galactose (Additional file 1: Figure S1A and S1E). These results suggest that control cells can upregulate OCR in galactose to match sALS and PLS. Interestingly, in galactose, the spare respiratory capacity was significantly lower in sALS than controls (Additional file 1: Figure D), while in PLS it was similar to controls. Since in glucose the spare respiratory capacity was higher in sALS and PLS than control (Fig. 2e), we interpret the result in galactose as an indication that ALS and PLS fibroblasts have respiration closer to maximal in glucose and cannot upregulate it much more when placed in galactose.

Stratification of ALS patients based on individual bioenergetic features

We separated our cohort of sALS fibroblast in two equally sized groups by the median values of key bioenergetic parameters: TMRM fluorescence (mitochondrial membrane potential), ECAR AA + Rot (maximal glycolytic activity), and oligomycin sensitive OCR (ATP synthesizing respiration). We then compared the two groups (i.e., with above median and below median values) for key clinical parameters: sex, age of disease onset, site of onset (i.e., bulbar vs. spinal), rate of disease progression, FVC at time of biopsy. We found that patients with high ECAR AA + Rot had significantly higher FVC (14%, p = 0.01) and more frequent spinal onset (25%, p = 0.02). We also found that patients with high TMRM had a faster rate of decline (18%, p = 0.04). Similar analyses were not performed for PLS or C9Orf72 lines, because the number of samples was too small to obtain adequately sized groups. Indeed, although interesting, the significant differences between upper and lower halves of the sALS lines were not large. Furthermore, significant liner correlations between individual key bioenergetic and clinical parameters, after correction for multiple correlations, were not found (not shown). Therefore, based on the available samples, we suggest that individual bioenergetic parameters in fibroblast lines may not be adequate to provide definite clinical classifications.

Supervised machine learning on bioenergetic profiles classifies sALS and PLS fibroblasts with high specificity

As no individual bioenergetic measure had sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used as a tool for classification by itself (data not shown), we took advantage of the high dimensionality of the data gathered and performed multivariate analysis. The following 12 features from 301 records (control, sALS, PLS, and C9Orf72 combined) were used: TMRM, MTG, ECAR base, ECAR AA-Rot, OCR baseline, oligomycin sensitive respiration, spare respiratory capacity, maximal respiration, OCR baseline/ECAR baseline, ATP baseline, ATP 2DG delta and ATP Oligo delta. The goal was to determine if fibroblast groups could be clustered and predicted based purely on their bioenergetic features. Importantly, considering that such tool could have translational applications in helping to stratify patients, we wanted to establish proof of principle that multivariate analyses could distinguish between sALS and PLS. To this end, we utilized support vector machines (SVM), which are trained to fit non-linear decision boundaries to high dimensional data.

First we sought to classify control fibroblasts versus all disease groups combined (i.e., sALS, PLS and C9Orf72). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated based on the SVM classifier that yielded the highest accuracy (probability of correct assignment of samples to their respective groups). The best performing SVM yielded good sensitivity (88.5%, CI: 84.2 to 92.7%), but low specificity (38.1%, CI: 27.7 to 48.5%) (Fig. 5a). Other parameters of the performance of this SVM classifier included, positive predictive value (78.7%, CI: 73.6 to 83.8%), negative predictive value (56.1%, CI: 43.3 to 69.0%), false positive rate (61.9%, CI: 51.5 to 72.3%), false negative rate (11.5%, CI: 7.3 to 15.8%), and false discovery rate (21.3%, CI: 16.2 to 26.4%). Interestingly, our best performing SVM to classify sALS versus PLS (Fig. 5b) yielded good sensitivity (70.6%, CI: 55.3 to 85.9%), and high specificity (98.8%, CI: 97.2 to 100.0%), with a positive predictive value of 92.3%, CI: 82.1 to 100.0%, negative predictive value of 94.4%, CI: 91.0 to 97.8%, false positive rate of 1.2%, CI: 0.0 to 2.8%, false negative rate of 29.4%, CI: 14.1 to 44.7%, and false discovery rate of 7.7%, CI: 0.0 to 17.9%. In summary, the SVM analysis of fibroblast bioenergetic features was most effective in classifying the two forms of motor neurons disease, sALS and PLS, as indicated by the high area under the curve value (0.94) and the steep rise of true positive rate of the mean ROC curve (Fig 5b).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of SVM classifiers distinguishes lines with motor neuron disease from controls (a), and sALS from PLS (b). SVMs were trained to distinguish between two groups, based on 12 bioenergetics features. Each continuous orange ROC curve represents the mean of 10 cross-validation curves, each shown as a dotted line. Values of the area under the curve for each ROC curve (0–9 fold ROC and mean ROC) are indicated in the boxes

