Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Mitochondrial complex I abnormalities is associated with tau and clinical symptoms in mild Alzheimer’s disease

Molecular Neurodegeneration volume 16, Article number: 28 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mitochondrial electron transport chain abnormalities have been reported in postmortem pathological specimens of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, it remains unclear how amyloid and tau are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in vivo. The purpose of this study is to assess the local relationships between mitochondrial dysfunction and AD pathophysiology in mild AD using the novel mitochondrial complex I PET imaging agent [18F]BCPP-EF.

Methods

Thirty-two amyloid and tau positive mild stage AD dementia patients (mean age ± SD: 71.1 ± 8.3 years) underwent a series of PET measurements with [18F]BCPP-EF mitochondrial function, [11C]PBB3 for tau deposition, and [11C] PiB for amyloid deposition. Age-matched normal control subjects were also recruited. Inter and intrasubject comparisons of levels of mitochondrial complex I activity, amyloid and tau deposition were performed.

Results

The [18F]BCPP-EF uptake was significantly lower in the medial temporal area, highlighting the importance of the mitochondrial involvement in AD pathology. [11C]PBB3 uptake was greater in the temporo-parietal regions in AD. Region of interest analysis in the Braak stage I-II region showed significant negative correlation between [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and [11C]PBB3 BPND (R = 0.2679, p = 0.04), but not [11C] PiB SUVR.

Conclusions

Our results indicated that mitochondrial complex I is closely associated with tau load evaluated by [11C]PBB3, which might suffer in the presence of its off-target binding. The absence of association between mitochondrial complex I dysfunction with amyloid load suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction in the trans-entorhinal and entorhinal region is a reflection of neuronal injury occurring in the brain of mild AD.

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized neuropathologically by the presence of senile plaques with extracellular aggregation of amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau neurofibrillary tangles [1]. In addition to Aβ and tau, neuroinflammation and oxidative stress reactions are observed in AD pathogenesis [2]. Mitochondria are responsible for not only energy supply of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) but also main intracellular source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that cause cellular damage [2, 3]. Mitochondrial dysfunction was reported to be play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis in AD [4, 5]. Previous studies showed that Aβ directly affected mitochondrial bioenergetics and produced mitochondrial morphological change [6]. However, our recent study did not support the theory that Aβ deposition itself accelerates mitochondrial dysfunction in AD [7]. According to the amyloid cascade hypothesis of AD, Aβ is responsible for triggering downstream tau pathology which is closely related neurodegeneration [8]. Tau localizes predominantly in axons and contributes to the axonal transport [9]; the accumulation of pathological tau affects mitochondrial transport and causes mitochondrial dysfunction [5, 9]. Therefore, depicting mitochondrial dysfunction might be a useful marker to elucidate the effects of tau pathology on neuronal function. In turn, mitochondrial dysfunction leads to neuronal degeneration were reported to be associated with ROS [3, 10]. Oxidative stress contributes to tau phosphorylation and formation of neurofibrillary tangles [11]. Our recent work in tau transgenic mice (rTg4510 TauTg) showed a significance of tau pathology for mitochondrial dysfunction [12]. Thus, an in vivo study in the clinical setting is needed to verify the relationships between tau pathology and mitochondrial dysfunction in the living brains of patients with AD.

[18F]BCPP-EF is a newly developed PET tracer which binds to mitochondrial complex I (MC-I) [13]. In the electron transport chain (ETC) in mitochondria, MC-I is the first and rate-limiting enzyme required for ATP production and is a site of ROS production [14, 15]. [18F]BCPP-EF also permits the investigation of the topographical distribution of mitochondrial dysfunction, as well as relationships with tau-PET parametric changes. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between MC-I availability, Aβ and tau deposition, and their influence on cognitive decline in mild AD patients using PET. We predict a pathophysiological association between tau pathology and MC-I availability in the clinical setting.

Methods

Participant

Thirty-two patients with relatively mild stage AD at the clinical dementia rating (CDR) of 0.5 or 1 (11 men and 21 women; mean age ± SD, 71.1 ± 8.3 years, all right-handed) were enrolled in this study [16]. Neuropsychological assessment for all patients comprised the Mental State Examination (MMSE) for global cognitive function. Twenty-five out of thirty-two patients completed Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical memory II (delayed recall) (story A and B) score (WMSR-LM) for episodic memory [17], and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) for executive function. The diagnosis of AD was based on the criteria of National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease (NIA/AA AD) [18]. To confirm the diagnosis of AD biologically, all patients underwent [11C] PiB PET scan to show the Aβ pathology as described below in detail. In addition, all patients underwent [11C]PBB3 scan or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) test including total tau and phosphor-tau to confirm the tau pathology (described below). We confirmed that all patients showed positive [11C] PiB uptake in the cerebral cortex, and increased [11C]PBB3 uptake in the cerebral cortex or increased CSF phospho-tau. Furthermore, patients with cerebrovascular disease, white matter lesion (Fazekas score were 2 or 3) [19], hydrocephalus, brain tumor, epileptic foci, or traumatic brain injury were excluded based on brain MRI findings. Based on the electroencephalography, patients with epilepsy were excluded. In addition, participants whose Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores were more than 60, indicating obvious depression, were excluded [20]. Patients with anxiety were excluded by using anxiety subscale of neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) [21]. All patients with AD were taking a donepezil (5 mg) at entry.

