Skip to main content

Novel App knock-in mouse model shows key features of amyloid pathology and reveals profound metabolic dysregulation of microglia

Abstract

Background

Genetic mutations underlying familial Alzheimer’s disease (AD) were identified decades ago, but the field is still in search of transformative therapies for patients. While mouse models based on overexpression of mutated transgenes have yielded key insights in mechanisms of disease, those models are subject to artifacts, including random genetic integration of the transgene, ectopic expression and non-physiological protein levels. The genetic engineering of novel mouse models using knock-in approaches addresses some of those limitations. With mounting evidence of the role played by microglia in AD, high-dimensional approaches to phenotype microglia in those models are critical to refine our understanding of the immune response in the brain.

Methods

We engineered a novel App knock-in mouse model (AppSAA) using homologous recombination to introduce three disease-causing coding mutations (Swedish, Arctic and Austrian) to the mouse App gene. Amyloid-β pathology, neurodegeneration, glial responses, brain metabolism and behavioral phenotypes were characterized in heterozygous and homozygous AppSAA mice at different ages in brain and/ or biofluids. Wild type littermate mice were used as experimental controls. We used in situ imaging technologies to define the whole-brain distribution of amyloid plaques and compare it to other AD mouse models and human brain pathology. To further explore the microglial response to AD relevant pathology, we isolated microglia with fibrillar Aβ content from the brain and performed transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses and in vivo brain imaging to measure energy metabolism and microglial response. Finally, we also characterized the mice in various behavioral assays.

Results

Leveraging multi-omics approaches, we discovered profound alteration of diverse lipids and metabolites as well as an exacerbated disease-associated transcriptomic response in microglia with high intracellular Aβ content. The AppSAA knock-in mouse model recapitulates key pathological features of AD such as a progressive accumulation of parenchymal amyloid plaques and vascular amyloid deposits, altered astroglial and microglial responses and elevation of CSF markers of neurodegeneration. Those observations were associated with increased TSPO and FDG-PET brain signals and a hyperactivity phenotype as the animals aged.

Discussion

Our findings demonstrate that fibrillar Aβ in microglia is associated with lipid dyshomeostasis consistent with lysosomal dysfunction and foam cell phenotypes as well as profound immuno-metabolic perturbations, opening new avenues to further investigate metabolic pathways at play in microglia responding to AD-relevant pathogenesis. The in-depth characterization of pathological hallmarks of AD in this novel and open-access mouse model should serve as a resource for the scientific community to investigate disease-relevant biology.

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a devastating neurological condition. Research using preclinical AD models has been an essential step towards the development of therapies and discovery of disease-related biomarkers. In particular, mouse models recapitulating some aspects of this complex disease are instrumental in gaining insight into the neurobiology of AD [1]. Transgenic mouse models overexpressing human amyloid precursor protein (hAPP) with familial AD (fAD) mutations, sometimes in combination with PSEN1 fAD mutations, have furthered our understanding of disease mechanisms [2,3,4], but also have the potential to introduce artifacts associated with App overexpression. Recently, a new generation of mouse models using knock-in (KI) approaches have been developed to avoid some of the limitations of transgenesis, including random genetic integration, ectopic expression and non-physiological protein levels [5]. In those models, the App gene has been humanized for the Aβ sequence and harbored fAD mutations resulting in progressive accumulation of amyloid deposits. Other pathologies associated with amyloid deposition have been observed, including immune responses and neurodegenerative processes [6, 7]. The identification of a plaque-induced gene signature (PIG) partially overlapping with gene expression changes observed in AD brain samples using an App KI model [8] further supports the relevance of these new models and provides incentive to continue their utilization to better define disease mechanisms and test candidate therapeutics.

Over the last decade, convergent findings from human genetics, gene expression studies and preclinical research revealed that microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS), are likely contributing to AD pathophysiology [9,10,11]. Microglia respond to pathogenic drivers of AD, including amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau, but how microglia may become dysfunctional and contribute to disease remain unclear. Microglia expression profiles from AD and preclinical mouse models have revealed that microglia undergo profound changes in their gene expression profiles [8, 9, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. However, the functional implications of this molecular remodeling are poorly defined. It has been hypothesized that this gene expression program may enable microglia to sequester and/or resorb amyloid deposits and associated neurodegenerative processes. Under these circumstances, the phagocytic activity of microglia is critical and the metabolic demand and burden on microglial degradation pathways are high, potentially leading to immunometabolic alteration [20] and increasing cellular dysfunction over time [21,22,23]. Indeed, alterations of lipid metabolism have been observed in AD brain, and several genes associated with late onset AD (LOAD) risk that control lipid metabolism (e.g., TREM2, APOE) are highly expressed in microglia [10, 24].

Here, we describe the engineering and characterization of a novel humanized Aβ App KI mouse model carrying the Swedish, Arctic and Austrian fAD mutations (AppSAA). This model demonstrated elevated Aβ42/40 ratio in relevant tissues, progressive deposition of amyloid plaques, increased biomarkers of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, as well as mild behavioral phenotypes. Leveraging this new model, we discovered extensive lipid and metabolite alterations in microglia, associated with their level of phagocytic activity and proximity to amyloid plaques. Specifically, metabolic profiles of phagocytic microglia were consistent with lysosomal dysfunction (e.g., accumulation of ganglioside GM3) and foam cell phenotypes (e.g., accumulation of neutral lipids like triglycerides). Those findings were corroborated by gene expression changes in phagocytic microglia and highlight the profound reprogramming of microglia as they respond to amyloid pathology. Our high-dimensional profiling of microglia opens new avenues to explore the contribution of metabolic pathways in their response to AD pathology, including specific lipids and metabolites of interest.

Methods

Generation of App SAA knock-in mouse model

The AppSAA knock-in mouse model was engineered by insertion of 6 mutations into the genomic App locus via homologous recombination. Three amino acids APP G676R, APP F681Y and APP R684H were substituted to humanize the mouse Aβ1-42 region and the following three FAD-linked APP mutations were inserted: KM670/671NL (Swedish), E693G (Arctic) and T714I (Austrian). This mouse model was created on a C57BL/6J background by Ozgene (Australia) using goGermline technology [25].

To generate the targeting vector for the AppSAA KI mouse model, six individual fragments (A-F) that cover the targeting area were engineered and introduced into six cloning vectors respectively. Fragment A encoding a 2828bp right homology arm fragment within intron 17 (mouse genomic DNA chr16:84,959,292-84,962,119 GRCm38/mm10) was amplified by PCR from BAC genomic DNA (clones RP23-126H12 and RP23-99P18) with primers P1915_41 and P1915_51. Fragment B encoding a portion of intron 17, exon 17 with the T714I and E693G mutations, a portion of intron 16 (corresponding to mouse genomic DNA region chr16:84,962,120-84,963,051 GRCm38/mm10) and a portion of the hygromycin cassette was synthesized as a gBlock by Integrated DNA Technologies. Fragment C encoding the remainder of the hygromycin cassette was amplified by PCR from an Ozgene in-house cloning vector using primers P1915_74 and P1915_53. Fragment D encoding a 2032bp portion of intron 16 (mouse genomic DNA region chr16:84,963,052-84,965,083 GRCm38/mm10) was synthesized as a gBlock by Integrated DNA Technologies. Fragment E encoding a portion of intron 16, exon 16 with the R684H, F681Y, G676R, and KM670/671NL mutations, and a portion of intron 15 (corresponding to mouse genomic DNA chr16:84,965,084-84,965,993 GRCm38/mm10) was synthesized by GENEWIZ and was housed within a vector that contained the neo cassette on the vector backbone. Fragment F encoding a 5870bp left homology arm within intron 15 (mouse genomic DNA chr16:84,965,994-84,971,863 GRCm38/mm10) was amplified by PCR from BAC genomic DNA (clones RP23-126H12 and RP23-99P18) with primers P1915_46 and P1915_56. The final targeting vector was then generated by the sequential assembly of fragments A-F. Fragment A digested with AatII was ligated into vector B digested with the same enzyme to generate vector AB. Fragment AB digested with AgeI was ligated into fragment C digested with the same enzyme to generate vector ABC. Fragment ABC digested with AscI was ligated into vector D digested with MluI to generate vector ABCD. Fragment ABCD digested with AscI was ligated into vector E digested with the same enzymes to generate vector ABCDE. Fragment ABCDE digested with enzyme MluI was ligated into vector F digested with the same enzyme to generate vector ABCDEF. The targeting vector containing Fragment ABCDEF was linearized with PmeI and electroporated into Bruce ES cells which were derived from C57BL/6-Thy1.1 mice. ES cells were maintained in the medium supplemented with G418 drug at 200ug/ml, and surviving clones were picked after 8 days of drug selection. ES cells were then screened for correct targeting events by qPCR and then confirmed by Southern analysis. For southern analysis, genomic DNA was purified from two ES clones (II_1C11 and II_1G11), digested with SpeI and then detected with 5’probe, 3’ probe, Hygro probe, enP probe, and neoP probe. Both clones were tested positive for proper homologous recombination in left and right arms. The ES cell clones (clone II_1C11 and clone II_1G11) that were confirmed to carry the correct homologous recombination events were injected into goGermline blastocysts, and the resulting chimeric mice were crossed to Flp transgenic mice (OzFlp) to excise the neo and hygro selection cassettes. The resulting heterozygous KI mice were backcrossed to C57BL/6J for more than two generations and then intercrossed to obtain homozygous KI mice for further characterization. The AppSAA model is available from the Jackson Laboratory as B6(Cg)-Apptm1.1Dnli/J (https://www.jax.org/strain/034711). Primer sequences and assays for mouse model generation are listed in the Supplementary Table 1.

Animals

The AppSAA mice were maintained on the C57BL/6J genetic background. The AppSAA heterozygous KI mice were intercrossed to obtain three genotypes of interest. Other App transgenic lines were used for comparative analysis: 5xFAD (B6SJL-Tg(APPSwFlLon,PSEN1*M146L*L286V)6799Vas/Mmjax, MMRRC Strain #034840-JAX [26]), APP/PS1 (B6.Cg-Tg[APPswe, PSEN1dE9]85Dbo/Mmjax, MMRRC Strain #034832-JAX [27]), Tg2576 (B6;SJL-Tg[APPSWE]2576Kh a [28]). The AppSAA mice were bred either at the Jackson Laboratory (USA, Bar Harbor or Sacramento) or Ozgene (Australia, Perth). The 5xFAD mice were bred at the Jackson Laboratory (USA, Sacramento). The APP/PS1 and Tg2576 mice were studied at Allen Institute and all experimental procedures related to the use of these two lines of mice were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Allen Institute for Brain Science, in accordance with NIH guidelines. Before experiments, the AppSAA mice were shipped to Denali Therapeutics for an acclimation period of at least 2 weeks. Housing conditions were similar among labs and included standard pellet food and water ad libitum, a 12-h light–dark cycle at 22°C with a maximum of 5 mice per cage. AppSAA KI mice used for experiments are listed in the Supplementary Table 2. All mouse husbandry and experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by Denali Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in full compliance with regulatory statutes, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee policies, and National Institutes of Health guidelines.

Frailty index composite and voluntary running assays

The behavioral assays were conducted at the Neurobehavioral Phenotyping core of the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, USA). Mice were brought in the testing room at least 60 min before the assessment for habituation. For the Frailty Index composite assay, mice were weighed and evaluated one at a time in a battery of assessment. Except for a few quantitative measures (body weight and body temperature; Braintree Scientific #TH5 Thermalert), all other variables were scored in a scale of 0 to 1 by a trained technician. Characteristics observed include physical, physiological and innate reflex conditions (modified from Whitehead et al. [29]). To measure voluntary running, mice were individually placed in a new cage equipped with a running wheel (Med Associates) and the activity of the animals was recorded during a minimum of 2 days and 3 nights. Data were evaluated for onset of activity (typically correlated with lights off), distance traveled (rpm) and time spent running (min). To test the activity of the mice in a novel environment, mice were placed inside an open-field area (Omnitech Electronics, Columbus, OH, USA) for 60 min. The enclosure was surrounded by two levels of infrared photo beam sensors enabling recording of the horizontal and vertical activity of the mice.

Repeated open field test

Exploratory locomotor activity was measured in an open field with a video-tracking system (EthoVision; Noldus) at the Gladstone Institute. 16–17-month-old AppSAA mice (KI/KI) (n=21, 11 males and 10 females) and wildtype littermate controls (+/+) (n=26, 14 males and 12 females) were used for the analysis. Mice were placed in one of four identical clear plastic circular chambers (12” diameter) for 5 min. The chamber walls were covered with plain gray backing to visually isolate the mice from their surroundings. Distance travelled in the center (0–4.5” diameter) and periphery (4.5–6” diameter) were measured in cm. Mice were tested twice a day (morning and afternoon sessions; 3–4 hours apart) on two consecutive days (Days 1–2; Trials 1–4) and retested two weeks later (Days 15–16; Trials 5–8) in the same chamber. The chambers were cleaned with 70% ethanol between trials. Only male or female mice were tested simultaneously in the four chambers, and to ensure balanced groups throughout the day, male and female mice were tested alternately. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (v.27).

Tissue collection

Prior to tissue harvest, animals were deeply anesthetized via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 2.5% Avertin. All collected tissues were snap-frozen on dry ice and stored at -80°C. Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture into an EDTA tube (Sarstedt Microvette 500 K3E, Ref# 201341102), then slowly inverted 10 times prior to centrifugation at 12,700 rpm for 7 minutes at 4°C to collect plasma. CSF samples were collected by pre-pulled glass capillary tube from the cisterna magna and then transferred to 0.5 mL Protein LoBind Eppendorf tubes (Eppendorf Cat #022431064) for centrifugation at 12,700 rpm for 7 minutes at 4°C, supernatant was then collected. The mice were then perfused intracardially with cold PBS, and brain tissues were sub-dissected to separate the cortical and hippocampal regions.

SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

Brains were homogenized using Qiagen Tissue-Lyser II (28 Hz, 3 min, 3 times) in lysis buffer (Cell Signaling #9803) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche #4693159001) and PhosSTOP (Roche #4906837001) (1 ml lysis buffer for 100 mg tissue). Lysates were then incubated on ice for 10 min followed by centrifugation at 18,660 g for 20 min at 4°. Supernatants were transferred to new tubes for protein concentration determination and loading sample preparation. Protein lysate samples were boiled at 95°C and SDS-PAGE was performed using standard BioRad reagents. For Western blotting, PDVF membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies diluted blocking buffer (Rockland): Mouse anti APP A4 clone 22C11 (Millipore MAB348, 1:1,000), Mouse anti APP clone 6E10 (Biolegend 803001, 1:2,000), Rabbit anti APP CTF (Sigma A8717, 1:4,000), Mouse anti-β-Actin (Sigma A2228, 1:4,000). Membranes were then incubated with the appropriate fluorescently conjugated secondary antibody (1:10,000, Li-Cor) and imaged using a Li-Cor Odyssey CLx system.