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we characterized the bioenergetics of a large number of sALS and PLS primary skin fibroblast lines with the goal of finding disease classifiers. In addition, we studied the bioenergetics of a smaller cohort of fibroblast lines from the most common genetic form of fALS, C9orf72, to assess if bioenergetic features generalized to this form of the disease. We found that compared to healthy controls, sALS, PLS, and C9orf72 shared higher mitochondrial membrane potential, and that sALS and PLS also shared features indicative of hypermetabolism, characterized by higher mitochondrial respiration and glycolytic fluxes.

So far, studies on metabolic function in sALS and fALS fibroblasts have been conducted in much smaller cohorts. In a study of 6 sALS and 10 control fibroblast lines, it was reported that sALS had a lower average OCR baseline [34]. However, the number of the samples was thirty-fold smaller than the one studied here. We think that the sample size is important in this case, because of the variability observed among individual lines in all bioenergetic assays. Importantly, when they looked selectively at the older (≥70 years of age at onset) patients, they found that ECAR was significantly higher than controls. This is in agreement with our results showing increased ECAR in sALS, PLS. Therefore, except for the OCR baseline result, which could differ because of the difference in sample sizes, glycolytic flux increase appears to be a common finding in the two studies. Furthermore, mitochondrial function measurements performed in 3 sALS fibroblast lines and 10 controls identified a defect of cytochrome c oxidase in sALS, which correlated with a lower respiratory activity, but only when cells were forced to respire with succinate as substrate after blocking complex I with rotenone [35]. In this study, we did not assess individual respiratory chain complexes, and since fibroblasts do not naturally utilize succinate as a major respiratory substrate, we did not analyze this pathway because of relatively low physiological significance. Instead, we performed measurements of respiration in intact cells allowed to utilize glucose and NADH-generating substrates, such as glutamine and pyruvate. Therefore, the differences in the findings may be attributable to the different sample size, but also to the different approaches utilized. Lastly, a recent study of 4 C9orf72 and 4 control fibroblast lines found increased mitochondrial membrane potential in the C9orf72 lines [36] similar to that found in our C9orf72 cohort.

In our sALS and PLS fibroblast cohorts hypermetabolism was not accompanied by an increase in mitochondrial content or by a proportional increase in ATP content. Taken together, the data could be best interpreted as an adaptation to higher ATP demands, involving both oxidative and glycolytic pathways of energy generation. When cells were forced to maximize oxidative phosphorylation in galactose medium, the sALS and PLS were not capable of maintaining a faster respiratory rate than controls, suggesting that their capacity was close to maximal under glucose.

Further studies will be needed to dissect the mechanisms leading to hypermetabolism in ALS fibroblasts. However, we could hypothesize that several pathways may contribute to high ATP expenditure, including anabolic reactions, such as RNA and protein synthesis, catabolic reactions, such as protein degradation, vesicle acidification by V-ATPases, and ion homeostasis. The average values of several bioenergetic features were significantly different in PLS and sALS compared to controls, but also between sALS and PLS. The latter is a less aggressive form of motor neuron disease as compared to sALS, since it only affects the upper motor neurons and progresses more slowly. In light of these findings, it could be speculated that hypermetabolism could be a functional adaptation to increased ATP demands common to fibroblasts and neurons. Future studies utilizing neurons differentiated from fibroblast derived induced pluripotent cells or directly derived from fibroblasts will test the hypothesis that hypermetabolism is shared by fibroblasts and neurons.

We deemed that we could exploit the metabolic differences between disease and control lines and between sALS and PLS to identify disease classifiers. Despite the significant differences among groups in bioenergetic parameters, because of the large variability of the values, no single metric performed well enough to be used individually as a predictive classifier (e.g., to discriminate between controls, sALS and PLS). To overcome the constraints associated with single parameters, we opted to use multivariate analyses. We implemented a widely employed machine learning method of supervised multivariate analysis, the SVM, which takes all bioenergetics parameters from each cell line as input to make a prediction. This system generates its own hypothesis based on a learning process and produces a model for a decision boundary. The model was able to distinguish control and disease lines (sALS, PLS and C9Orf72 combined) with moderate accuracy, likely because the variability among the disease groups. Importantly, we found that sALS and PLS fibroblasts could be distinguished with high specificity using the machine learning model.