Two groups of age-matched normal control subjects were also recruited. Control group for [18F]BCPP-EF evaluations consisted of 17 healthy subjects (10 men and 7 women: mean age ± SD, 66.6 ± 9.4 years) and control group for [11C]PBB3 evaluations consisted of 18 healthy subjects (8 men and 10 women: mean age ± SD, 69.5 ± 8.8 years). To reduce the radiation exposure in controls subjects, two control groups were investigated, and each control group underwent [18F]BCPP-EF or [11C] PBB3 respectively. All controls were right-handed and had no neurological problems, no history of head injury, psychiatric disease, serious medical illness, major surgery, or no family history of dementia. Their CDR score was zero, indicating no dementia [16]. Participants whose MMSE scores were less than 24, indicating global cognitive decline, were excluded [22]. Participants were excluded if they had MRI findings such as cerebrovascular disease, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor, hydrocephalus and epileptic foci. No significant differences in age and gender were found between the two control groups.

This study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders (SIEND), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, and Hamamatsu Medical Center. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects to participate in the study.

MRI scanning

Before the PET scan, 1.5 Tesla MRI (General Electric Healthcare, Japan) of the brain was performed with three-dimensional mode sampling to determine the brain areas in which to establish regions of interest (ROI). The scanning parameters were as follows: TR = 8.6 ms; TE = 3.6 ms; flip angle 25°; acquisition matrix = 256 × 224; FOV = 240 mm; 124 contiguous sagittal sections, each with a thickness of 1.4 mm; and a resolution of 0.9375 mm × 1.0714 mm × 1.4 mm. T2-weighted FLAIR images were also obtained to exclude the potential abnormalities described above. The MRI measurements and mobile PET gantry allows us to reconstruct PET images parallel to the intercommissural (anterior commissure-posterior commissure [AC-PC]) line without reslicing. Thus, we were able to locate the ROI in the target regions of the original PET images.

PET measurement

All participants underwent a series of PET measurements using a high-resolution brain PET scanner (SHR12000; Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Japan) [23], yielding 47 slices simultaneously. All thirty two AD patients completed [18F]BCPP-EF and [11C] PiB PET scan. Among the AD patients, sixteen out of thirty-two patients completed both [18F]BCPP-EF and [11C]PBB3 scan. A thermoplastic face mask was used to fix the head to the same place during the scans. Orbitomeatal line was defined by direct visual inspection of the subject and was aligned with a laser. On the other hand, the landmarks on the MR image were AC-PC line and orbitomeatal line. We analyzed the angles between the AC-PC line and orbitomeatal line on the MRI image. The PET gantry was set parallel to the AC-PC line determined by MRI by tilting and moving the gantry for each study. After backprojection and filtering (Hanning filter, cutoff frequency 0.2 cycles per pixel), the image resolution was 2.9 × 2.9 × 3.4 mm full-width half-maximum (FWHM). The voxel of each reconstructed image measured 1.3 × 1.3 × 3.4 mm. A 10-min transmission scan for attenuation correction with a 68Ge/68Ga source was conducted under resting conditions. After fasting overnight for at least 12 h, dynamic PET scans with 33 frames (serial emission scan: 6 frames× 10 s, 3 × 20, 6 × 60, 4 × 180, and 14 × 300) were obtained for 90 min, after a slow bolus venous injection (taking 1 min) of a 2 MBq/kg dose of [18F]BCPP-EF (106.8 ± 20.6 MBq). Within a few weeks allowance interval, dynamic PET scans with 29 frames (serial emission scan: 6 frames× 10 s, 3 × 20, 6 × 60, 4 × 180, and 10 × 300) were also obtained for 70 min after injection of 6 MBq/kg dose of [11C] PBB3 (295.9 ± 55.7 MBq). A few months prior to the current study, all patients were scanned with [11C] PiB PET to confirm the AD diagnosis biologically. After fasting overnight for at least 12 h, dynamic PET scans with 25 frames (serial emission scan: 6 frames × 10 s, 3 × 20, 2 × 60, 2 × 180, 8 × 300) were obtained for 70 min after injection of a 6 MBq/kg dose of [11C] PiB (255.1 ± 49.6 MBq). No arterial sampling was performed along with the series of PET measurements.