Aβ extraction and measurement by MSD

Cortical and hippocampal tissues were weighed and homogenized in TBS (140 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM 1,10-phenanthroline) containing protease inhibitor (Roche,#4693159001). The homogenates were centrifuged at 100,000 g, 4°C for 1 hour, and then the supernatant was collected (TBS-soluble fraction). Pellets were resuspended in 5 M guanidine, 50 m M Tris, pH 8.0, further homogenized, and incubated at room temperature for 3 hours. Samples were then centrifuged at 20,800 g, 4°C, for 20 minutes, and the supernatant was collected (TBS-insoluble GuHCl fraction). To measure Aβ in brain fractions and biofluids, we tested two commercial kits: MSD V-PLEX Aβ Peptide Panel 1 (4G8) Kit (cat#K15199E) and MSD V-PLEX Aβ Peptide Panel 1 (6E10) Kit (cat#K15200E). We found that the 4G8 kit has a good cross-reactivity to mouse and human Aβ. Since the 4G8 kit showed a greater sensitivity than the 6E10 kit to detect mutated human Aβ from 4-month AppSAA KI/KI brains, we used 4G8 kit for Aβ analysis. Samples were diluted by Diluent 35 provided in the kit (GuHCl fractions 1:20; TBS fractions, no dilution; plasma 1:4; CSF 1:26). Plates were read using the SECTOR Imager 2400A.

Tau measurement by MSD

Total mouse tau in CSF was measured using an ECL-immunoassay MSD 96-well mouse total tau assay (Meso Scale Discovery: MSD) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, CSF samples (5 μL) were diluted 1 to 5 in 10% blocking solution (10% BSA in tris wash buffer) and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour on a shaker plate. Standard samples were also diluted in 10% blocking solution. Plates were washed 4 times with 1XTris washing buffer and then incubated at room temperature with sulfo-tag total tau detection antibody for 1 hour. After a few additional washes, plates were read on the MSD SECTOR 600 Reader. Samples were fit against a 9-point standard curve.

TREM2 measurement by MSD

TREM2 levels in brain homogenates prepared by Cell Signaling lysis buffer (#9803) and plasma were quantified by using MSD technology. The sandwich layout of this TREM2 MSD assay from the bottom to the top is (1) capture-antibody (1 μg/mL; BAF1729, R&D Systems), (2) samples, (3) primary-antibody (10 μg/mL; anti-TREM2 antibody - clone 4D9) [30], and (4) detection-antibody (0.5 μg/mL; SULFO-TAG-labeled anti-human antibody, Meso Scale Discovery). MSD 96-well plates coated with streptavidin were first incubated with 150 μL MSD-Blocker A. For building each layer for the assay, 25 μL of the reagent was added to each well, and the plates were incubated at room temperature on a shaker at 800 rpm for 1hr. Between incubation step, each well was washed with TBST buffer (0.05% Tween 20 in TBS) using ELx406 plate washer (BioTek). Diluted samples (Brain lysates = 1:5; plasma = 1:20) and TREM2 protein standard in assay buffer (25% MSD-Blocker A and 75% TBST) were prepared and aliquoted for running duplicates in the assay. A four-fold serial-dilution standard curve of recombinant murine TREM2 extracellular domain was prepared to include the linear detection range from 62.5 ng/ml to 15.25 pg/mL. For acquiring the MSD units on the MSD Sector Imager S600 reader (MSD), 150μL of 2X MSD read buffer was added to each well after the final TBST wash. TREM2 levels were calculated using the MSD Discovery Workbench software and normalized by each lysate's concentration (brain samples only).

Cytokines

Brain homogenates prepared by Cell Signaling lysis buffer (#9803) were diluted to 5 μg/μl with PBS and plasma samples were prepared at a 2-fold dilution with PBS. Diluted samples were sent to Eve Technologies (Canada) for cytokines and chemokines measurement by using the Mouse Cytokine Array / Chemokine Array 44-Plex (MD44).

Neurofilament Light detection

CSF neurofilament light (Nf-L) concentrations were measured using Simoa NF-Light® (SR-X version, Quanterix 103400) bead-based digital ELISA kits and read on the Quanterix SR-X instrument. CSF samples were diluted 100x with Sample Diluent (Quanterix 102252) before being added to Simoa 96-well microplates (Quanterix 101457). Following kit instructions, Simoa Detector Reagent and Bead Reagent (Quanterix 103159, 102246) were added to the samples before incubating and shaking for 30 mins, 30°C at 800 rpm. After incubation, the sample plate was washed with Simoa Wash Buffer A (Quanterix 103078) on a Simoa Microplate Washer according to Quanterix’s two step protocol. After initial washes, SBG Reagent (Quanterix 102250) was added and samples were again incubated at 30°C, 800 rpm for 10 min. The two-step washer protocol was continued, with the sample beads being twice resuspended in Simoa Wash Buffer B (Quanterix 103079) before final aspiration of buffer. Sample Nf-L levels were measured using the NF Light analysis protocol on the Quanterix SR-X instrument and interpolated against a calibration curve provided with the Quanterix assay kit.

Whole brain imaging and quantification of plaque distribution

To label amyloid plaques, mice were administered 3.3 mg/kg of methoxy-X04 (R&D Systems) by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. Twenty-four hours later, mice were perfused with PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) sequentially and then intact brains were dissected and postfixed in 4% PFA at room temperature for 6 hours, followed by overnight at 4°C. Whole brain fluorescence imaging was performed as described in Whitesell et a l[31] with serial two-photon (STP) tomography (TissueCyte 1,000, TissueVision Inc., Somerville, MA), using 925 nm excitation, a 500 nm dichroic mirror, and a 447/60 bandpass emission filter on the blue channel. One hundred and forty serial block-face images were acquired from each brain at 0.35 μm/pixel lateral resolution with a 100 μm sectioning interval. Automated segmentation of the fluorescent signal from methoxy-X04 labeled plaques and registration to the 3D Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework, v3 (CCFv3) [32] were performed as previously described [31]. Briefly, segmented fluorescence output is a full resolution mask that classifies each 0.35 μm × 0.35 μm pixel as either signal or background. An isotropic 3D summary of each brain is constructed by dividing each image series into 10 μm × 10 μm × 10 μm grid voxels. Total signal is computed for each voxel by summing the number of signal positive pixels in that voxel. Each image stack is registered to the CCFv3 in a multi-step process using both global affine and local deformable registration. Plaque density for each structure in the reference atlas ontology was calculated by summing voxels from the same structure. To obtain plaque counts within each structure, we used a standard feature labeling algorithm. Adjacent and orthogonally adjacent voxels in the segmentation signal were grouped together as one plaque object. Due to the 100 μm z-sampling interval, our resolution limit for detecting separate plaques in the z-axis was 100 μm. Plaque quantification is reported for one hemisphere per brain, chosen based on image and tissue quality (Supplementary Table 3). All image series were subjected to manual QC checks for completeness and uniformity of raw fluorescence images, minimum fluorescence intensity, and artifacts. Automatic segmentation results were checked for overall quality and false positive signals by overlaying segmentation results for 3–5 single coronal sections with raw fluorescent images from STP imaging.

Sectioning and immunofluorescence staining

Fresh brains were fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 24 hours then transferred to a phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution with 0.1% sodium azide for storage until ready for processing. Brains were initially transferred to a 30% sucrose solution in PBS for two days before sectioning and then subsequently sectioned coronally on a freezing microtome at a thickness of 40 μm for most stainings except for astrocyte-related stainings (GFAP, GLT-1 and C3), which were performed on 30 μm sections. Sections were stored in cryoprotectant buffer (30% glycerol, 30% ethoxyethanol, and 40% PBS) at -20°C prior to staining. Seven to twelve coronal brain sections (from approximately bregma to 4.8 mm posterior to bregma) were selected for immunostaining for Aβ, Iba1, CD68, AT8, LAMP1, Neurofilament, CD31, alpha smooth muscle actin, GFAP, GLT-1 and C3. Sections were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature in 1x Tris-buffered saline solution containing 0.05% Tween (TBST) and 5% donkey serum, followed by primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Sections were then washed in TBST and a solution of secondary antibodies was then applied for 1 hour at room temperature. Sections were washed in TBST prior to mounting and cover slipping with Prolong Glass Antifade Mountant solution (Thermo Fisher, P36984). Immunofluorescence was performed using the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-human amyloid beta (IBL America, 18584; 1:500), rat anti-CD68 (BioRad, MCA1957A; 1:500), goat anti-Iba1 (Novus, NB100-1028; 1:500), mouse anti-pTau (Invitrogen, MN1020; 1:500), goat-anti-CD31 (R&D Systems, AF3628, 1:500), mouse-anti-alpha smooth muscle actin Cy3 (Sigma, C6198; 1:500), rat anti-LAMP1 (DSHB, 1D4B; 1:250), mouse anti-Neurofilament (BioLegend, 837801; 1:500), rabbit anti-GFAP (Sigma, G9269, 1:500), guinea pig anti-GLT-1 (Sigma, AB1783, 1:1000) and rat anti-complement component 3 (C3; clone 11H9, Novus Biologicals, NB200-540, 1:50); and the following secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor 488 Donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher, A-21206; 1:200), DyLight 550 Donkey anti rat-IgG (Thermo Fisher, SA5-10027, 1:200), Alexa Fluor Plus 555 Donkey anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, A32773; 1:200), Alexa Fluor 647 Donkey anti-goat IgG (Thermo Fisher, A-21447; 1:200), Alexa Fluor Plus 647 Donkey anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher, A32787; 1:200), Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher, A21202; 1:500), Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-rat IgG (Thermo Fisher, A21434; 1:500), Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-guinea pig IgG (Thermo Fisher, A21435; 1:500), Alexa Fluor 555 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher, A31572; 1:500).

Multiplexed Fluorescence in situ hybridization and imaging

Fresh-frozen mouse brains embedded in OCT were coronally sectioned at 15 μm onto Superfrost Plus glass slides (Fisher Scientific). Sections were stored at -80°C until RNAscope treatment. The RNAscope multiplex fluorescent v2 kit was used following the manufacturer’s protocol for fresh-frozen tissue sections (ACD 323100) except that protease treatment was performed for 15 minutes. Probe sets for Trem2 (ACD 404111-C2) and Tmem119 (ACD 472901-C3) were used with Opal 520 and Opal 570 dyes (Akoya Biosciences FP1487001KT), respectively. Methoxy-X04 (Tocris 4920) was applied to the tissue sections at 100 μM in 1xPBS for 30 min at room temperature immediately following in situ hybridization. Sections were then washed three times for 10min in 1xPBS before mounting in ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (ThermoFisher P36930) followed by a coverslip. Sections were imaged using a confocal microscope (Leica SP8; Leica Microsystems, Inc.) with a 20x/.75IMM oil objective.

Microscopy and quantification for immunohistochemistry

Fluorescent stained sections were captured using a Zeiss Axioscan.Z1 slide scanner with a 10x / 0.45 NA objective. A custom macro in Zeiss Zen software was used to quantify signal for Aβ, CD68, Iba1 and AT8 following median smoothing, channel extraction, and local background subtraction to create binary masks of fluorescent signal for each channel. Objects smaller than 10 pixels were excluded as staining artifacts / debris. Individual plaques were dilated to create a region surrounding the plaques to detect microglia adjacent to plaques. The cortex and hippocampus regions of interest (ROIs) were manually outlined for each section and analyzed using the macro to quantify ROI area and measure the number and area of all plaques and microglia, including overlapping area between microglia and the dilated region surrounding and including plaques. The percentage amyloid plaque, Iba1, CD68, or AT8 positivity in the areas of interest were calculated by normalizing the positive pixel area to the quantified tissue area and averaged from 7–12 sections per mouse.

For 3D assessment of plaque architecture and the associated cellular changes, super resolution confocal microscopy of fluorescently stained sections was performed using a scanning confocal microscope (Leica SP8, Leica Microsystems, Inc.) operated in super resolution lightning mode. Images were acquired using a 63x / 1.4 NA oil immersion objective at a pixel size of 50 nm and processed using the Adaptive processing algorithm. Confocal z-stacks of 18-25 μm were acquired for each channel using sequential scan settings. A minimum of four representative fields were captured from within the cortical brain region of AppSAA KI/KI (n=3-4) and AppSAA +/+ control (n=2) mice.

Microscopic evaluation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) pathology was performed on larger fields using a 10x / 0.45 NA objective at a pixel size of 150 nm and z-stacks of 30-40 μm, and at higher resolution using a 20x / 0.75 NA oil immersion objective at a pixel size of 67 μm and z-stacks of 25-35 μm. In both cases, images were processed using the lightning Adaptive processing algorithm.

To assess the 3D morphology of microglia and sub-cellular localization of methoxy-X04 and Aβ, a minimum of 3 cortical regions per animal were imaged in AppSAA KI/KI mice (n=6) using a 40x/1.3 NA oil immersion objective at a pixel size of 50 nm in Lightning mode and processed using the Adaptive processing algorithm. Confocal z-stacks of 15-30 μm with a z-step size of 500 nm were acquired for each channel using sequential scan settings. To reduce noise, images were first resampled to 500 nm isotropic volumes using local mean resampling. The background intensity of each image was estimated using gaussian smoothing with a kernel size of 10 μm isotropic and subtracted from the original image. The methoxy-X04 and Aβ surfaces were estimated by manual thresholding of each image. The surface of Iba1+ microglia was estimated using a bipartite manual threshold, where values below the lowest value were assigned background, values above the high threshold were assigned to the microglial volume, and intermediate values were assigned using random walker diffusive segmentation algorithm with a diffusion constant of 10 [33]. Microglia surfaces were found to often contain several microglia, so the positions of individual microglial soma were then estimated by finding regions where the surface was at least 7 μm in diameter, spaced at least 10 μm from other regions of high surface thickness, and then finding local peak cell thickness using non-maximum suppression. These regions of peak thickness were then used as seeds for a watershed segmentation of the overall microglial surface, where each voxel in the surface was assigned to the closest peak. Both segmentation stages were performed using the algorithms implemented in the Python package scikit-image v0.18.1 [34].