This result suggests that a machine learning model based on fibroblast bioenergetics may serve as a classifier to predict, prior to a definite clinical diagnosis, whether a patient will develop sALS or the milder motor neuron disease PLS, a prediction that would have clear prognostic implications. Admittedly, machine learning works best with high number of examples and more diverse features than the ones currently available to us. Although our collection of ALS fibroblast lines is likely one of the largest in existence, we predict that expanding the database with additional lines and features will increase the performance of the classification model. In addition, since in this work we did not have enough C9orf72 lines to be able to analyze them as a separate group, in the future it will be important increase the C9orf72 cohort. This would allow us to include them in the multivariate analyses of disease groups, for example to predict whether a C9orf72 patient will develop frontotemporal dementia, ALS, or both. Another development could include patients with different neuropathies, such as spinal muscular atrophy and hereditary spastic paraplegia, to assess whether the model’s power of distinction between sALS from PLS can be also extended to other forms of lower and upper motor neuron degeneration.

Conclusions

We have identified bioenergetic markers of hypermetabolism in ALS fibroblasts. These findings will open new avenues of investigation of the molecular and biochemical mechanisms responsible for the bioenergetic modifications and their relationship to disease pathogenesis. We have also devised a novel approach that utilizes bioenergetic features to distinguish between fibroblast groups, which performed well in discriminating between sALS and PLS. Therefore, it is conceivable that analyses of fibroblasts bioenergetic features will help to stratify ALS patients into well-defined classes (e.g., hypermetabolic vs. normometabolic), to preselect patients entering clinical trials or to be used as post hoc criteria to interpret trial results. They could also help developing makers of prognosis and response to therapy, by implementing longitudinal studies on ALS fibroblast bioenergetics on subsequent skin biopsies obtained during disease progression and during the course of treatments.

Abbreviations

2DG:

2-Deoxy-D-glucose

AA + Rot:

Antimycin A + Rotenone

ALS:

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

ALSFRS:

ALS Functional Rating Scale

BMI:

Body mass index

DMEM:

Dulbecco modified Eagle medium

ECAR:

Extracellular acidification rate

FCCP:

Cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

MTG:

MitoTracker Green

OCR:

Oxygen consumption rate

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PLS:

Primary lateral sclerosis

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

sALS:

Sporadic ALS

SVM:

Support vector machine

TMRM:

Tetramethylrhodamine-methyl-ester

References

  1. Talbott EO, Malek AM, Lacomis D. The epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;138:225–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chio A, Calvo A, Moglia C, Mazzini L, Mora G, group Ps. Phenotypic heterogeneity of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:740–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz JS, Barohn RJ, Dimachkie MM, Mitsumoto H. The dilemma of the clinical trialist in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the hurdles to finding a cure. Neurol Clin. 2015;33:937–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Menke RA, Agosta F, Grosskreutz J, Filippi M, Turner MR. Neuroimaging endpoints in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;14(1):11–23.