PET imaging data processing

All PET data processing procedures were performed using PMOD 3.4 software (PMOD Technologies Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland). Co-registering the MRI and PET images was also determined by PMOD. To evaluate mitochondrial availability, semiquantitative evaluation based on the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was calculated as reported recently [7]. The parametric [18F]BCPP-EF late-phase images were extracted from the interval between 70 and 90 min after injection. The standardized uptake value (SUV) of each region were divided by the SUV of whole brain as a reference region, and expressed as the SUVR image. Although a recent research demonstrated that centrum semiovale could be used as a reference region for estimating SUVR [17], our previous report showed that the semiquantitative value of [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR relative to the whole brain was positively correlated with the quantitatively estimated value of [18F]BCPP-EF volume of the distribution (VT) [7]. In addition, ROIs were manually drawn over the centrum semiovale on the MR image of each subject, these ROIs were placed onto corresponding original [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR parametric images. [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR image relative to the centrum semiovale was also created. We confirmed a better correlation between semiquantitative value of [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR relative to the whole brain and [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR relative to the centrum semiovale (Sup. Figure 1). Therefore, the use of [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR relative to the whole brain was adequate for semiquantitative evaluation.

To evaluate tau accumulation, the binding potential (BPND) of [11C]PBB3 was estimated with the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) as described elsewhere [23]. Irregular manual ROI were located on the pons on the MR image in reference to MRI atlas. These ROIs were then automatically transferred onto corresponding [11C]PBB3 parametric images. The pons ROI was selected as the reference region. A global [11C]PBB3 BPND outside the mean + 2SD was considered be abnormal.

To evaluate Aβ accumulation, we used SUVR, normalized by the cerebellar grey matter. MRI was also used to set the ROI of the cerebellum. A global [11C] PiB SUVR larger than 1.4 was considered to be abnormal [24].

After creating SUVR or BPND images, all PET images were normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space and smoothed with an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 8 mm at FWHM. Then, all the image matrix and pixel resolution were interpolated to match those of the International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM)-152 (193 × 229 × 193 with 1 mm pixel resolution).

Even though we used a high-resolution scanner and dedicated means for accurate positioning of PET and MRI images, PET data were corrected for partial volume using the Muller-Gartne method [19].

Voxel-based analysis

To identify the brain region that exhibits decreased levels of [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and higher levels of [11C]PBB3 BPND in the patients with AD than in age-matched control subjects, we performed a voxel-based t-test using the VoxelStats toolbox (https://github.com/sulantha2006/VoxelStats) running on MATLAB 8.5.0 (The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) [25, 26]. All voxel-based regression analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons using random field theory threshold with a cluster threshold at p < 0.001. This VoxelStats allows a comparison between age-matched groups, or conversely it cannot be applied when comparing groups with a significant age difference (https://github.com/sulantha2006/VoxelStats). In this study, albeit there was a wide age-range with a high SD between them, no significant difference of age between groups allowed to dismiss the procedure in treating age as a covariate.

ROI analysis

We focused on medial temporal areas, a site of early tau accumulation [27,28,29]. We created FreeSurfer-derived ROI corresponding anatomically to the Braak staging regions of tau pathology as described elsewhere: Braak stage I-II (i.e., trans-entorhinal cortex, entorhinal cortex and hippocampus) [30,31,32]. White matter voxels were removed from the Braak stage ROI by using ICBM-152 Gy matter atlas (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesAtlases/ICBM152NLin2009) (Fig. 2a). We blurred Braak stage ROI to a FWHM of 8 mm (the same resolution as the PET images). This ROI was then automatically transferred onto corresponding [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR, [11C]PBB3 BPND, [11C] PiB SUVR images. Then, regional [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR, [11C]PBB3 BPND, and [11C] PiB SUVR derived from this regional Braak ROI were determined. Using segmented MRI information allowed us to exclude data of the cerebrospinal fluid space. Pearson’s correlation analysis and linear regression analysis with the GraphPad Prism 5.0 package (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) were calculated to explore the relationships among mitochondrial activity ([18F]BCPP-EF), tau deposition ([11C]PBB3), Aβ deposition ([11C]PiB), and neuropsychological tests (MMSE, WMSR-LM, and FAB). In addition, t-test was conducted to compare the mitochondrial activity or tau deposition between AD and control subjects. Statistical significance in the Braak I-II ROI was set to p < 0.05 without multiple comparison. Because this test was exploratory with a priori knowledge of tau induced mitochondrial dysfunction in AD [12], the region including the trans-entorhinal, entorhinal and hippocampal cortices was a central target of interest in this study.

Similarly, to reject the possibility for significant contribution of tau aggregated at the Braak III-VI stage, Pearson’s correlation analysis and t-test were conducted in the Braak stage III-IV region that covers the amygdala, parahippocampus, fusiform, lingual gyrus, insula, inferior temporal, lateral temporal, posterior cingulate, and inferior parietal cortex (Fig. 3a) and Braak stage V-VI region that covers the orbitofrontal, superior temporal, inferior frontal, cuneus, anterior cingulate, supramarginal gyrus, lateral occipital, precuneus, superior parietal, superior frontal, rostro medial frontal, paracentral, postcentral, precentral, and pericalcarine (Fig. 4a).