To assess astrogliosis, image acquisition of entire hemispheres, hippocampal subregions, and posterior parietal cortex was performed using the BX-X710 microscope (Keyence) with 4X, 20X or 40X objectives (Nikon). Image analysis was performed with FIJI [35]. Briefly, for GFAP immunoreactivity, images were background-subtracted and thresholded to clearly outline astrocytic cells and the total GFAP-positive area was measured. For C3 immunoreactivity, a GFAP-positive mask was generated and C3 fluorescence intensity was measured in GFAP-positive astrocytes. For GLT-1 immunoreactivity, total fluorescence intensity was measured. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (v9.3.1).

Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)

Mice were perfused with cold PBS and cortical and hippocampal tissues were dissected and dissociated into a single cell suspension using the Adult Brain Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec 130-107-677), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cell suspensions were stained with the following antibodies in FACS buffer (1% fatty acid-free BSA + 1mM EDTA in PBS) for 25 minutes on ice: Fixable Viability Stain BV510 (BD Biosciences, 564406), CD11b-BV421 (BioLegend 101251), CD45-APC (BD Biosciences, 559864), ACSA-2-PE (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-102-365), Mouse Fc blocker (anti-mouse CD16/32, BioLegend 101320). Cells were washed twice with FACS buffer and strained through a 100 μm filter before sorting CD11b+ microglia and ACSA-2+ astrocytes on a FACS Aria III (BD Biosciences) with a 100 μm nozzle. For bulk RNAseq analysis, cells were sorted directly into freshly prepared RLT-plus buffer (Qiagen) containing beta-mercaptoethanol; for lipid extraction, cells were sorted directly into LC/MS grade Methanol with internal standards.

To label Aβ-containing microglia, mice were injected i.p. with 10 mg/kg of methoxy-X04 (R&D Systems). Mice were perfused with PBS 24 hours after injection and cortical and hippocampal tissues were dissected and processed into single-cell suspension for staining as described above except the antibodies used for FACS were: Fixable/viability Dye 780 (Thermo fisher 65-0865-14), Cd11b-PE (BioLegend, 101208), CD45-APC (BD Biosciences, 559864), Mouse FC block 1:50 (BioLegend, 101320). Methoxy-X04 positive and negative microglia (CD11b+) were collected for RNAseq and LC-MS analysis.

RNA isolation, RT-qPCR, and SMARTSeq library preparation

RNA from bulk mouse brain tissue was extracted using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen) and resuspended in nuclease-free water. For RT-qPCR, 3 μl of RNA was transcribed into cDNA using SuperScript IV (Invitrogen). App gene expression level was assessed using Taqman probe (FAM-Mm01344172_m1) on a QuantStudio 6 Flex (Applied Biosystems) and normalized to Gapdh.

For RNA-seq analysis of FACS sorted cells, 200 live cells were sorted directly into 11.5 microliters of Clontech SMARTseq 10X reaction buffer for reverse transcription. cDNA synthesis was performed with the Clontech SMARTSeq v4 3′ DE kit (Takara Bio USA, Inc. 635040). Reverse transcription was followed by 14 cycles of cDNA amplification. cDNA was purified with 0.8X volume of SPRIselect beads (Beckman Coulter B23318), quantified on a Bioanalyzer 2100 System with a High Sensitivity DNA chip (Agilent 5067-4626). 300 pg of cDNA from each sample was used as input for library preparation with the Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina FC-131-1096). Fragmentation and adaptors insertion were performed by tagmentation, followed by 12 cycles of PCR amplification. The final libraries were purified using 0.8X SPRIselect beads. Library quantity and quality were assessed with Qubit 4 Fluorometer with the 1X dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen Q33231) and on a Bioanalyzer 2100 System with a High Sensitivity DNA chip. Sequencing reads were generated on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument (100 bp single end) by SeqMatic (Fremont, CA, USA).

Sequencing adapters were trimmed from the raw reads with skewer (version 0.2.2) [36]. Reads were aligned to the mouse genome version GRCm38_p6. A STAR index (version 2.7.1a) [37] and built with the --sjdbOverhang=50 argument. Splice junctions from Gencode gene models (release M17) were provided via the --sjdbGTFfile argument. STAR alignments were generated with the following parameters: --outFilterType BySJout, --quantMode TranscriptomeSAM, --outFilterIntronMotifs RemoveNoncanonicalUnannotated, --outSAMstrandField intronMotif, --outSAMattributes NH HI AS nM MD XS and --outSAMunmapped Within. Alignments were obtained with the following parameters: --readFilesCommand zcat --outFilterType BySJout --outFilterMultimapNmax 20 --alignSJoverhangMin 8 --alignSJDBoverhangMin 1 --outFilterMismatchNmax 999 --outFilterMismatchNoverLmax 0.6 --alignIntronMin 20 --alignIntronMax 1000000 --alignMatesGapMax 1000000 --quantMode GeneCounts --outSAMunmapped Within --outSAMattributes NH HI AS nM MD XS --outSAMstrandField intronMotif --outSAMtype BAM SortedByCoordinate --outBAMcompression 6. Gene level counts were obtained using featureCounts from the subread package (version 1.6.2 )[38] . Gene symbols and biotype information were extracted from the Gencode GTF file.

RNA-seq data analysis

Following alignment and expression quantitation, lowly expressed genes were removed, and differential expression analysis was performed using the limma/voom with sample weighting framework [39, 40]. Lowly expressed genes are those that did not have more than ten reads assigned to them in at least as many samples as the minimum replicate size per experiment (six samples in GSE158152 reporting on total microglia analysis and ten in GSE158153 reporting on methoxy-X04 (+) vs methoxy-X04 (-) microglia). Technical replicate libraries from GSE158152 (identified by the animal_id column) were summed together prior to analysis. Linear models were fit against the covariate(s) of interest (genotype and/or methoxy-X04-status) with “take-down day” and “sex” encoded as batch covariates. Because the direct comparison of the methoxy-X04 (+) vs methoxy-X04 (-) profiles in AppSAA KI/KI mice utilized repeated measures from the same animal, “subject_id” was fit as a random effect using the duplicateCorrelation function from limma [41]. Empirical Bayes moderated t-statistics and p-values were computed relative to a 1.2 fold-change cutoff using treat [42]. Significantly differentially expressed genes were then defined as those having an FDR <= 10%.

Single sample gene set activity scores were calculated in Fig. 3b by taking a weighted average of the expression of the genes in each gene set using the eigenWeightedMean function from the sparrow Bioconductor package (v1.0.1; DOI: 10.18129/B9.bioc.sparrow). Weights correspond to the loadings of each gene on the first principal component of the mean-centered gene-by-sample matrix for each gene set. Activity scores for 5xFAD mouse profiles were taken from the microarray data reported in Ulland et al. [43] (GSE65067).

Gene set enrichment analyses were performed via the fgseaMultiLevel function in the fgsea R package using the moderated t-statistic as the gene ranking statistic [44]. Gene sets used for testing were taken from the Biological Process collection of the Gene Ontology database, the KEGG database, as well as a custom set of genes compiled from the literature that are enumerated in Supplemental Table 4 [45,46,47]. Gene set enrichment scores shown Fig. 4i were calculated by averaging the moderated t-statistics of the genes in the leading edge of the gene set. Because the leading edge can consist of different genes for each comparison, we defined the genes used in this calculation as the universe of the genes that appeared in the leading edge of the gene set across all comparisons shown in these figures. The gene sets presented in Fig. 4i along with the genes that make up their leading edge are listed in Supplementary Table 4. The methoxy-X04 (+) specific gene signature was extracted from Supplementary Table 4 (Specific X04+ DEGs) from Grubman et al. [13] by selecting only those genes with an estimated log2FC >= 1.

All software versions for the RNA-seq analysis correspond to Bioconductor release version 3.14 [48].

FACS lipid extraction

Lipid extraction was performed using Matyash liquid-liquid extraction protocol with the following modifications. Briefly, 50,000 cells were sorted directly into 400 μl of methanol containing surrogate internal standards and kept on ice. To each tube, 200-400 μl of water was added to achieve final volume of 800 μl. These samples were vortexed for 5 min at room temperature. To these samples, 800 μl of tert-Butyl methyl ether (MTBE) was added and vortexed for an additional 5 min at room temperature. Samples were then centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Following centrifugation, 700 μl of upper organic layer was collected and dried under constant stream of N2 gas. Dried samples were reconstituted in 100 μl of MS-grade methanol for further analysis by LC-MS/MS.

LCMS analysis of lipids

Lipid analyses were performed by liquid chromatography UHPLC Nexera X2, coupled to electrospray mass spectrometry (QTRAP 6500+, Sciex). For each analysis, 5 μL of sample was injected on a BEH C18 1.7 μm, 2.1×100 mm column (Waters) using a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min at 55°C. Electrospray ionization was performed in positive and negative ion modes. For positive ionization mode, mobile phase A consisted of 60:40 acetonitrile/water (v/v) with 10 mM ammonium formate + 0.1% formic acid; mobile phase B consisted of 90:10 isopropyl alcohol/acetonitrile (v/v) with 10 mM ammonium formate + 0.1% formic acid. For negative ionization mode, mobile phase A consisted of 60:40 acetonitrile/water (v/v) with 10 mM ammonium acetate + 0.1% acetic acid; mobile phase B consisted of 90:10 isopropyl alcohol/acetonitrile (v/v) with 10 mM ammonium acetate + 0.1% acetic acid. The gradient was programmed as follows: 0.0-8.0 min from 45% B to 99% B, 8.0-9.0 min at 99% B, 9.0-9.1 min to 45% B, and 9.1-10.0 min at 45% B.

Electrospray ionization was performed using the following settings: curtain gas at 30 psi; collision gas at 8 psi; ion spray voltage at 5500 V (positive mode) or -4500 V (negative mode); temperature at 250°C (positive mode) or 600°C (negative mode); ion source Gas 1 at 55 psi; ion source Gas 2 at 60 psi; entrance potential at 10 V (positive mode) or -10 V (negative mode); and collision cell exit potential at 12.5 V (positive mode) or -15.0 V (negative mode). Data acquisition was performed in multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM) with the collision energy (CE) values reported in Supplementary Table 5. Lipids were quantified as area normalized to specific non-endogenous internal standards as reported in Supplementary Table 5. Quantification was performed using MultiQuant 3.02 (Sciex). Lipids were normalized to protein amount. Protein concentration was measured using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).

LCMS analysis of polar metabolites

Positive mode

Metabolites analyses were performed liquid chromatography (UHPLC Nexera X2) coupled to electrospray mass spectrometry (QTRAP 6500+, Sciex). For each analysis, 5 μL of sample was injected on a BEH amide 1.7 μm, 2.1×150 mm column (Waters Corporation, Milford, Massachusetts, USA) using a flow rate of 0.40 mL/min at 40°C. Mobile phase A consisted of water with 10 mM ammonium formate + 0.1% formic acid. Mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. The gradient was programmed as follows: 0.0–1.0 min at 95% B; 1.0–7.0 min to 50% B; 7.0–7.1 min to 95% B; and 7.1–10.0 min at 95% B. The following source settings were applied: curtain gas at 30 psi; collision gas was set at at 8 psi; ion spray voltage at 5500 V; temperature at 600°C; ion source Gas 1 at 50 psi; ion source Gas 2 at 60 psi; entrance potential at 10 V; and collision cell exit potential at 12.5 V. Data acquisition was performed in multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM) with the collision energy (CE) values reported in Supplementary Table 6. Quantification was performed using MultiQuant 3.02 (Sciex).

Negative mode

Metabolites analyses were performed liquid chromatography (ACQUITY I-Class Plus UPLC FL, Waters Corp) coupled to electrospray mass spectrometry (XEVO TQ-S Micro, Waters Corp). For each analysis, 5 μL of sample was injected on an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 HILIC-Z P 2.7 μm, 2.1×50 mm (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA USA); using a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min at 25°C. Mobile phase A consisted of water with 10 mM ammonium acetate + 5 μM medronic acid (Agilent), pH 9. Mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile:water 9:1 with 10 mM ammonium acetate + 5 μM medronic acid (Agilent), pH 9. The gradient was programmed as follows: 0.0–1.0 min at 95% B; 1.0–6.0 min to 50% B; 6.0–6.5 min to 95% B; and 6.5–10.0 min at 95% B. Electrospray ionization was performed in negative ion mode. The following source settings were applied: capillary voltage at 1.9 kV; source temperature at 150°C; desolvation temperature at 600°C; desolvation gas flow at 1000 L/hr; cone gas flow at 50 L/hr; cone voltage at 20 V; nebulizer gas at 7 bar. Data acquisition was performed in multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM) with the collision energy (CE) values reported in Supplementary Table 6. Quantification was performed using Skyline (v19.1;University of Washington).

In vivo PET imaging and quantification

All rodent PET procedures followed an established standardized protocol for radiochemistry, acquisition times and post-processing [49], which was transferred to a novel PET/MRI system. In brief, [18F]GE-180 TSPO-PET and [18F]FDG-PET was used to measure cerebral microglial activity and glucose metabolism respectively. For TSPO-PET imaging, AppSAA mice (KI/KI) (n=21, 14 males and 7 females) and aged-matched wildtype littermate controls (+/+) (n=30, 6 males and 24 females) were analyzed from 5 to 20 months of age. For FDG-PET imaging, another cohort of AppSAA mice (KI/KI) (n=14, 7 males and 7 females) and aged-matched wildtype littermate controls (+/+) (n=27, 6 males and 21 females) were studied from 5 to 20 months of age.

All mice were scanned with a 3T Mediso nanoScan PET/MR scanner (Mediso Ltd, Hungary) with a triple-mouse imaging chamber. A 15-minute anatomical T1 MR scan was performed at 15 min after [18F]FDG injection or at 45 min after [18F]GE-180 injection (head receive coil, matrix size 96 × 96 × 22, voxel size 0.24 × 0.24 × 0.80 mm3, repetition time 677 ms, echo time 28.56 ms, flip angle 90°). PET emission was recorded at 30-60 min p.i. ([18F] FDG) or at 60-90 min p.i. ([18F]GE-180). PET list-mode data within 400-600 keV energy window were reconstructed using a 3D iterative algorithm (Tera-Tomo 3D, Mediso Ltd, Hungary) with the following parameters: matrix size 55 × 62 × 187 mm3, voxel size 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 mm3, 8 iterations, 6 subsets. Decay, random, and attenuation correction were applied. The T1 image was used to create a body-air material map for the attenuation correction.

Normalization of injected activity was performed by the previously validated myocardium correction method [50] for [18F]GE-180 TSPO-PET and by standardized uptake value (SUV) normalization for [18F]FDG-PET.

FDG-PET and TSPO-PET values deriving from a predefined cortical volume of interest [51] were extracted and analyzed as a function of age in direct comparison of AppSAA and wildtype mice.