  5. Grolez G, Moreau C, Danel-Brunaud V, Delmaire C, Lopes R, Pradat PF, El Mendili MM, Defebvre L, Devos D. The value of magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rutkove SB, Caress JB, Cartwright MS, Burns TM, Warder J, David WS, Goyal N, Maragakis NJ, Clawson L, Benatar M, et al. Electrical impedance myography as a biomarker to assess ALS progression. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012;13:439–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y, Liu XH, Wu JJ, Ren HM, Wang J, Ding ZT, Jiang YP. Proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp Ther Med. 2016;11:2095–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Oeckl PP, Jardel CPP, Salachas FM, Lamari FM, Andersen PMMP, Bowser RP, de Carvalho MP, Costa JP, van Damme PMP, Gray EP, et al. Multicenter validation of CSF neurofilaments as diagnostic biomarkers for ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2016;17:404–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehnert S, Costa J, de Carvalho M, Kirby J, Kuzma-Kozakiewicz M, Morelli C, Robberecht W, Shaw P, Silani V, Steinacker P, et al. Multicentre quality control evaluation of different biomarker candidates for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15:344–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinacker P, Feneberg E, Weishaupt J, Brettschneider J, Tumani H, Andersen PM, von Arnim CA, Bohm S, Kassubek J, Kubisch C, et al. Neurofilaments in the diagnosis of motoneuron diseases: a prospective study on 455 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:12–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsukie T, Masaki H, Yoshida S, Fujikura M, Ono S. Decreased amount of collagen in the skin of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the Kii peninsula of Japan. Acta Neurol Taiwanica. 2014;23:82–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ono S, Toyokura Y, Mannen T, Ishibashi Y. Increased dermal collagen density in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 1988;83:81–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ono S, Imai T, Tsumura M, Takahashi K, Jinnai K, Suzuki M, Tagawa A, Shimizu N. Increased serum hyaluronic acid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: relation to its skin content. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2000;1:213–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beach RL, Rao JS, Festoff BW, Reyes ET, Yanagihara R, Gajdusek DC. Collagenase activity in skin fibroblasts of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 1986;72:49–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang L, Huber-Abel F, Teuchert M, Hendrich C, Dorst J, Schattauer D, Zettlmeissel H, Wlaschek M, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Tumani H, et al. Linking neuron and skin: matrix metalloproteinases in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). J Neurol Sci. 2009;285:62–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fang L, Teuchert M, Huber-Abel F, Schattauer D, Hendrich C, Dorst J, Zettlmeissel H, Wlaschek M, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Kapfer T, et al. MMP-2 and MMP-9 are elevated in spinal cord and skin in a mouse model of ALS. J Neurol Sci. 2010;294:51–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fukazawa H, Tsukie T, Higashida K, Fujikura M, Ono S. An immunohistochemical study of increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the skin of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20:1371–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Higashida K, Tsukie T, Fukazawa H, Fujikura M, Ono S. Immunohistochemical studies of angiogenin in the skin of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2013;326:18–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishikawa H, Yasui K, Oketa Y, Suzuki M, Ono S. Increased expression of valosin-containing protein in the skin of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:522–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu WC, Liu T, Liu ZH, Deng M. Detection the mutated protein aggregation and mitochondrial function in fibroblasts from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients with SOD1 gene mutations. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016;96:1982–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oketa Y, Higashida K, Fukasawa H, Tsukie T, Ono S. Abundant FUS-immunoreactive pathology in the skin of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;128:257–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ono S, Hu J, Shimizu N, Imai T, Nakagawa H. Increased interleukin-6 of skin and serum in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2001;187:27–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Suzuki M, Mikami H, Watanabe T, Yamano T, Yamazaki T, Nomura M, Yasui K, Ishikawa H, Ono S. Increased expression of TDP-43 in the skin of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2010;122:367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suzuki M, Watanabe T, Mikami H, Nomura M, Yamazaki T, Irie T, Ishikawa H, Yasui K, Ono S. Immunohistochemical studies of vascular endothelial growth factor in skin of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2009;285:125–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang X, Zhou S, Ding X, Ma M, Zhang J, Zhou Y, Wu E, Teng J. Activation of ER stress and autophagy induced by TDP-43 A315T as pathogenic mechanism and the corresponding histological changes in skin as potential biomarker for ALS with the mutation. Int J Biol Sci. 2015;11:1140–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Watanabe T, Okeda Y, Yamano T, Ono S. An immunohistochemical study of ubiquitin in the skin of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2010;298:52–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang S, Zhang KY, Kariawasam R, Bax M, Fifita JA, Ooi L, Yerbury JJ, Nicholson GA, Blair IP. Evaluation of skin fibroblasts from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients for the rapid study of pathological features. Neurotox Res. 2015;28:138–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sances S, Bruijn LI, Chandran S, Eggan K, Ho R, Klim JR, Livesey MR, Lowry E, Macklis JD, Rushton D, et al. Modeling ALS with motor neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:542–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Pare B, Gros-Louis F. Potential skin involvement in ALS: revisiting Charcot’s observation - a review of skin abnormalities in ALS. Rev Neurosci. 2017;28:551–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pare B, Touzel-Deschenes L, Lamontagne R, Lamarre MS, Scott FD, Khuong HT, Dion PA, Bouchard JP, Gould P, Rouleau GA, et al. Early detection of structural abnormalities and cytoplasmic accumulation of TDP-43 in tissue-engineered skins derived from ALS patients. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirk K, Gennings C, Hupf JC, Tadesse S, D'Aurelio M, Kawamata H, Valsecchi F, Mitsumoto H, Groups APCS, Manfredi G. Bioenergetic markers in skin fibroblasts of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and progressive lateral sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 2014;76:620–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. McCombe PA, Henderson RD. Effects of gender in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Gend Med. 2010;7:557–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Divakaruni AS, Paradyse A, Ferrick DA, Murphy AN, Jastroch M. Analysis and interpretation of microplate-based oxygen consumption and pH data. Methods Enzymol. 2014;547:309–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Allen SP, Duffy LM, Shaw PJ, Grierson AJ. Altered age-related changes in bioenergetic properties and mitochondrial morphology in fibroblasts from sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36:2893–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vielhaber S, Winkler K, Kirches E, Kunz D, Buchner M, Feistner H, Elger CE, Ludolph AC, Riepe MW, Kunz WS. Visualization of defective mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle fibers of patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 1999;169:133–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Onesto E, Colombrita C, Gumina V, Borghi MO, Dusi S, Doretti A, Fagiolari G, Invernizzi F, Moggio M, Tiranti V, et al. Gene-specific mitochondria dysfunctions in human TARDBP and C9ORF72 fibroblasts. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4:47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study used fibroblast samples from the NINDS Repository, as well as clinical data related to the samples. NINDS Repository sample numbers corresponding to the samples used are: (ND39022, ND39023, ND29422, ND29774, ND29149, AG13244, AG12598, AG13285, AG14284, AG11482, AG13150, AG13968, AG12657, AG12597, AG12851, AG11489, AG12964, AG12850, AG13144, AG13994, AG14048, AG13348, AG13990).