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Demographic and AD-related clinical factors are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the Alzheimer’s disease patient group and control groups
Full size table

Comparison of the [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR, and [11C]PBB3 BPND, between AD and control groups

A voxel-based t-test showed that a significant reduction in [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR was observed in the medial and lateral temporal, parietal, frontal cortex, precuneus, cingulate gyrus, thalamus, and basal ganglia in the total AD group compared with the control group (Fig. 1a). A voxel-based regression model showed that a significant increase in [11C]PBB3 BPND was observed in the medial and lateral sides of the temporal and parietal lobes including the parahippocampus and hippocampus in the AD group compared with the control group (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Voxelwise results for [18F]BCPP-EF and [11C]PBB3 in the whole brain in AD patients. T statistical parametric map corrected for multiple comparisons using random field theory at p < 0.001, overlaid on the Montreal Neurological Institute 152 reference template. Color bar represents the T-value. a The regions in which the [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR in the AD group were significant reduced compared to control group (b) The regions in which the [11C]PBB3 BPND in the AD group were significant increased compared to control group

Full size image

ROI analysis

Direct comparisons between [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and [11C]PBB3 BPND identified a significant negative correlation in the Braak stage I-II ROI (Fig. 2a, d). However, there was no correlation between [18F] BCPP-EF SUVR and [11C] PiB SUVR (Fig. 2e). In addition, there were no significant correlations between [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and [11C]PBB3 BPND or [11C] PiB SUVR in the Braak stage III-IV ROI and V-VI ROI (Figs. 3d, e, 4d, e).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation analyses between [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and [11C]PBB3 BPND, [11C] PiB SUVR, or neuropsychological battery scores in the Braak stage I-II region of interest (ROI) in patients with AD. a Brain area of Braak stage I-II ROI overlaid on the Montreal Neurological Institute 152 reference template. b The regional [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR in AD (n = 32) was significant lower than that in the controls (n = 17). c The regional [11C]PBB3 BPND in AD (n = 32) was significant higher than that in the controls (n = 18). d There was significant negative correlation of [18F] BCPP-EF SUVR with [11C]PBB3 BPND (n = 16). e Correlation of [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR with [11C] PiB SUVR failed to reach significance (n = 32). f, g, h There was significant positive correlation of [18F] BCPP-EF SUVR with Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical memory score (n = 25), but not Mini-Mental Examination score (n = 32) or Frontal Assessment Battery score (n = 25). i, j, k There was no significant positive correlation of [11C]PBB3 BPND with Mini-Mental Examination score, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical memory score, or Frontal Assessment Battery score (n = 16)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation analyses between [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and [11C]PBB3 BPND, [11C] PiB SUVR, or neuropsychological battery scores in the Braak stage III-IV region of interest (ROI) in patients with AD. a Brain area of Braak stage III-IV ROI overlaid on the Montreal Neurological Institute 152 reference template. b The regional [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR in AD (n = 32) was significant lower than that in the controls (n = 17). c The regional [11C]PBB3 BPND in AD (n = 32) was significant higher than that in the controls (n = 18). d, e There was no significant negative correlation of [18F] BCPP-EF SUVR with [11C]PBB3 BPND (n = 16) or [11C] PiB SUVR (n = 32). f, g, h There was significant positive correlation of [18F] BCPP-EF SUVR with Mini-Mental Examination score (n = 32) or Frontal Assessment Battery score (n = 25), but not Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical memory score (n = 25). i, j, k There was no significant positive correlation of [11C]PBB3 BPND with Mini-Mental Examination score, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical memory score, or Frontal Assessment Battery score (n = 16)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlation analyses between [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and [11C]PBB3 BPND, [11C] PiB SUVR, or neuropsychological battery scores in the Braak stage V-VI region of interest (ROI) in patients with AD. a Brain area of Braak stage V-VI ROI overlaid on the Montreal Neurological Institute 152 reference template. b The regional [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR in AD (n = 32) was significant lower than that in the controls (n = 17). c The regional [11C]PBB3 BPND in AD (n = 32) was significant higher than that in the controls (n = 18). d, e There was no significant negative correlation of [18F] BCPP-EF SUVR with [11C]PBB3 BPND (n = 16) or [11C] PiB SUVR (n = 32). f, g, h There was no significant positive correlation of [18F] BCPP-EF SUVR with Mini-Mental Examination score (n = 32), Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical memory score (n = 25), or Frontal Assessment Battery score (n = 25). i, j, k There was no significant positive correlation of [11C]PBB3 BPND with Mini-Mental Examination score, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical memory score, or Frontal Assessment Battery score (n = 16)

Full size image

There were positive correlations between the [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and WMSR-LM score in the Braak stage I-II ROI (Fig. 2g), but not MMSE or FAB score (Fig. 2f, h). However, there were positive correlations between the [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and MMSE score or FAB score in the Braak stage III-IV ROI (Fig. 3f, h), but not WMSR-LM score (Fig. 3g). There was no positive correlation between [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR and neuropsychological battery score in the Braak stage V-VI ROI (Fig. 4f, g, h). There was no positive correlation between [11C]PBB3 BPND and neuropsychological battery score in the Braak stage I-II, III-IV, V-VI ROI (Figs. 2i, j, k, 3i, j, k, 4i, j, k).