Statistical analysis

Data have either been expressed as means ± SEM or as indicated in graphs. Statistical analysis of data was performed in GraphPad Prism 8 or as indicated otherwise for whole brain plaque analysis, RNAseq and LC-MS data. Analysis was performed using t test or with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett multiple comparison as indicated in figure legends. Criterion for differences to be considered significant was P < 0.05.

Comparison of LC/MS results from FACS-isolated microglia from AppSAA +/+, AppSAA KI/+ and AppSAA KI/KI mice: Integrated peak areas were divided by the area of pre-assigned internal limma standards, and the resulting ratios were log2 transformed. Analytes detected in less than 75% of the samples were removed. To identify and account for unwanted sources of variation, two surrogate variables (SV) were identified with the sva R packag e[52]. Genotypes were compared by fitting the following linear model using the limma R packag e[53]: log2(abundance) ~ genotype + batch + sex + SV. Sample weights were incorporated vi’ limma's arrayWeights function. Analytes with an estimated absolute fold difference of more than 20% at a false discovery rate of less than 10% were deemed significant. To visualize adjusted abundances in the heatmap, the batch, sex and SV covariates were regressed out with limma's removeBatchEffect function. LC/MS results from methoxy-positive and -negative microglia were analyzed in a similar way, but as no significant surrogate variables were identified, median scaling was applied to the log2 transformed ratios of each sample instead and the following linear model was fit using limma: log2(abundance) ~ genotype + batch + sex.

Data availability

RNA-seq datasets have been deposited online in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository as SuperSeries GSE158156, which is composed of the SubSeries GSE158152 and GSE158153

Results

Generation of the App SAA KI mouse model and characterization of APP metabolism

We used a knock-in (KI) strategy to humanize the Aβ sequence of the murine App gene and introduced three fAD mutations - Swedish (KM670/671NL) [54], Arctic (E693G) [55] and Austrian (T714I) [56] - using homologous recombination (Supplementary Fig. 1a). To determine whether introduction of the fAD and humanization mutations disrupts App expression, we examined App mRNA levels in AppSAA KI/KI (homozygous), AppSAA KI/+ (heterozygous) and AppSAA +/+ (wild type) mice at 2 months of age. RT-qPCR analysis showed normal levels of App mRNA in KI/KI and KI/+ brains (Fig. 1a). Western blotting analysis with an antibody recognizing the N-terminus of mouse and human APP (22C11) revealed similar full-length APP protein levels across the three genotypes (Fig. 1b). Immunoblotting with an antibody recognizing amino acids 1-16 of human Aβ (6E10) detected the humanized Aβ sequence in the full-length APP and C-terminal APP fragments (APP-CTF) in brains of KI/+ animals, and we observed elevated levels in the KI/KI background (Fig. 1b), as expected based on enhanced cleavage due to the Swedish mutation [57, 58]. The elevation of APP-CTF was further validated by antibody A8717 which specifically recognizes the C-terminus of APP (Fig. 1b). These results demonstrate that AppSAA does not affect full-length APP expression but alters its cleavage products.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Alterations of APP cleavage and Aβ levels in AppSAA knock-in mice. a RT-qPCR analysis of brain RNA shows normal App mRNA level in the AppSAA homozygous mice (KI/KI), heterozygous mice (KI/+) and wild-type mice (+/+) at 2-month-old. b Western blotting analysis of brain lysates at 2-month-old shows normal expression of full-length APP proteins in all three genotypes and KI gene dosage-dependent increase of human full-length APP proteins and APP-CTF in KI/KI and KI/+ mice. β-Actin was used as internal loading control. c Measurement of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in brain insoluble and soluble fractions extracted from animals at 4 months of age. Level of insoluble Aβ42 is increased in KI/KI homogenates and level of insoluble Aβ40 is reduced in KI/KI and KI/+ homogenates relative to wild-type control. The insoluble Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio is significantly enhanced in KI/KI brains. Level of soluble Aβ42 is unchanged in KI/KI homogenates and level of soluble Aβ40 is reduced in KI/KI and KI/+ homogenates relative to wild-type control. The soluble Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio is significantly increased in KI/KI brains. d Measurement of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in CSF and plasma collected from mice at 4 months of age. Level of Aβ42 is unchanged in KI/KI CSF while level of Aβ40 is reduced in KI/KI and KI/+ CSF relative to wild-type control. The CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio is significantly increased in KI/KI CSF. Level of Aβ42 is unchanged in KI/KI plasma while level of Aβ40 is reduced in KI/KI and KI/+ plasma relative to wild-type control. The plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio is significantly increased in KI/KI. Graphs are box and whisker plots and P values: one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, each group compared to the AppSAA +/+ control group; **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. Sample size: 3-6 per genotype.

We then used an immunoassay with the 4G8 antibody to measure Aβ40 and Aβ42 in AppSAA mice. The Aβ42/40 ratio was increased in soluble and insoluble brain fractions, CSF, and plasma from AppSAA KI/KI at 2 and 4 months of age (Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Fig. 1b-e). At 2 months of age, before amyloid plaques were detected (Fig. 2a), we observed a reduction of Aβ40 levels in brain fractions, CSF and plasma from AppSAA KI/KI, leading to an increased Aβ42/40 ratio (Supplementary Fig. 1b-e). At 4 months of age, an increase of Aβ42 levels in insoluble brain fraction further increased the Aβ42/40 ratio in the AppSAA KI/KI (Fig. 1c). The reduction of Aβ40 levels in brain and biofluids in young AppSAA KI/KI mice could be induced by the Austrian fAD mutation, which has been reported to impact APP cleavage by γ-secretase [56]. Alternatively, it is possible that the 4G8 antibody used in this assay has reduced binding to humanized Aβ (in AppSAA KI/KI) as compared to murine Aβ (in AppSAA +/+), leading to an apparent decrease in Aβ40. However, since 4G8 antibody similarly binds Aβ40 and Aβ42, the calculated Aβ42/40 ratio for both AppSAA +/+ controls and AppSAA KI/KI mice are independent of the affinity of 4G8 for humanized versus murine Aβ.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Amyloid plaque pathology, biomarkers of neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. a Amyloid plaques were measured by segmentation and registration to the CCFv3 atlas post-methoxy-X04 labeling. N = 4-30 mice/ group. b Methoxy-X04 positive plaque density across brain regions in the AppSAA KI/KI. Hippocampal F. = formation. N = 4-6 mice/ group. c 3D heatmaps show brain distribution of methoxy-X04 positive plaques in AppSAA KI/KI at 8-month-old. Except panel i, all panels from d-n show data from 8-month-old mice. d Representative images of brain sections show Aβ plaque immunoreactivity in AppSAA KI/KI but not in KI/+ mice. Leptomeningeal cerebral amyloid angiopathy is indicated by arrows. e Confocal images from AppSAA KI/KI stained for plaques, microglia markers (Iba1, CD68), dystrophic neurites (AT8), neurofilament (Nf) and lysosomal marker (LAMP1). Far right column provides a magnified view of the inset in merged images. Scale bars = 10 μm. f-g Quantification of brain areas covered by Aβ plaques (f) and AT8 area (g). N = 3-6 mice/ genotype. h Total tau levels in CSF. N = 6-11 mice/ genotype. i Higher level of CSF Nf-L in aged AppSAA KI/KI relative to +/+ mice. N = 4-33 mice/ group. Age: F (4, 111) = 61.74, P < 0.0001. Genotype: F (1, 111) = 33.46, P < 0.0001. j-l Quantification of Iba1 (j), CD68 (k), percentage of the Iba1 and CD68 signals overlapping with plaques (l). N = 3-6 mice/ genotype. m TREM2 levels measured in brain homogenates. N = 10 mice/ genotype. n Differential abundance (log2) of cytokines measured in brain lysates. N = 10 mice/ genotype. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals of fold change. Graphs from f-m are box and whisker plots. P values: (f, j, k) one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, (g, h, m) t-test. Each genotype compared to AppSAA +/+; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001

Progression of amyloid-plaque pathology and associated neurodegeneration

Methoxy-X04 is a blood-brain permeable fluorescent dye, derived from congo red, that is widely used to stain amyloid plaques containing fibrillar forms of Aβ [59, 60]. To analyze the spatial distribution of Aβ deposition at the whole brain level, we injected methoxy-X04 intraperitoneally in KI/KI, KI/+ and +/+ mice from 2 to 8 months of age and euthanized animals 24 hours post injection for two-photon serial imaging [31]. Amyloid deposition was detected in AppSAA KI/KI from 4 months of age and the total brain density of Aβ plaques increased in an age-dependent manner at 4 and 8 months of age in this genotype (Fig. 2a). In contrast, no methoxy-X04 positive plaques were observed in AppSAA KI/+ from 4 to 8 months. Aβ deposition in AppSAA KI/KI was comparable to that reported for commonly used transgenic models, such as the APP/PS1 and the 5xFAD lines (Fig. 2a). At 8 months of age, Aβ plaques were detected in multiple brain regions, but the highest density of pathology was found in cortical and hippocampal regions (Fig. 2b, c). Comparing the temporal and spatial plaque deposition patterns in AppSAA KI/KI with progression of amyloid pathology in human AD [31, 61] revealed remarkable similarities in plaque distribution (Supplementary Fig. 2). Immunostaining with an anti-amyloid antibody confirmed the age-dependent amyloid pathology in the AppSAA KI/KI brains (Fig. 2d, f; Supplementary Fig. 3a, b) and identified plaques in the AppSAA KI/+ brains at 16 months of age (Supplementary Fig. 5a). No sex effect was detected in amyloid burden in the cortex (2-way ANOVA: p=0.49, 4 males and 2 females) or the hippocampus (2-way ANOVA: p=0.31, 4 males and 2 females) in 8 month-old AppSAA KI/KI mice (Fig. 2f), but since sample sizes were relatively small in this analysis, a potential sex effect cannot be firmly excluded. Moreover, anti-Aβ and methoxy-X04 co-stainings revealed a lower percentage of methoxy-X04 positive plaques in the AppSAA KI/KI brains compared to that in 5xFAD brains at 6-8 months of age (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b), indicating that the plaques in AppSAA KI/KI brains are less dense than in the 5xFAD brains. We also identified vascular Aβ deposition in AppSAA KI/KI at 8 and 16 months of age, particularly in leptomeningeal (pial) vessels at the brain surface, demonstrating the presence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) in this model (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 5b-e).

Swollen, dystrophic neural processes surrounding amyloid plaques are a common pathological feature of AD [62]. To determine if amyloid plaques were associated with this type of neurodegenerative processes in AppSAA KI/KI, we analyzed three markers of dystrophic neurites by immunohistochemistry at 8 months of age: phosphorylated tau (pTau), neurofilament (axonal marker) and LAMP1 (lysosomal marker). We observed numerous AT8-positive pTau puncta (Fig. 2e, g), abnormal shape of neurites (swollen, expanded, dystrophic) and accumulation of LAMP1 (Fig. 2e) around plaques, which are all prominent features of dystrophic neurites.

To further explore if amyloid pathology caused elevation of biomarkers of neurodegeneration in AppSAA KI mice, we measured total tau and neurofilament light chain (Nf-L) in CSF. We found that total tau levels were elevated in AppSAA KI/KI relative to the AppSAA +/+ controls at 8 months of age (Fig. 2h). We also observed age-dependent increase of CSF Nf-L in both AppSAA KI/KI and AppSAA +/+ from 2 to 23 months of age (Fig. 2i). Levels of Nf-L were significantly higher in AppSAA KI/KI mice at 18 and 23 months of age when compared to AppSAA +/+ (Fig. 2i). No sex difference was detected in Nf-L levels across ages (ANOVA, sex variable, p=0.49). Altogether, our data demonstrate that the AppSAA KI mouse model develops progressive deposition of neuritic plaques that is associated with an elevation of neurodegeneration biomarkers.

To investigate microglial responses, we stained brain sections for Iba1 and CD68 proteins in the cortex and the hippocampus from AppSAA KI/KI at 8 months of age. We found that microglia density was increased in the vicinity of amyloid plaques with an enrichment in CD68-positive microglia (Fig. 2e, j-l and Supplementary Fig. 6a-d), indicating clustering of responsive microglia around plaques. Additionally, levels of TREM2 and various cytokines were elevated in brain homogenates from AppSAA KI/KI at 8 months of age (Fig. 2m, n), showing profound immune responses.

One of the hallmarks of AD and related animal models is reactive astrogliosis, a process characterized by complex molecular, morphological, and functional changes in astrocytes [63]. To assess astrocytic changes in 18-month-old AppSAA KI/KI mice, we first analyzed the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a commonly used marker of astrocytic responses in disease. We found robust and widespread increases in GFAP immunoreactivity in AppSAA KI/KI mice as compared to age matched AppSAA +/+ controls, especially in the neocortex and hippocampus (Supplementary Fig. 7a, d). We also detected strong polarization of GFAP-immunoreactive astrocytes around Aβ plaques in AppSAA KI/KI mice. Next, we assessed the expression of GLT-1 (also known as Slc2a1, or excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2)), a major glutamate transporter mainly expressed by astrocytes and essential for synaptic glutamate homeostasis [64, 65]. Decreased GLT-1 levels have been previously reported in postmortem AD brain tissue [66,67,68], suggesting that AD pathology involves dysregulation in excitatory transmission. In agreement with previous reports, we found decreased levels of GLT-1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of AppSAA KI/KI mice (Supplementary Fig. 7b, e). Lastly, we assessed the expression of C3, a complement factor implicated in AD pathology and upregulated in astrocytes in response to microglial release of proinflammatory factors [69, 70]. Similar to GFAP, astrocytic C3 levels were increased in the hippocampus, neocortex, and other brain regions of AppSAA KI/KI mice, and these increases seemed highest near Aβ plaques (Supplementary Fig. 7c, f). Together, these results suggest that AppSAA KI/KI mice have profound alterations in astrocytes that may contribute to disease progression in this model.