Funding

This work was funded by NIH R01NS062055 and by ALS Association grant 15-IIP-195 to GM.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, 407 East 61st Street, RR507, New York, NY, 10065, USA

    Csaba Konrad, Hibiki Kawamata, Kirsten G. Bredvik, Andrea J. Arreguin, Steven A. Cajamarca & Giovanni Manfredi

  2. Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Jonathan C. Hupf & Hiroshi Mitsumoto

  3. Department of Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    John M. Ravits

  4. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Timothy M. Miller

  5. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Nicholas J. Maragakis

  6. Department of Neurology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Chadwick M. Hales & Jonathan D. Glass

  7. Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Steven Gross

Authors
  1. Csaba Konrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hibiki Kawamata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kirsten G. Bredvik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea J. Arreguin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Steven A. Cajamarca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jonathan C. Hupf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John M. Ravits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Timothy M. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nicholas J. Maragakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chadwick M. Hales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jonathan D. Glass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Steven Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hiroshi Mitsumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Giovanni Manfredi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Key contributors: CK, HK, KGB, AJA, SAC, MS, SG, HM, GM. Data acquisition contributors: JCH, JMR, TMM, NJM, CMH, JDG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Manfredi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Flux analysis of control, sALS and PLS fibroblasts under forced oxidative metabolism in galactose medium. Scatter plots of OCR baseline (A; Control mean: 3850.0, SD: 1936.7; sALS mean: 3307.5, SD: 1430.7; PLS mean: 2989.2, SD: 1164.7), oligomycin sensitive rate (B; Control mean: 3630.0, SD: 1772.0; sALS mean: 2835.0, SD: 1135.4; PLS mean: 2707.5, SD: 1138.9), maximal respiratory capacity (C; Control mean: 5325.8, SD: 2993.3; sALS mean: 3613.3, SD: 1662.5; PLS mean: 3741.7, SD: 2102.3), spare respiratory capacity (D; Control mean: 1478.8, SD: 1385.2; sALS mean: 306.8, SD: 589.2; PLS mean: 754.5, SD: 1120.1), ECAR baseline (E; Control mean: 1114.8, SD: 349.3; sALS mean: 1063.3, SD: 573.2; PLS mean: 1007.8, SD: 351.7), and OCR base/ECAR base (F; Control mean: 3.6, SD: 1.3; sALS mean: 3.5, SD: 1.4; PLS mean: 3.3, SD: 1.4). Values are shown comparing sALS, PLS, and control lines. Middle bars represent the average values and error bars show standard deviations. p-values are indicated where there was a significant difference between groups. n.s.: no significant difference. n = 12 sALS; n = 12 PLS, n = 12 controls. (DOCX 132 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konrad, C., Kawamata, H., Bredvik, K.G. et al. Fibroblast bioenergetics to classify amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Mol Neurodegeneration 12, 76 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-017-0217-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-017-0217-5

Keywords

Molecular Neurodegeneration

ISSN: 1750-1326