The regional [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR in the Braak stage I-II, III-IV, and V-VI ROI was significant lower in AD than in the controls (Figs. 2b, 3b, 4b). Between the controls and AD group without two patients who presented lower [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR in the Braak stage I-II ROI, the statistical significance was still observed (p = 0.0235) (data not shown). The regional [11C]PBB3 BPND in the Braak stage I-II, III-IV, and V-VI ROI was significant higher in AD than in the controls (Figs. 2c, 3c, 4c).

Discussion

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship of mitochondrial activity with tau pathology and its influence on clinical symptoms in mild AD dementia. The present study demonstrated decreased levels of MC-I availability in the temporal, parietal and frontal cortices, and significant increased level of tau load in the temporo-parietal and frontal cortices. Within the trans-entorhinal, entorhinal and hippocampal cortices (Braak stage I-II), levels of mitochondrial availability displayed a negative association with levels of tau aggregation, suggesting that intracellular and partly extracellular aggregation of tau is an important detrimental event for neuronal failure caused by MC-I availability in AD. No correlation was observed between levels of MC-I availability and Aβ accumulation. Altered MC-I availability in the trans-entorhinal and entorhinal region reflects a loss of normal homeostasis in neurons as an early biomarker of pathophysiology in AD.

It is increasingly recognized that mitochondrial dysfunction occurs in earlier disease stages [7, 10, 23] in AD. The present finding of mutual relation between mitochondrial dysfunction and tau pathology in AD is consistent with previous reports [7, 23], suggesting the coexistence of mitochondrial dysfunction and tau pathology. Because of this study’s cross-sectional design, it was not possible to infer whether mitochondrial dysfunction or these abnormal protein depositions occurs first. Since these analyses were exploratory, further study with multiple comparison will be needed. However, when the MC-I availability as measured with [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR is plotted against tau load measured with [11C]PBB3 BPND, the results provided the significant negative correlation in the ROI of Braak stage I-II. In addition, we confirmed altered MC-I availability and tau pathology in the Braak stage I-II ROI in AD, although the standard deviation was relatively large. According to the amyloid-β cascade hypothesis [33, 34], Aβ triggers tau pathology which is accompanied by subsequent neurodegeneration [8]. According to the Braak’s stage of tau distribution, pathological tau deposition initially occurs in the medial temporal area, followed by the frontal and lateral temporal area, and later spread to the primary motor and sensory areas [28, 33]. Tau pathology sequentially induces neurodegeneration, and greater tau load is related to longer disease duration [33].

Medial temporal area covering trans-entorhinal and entorhinal cortex are particularly vulnerable to AD-related pathological changes such as tau accumulation [28, 35]. Thus, it is likely that tau aggregation in AD constitutes an important detrimental event, imposing energy failure in neurons and neurodegeneration. Negligible associations between [18F]BCPP-EF with [11C] PiB suggested that mitochondrial damage in the trans-entorhinal and entorhinal regions is not directly linked directly to Aβ deposition in mild AD. In addition, the absence of association between reduced [18F]BCPP-EF with increased [11C] PiB may indicate that MC-I dysfunction is late and not early in the AD disease process. However, it is important to note that [11C] PiB SUVR is not a strong correlate of Aβ oligomers, toxic Aβ species and it is plausible that no correlation between MC-I uptake and the reactive or “benign” accumulation of Aβ plaques that happen with aging and are accelerated in AD.

[18F]BCPP-EF SUVR in Braak stage I-II area covering trans-entorhinal cortex and entorhinal cortex was positively correlated with the WMSR-LM score that reflects logical memory function [36]. Memory impairments are referred to as the early clinical manifestation of AD [37]. Correspondingly, in vivo imaging showed that tau pathology appears early in the medial temporal lobe, with medial temporal lobe atrophy and memory impairments continuing in AD [28]. Our result of reduced mitochondrial activity correlating with memory decline gives an additional important message such as a considerable contribution of an early mitochondrial dysfunction (supporting a mitochondrial cascade hypothesis [4]) to this tau-based memory impairment. In contrast, we failed to show any relationship between [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR in Braak stage I-II area and MMSE or FAB score. On the other hand, [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR in Braak stage III-IV area covering limbic area including temporal cortex and insula was positively correlated with the MMSE or FAB score. The MMSE and FAB scores reflect the levels of general cognition [22] and frontal lobe-based executive function [38]. These findings are consistent with the present clinical evaluation that the AD patients examined in this study were rated as those with mild severity of dementia. The lack of correlation between MC-I availability and MMSE in Braak stage I-II area might be due to the fact that this correlation builds up with the spreading of the pathological process to the later stages of tau accumulation in Braak stages III-IV area. In addition, the correlation between MC-I availability and FAB in not Braak stage I-II area but Braak stages III-IV area support the notion that executive dysfunction in AD appears after memory problems [37]. Thus, the level of [18F]BCPP-EF binding in the trans-entorhinal cortex and entorhinal cortex can be a biomarker that predicts the memory-dominant cognitive decline in mild AD. Although our previous study indicated the association between tau deposition detected by [11C]PBB3 BPND and MMSE score in the whole brain analysis [23], our ROI analysis failed to show any relationship between [11C]PBB3 BPND and neuropsychological battery scores in Braak stages area. This discrepancy might be a due to methodological differences. The relatively large size of the ROI (especially at the high Braak stages) used in this study might be an explanation for the lack of correlation.