Multi-dimensional phenotyping of the microglial response

The presence of microglia clusters around amyloid plaques and the elevation of cytokines suggested that microglia transitioned to a responsive state. To further characterize this response, we isolated CD11b+ microglia from AppSAA KI/KI, KI/+ and +/+ mice at 8 months of age by FACS (Fig. 3a) and analyzed their mRNA, metabolite, and lipid profiles as previously described in non-amyloid models [22].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Multi-omics analysis of microglia from AppSAA KI/KI and control mice at 8 months of age. a FACS gating strategy for isolating microglia from whole brains of AppSAA homozygous mice (KI/KI), heterozygous mice (KI/+) and wild-type mice (+/+) at 8 months of age for transcriptomics, lipidomics, and metabolomics analysis. b Volcano plots showing log2 fold change of gene expression between AppSAA heterozygous (left) and homozygous (right) knock-in compared to WT; dark grey, fuchsia, and blue indicate DEGs (FDR <= 10%; see methods), DAM, and homeostatic genes, respectively. N = 6 mice per genotype. c Single sample activity scores for curated gene sets in AppSAA heterozygous, AppSAA homozygous, and 5xFAD. Intensities indicate log2 fold change of aggregated gene set score (row) per mouse (column) with respect to mean gene set score from matched WT mice. N = 5-6 mice per genotype. d Volcano plot showing log2 fold change of lipids between AppSAA homozygous mice compared to WT. FDR <= 10%; absolute fold change > 20%. N = 6 mice per genotype. e Heatmap of top 10 lipids significantly altered by genotype in isolated microglia; columns represent individual mice. Intensities indicate log2 fold change of lipids with respect to mean abundance in WT mice. N = 6 mice per genotype

We first confirmed the enrichment and purity of isolated microglia using RNA-seq data to compare the expression levels of previously reported marker genes from different cell types in the mouse brain [71] (Supplementary Fig. 8a). At 8 months of age, the microglial transcriptome from AppSAA KI/+ showed little difference when compared to AppSAA +/+ controls (Fig. 3b). Microglia from AppSAA KI/KI mice, however, contained more than six hundred differentially expressed genes (DEGs) vs. AppSAA +/+ controls (absolute log2 fold change [FC] > 1.2, false discovery rate [FDR] < 10%), with an upregulation of disease-associated microglia (DAM) genes (Fig. 3b). Increased activity of other gene sets related to microglial state and function, such as cholesterol metabolism, glycolysis, phagocytic and lysosomal function resembled those observed in microglia from the 5xFAD transgenic or demyelination models [14, 22, 43] (Fig. 3c), demonstrating that some aspects of the microglia signature are conserved across diverse APP mouse models, including the AppSAA KI mouse model.

Targeted liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LCMS) analysis of 176 lipids in FACS-isolated microglia identified 4 significantly decreased and 16 significantly increased analytes between AppSAA KI/KI and +/+ mice (>= 20% change with FDR < 10%) (Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). Ganglioside GM3 (d36:1), various species of triglyceride (TG) (including species of arachidonate-containing TG) as well as a variety of phospholipid species (i.e., PG, PS and PI) were more abundant in AppSAA KI/KI microglia (Fig. 3d-e). Conversely, lysolipid lysophosphatidylinositol LPI 18:1 and coenzyme Q10 were less abundant in AppSAA KI/KI microglia (Fig. 3d-e). Together, these observations indicate broad changes in microglia lipid metabolism in the AppSAA KI mouse model, reminiscent of findings in human AD brains [72] and other AD mouse models [73, 74].

Methoxy-X04-positive microglia exhibit an exacerbated gene expression and metabolic response

Next, we asked whether proximity to amyloid plaques affected microglia gene expression, lipid, and metabolite profiles. We hypothesized that the microglia in proximity to amyloid plaques may have more phagocytic activity and show higher intracellular Aβ levels than the microglia distal to plaques. We labelled fibrillar Aβ in AppSAA KI/KI by peripheral injection of methoxy-X04 and quantified the proximity of methoxy-X04-positive (+) microglia to amyloid plaques via super-resolution microscopy (Fig. 4a). We confirmed that most methoxy-X04 (+) microglia were found around amyloid plaques (Fig. 4b), consistent with the notion that those microglia phagocytosed Aβ.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Methoxy-X04 (+) microglia from AppSAA KI/KI mice exhibit exacerbated gene expression and metabolic profiles. a (Left) Confocal images of cortex from 8-month-old AppSAA homozygous mice (KI/KI) stained for amyloid plaques and microglia markers (Iba1) post methoxy-X04 injection. Scale bars = 25 μm. (Right) a magnified view of the inset. b Quantification of methoxy-X04 (+) microglia proximal to plaques n=6. c-d Schematic of FACS experiment and gating strategy used to isolate pure populations of microglia that are negative (-) or positive (+) for methoxy-X04. e Fraction of methoxy-X04 (+) microglia purified from WT and AppSAA KI/KI mouse brains at 8 months of age. N = 10. f Volcano plot showing log2 fold change of gene expression between methoxy-X04 (+) and methoxy-X04 (-) samples. Genes expressed higher in methoxy (+) microglia have log2 fold changes > 0; colors same as in Fig. 3b. g Images of brain sections showing methoxy-X04 labeling and detection of Trem2 and Tmem119 transcripts by in situ hybridization. h Gene expression profiles from a representative subset of differentially expressed genes in methoxy-X04 (-) and (+) AppSAA KI/KI microglia when compared to WT. Intensities correspond to the log2 fold- change for each gene (row) per sample (column) as compared to the mean expression of the gene in the methoxy-X04 (-) WT group. i Gene set enrichment analysis from methoxy-X04 (-) (grey) or methoxy-X04 (+) (light green) AppSAA KI/KI vs methoxy-X04 (-) WT mice. Enrichment scores are calculated as the mean t-statistic of genes in the leading edge of the gene set. Filled bars indicate gene set enrichment results with FDR <= 10%

To further characterize the relationship between microglial phagocytic activity, gene, and metabolite profiles, we sorted methoxy-X04 (-) and (+) microglia by FACS prior to conducting RNA-seq, lipidomic, and metabolomic analyses (Fig. 4c–d). We found that about 15% of microglia are methoxy-X04 (+) (Fig. 4e) in AppSAA KI/KI at 8 months of age. This figure is comparable to what was reported in the 5xFAD model at 4 months of age [75]. Direct comparison of methoxy-X04 (+) vs. (-) microglia from AppSAA KI/KI identified more than 800 DEGs, with methoxy-X04 (+) microglia showing increased DAM activation (Fig. 4f), as well as increased expression of Gusb, Prdx6, Ctsa, Arpc1b, Grn among other genes recently reported in the plaque-induced gene (PIG) signature [8] (Supplementary Fig. 8b). Higher levels of Trem2 transcripts were detected in methoxy-X04 positive amyloid plaques by in situ hybridization (Fig. 4g) in AppSAA homozygous mice at 8 months of age, consistent with an enrichment of responsive microglia clustering around amyloid plaques (Fig. 2k-l). Methoxy-X04 (-) microglia from AppSAA mice also showed significant changes compared to methoxy-X04 (-) microglia from WT control mice, but the effects were not as strong as the ones measured in AppSAA methoxy-X04 (+) microglia (Fig. 4h; Supplementary Fig. 8b).

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed approximately twice as many significant pathways (FDR <= 10%) in the methoxy-X04 (+) relative to the methoxy-X04 (-) microglia when these populations were compared against WT. Most notably, methoxy-X04 (+) cells exhibited higher enrichment for genes regulating innate immune function as well as metabolic functions that appear critical for supporting lipid clearance and metabolism (Fig 4i). As anticipated, these cells also showed an enrichment in genes associated with regulation of Aβ clearance and amyloid plaques (PIGs) (Fig 4i). Finally, the upregulation of the signature genes (Spp1, Tmem163, Apoe, Ctsb, Hif1a, among others) from the Mic1 microglia sub-cluster in human AD [19] were enriched in the phagocytic microglia from the AppSAA homozygous mice (p-value < 1e-4, hypergeometric test; Fig 4i), suggesting that this mouse model successfully recapitulates a subset of the microglial response found in human disease.

Mirroring our transcriptomic analyses, lipid alterations were exacerbated in AppSAA methoxy-X04 (+) microglia relative to methoxy-X04 (-) and WT microglia, as shown for instance for GM3(d36:1) and TG 20:4/36:3 species (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Tables 7 and 8). In total, 48 of the 172 assayed lipids showed higher and 32 displayed lower abundance in AppSAA methoxy-X04 (+) compared to WT microglia (>= 20% change with FDR < 10%). Some lipid changes appeared to be specific to methoxy-X04 (+) microglia, including an increase in cholesteryl ester CE 22:6 and a decrease in other CE species, such as CE 20:4 (Fig. 5a). Finally, analyses of 101 polar metabolites in sorted microglia revealed 2 analytes with increased and 28 with decreased abundance in AppSAA methoxy-X04 (+) compared to WT microglia (>= 20% change with FDR < 10%; Supplementary Tables 7 and 8). For example, the polyamine spermine accumulated specifically in methoxy-X04 (+) microglia (Fig. 5b-c). Therefore, our data lends further support to the notion that phagocytic microglia undergo profound cellular alterations, including changes in lysosomal activity, lipid dyshomeostasis, and other metabolic changes.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Methoxy-X04 (+) microglia isolated from AppSAA knock-in mice show alterations of lipids and metabolites levels. a-b Heatmap of (a) lipids and (b) metabolites significantly altered by genotype and/or presence of methoxy-X04 dye in microglia isolated from AppSAA KI/KI and AppSAA +/+ mouse brain. n=10, columns represent individual mice. c Representative plots showing genotype and methoxy-X04 effects on key lipids and metabolites from FACS-isolated microglia. n=10. Statistical analysis was performed by fitting linear models using limma; FDR was calculated according to Benjamini’s and Hochberg’s method. All panels from a-c are showing data from 8-month-old mice

App SAA mice show enhanced TSPO and FDG-PET signals in brain

Based on the amyloid-related response of microglia in the AppSAA KI model, we sought to determine if mice show elevated levels of the 18KDa translocator protein TSPO, an imaging marker that is associated with microglia biology [20, 76, 77] and elevated in AD patients [78, 79]. We compared the TSPO positron emission tomography (PET) signal of AppSAA +/+ controls and AppSAA KI/KI at different ages. AppSAA KI/KI mice had a significantly higher TSPO-PET signal in the cortex at 12 and 20 months of age when compared to AppSAA +/+ mice (Fig. 6a, c). To evaluate if this increase in TSPO expression was associated with changes in brain metabolism, we measured glucose uptake by 2-deoxy-2- [18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG)-PET. The cortical signal of FDG-PET was also elevated in AppSAA KI/KI compared to AppSAA +/+ across the studied lifespan (Fig. 6b). AppSAA KI/KI had a significantly higher glucose uptake at 12 and 20 months of age when compared to control mice (Fig. 6d). TSPO-PET and FDG-PET quantification were strongly associated in AppSAA KI/KI (R=0.709, p=0.007) but not in AppSAA +/+ (R=0.171, p=0.577), suggesting that the elevation of glucose metabolism could be partially driven by responsive microglia in this model, as recently demonstrated in a distinct mouse model [20].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Elevated TSPO- and FDG-PET cortical signals in AppSAA mice. a-b Axial slices upon an MRI template show TSPO-PET and FDG-PET uptake patterns of WT and AppSAA mice at different age groups. c AppSAA KI/KI mice had a significantly higher TSPO-PET signal at 12 months and 20 months of age when compared to AppSAA +/+ control mice. d AppSAA KI/KI mice had a significantly higher glucose uptake at 12 and 20 months of age when compared to AppSAA +/+ control mice. P values: t-test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ****P < 0.0001.

Characterization of behavioral phenotypes in App SAA KI model

APP transgenic mouse models often display behavioral alterations, including locomotor hyperactivity, habituation deficits to a novel environment, emotional alterations and learning and memory deficit s[80, 81]. The emergence of behavioral abnormalities in App KI mouse models indicates that accumulation of Aβ without APP overexpression is sufficient to trigger age-dependent brain dysfunction [7, 82, 83]. To determine whether the AppSAA KI mouse model developed similar behavior alterations, we first evaluated a cohort of mice from 4 to 18 months of age using the frailty scoring, activity monitoring in their home cage and an open field. AppSAA KI/KI and KI/+ did not show deficits in frailty index at any of the tested ages (Supplementary Table 9), indicating that this model does not develop major general health issues. AppSAA KI/KI mice displayed a robust hyperactivity phenotype at 18 months of age in the open field (Supplementary Table 9). Longitudinal monitoring of running wheel activity in their home cages revealed an age-dependent increase in spontaneous activity (Fig. 7a-c). Females showed a more pronounced phenotype compared to males, with a significant hyperactivity phenotype detected at 8 months of age (Fig. 7a-c). To determine whether AppSAA KI/KI show any deficit in habituation to a novel environment, we tested an independent cohort of mice at 16–17-month-old in a repeated version of the open field (Fig. 7d). Mice were tested twice a day for two days (trials 1–4) and retested two weeks later (trials 5–8) to assess locomotor activity and short- and long-term habituation [84]. Compared to sex-matched wildtype littermate mice, AppSAA KI/KI had increased locomotor activity (hyperactivity), which became more prominent as wildtype mice habituated to the open field over the repeated testing (habituation deficits), and AppSAA KI/KI showed stronger center preference (disinhibition). Overall, there were prominent effects in genotype (p = 0.004), sex (p = 0.008), and location (p <0.001), indicating that AppSAA KI/KI displayed altered behavior; males and females regardless of genotype behaved differently; and there was a distinct preference for location (center). Genotype interacted with location (p < 0.001), but not with sex (p = 0.439), indicating that AppSAA KI/KI behaved differently in the center (higher activity) than in the periphery (decreased activity) relative to wildtype littermate controls, and that male and female AppSAA KI/KI displayed similar behavioral alterations relatively to sex-matched wildtype mice. Notably, male AppSAA KI/KI displayed prominent hyperactivity during the first (Trials 5 and 7) but not the second (Trials 6 and 8) trials of the retest days, whereas female AppSAA mice displayed a more consistent hyperactivity throughout all trials relative to sex-matched wildtype controls. These results indicate that aged male and female AppSAA KI/KI develop robust hyperactivity, habituation deficits, and disinhibition alterations.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Hyperactivity phenotype in AppSAA KI/KI mice. a-c Spontaneous activity was monitored in home-cage using running wheels. The average time running is represented for males (a) and females (b) at 4, 8, 12 and 18 months of age for the three genotypes (AppSAA +/+, KI/+ and KI/KI). Graphs are box and whisker plots. P values: one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. AppSAA KI/KI compared to the AppSAA +/+ control group; ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001. c Illustration of time spent running averaged per genotype in female mice at 18 months of age. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. d 16–17-month-old male and female AppSAA mice (KI/KI) and wildtype littermate controls (+/+) were tested in the open field for 5 min twice a day for two days (Day 1–2; Trials 1–4) and retested two weeks later (Day 15–16; Trials 5–8). Top: Distance travelled (cm) in the center and periphery of a circular arena. Bottom: P values for the repeated three-way ANOVA with genotype (KI/KI vs +/+), sex (male vs female), and location (center vs periphery) as fixed factors and their interactions. Bars represent mean ± SEM. Number of mice indicated in parentheses

Discussion

This study demonstrates that a mouse model expressing physiologically relevant levels of APP bearing familial AD mutations recapitulates several key aspects of AD biology. The AppSAA KI mouse model shows progressive accumulation of amyloid pathology, increased levels of biomarkers of neurodegeneration, and robust astroglial and microglial responses. Deep phenotyping of microglia by multi-omics approach demonstrates that phagocytic microglia in the vicinity of amyloid plaques display profound gene expression and metabolic dysregulation in this model. Given the large contribution of microglial genes to AD risk, and the many microglial-directed therapies currently in clinical development [10] this model represents an opportunity to gain novel insight into the role of microglial biology in the context of amyloid pathology and offers a translationally relevant model system for evaluating the impact of microglial-directed therapies in a disease context.

As anticipated based on the diffuse amyloid deposits seen in AD patients carrying the Austrian or the Arctic mutation [85], a large proportion of the amyloid plaques in the AppSAA mice were also diffuse with or without a dense core structure. The fibrillar form of Aβ combined with a diffuse halo of amyloid was associated with key features of neuritic plaques [86, 87] in the AppSAA mice, including dystrophic neurites, accumulation of phosphorylated tau and enlarged LAMP1-positive lysosomes. In response to the progressive accumulation of amyloid plaques, the AppSAA mice developed a robust immune response that was characterized by elevated levels of multiple neuroinflammatory cytokines and TREM2 in brain lysates, an increased density of responsive microglia at the vicinity of amyloid plaques, profound expression changes in genes belonging to inflammatory and DAM pathways in microglia, and an increase of TSPO-PET signal in the brain.

One of the fundamental questions in the field is whether microglia are affected by the amyloid plaque environment and if so, whether these changes in cell state are beneficial (e.g., by facilitating inflammation resolution) or pathogenic (e.g., by preventing inflammation resolution or promoting neurotoxicity). To begin to address this question, we profiled methoxy-X04 (+) and (-) microglia derived from the AppSAA brain using LCMS and assessed impact of Aβ phagocytosis on their lipidome and metabolome. This approach revealed significant alterations that are consistent with cellular dysfunction. One of the most striking manifestations is accumulation of ganglioside GM3 in methoxy-X04 (+) microglia, which might be indicative of a lysosomal dysfunction since gangliosides are glycosphingolipids that typically accumulate in lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs). In fact, lipidomic profiling of sorted microglia from independent LSD models, such as the Ids KO model of MPS-II (Hunter syndrome) and a Grn KO model of GRN-associated frontotemporal dementia, showed similar increases in GM3 [88, 89]. GM3 accumulation has previously been described in the entorhinal cortex of AD patients and the forebrain of AD transgenic mouse models, suggesting that it might be broadly associated with AD pathology [72]. One can speculate that microglial GM3 accumulation may result from phagocytosis of Aβ, which can potentially interfere with normal lysosomal degradative capacity and decrease lysosomal catabolism of gangliosides.

Another prominent phenotype is accumulation of neutral lipids, such as triglycerides and to a lower extent, some CE species. While these lipids are generally found in cytoplasmic lipid droplets where they can store fatty acids and cholesterol while minimizing their lipotoxicity, accumulation of these lipids may also reflect metabolic imbalance and has been associated with pro-inflammatory states and neurotoxicity in other models [10, 22, 90, 91]. Remarkably, these biochemical findings are consistent with Dr. Alzheimer’s original observations of “adipose inclusions” in glial cells neighboring amyloid plaque s[92]. Consistent with these early seminal observations, xenografted human iPSC-derived microglia (xMG) in an AD mouse model background showed similarities with atherosclerotic “foam” macrophages, including increased occurrence of lipid droplets in amyloid plaque-bound xMGs [73]. Taken together with a growing amount of human genetic data linking various genes mediating lipid metabolism to AD (e.g., APOE4, ABCA7, CLU, TREM2), these published data as well as lipidomic data from our study lends strong support to the notion dysregulation of microglial lipid metabolism contributes to AD pathogenesis.

One of the most striking observations from our metabolomic study is selective accumulation of the polyamine spermine in methoxy-X04 (+) microglia from the AppSAA KI mice. Spermine has been shown to modulate various cellular functions, including gene expression, ion channel function, response to oxidative stress, autophagy, metabolism and immune response. Spermine is critical for normal cell function as genetic ablation of spermine synthase (SMS) has been shown to cause oxidative stress and lysosomal impairment [93]. Additionally, spermine binds and neutralizes Aβ [94] and is upregulated in the PSAPP mouse model [95], suggesting that increase in spermine levels in methoxy-X04 (+) microglia may be a compensatory response to prevent the deleterious effects of Aβ. Alternatively, since spermine can be actively transported out of the lysosomes through the lysosome-associated transporter ATP13A2 and can accumulate in these organelles [96], spermine accumulation may reflect lysosomal dysfunction, as speculated for GM3. While our lipidomic and metabolic observations of phagocytic microglia in AppSAA KI provide evidence of pathway dysregulation, it will be important to assess whether manipulation of these pathways through targeted molecular genetic and/or pharmacological approaches in AppSAA mice (e.g., via targeting GM3, TG/CE, or spermine metabolism) confer benefits or exacerbate specific disease-related phenotypes.

Microglia expression profiles from preclinical mouse models of AD have shown that microglia rewire their transcriptome in a manner that does not fit the canonical M1/M2 macrophage activation paradigm [8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 17,18,19]. A recent meta-analysis of single-cell RNA-seq studies of microglia from these models has postulated that the microglial diversity observed can be characterized as some combination of five broad states: Homeostatic, DAM-like, IFN-response, MHC-II, and a proliferating state [97]. Expression profiles of microglia from AppSAA mice show that they exhibit a response similar to what has been seen in 5xFAD mice, with a strong upregulation of the DAM-like signature. Concordant with recent findings in 5xFAD mice reported by Grubman et al. [13], transcriptional analysis of methoxy-X04 (+) microglia in AppSAA mice identified a number of acutely upregulated genes and biological processes involved in the regulation of amyloid beta clearance (Lrpap1, Tnf, Trem2), lipid metabolism (Apoe, Olr1, Fabp5, Lpl, Ch25h), and lysosomal function (Gla, Galns, Ctsd, Cst7). The transcriptional program found in the methoxy-X04 (+) microglia of AppSAA mice appears to be a hyper-activated version of the methoxy-X04 (-) population when both are compared to microglia from WT mice, which stands in slight contrast to the qualitatively different response between the methoxy-X04 (+) and (-) populations from 5xFAD mice as reported in Grubman et al. [13] (Supplementary Fig. 8c-e).

In addition to neuroinflammation, the AppSAA mice show elevated levels of biomarkers of neurodegeneration in the CSF. Neurofilament light chain (Nf-L) has received a lot of attention in the last few years and has been studied across various neurological conditions to evaluate the extent of neuronal damage [98]. In AD, Nf-L progressively increases in CSF and plasma and has been correlated with brain atrophy and cognitive decline [99, 100]. Interestingly, we observed a progressive increase of Nf-L levels in the CSF in the AppSAA mice, starting with trends at 8 months of age. Despite the increase of Nf-L in CSF from control animals with age, we detected a greater separation of Nf-L levels over time, suggesting that neuronal damage increased as pathology worsens in this model. The extent of Nf-L elevation in this model (~1.5-2 fold) was within the range of what has been reported in patients with mild-cognitive impairment and AD [101, 102] and contrasted with the profound elevation of Nf-L levels in CSF reported in the 5xFAD and APP/PS1 mouse models (~10-20 fold) [101, 102], indicating that AppSAA mice may better recapitulate the rate of neurodegeneration estimated in the human condition than the 5xFAD or APP/PS1 mouse models. The excessive levels of Nf-L increase in those models are likely caused by the accumulation of fAD mutations in APP and PSEN1 in the overexpressed transgenes which result in early and fast accumulation of amyloid plaques. Consistent with the Nf-L increase, we also found that total tau was elevated at 8 months of age, again within range previously reported in patients [103]. As Nf-L levels have been associated with hypometabolism in AD [104], we measured FDG-PET signal in the AppSAA mice. In contrast to human FDG hypometabolism reported in the later phase of A D[105,106,107,108,109], we observed a cortical FDG hypermetabolism in the AppSAA mouse model. Similar hypermetabolism was also found in other amyloid models and probably reflects enhanced microglial and astroglial glucose uptake [20, 110]. In addition, it is possible that the neuronal loss in those models is not substantial enough to drive an overall reduction in brain. Despite the mouse to human discrepancy in FDG-PET signal, our data demonstrate increase of biomarkers of neurodegeneration as amyloid pathology accumulates in the AppSAA mouse model.

We also observed the emergence of behavioral abnormalities in the AppSAA KI mice, who displayed a robust alteration in spontaneous activities. Locomotor hyperactivity is commonly observed in transgenic mouse models of AD [81]. Although locomotor hyperactivity has been suggested to be linked to APP overexpression in APP/TTA transgenic mice [111], our results indicate that fAD mutations without APP overexpression are sufficient to induce locomotor hyperactivity and habituation deficits. Importantly, we found that the hyperactivity in AppSAA mice was experience-dependent and emerged as wildtype littermate mice habituate to the environment, particularly during delayed trials, potentially indicating mild impairment in context-dependent habituation, as previously described in other models [84, 112].

To the extent that we could, we included both males and females, different ages and the three genotypes of interest in this study. Early in the project, we made the decision to use wild-type littermate mice as controls. While this experimental approach provides many advantages, we also recognized that the combination of the 3 fAD mutations (Swedish, Arctic and Austrian) in the AppSAA KI line unfortunately precludes us from determining the relative contribution of each fAD mutation on the generation of Aβ peptides in this model. Generation of humanized Aβ mouse lines with inclusion of a single fAD mutation, and/or dual combination of those mutations (e.g., Swedish and Austrian, Swedish and Arctic, and Arctic and Austrian), would be necessary to rigorously explore the contribution of those mutations on Aβ production and stability. We have ongoing efforts to generate those new lines and will make them also available to the field. A recently generated mouse model expressing humanized Aβ (hAβ-KI) did not form amyloid plaques or show robust immune/glial responses and had only minor signs of neurodegeneration detected at 22 months of age [113]. In addition, a transcriptomics analysis of bulk brain tissue in the hAβ-KI showed that only a very few genes were differentially regulated compared to wild-type control mice, contrasting with the profound gene expression changes reported in microglia from AppSAA KI mice. Surprisingly, the hAβ-KI mouse model showed behavioral and synaptic deficits after 10-14 months of age, suggesting that humanization of Aβ per se may be sufficient to cause minor behavioral abnormalities, at least in the background strain studied (mixed C57BL/6NTac and C57BL/6J background) [113]. At this stage, we thus cannot parse out the potential contribution of Aβ humanization and fAD mutations on behavioral phenotype in the AppSAA KI mice. Altogether, our observations indicate that biological changes in the AppSAA KI mouse model were largely driven by the fAD mutations inserted on the App gene, which is consistent with the notion that amyloid plaques and associated neurodegeneration are the main pathological driver in App KI models.

Conclusions

Our in-depth analysis of the AppSAA knock-in mouse model confirms emergence of disease-relevant biology and progressive accumulation of pathological hallmarks of AD (Fig. 8). We identified extensive lipid and metabolite alterations in microglia, depending on their stage of phagocytic activity and proximity to amyloid plaques. Based on these findings, this new mouse model provides a helpful tool to investigate multiple relevant aspects of AD biology. We have therefore made it available to the broad scientific community to facilitate AD research and therapeutic development.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Summary of disease-relevant biology in the AppSAA mouse model

Abbreviations

Aβ:

Amyloid-β protein

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

CAA:

cerebral amyloid angiopathy

CE:

cholesteryl esters

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

DAM:

Disease associated microglia

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

KI:

Knock-in

LCMS:

liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry

PIG:

Plaque-induced genes

PSEN:

presenilin 1

Nf-L:

Neurofilament light chain

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

TG:

triglycerides

WT:

wild type

References

  1. Scearce-Levie K, Sanchez PE, Lewcock JW. Leveraging preclinical models for the development of Alzheimer disease therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(7):447–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jankowsky JL, Zheng H. Practical considerations for choosing a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12(1):89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gotz J, Bodea LG, Goedert M. Rodent models for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(10):583–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Myers A, McGonigle P. Overview of Transgenic Mouse Models for Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2019;89(1):e81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sasaguri H, Nilsson P, Hashimoto S, Nagata K, Saito T, De Strooper B, et al. APP mouse models for Alzheimer's disease preclinical studies. EMBO J. 2017;36(17):2473–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sakakibara Y, Sekiya M, Saito T, Saido TC, Iijima KM. Amyloid-beta plaque formation and reactive gliosis are required for induction of cognitive deficits in App knock-in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. BMC Neurosci. 2019;20(1):13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saito T, Matsuba Y, Mihira N, Takano J, Nilsson P, Itohara S, et al. Single App knock-in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(5):661–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen WT, Lu A, Craessaerts K, Pavie B, Sala Frigerio C, Corthout N, et al. Spatial Transcriptomics and In Situ Sequencing to Study Alzheimer's Disease. Cell. 2020;182(4):976–991 e919.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen DV, Hanson JE, Sheng M. Microglia in Alzheimer's disease. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(2):459–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewcock JW, Schlepckow K, Di Paolo G, Tahirovic S, Monroe KM, Haass C. Emerging Microglia Biology Defines Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Alzheimer's Disease. Neuron. 2020.