The correlation between mitochondrial dysfunction and tau deposition was restricted to the early sites of tau accumulation, i.e. medial temporal region. In this study, patients with mild AD (CDR0.5 or 1) were recruited. Therefore, there might be a chance of positive correlation between mitochondrial dysfunction and tau deposition more widely if preclinical or more severe stage of AD were recruited. Other than the genetical reason, mitochondrial dysfunction can be caused by various factors such as neuroinflammation and misfolded proteins like Aβ and tau [4, 34]. Once mitochondria are impaired, mitochondria-generated ROS causes neuroinflammation [2, 34, 39], and mitochondria are in turn targeted at by generated ROS [2, 40, 41]. Our results indicated the presence of MC-I dysfunction in the subcortical areas outside the cortical region. Subcortical area such as thalamus and basal ganglia were reported to be one of the brain areas showing mitochondrial dysfunction, which were associated with wide neuronal loss and synaptic alternations [42]. Future studies are needed to know how neuroinflammation contributes to the exacerbation of the brain milieu in a vicious cycle by tau aggregation and mitochondrial dysfunction [34].

There are several limitations that must be considered when interpreting this study. The sample size was small. Although there was no significant difference of age between AD patients and controls subjects, the relatively wide age range and high standard deviation of both groups might be a confounding factor. Hence, it might be more appropriate to consider many factors affecting the brain functions and morphology such as age, education, diet etc. as confounding covariates. Although the setting of ROIs was completely automatic, any automatic manipulation would suffer more or less misplacement of ROIs even in spatially-normalized images (which sometimes accompanies distortion), which might cause an interpretation bias in this study. However, this possible bias is a universal problem to be overcome in in vivo imaging studies even using spatially normalized images. To reduce the criticism, we are referring to the widely-accepted atlas. Previous studies indicated that the first-generation of tau tracers such as [11C]PBB3 showed off-target binding in the basal ganglia, thalamus, choroid plexus, and venous sinus [43]. Therefore, we need to be cautious about describing any increase in [11C]PBB3 BPND in these areas. The spill-over radioactivity might affect the signal. The localization of the choroid plexus in the lateral ventricles, in close proximity to the hippocampus could lead to problematic quantification of the tracer retention and asymmetric fixation of [11C]PBB3 [44]. Additional studies with other tau PET tracer are needed to confirm our result [45]. In addition, an association between mitochondrial dysfunction and tau deposition could only be examined in AD patients at relatively mild clinical stage, and the utility of MC-I PET in predementia AD is not known. Despite this preliminary condition, the present information about within subject changes in these pathophysiological biomarkers would help understand the prognostic use of mitochondrial dysfunction as a biomarker in mild AD. To confirm this, further studies with large sample size and several disease stages of AD patients are needed by focusing changes in the associations between mitochondrial dysfunction and misfolded proteins aggregation or neuronal damage.

Conclusions

This study provides in vivo evidence that MC-I impairment coincides with tau deposition in the trans-entorhinal and entorhinal region, which contributes to the memory decline in mild AD. Assessing MC-I availability by [18F]BCPP-EF PET may constitute a valuable tool for evaluating the pathophysiology of AD from the perspective of mitochondrial hypothesis, which can open numerous therapeutic avenues.

Availability of data and materials

Anonymized data not published within the article will be shared on reasonable request from any qualified investigator.\

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

Aβ:

Amyloid-β

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

BCPP-EF:

2-tert- butyl-4-chloro-5–2Hpyridazin-3-one

PET:

Positron emission tomography

MC-I:

Mitochondrial complex I

ETC:

Electron transport chain

CDR:

Clinical dementia rating

MMSE:

Mental State Examination

WMSR-LM:

Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical memory

FAB:

Frontal Assessment Battery

SDS:

Self-rating Depression Scale

NPI:

Neuropsychiatric inventory

NIA/AA AD:

National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease

PiB:

Pittsburg compound B

PBB3:

Pyridinyl-butadienyl-benzothiazole 3

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

ROI:

Regions of interest

AC-PC:

Anterior commissure-posterior commissure

FWHM:

Full-width half-maximum

SUVR:

Standardized uptake value ratio

SUV:

Standardized uptake value

BPND :

Binding potential

SRTM:

Simplified reference tissue model

MNI:

Montreal Neurological Institute

ICBM:

International Consortium for Brain Mapping

References

  1. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018.

  2. Lautrup S, Lou G, Aman Y, Nilsen H, Tao J, Fang EF. Microglial mitophagy mitigates neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Int. 2019;129:104469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104469.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang WJ, Zhang X, Chen WW. Role of oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease. Biomed Rep. 2016;4(5):519–22. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2016.630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Swerdlow RH. Mitochondria and mitochondrial cascades in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(3):1403–16. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W, Zhao F, Ma X, Perry G, Zhu X. Mitochondria dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease: recent advances. Mol Neurodegener. 2020;15(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-020-00376-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cabezas-Opazo FA, Vergara-Pulgar K, Perez MJ, Jara C, Osorio-Fuentealba C, Quintanilla RA. Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:509654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Terada T, Obi T, Bunai T, Matsudaira T, Yoshikawa E, Ando I, et al. In vivo mitochondrial and glycolytic impairments in patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2020;94(15):e1592–e604. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009249.