  11. Song WM, Colonna M. The identity and function of microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(10):1048–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman BA, Srinivasan K, Ayalon G, Meilandt WJ, Lin H, Huntley MA, et al. Diverse Brain Myeloid Expression Profiles Reveal Distinct Microglial Activation States and Aspects of Alzheimer's Disease Not Evident in Mouse Models. Cell Rep. 2018;22(3):832–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grubman A, Choo XY, Chew G, Ouyang JF, Sun G, Croft NP, et al. Transcriptional signature in microglia associated with Abeta plaque phagocytosis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3015.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK, et al. A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer's Disease. Cell. 2017;169(7):1276–1290 e1217.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krasemann S, Madore C, Cialic R, Baufeld C, Calcagno N, El Fatimy R, et al. The TREM2-APOE Pathway Drives the Transcriptional Phenotype of Dysfunctional Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Immunity. 2017;47(3):566–581 e569.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathys H, Adaikkan C, Gao F, Young JZ, Manet E, Hemberg M, et al. Temporal Tracking of Microglia Activation in Neurodegeneration at Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Rep. 2017;21(2):366–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sala Frigerio C, Wolfs L, Fattorelli N, Thrupp N, Voytyuk I, Schmidt I, et al. The Major Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Disease: Age, Sex, and Genes Modulate the Microglia Response to Abeta Plaques. Cell Rep. 2019;27(4):1293–1306 e1296.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Srinivasan K, Friedman BA, Etxeberria A, Huntley MA, van der Brug MP, Foreman O, et al. Alzheimer's Patient Microglia Exhibit Enhanced Aging and Unique Transcriptional Activation. Cell Rep. 2020;31(13):107843.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathys H, Davila-Velderrain J, Peng Z, Gao F, Mohammadi S, Young JZ, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 2019;570(7761):332–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiang X, Wind K, Wiedemann T, Blume T, Shi Y, Briel N, et al. Microglial activation states drive glucose uptake and FDG-PET alterations in neurodegenerative diseases. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(615):eabe5640.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cantuti-Castelvetri L, Fitzner D, Bosch-Queralt M, Weil MT, Su M, Sen P, et al. Defective cholesterol clearance limits remyelination in the aged central nervous system. Science. 2018;359(6376):684–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nugent AA, Lin K, van Lengerich B, Lianoglou S, Przybyla L, Davis SS, et al. TREM2 Regulates Microglial Cholesterol Metabolism upon Chronic Phagocytic Challenge. Neuron. 2020;105(5):837–854 e839.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Poliani PL, Wang Y, Fontana E, Robinette ML, Yamanishi Y, Gilfillan S, et al. TREM2 sustains microglial expansion during aging and response to demyelination. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(5):2161–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Neuner SM, Tcw J, Goate AM. Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;143:104976.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koentgen F, Lin J, Katidou M, Chang I, Khan M, Watts J, et al. Exclusive transmission of the embryonic stem cell-derived genome through the mouse germline. Genesis. 2016;54(6):326–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oakley H, Cole SL, Logan S, Maus E, Shao P, Craft J, et al. Intraneuronal beta-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer's disease mutations: potential factors in amyloid plaque formation. J Neurosci. 2006;26(40):10129–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jankowsky JL, Slunt HH, Ratovitski T, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Borchelt DR. Co-expression of multiple transgenes in mouse CNS: a comparison of strategies. Biomol Eng. 2001;17(6):157–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hsiao K, Chapman P, Nilsen S, Eckman C, Harigaya Y, Younkin S, et al. Correlative memory deficits, Abeta elevation, and amyloid plaques in transgenic mice. Science. 1996;274(5284):99–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Whitehead JC, Hildebrand BA, Sun M, Rockwood MR, Rose RA, Rockwood K, et al. A clinical frailty index in aging mice: comparisons with frailty index data in humans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(6):621–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schlepckow K, Monroe KM, Kleinberger G, Cantuti-Castelvetri L, Parhizkar S, Xia D, et al. Enhancing protective microglial activities with a dual function TREM2 antibody to the stalk region. EMBO Mol Med. 2020;12(4):e11227.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Whitesell JD, Buckley AR, Knox JE, Kuan L, Graddis N, Pelos A, et al. Whole brain imaging reveals distinct spatial patterns of amyloid beta deposition in three mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. J Comp Neurol. 2019;527(13):2122–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Q, Ding SL, Li Y, Royall J, Feng D, Lesnar P, et al. The Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework: A 3D Reference Atlas. Cell. 2020;181(4):936–953 e920.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Grady L. Random walks for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006;28(11):1768–83.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. van der Walt S, Schonberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J, Boulogne F, Warner JD, Yager N, et al. scikit-image c: scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ. 2014;2:e453.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jiang H, Lei R, Ding SW, Zhu S. Skewer: a fast and accurate adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end reads. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:182.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu R, Holik AZ, Su S, Jansz N, Chen K, Leong HS, et al. Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(15):e97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK. voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 2014;15(2):R29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Smyth GKMJ, Scott HS. Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(9):2067–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. Testing significance relative to a fold-change threshold is a TREAT. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(6):765–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ulland TK, Song WM, Huang SC, Ulrich JD, Sergushichev A, Beatty WL, et al. TREM2 Maintains Microglial Metabolic Fitness in Alzheimer's Disease. Cell. 2017;170(4):649–663 e613.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11(2):R14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. The Gene Ontology C. The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D330–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, Anders S, Carlson M, Carvalho BS, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods. 2015;12(2):115–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Overhoff F, Brendel M, Jaworska A, Korzhova V, Delker A, Probst F, et al. Automated Spatial Brain Normalization and Hindbrain White Matter Reference Tissue Give Improved [(18)F]-Florbetaben PET Quantitation in Alzheimer's Model Mice. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Deussing M, Blume T, Vomacka L, Mahler C, Focke C, Todica A, et al. Coupling between physiological TSPO expression in brain and myocardium allows stabilization of late-phase cerebral [(18)F]GE180 PET quantification. Neuroimage. 2018;165:83–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rominger A, Brendel M, Burgold S, Keppler K, Baumann K, Xiong G, et al. Longitudinal assessment of cerebral beta-amyloid deposition in mice overexpressing Swedish mutant beta-amyloid precursor protein using 18F-florbetaben PET. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(7):1127–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Jaffe AE, Storey JD. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(6):882–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mullan M, Crawford F, Axelman K, Houlden H, Lilius L, Winblad B, et al. A pathogenic mutation for probable Alzheimer's disease in the APP gene at the N-terminus of beta-amyloid. Nat Genet. 1992;1(5):345–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kamino K, Orr HT, Payami H, Wijsman EM, Alonso ME, Pulst SM, et al. Linkage and mutational analysis of familial Alzheimer disease kindreds for the APP gene region. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;51(5):998–1014.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kumar-Singh S, De Jonghe C, Cruts M, Kleinert R, Wang R, Mercken M, et al. Nonfibrillar diffuse amyloid deposition due to a gamma(42)-secretase site mutation points to an essential role for N-truncated A beta(42) in Alzheimer's disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(18):2589–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Citron M, Haass C, Selkoe DJ. Production of amyloid-beta-peptide by cultured cells: no evidence for internal initiation of translation at Met596. Neurobiol Aging. 1993;14(6):571–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Haass C, Lemere CA, Capell A, Citron M, Seubert P, Schenk D, et al. The Swedish mutation causes early-onset Alzheimer's disease by beta-secretase cleavage within the secretory pathway. Nat Med. 1995;1(12):1291–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Burgold S, Bittner T, Dorostkar MM, Kieser D, Fuhrmann M, Mitteregger G, et al. In vivo multiphoton imaging reveals gradual growth of newborn amyloid plaques over weeks. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;121(3):327–35.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Klunk WE, Bacskai BJ, Mathis CA, Kajdasz ST, McLellan ME, Frosch MP, et al. Imaging Abeta plaques in living transgenic mice with multiphoton microscopy and methoxy-X04, a systemically administered Congo red derivative. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61(9):797–805.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Thal DR, Rub U, Orantes M, Braak H. Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology. 2002;58(12):1791–800.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Adalbert R, Nogradi A, Babetto E, Janeckova L, Walker SA, Kerschensteiner M, et al. Severely dystrophic axons at amyloid plaques remain continuous and connected to viable cell bodies. Brain. 2009;132(Pt 2):402–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Escartin C, Galea E, Lakatos A, O'Callaghan JP, Petzold GC, Serrano-Pozo A, et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24(3):312–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Tzingounis AV, Wadiche JI. Glutamate transporters: confining runaway excitation by shaping synaptic transmission. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(12):935–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Murphy-Royal C, Dupuis J, Groc L, Oliet SHR. Astroglial glutamate transporters in the brain: Regulating neurotransmitter homeostasis and synaptic transmission. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(11):2140–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Jacob CP, Koutsilieri E, Bartl J, Neuen-Jacob E, Arzberger T, Zander N, et al. Alterations in expression of glutamatergic transporters and receptors in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2007;11(1):97–116.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Masliah E, Alford M, DeTeresa R, Mallory M, Hansen L. Deficient glutamate transport is associated with neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 1996;40(5):759–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Scott HA, Gebhardt FM, Mitrovic AD, Vandenberg RJ, Dodd PR. Glutamate transporter variants reduce glutamate uptake in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011:32(3):553 e551-511.

  69. Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. 2017;541(7638):481–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wu T, Dejanovic B, Gandham VD, Gogineni A, Edmonds R, Schauer S, et al. Complement C3 Is Activated in Human AD Brain and Is Required for Neurodegeneration in Mouse Models of Amyloidosis and Tauopathy. Cell Rep. 2019;28(8):2111–2123 e2116.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhang Y, Chen K, Sloan SA, Bennett ML, Scholze AR, O'Keeffe S, et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2014;34(36):11929–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Chan RB, Oliveira TG, Cortes EP, Honig LS, Duff KE, Small SA, et al. Comparative lipidomic analysis of mouse and human brain with Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(4):2678–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Claes C, Danhash EP, Hasselmann J, Chadarevian JP, Shabestari SK, England WE, et al. Plaque-associated human microglia accumulate lipid droplets in a chimeric model of Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16(1):50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Hamilton LK, Dufresne M, Joppe SE, Petryszyn S, Aumont A, Calon F, et al. Aberrant Lipid Metabolism in the Forebrain Niche Suppresses Adult Neural Stem Cell Proliferation in an Animal Model of Alzheimer's Disease. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17(4):397–411.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang Y, Ulland TK, Ulrich JD, Song W, Tzaferis JA, Hole JT, et al. TREM2-mediated early microglial response limits diffusion and toxicity of amyloid plaques. J Exp Med. 2016;213(5):667–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Karlstetter M, Nothdurfter C, Aslanidis A, Moeller K, Horn F, Scholz R, et al. Translocator protein (18 kDa) (TSPO) is expressed in reactive retinal microglia and modulates microglial inflammation and phagocytosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Sandiego CM, Gallezot JD, Pittman B, Nabulsi N, Lim K, Lin SF, et al. Imaging robust microglial activation after lipopolysaccharide administration in humans with PET. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(40):12468–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Kreisl WC, Lyoo CH, Liow JS, Wei M, Snow J, Page E, et al. (11)C-PBR28 binding to translocator protein increases with progression of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;44:53–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Pascoal TA, Benedet AL, Ashton NJ, Kang MS, Therriault J, Chamoun M, et al. Microglial activation and tau propagate jointly across Braak stages. Nat Med. 2021;27(9):1592–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kosel F, Pelley JMS, Franklin TB. Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease-related pathology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;112:634–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Webster SJ, Bachstetter AD, Nelson PT, Schmitt FA, Van Eldik LJ. Using mice to model Alzheimer's dementia: an overview of the clinical disease and the preclinical behavioral changes in 10 mouse models. Front Genet. 2014;5:88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Johnson ECB, Ho K, Yu GQ, Das M, Sanchez PE, Djukic B, et al. Behavioral and neural network abnormalities in human APP transgenic mice resemble those of App knock-in mice and are modulated by familial Alzheimer's disease mutations but not by inhibition of BACE1. Mol Neurodegener. 2020;15(1):53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Masuda A, Kobayashi Y, Kogo N, Saito T, Saido TC, Itohara S. Cognitive deficits in single App knock-in mouse models. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016;135:73–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Verret L, Mann EO, Hang GB, Barth AM, Cobos I, Ho K, et al. Inhibitory interneuron deficit links altered network activity and cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer model. Cell. 2012;149:708–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Kalimo H, Lalowski M, Bogdanovic N, Philipson O, Bird TD, Nochlin D, et al. The Arctic AbetaPP mutation leads to Alzheimer's disease pathology with highly variable topographic deposition of differentially truncated Abeta. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2013;1:60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Gowrishankar S, Yuan P, Wu Y, Schrag M, Paradise S, Grutzendler J, et al. Massive accumulation of luminal protease-deficient axonal lysosomes at Alzheimer's disease amyloid plaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(28):E3699–708.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Leyns CEG, Gratuze M, Narasimhan S, Jain N, Koscal LJ, Jiang H, et al. TREM2 function impedes tau seeding in neuritic plaques. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(8):1217–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Logan T, Simon MJ, Rana A, Cherf GM, Srivastava A, Davis SS, et al. Rescue of a lysosomal storage disorder caused by Grn loss of function with a brain penetrant progranulin biologic. Cell. 2021;184(18):4651–4668 e4625.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Ullman JC, Arguello A, Getz JA, Bhalla A, Mahon CS, Wang J, et al. Brain delivery and activity of a lysosomal enzyme using a blood-brain barrier transport vehicle in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(545).

  90. Marschallinger J, Iram T, Zardeneta M, Lee SE, Lehallier B, Haney MS, et al. Lipid-droplet-accumulating microglia represent a dysfunctional and proinflammatory state in the aging brain. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(2):194–208.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Andreone BJ, Przybyla L, Llapashtica C, Rana A, Davis SS, van Lengerich B, et al. Alzheimer's-associated PLCgamma2 is a signaling node required for both TREM2 function and the inflammatory response in human microglia. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(8):927–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Alzheimer A, Stelzmann RA, Schnitzlein HN, Murtagh FR. An English translation of Alzheimer's 1907 paper, "Uber eine eigenartige Erkankung der Hirnrinde". Clin Anat. 1995;8(6):429–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Li C, Brazill JM, Liu S, Bello C, Zhu Y, Morimoto M, et al. Spermine synthase deficiency causes lysosomal dysfunction and oxidative stress in models of Snyder-Robinson syndrome. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1257.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Luo J, Mohammed I, Warmlander SK, Hiruma Y, Graslund A, Abrahams JP. Endogenous polyamines reduce the toxicity of soluble abeta peptide aggregates associated with Alzheimer's disease. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(6):1985–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Vemula PK, Jing Y, Cicolini J, Zhang H, Mockett BG, Abraham WC, et al. Altered brain arginine metabolism with age in the APPswe/PSEN1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Int. 2020;140:104798.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. van Veen S, Martin S, Van den Haute C, Benoy V, Lyons J, Vanhoutte R, et al. ATP13A2 deficiency disrupts lysosomal polyamine export. Nature. 2020;578(7795):419–24.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Chen Y, Colonna M. Microglia in Alzheimer's disease at single-cell level. Are there common patterns in humans and mice? J Exp Med. 2021;218(9).