  8. Hardy JA, Higgins GA. Alzheimer's disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Science. 1992;256(5054):184–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1566067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perez MJ, Jara C, Quintanilla RA. Contribution of tau pathology to mitochondrial impairment in Neurodegeneration. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00441.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang X, Wang W, Li L, Perry G, Lee HG, Zhu X. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1842;2014:1240–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Z, Li T, Li P, Wei N, Zhao Z, Liang H, et al. The ambiguous relationship of oxidative stress, tau hyperphosphorylation, and autophagy dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:352723.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barron AM, Ji B, Fujinaga M, Zhang M-R, Suhara T, Sahara N, et al. In vivo PET imaging of mitochondrial abnormalities in a mouse model of tauopathy. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;94:140–8.

  13. Harada N, Nishiyama S, Kanazawa M, Tsukada H. Development of novel PET probes, [18F]BCPP-EF, [18F]BCPP-BF, and [11C]BCPP-EM for mitochondrial complex 1 imaging in the living brain. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2013;56(11):553–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murayama C, Kawaguchi AT, Kamijo A, Naito K, Kanazawa M, Tsukada H. Monitoring mitochondrial complex-I activity using novel PET probe 18F-BCPP-EF allows early detection of radiotherapy effect in murine squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0170911. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170911.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsukada H, Nishiyama S, Ohba H, Kanazawa M, Kakiuchi T, Harada N. Comparing amyloid-beta deposition, neuroinflammation, glucose metabolism, and mitochondrial complex I activity in brain: a PET study in aged monkeys. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(11):2127–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2821-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140(6):566–72. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.140.6.566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn YD, Yi D, Joung H, Seo EH, Lee YH, Byun MS, et al. Normative data for the logical memory subtest of the Wechsler memory scale-IV in middle-aged and elderly Korean people. Psychiatry Investig. 2019;16(11):793–9. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2019.0061.

  18. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Muller-Gartner HW, Links JM, Prince JL, Bryan RN, McVeigh E, Leal JP, et al. Measurement of radiotracer concentration in brain gray matter using positron emission tomography: MRI-based correction for partial volume effects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992;12(4):571–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1992.81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmes CB, Fouty HE, Wurtz PJ, Burdick BM. Zung self-rating depression scale scores of psychiatric outpatients by age and sex. Psychol Rep. 1988;62(1):259–62. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.62.1.259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The neuropsychiatric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44(12):2308–14. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.44.12.2308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(9):922–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Terada T, Yokokura M, Obi T, Bunai T, Yoshikawa E, Ando I, et al. In vivo direct relation of tau pathology with neuroinflammation in early Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol. 2019;266(9):2186–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09400-2.

  24. Kantarci K, Lowe VJ, Boeve BF, Senjem ML, Tosakulwong N, Lesnick TG, et al. AV-1451 tau and beta-amyloid positron emission tomography imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(1):58–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24825.

  25. Mathotaarachchi S, Wang S, Shin M, Pascoal TA, Benedet AL, Kang MS, et al. VoxelStats: a MATLAB package for multi-modal voxel-wise brain image analysis. Front Neuroinform. 2016;10:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Therriault J, Ng KP, Pascoal TA, Mathotaarachchi S, Kang MS, Struyfs H, et al. Anosognosia predicts default mode network hypometabolism and clinical progression to dementia. Neurology. 2018;90(11):e932–e9. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005120.

  27. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Scholl M, Lockhart SN, Schonhaut DR, O'Neil JP, Janabi M, Ossenkoppele R, et al. PET imaging of tau deposition in the aging human brain. Neuron. 2016;89(5):971–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson KA, Schultz A, Betensky RA, Becker JA, Sepulcre J, Rentz D, et al. Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(1):110–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24546.

  30. Pascoal TA, Therriault J, Benedet AL, Savard M, Lussier FZ, Chamoun M, et al. 18F-MK-6240 PET for early and late detection of neurofibrillary tangles. Brain. 2020;143(9):2818–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa180.

  31. Franzmeier N, Rubinski A, Neitzel J, Ewers M. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I. The BIN1 rs744373 SNP is associated with increased tau-PET levels and impaired memory. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mattsson N, Smith R, Strandberg O, Palmqvist S, Scholl M, Insel PS, et al. Comparing (18) F-AV-1451 with CSF t-tau and p-tau for diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2018;90(5):e388–e95. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Serrano-Pozo A, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Hyman BT. Neuropathological alterations in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2011;1:a006189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Di Filippo M, Chiasserini D, Tozzi A, Picconi B, Calabresi P. Mitochondria and the link between neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(Suppl 2):S369–79. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2010-100543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schonheit B, Zarski R, Ohm TG. Spatial and temporal relationships between plaques and tangles in Alzheimer-pathology. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25(6):697–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chapman KR, Bing-Canar H, Alosco ML, Steinberg EG, Martin B, Chaisson C, et al. Mini mental state examination and logical memory scores for entry into Alzheimer's disease trials. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016;8(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-016-0176-z.

  37. Reinvang I, Grambaite R, Espeseth T. Executive dysfunction in MCI: subtype or early symptom. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;2012:936272.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000;55(11):1621–6. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.55.11.1621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Solleiro-Villavicencio H, Rivas-Arancibia S. Effect of chronic oxidative stress on Neuroinflammatory response mediated by CD4(+)T cells in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lenaz G, Cavazzoni M, Genova ML, D'Aurelio M, Merlo Pich M, Pallotti F, et al. Oxidative stress, antioxidant defences and aging. Biofactors. 1998;8(3-4):195–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.5520080305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Robinson BH. Human complex I deficiency: clinical spectrum and involvement of oxygen free radicals in the pathogenicity of the defect. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1364(2):271–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00033-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Baloyannis SJ. Mitochondria are related to synaptic pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;2011:305395.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Chiotis K, Stenkrona P, Almkvist O, Stepanov V, Ferreira D, Arakawa R, et al. Dual tracer tau PET imaging reveals different molecular targets for (11) C-THK5351 and (11) C-PBB3 in the Alzheimer brain. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(9):1605–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4012-5.

  44. Lemoine L, Leuzy A, Chiotis K, Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Nordberg A. Tau positron emission tomography imaging in tauopathies: The added hurdle of off-target binding. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018;10:232–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Leuzy A, Cicognola C, Chiotis K, Saint-Aubert L, Lemoine L, Andreasen N, et al. Longitudinal tau and metabolic PET imaging in relation to novel CSF tau measures in Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(5):1152–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4242-6.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Makoto Higuchi at National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology and the staff of the Hamamatsu Medical Center and Hamamatsu PET Imaging Center for providing valuable technical assistance.

Funding

This study was supported by the grants from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (16H06402A01, 17 K09797, and 17H04247) and a Grant-in-Aid from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Research Institute, Le Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de l’Ouest-de-l’Île-de-Montréal; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Psychiatry and Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, 6875 Boulevard LaSalle, Montreal, H4H 1R3, Canada

    Tatsuhiro Terada, Joseph Therriault, Min Su Peter Kang, Melissa Savard, Tharick Ali Pascoal, Firoza Lussier, Cecile Tissot, Yi-Ting Wang, Andrea Benedet & Pedro Rosa-Neto

  2. Department of Biofunctional Imaging, Preeminent Medical Photonics Education & Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan

    Tatsuhiro Terada, Takashi Matsudaira, Tomoyasu Bunai & Yasuomi Ouchi

  3. Department of Neurology, Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, 886 Urushiyama, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka, 420-8688, Japan

    Tatsuhiro Terada, Takashi Matsudaira & Tomokazu Obi

  4. Central Research Laboratory, Hamamatsu Photonics KK, 5000 Hirakuchi, Hamakita-ku, Hamamatsu, 434-0041, Japan

    Hideo Tsukada

  5. Hamamatsu PET Imaging Center, Hamamatsu Medical Photonics Foundation, 5000 Hirakuchi, Hamakita-ku, Hamamatsu, 434-0041, Japan

    Yasuomi Ouchi

Authors
  1. Tatsuhiro Terada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph Therriault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Min Su Peter Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Melissa Savard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tharick Ali Pascoal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Firoza Lussier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cecile Tissot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yi-Ting Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Andrea Benedet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Takashi Matsudaira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tomoyasu Bunai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tomokazu Obi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hideo Tsukada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yasuomi Ouchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Pedro Rosa-Neto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Design and conceptualized study: TT, HT, YO, PRN. Data collection: TT, TM, TB, TO. Data analysis: TT, JT, MPK, MS, TAP, FL, CT, YTW, AB, TM, TB, TO, YO, PRN. Interpretation of the data: HT. Statistical analysis: TT, JP, YO, PRN. Drafting of the manuscript: TT, JT, YO, PRN. Revision of the manuscript: JT, HT, YO, PRN. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yasuomi Ouchi or Pedro Rosa-Neto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders (SIEND), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, and Hamamatsu Medical Center. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Supplemental Figure 1. There was significant positive correlation between the semiquantitative value of [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR relative to the whole brain and [18F]BCPP-EF SUVR relative to the centrum semiovale in the average of the all ROIs (manually located bilaterally in the cerebellum, anterior cingulated cortex, caudate, putamen, thalamus, posterior cingulated cortex, precuneus, superior frontal cortex, middle frontal cortex, occipital cortex, lateral temporal cortex, medial temporal cortex including hippocampus, parahippocampus, amygdala, parietal cortex, pons, and midbrain).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Terada, T., Therriault, J., Kang, M.S.P. et al. Mitochondrial complex I abnormalities is associated with tau and clinical symptoms in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegeneration 16, 28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-021-00448-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-021-00448-1

Keywords

Molecular Neurodegeneration

ISSN: 1750-1326