  98. Gafson AR, Barthelemy NR, Bomont P, Carare RO, Durham HD, Julien JP, et al. Neurofilaments: neurobiological foundations for biomarker applications. Brain. 2020;143(7):1975–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I: Association of Plasma Neurofilament Light With Neurodegeneration in Patients With Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(5):557–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Zetterberg H, Skillback T, Mattsson N, Trojanowski JQ, Portelius E, Shaw LM, et al. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I: Association of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Concentration With Alzheimer Disease Progression. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(1):60–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Andersson E, Janelidze S, Lampinen B, Nilsson M, Leuzy A, Stomrud E, et al. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light differentially detect neurodegeneration in early Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;95:143–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Bacioglu M, Maia LF, Preische O, Schelle J, Apel A, Kaeser SA, et al. Neurofilament Light Chain in Blood and CSF as Marker of Disease Progression in Mouse Models and in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Neuron. 2016;91(1):56–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Olsson B, Lautner R, Andreasson U, Ohrfelt A, Portelius E, Bjerke M, et al. CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(7):673–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Benedet AL, Ashton NJ, Pascoal TA, Leuzy A, Mathotaarachchi S, Kang MS, et al. Plasma neurofilament light associates with Alzheimer's disease metabolic decline in amyloid-positive individuals. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019;11:679–89.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Arbizu J, Festari C, Altomare D, Walker Z, Bouwman F, Rivolta J, et al. Clinical utility of FDG-PET for the clinical diagnosis in MCI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(9):1497–508.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Kato T, Inui Y, Nakamura A, Ito K. Brain fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in dementia. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;30:73–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Mosconi L, Brys M, Glodzik-Sobanska L, De Santi S, Rusinek H, de Leon MJ. Early detection of Alzheimer's disease using neuroimaging. Exp Gerontol. 2007;42(1-2):129–38.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Mosconi L, Tsui WH, Herholz K, Pupi A, Drzezga A, Lucignani G, et al. Multicenter standardized 18F-FDG PET diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and other dementias. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(3):390–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Nasrallah IM, Wolk DA. Multimodality imaging of Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative dementias. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(12):2003–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Zimmer ER, Parent MJ, Souza DG, Leuzy A, Lecrux C, Kim HI, et al. [(18)F]FDG PET signal is driven by astroglial glutamate transport. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(3):393–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Born HA, Kim JY, Savjani RR, Das P, Dabaghian YA, Guo Q, et al. Genetic suppression of transgenic APP rescues Hypersynchronous network activity in a mouse model of Alzeimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2014;34(11):3826–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Martinez-Losa M, Tracy TE, Ma K, Verret L, Clemente-Perez A, Khan AS, Cobos I, Ho K, Gan L, Mucke L et al: Nav1.1-overexpressing interneuron transplants restore brain rhythms and cognition in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 2018, 98(1):75–89 E75.

  113. Baglietto-Vargas D, Forner S, Cai L, Martini AC, Trujillo-Estrada L, Swarup V, et al. Generation of a humanized Abeta expressing mouse demonstrating aspects of Alzheimer's disease-like pathology. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2421.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

5xFAD brains used in whole brain imaging were a generous gift from Drs. Sandro Da Mesquita and Jonathan Kipnis to J.A.H. J.D.W. and J.A.H thanks the Allen Institute founder, Paul G. Allen, for his vision, encouragement, and support. We would like to also thank Audrey Gill for help with statistical analysis.

Availability of data and material

Materials described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes

Funding

This study was funded by Denali Therapeutics Inc. Whole brain analysis of plaques was supported by the National Institute on Aging under Award Number R01AG047589 to J.A.H. NIA RF1AG062234, P01AG073082 and R01AG062629 (to J.J.P.). C.H. is supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy within the framework of the Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (EXC 2145 SyNergy – ID 390857198) (to C.H. and M.B.) and a Koselleck Project HA1737/16-1; to C.H.). NIA/NIH grant R01AG068091 and BrightFocus Foundation grant A2019363S (to A.G.O.).

Authors' contributions

Conceptualization: D.X., S.L., M.S., J.W.L., G.D.P., P.E.S. Experiments: D.X., M.C., E.T., J.D., M.P., S.L.D., T.E., C.C.L., S.D., C.H., H.N., R.C., E.Y., H.S., S.T.M., G.P., K.S., S.M., J.J.P., S.M., J.G., K. W., L.K., A.Z., M.B., M.W., R.C., K.L., D.G., J.D.W., D.B., T.S.Z., A.G.O. Data analysis: D.X., S.L., T.S., M.C., J.H.S., M.P., S.L.D., N.E.K, J.Y.Z., R.G.T., T.K.E., K.S., S.M., J.J.P., S.M., J.G., K. W., L.K., A.Z., M.B., M.W., R.C., J.D.W., J.A.H, D.B., T.S.Z., A.G.O., P.E.S. Writing original draft: D.X., S.L., T.S., J.S., G.D.P., P.E.S. Writing – review and editing: D.X., S.L., T.S., M.C., J.S., M.P., S.L.D., R.G.T., J.D.W., M.S., J.A.H., K.S.L., J.W.L., P.E.S. Supervision: P.E.S. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal E. Sanchez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

D.X., S.L., T.S., M.C., J.S., E.T., J.D., M.P., N.E.K, J.Y.Z., S.L.D., T.K.E., C.C.L., S.D., C.H., H.H., R.C., E.Y., H.S., S.T.M., R.L., K.L., R.G.T., K.S.L., J.W.L., G.D.P. and P.E.S are paid employees and shareholders of Denali Therapeutic Inc. J.D.W. and J.A.H are currently employed by Cajal Neuroscience.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1.

Levels of Aβ in brain, CSF and plasma from AppSAA KI mice at 2 months of age. a Schematic illustrating the genetic engineering approach of the AppSAA mouse line. Sp denotes restriction sites for SpeI digestion. b-e Aβ40 and Aβ42 concentrations and the corresponding ratio of Aβ42/40 were analyzed from brain insoluble fraction (b), brain soluble fraction (c), CSF (d) and plasma (e) from the 3 genotypes of the AppSAA mouse line at 2-month-old. n = 4 mice per genotype. Graphs are box and whisker plots and P values: one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, each group compared to the AppSAA +/+ wild-type control group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Figure 2

. Brain-wide spatio–temporal patterns of plaque deposition in AppSAA KI/KI mice recapitulates the pattern seen in human patients with AD. Comparison of relative plaque density in similar structures between human autopsy tissue and four APP mouse models. Human brain regions where Aβ pathology was previously quantified (Thal et al. 2002) are listed in the left column and the corresponding region(s) from the Allen CCFv3 reference atlas are listed in the second column. The median plaque density (plaques per mm3) for each age group and mouse line is indicated by the heatmap in the columns to the right. Cartoons on the right show the anatomical location of the structures that were included in each Phase. The colormap for the plaque density spans from the 10th percentile to the 90th percentile of the plaque density for all structures at the oldest age in each mouse line. Abbreviations: ENTl = entorhinal area, lateral part; ENTm = entorhinal area, medial part, dorsal zone; ACA = anterior cingulate area; RSP = retrosplenial area; LA = lateral amygdalar nucleus; BLA = basolateral amygdalar nucleus; BMA = basomedial amygdalar nucleus; PA = posterior amygdalar nucleus; CEA = central amygdalar nucleus; MEA = medial amygdalar nucleus; COA = cortical amygdalar area; DG = dentate gyrus; PRE = presubiculum; POST = postsubiculum; TH = thalamus; CP = caudoputamen; ACB = nucleus accumbens; HY = hypothalamus; SI = substantia innominata; MA = magnocellular nucleus; NDB = diagonal band nucleus; PAG = periaqueductal gray; SCs = Superior colliculus, sensory related; SCm = superior colliculus, motor related; RN = red nucleus; IO = inferior olivary complex; SNr = substantia nigra, reticular part; SNc = substantia nigra, compact part; GRN = gigantocellular reticular nucleus; IRN = intermediate reticular nucleus; PARN = parvicellular reticular nucleus; CBX = cerebellar cortex; PRNr = pontine reticular nucleus; PRNc = pontine reticular nucleus, caudal part; RAmb = midbrain raphe nuclei; LC = locus ceruleus; PB = parabrachial nucleus; DN = dentate nucleus.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Figure 3.

Aβ plaque onset and accumulation in AppSAA KI/KI mice over time. a Representative images of brain sections co-stained with anti-amyloid antibody (left) and methoxy-X04 (right) show plaque pathology in AppSAA KI/KI mice from 4-12 months of age. The early plaque deposition in 4-month-old AppSAA KI/KI mice was indicated by white arrowheads. Scale bars = 2 mm. b Quantification of brain areas covered by Aβ plaques from 4-month-old to 12-month-old AppSAA KI/KI mice. N = 3-4 mice per age.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Figure 4.

Comparison of plaques between 5xFAD mice and AppSAA KI/KI mice at 6 months of age. a Representative images of brain sections co-stained with methoxy-X04 and anti-amyloid antibody show plaque pathology in 5xFAD mice and AppSAA KI/KI mice at 6 months of age. Scale bars = 200 μm. b Methoxy-X04 and anti-amyloid co-immunostaining reveals lower proportion of methoxy positive plaques in AppSAA KI/KI mice relative to 5xFAD mice at 6-8 months of age. n=7-8 mice per genotype. Graphs are box and whisker plots and P values: unpaired t test; ***P < 0.001.

Additional file 5: Supplementary Figure 5.

Evidence of CAA pathology in AppSAA mice at 8 and 16 months of age. a Representative images of Aβ deposition in AppSAA +/+, AppSAA KI/+, and AppSAA KI/KI mice at 16 months of age; AppSAA KI/+ and AppSAA KI/KI exhibit parenchymal Aβ plaque deposition (examples indicated with yellow arrowheads for AppSAA KI/+) and Aβ deposition associated with leptomeningeal vessels (CAA; examples indicated with white arrows for both AppSAA KI/+ and AppSAA KI/KI). Scale bars = 1 mm. b Representative confocal images showing accumulation of Aβ surrounding leptomeningeal (pial) vessels (endothelial cells labeled by CD31 and smooth muscle cells labeled by alpha-smooth muscle actin, consistent with putative arteries/arterioles) in AppSAA mice at 8 and 16 months of age. Scale bars = 50 μm (left images and magnified views). c-e Super resolution confocal images from AppSAA KI/KI mice 16 months of age showing Aβ accumulation in a penetrating parenchymal vessel (c), branching leptomeningeal vessel in the ambient cistern (d) and a leptomeningeal vessel (e), scale bars = 20 μm for images across (c-e).

Additional file 6: Supplementary Figure 6.

Analysis of microglia clustering in AppSAA mice. a-d Histological analysis of microglia and amyloid-β plaques in brain sections from 8-month-old AppSAA mice. Quantification of hippocampal areas covered by Iba1 (a), CD68 (b) and the percentage of the CD68 and Iba1 signals overlapping with amyloid-β plaques in the hippocampus (c) from AppSAA KI/KI mice. (d) Percentage of amyloid plaque overlapping with CD68 or Iba1 in the hippocampus or cortex. Graphs are box and whisker plots and P values: one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, each group compared to the AppSAA +/+ control group (n=4-6 per group); *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

Additional file 7: Supplementary Figure 7.

AppSAA knock-in mice have multiple AD pathology-related changes in astrocytes. a Representative images of GFAP and Aβ co-immunolabeling in the CA1 region of the hippocampus (left), and GFAP immunolabeling of entire hemispheres (right) in 18-month-old AppSAA +/+ and AppSAA KI/KI mice. b Representative images of GLT-1 immunolabeling in the CA1 and CA3 subregions of the hippocampus. c Representative images of C3 and GFAP co-immunolabeling in the CA1 subregion of the hippocampus (left) and C3 immunolabeling of entire hemispheres (right) in 18-month-old AppSAA +/+ and AppSAA KI/KI mice. d Quantification of GFAP immunoreactivity in the CA1, CA3, dentate gyrus (DG), and neocortex (CTX). e Quantification of GLT-1 immunoreactivity in the CA1, CA3, DG, and CTX. f Quantification of astrocytic C3 immunoreactivity in the CA1, CA3, DG and CTX. Scale bars: 300 μm for hemisphere images and 100 μm for all other images. Graphs show means ± SEM. Mann-Whitney test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus AppSAA +/+; n = 5 AppSAA +/+, 7 AppSAA KI/KI.

Additional file 8: Supplementary Figure 8.

Comparative analysis of microglia transcriptome. a Absolute expression (log2 counts per million) of cell type specific markers shows strong enrichment and purity of microglia cell population analyzed in this Study. b Log2 fold change of methoxy-X04 (-) AppSAA +/+ microglia vs methoxy-X04 (-) WT microglia (x-axis) vs log2 fold change of methoxy-X04 (+) AppSAA +/+ microglia vs methoxy-X04 (-) WT (y-axis). Only genes with log2 fold change >= 1.2 and FDR <= 10% in either comparison are shown. Genes from the homeostatic (light blue), DAM (fuscia), and PIGs (dark blue) signatures are highlighted. c Same as in (b) but data taken from bulk RNA-seq data from Grubman et al. Genes highlighted in green are the methoxy (+) signature genes identified in scRNAseq data from Grubman et al. (supplemental table 5: specific X04+ DEGs) with log2FC >= 1. d comparison of log2 fold changes of genes identified in AppSAA KI/KI methoxy-X04 (+) microglia vs WT (x-axis) and 5xFAD methoxy-X04 (+) microglia vs WT (y-axis) in Grubman et al. Spearman’s rho: 0.66, p-value < 1e-10. e Functional enrichment scores of the union of top 10 Gene Ontology Biological Process categories identified in methoxy (+) microglia vs WT in AppSAA KI/KI mice (orange) and 5xFAD mice from Grubman et al. (purple). Bars indicate -log10(q-value) from an overrepresentation analysis of upregulated genes in each of the ontology terms.

Additional file 9: Table s1.

Primers.

Additional file 10: Table s2.

Mouse Cohorts.

Additional file 11: Table s3.

Plaque Count Whole-Bean

Additional file 12: Table s4.

Gene Sets in Figure 3 and Figure 4.

Additional file 13: Table s5.

microglia baseline abundance.

Additional file 14: Table s6.

microglia diff abundance analysis.

Additional file 15: Table s7.

methoxyx04_baseline_abundance.

Additional file 16: Table s8.

methoxyx04_diff_abundance analysis

Additional file 17: Table s9.

Summary of behavioral results at the Jackson Research Laboratory.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, D., Lianoglou, S., Sandmann, T. et al. Novel App knock-in mouse model shows key features of amyloid pathology and reveals profound metabolic dysregulation of microglia. Mol Neurodegeneration 17, 41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-022-00547-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-022-00547-7

Keywords

  • Neuritic plaques
  • Vascular amyloid
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Astrogliosis
  • Phagocytic microglia
  • Lipid dyshomeostasis