Open Access

Endogenous expression of FAD-linked PS1 impairs proliferation, neuronal differentiation and survival of adult hippocampal progenitors

  • Karthikeyan Veeraraghavalu1,
  • Se Hoon Choi1,
  • Xiaoqiong Zhang1 and
  • Sangram S Sisodia1Email author
Molecular Neurodegeneration20138:41

https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-8-41

Received: 5 August 2013

Accepted: 16 October 2013

Published: 20 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by progressive memory loss and impaired cognitive function. Early-onset familial forms of the disease (FAD) are caused by inheritance of mutant genes encoding presenilin 1 (PS1) variants. We have demonstrated that prion promoter (PrP)-driven expression of human FAD-linked PS1 variants in mice leads to impairments in environmental enrichment (EE)-induced adult hippocampal neural progenitor cell (AHNPC) proliferation and neuronal differentiation, and have provided evidence that accessory cells in the hippocampal niche expressing PS1 variants may modulate AHNPC phenotypes, in vivo. While of significant interest, these latter studies relied on transgenic mice that express human PS1 variant transgenes ubiquitously and at high levels, and the consequences of wild type or mutant PS1 expressed under physiologically relevant levels on EE-mediated AHNPC phenotypes has not yet been tested.

Results

To assess the impact of mutant PS1 on EE-induced AHNPC phenotypes when expressed under physiological levels, we exposed adult mice that constitutively express the PSEN1 M146V mutation driven by the endogenous PSEN1 promoter (PS1 M146V “knock-in” (KI) mice) to standard or EE-housed conditions. We show that in comparison to wild type PS1 mice, AHNPCs in mice carrying homozygous (PS1 M146V/M146V ) or heterozygous (PS1 M146V/+ ) M146V mutant alleles fail to exhibit EE-induced proliferation and commitment towards neurogenic lineages. More importantly, we report that the survival of newborn progenitors are diminished in PS1 M146V KI mice exposed to EE-conditions compared to respective EE wild type controls.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal that expression at physiological levels achieved by a single PS1 M146V allele is sufficient to impair EE-induced AHNPC proliferation, survival and neuronal differentiation, in vivo. These results and our finding that microglia expressing a single PS1 M146V allele impairs the proliferation of wild type AHNPCs in vitro argue that expression of mutant PS1 in the AHNPC niche impairs AHNPCs phenotypes in a dominant, non-cell autonomous manner.

Keywords

Adult neurogenesis Presenilin mutants Alzheimer’s disease

Background

AD is pathologically characterized by the deposition of β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides in senile plaques and neuronal loss that leads to impairments in memory and cognitive function. Aβ peptides are derived from larger amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the concerted action of BACE1 and a multiprotein complex, termed γ-secretase, that catalyzes intramembranous proteolysis of a variety of type I membrane substrates. Inheritance of mutations in PSEN1, PSEN2 or APP genes, encoding PS1, PS2 or APP variants, respectively, cause early-onset, autosomal dominant forms of familial AD (FAD) [1]. PS are the catalytic components of the γ-secretase complex and expression of PS1 variants leads to elevations in the ratio of Aβ42/Aβ40 peptides, leading to nucleation, oligomerization and neuropathogenicity of Aβ42 peptides [2]. Notwithstanding this important aspect of pathogenesis mediated by FAD-linked PS1 variants, a number of studies have revealed that PS1 influences multiple signaling pathways and have more global effects on neuronal function and plasticity [3].

Adult hippocampal neural stem cells (AHNSCs), a self-renewing cell population in the subgranular layer (SGL) of the dentate gyrus (DG), functionally mature into neurons and integrate into the hippocampal circuitry [4]. This process of adult neurogenesis has been implicated in hippocampal function, learning and memory, and adaptation to novel environments, stress response, depression, injury or disease [57]. Genetic ablation of new born neurons in adult mice results in gradual loss of granule cell numbers in the DG, leading to impairments in hippocampal-dependent behaviors, including contextual and spatial memory [8]. On the other hand, exposure of adult rodents to an enriched environment (EE), in which animals are placed in large cages containing running wheels, colorful tunnels and assorted toys, increases hippocampal neurogenesis and enhances spatial learning performance [911]. We have demonstrated that transgenic mice expressing FAD-linked PS1 variants in a ubiquitous manner exhibit impairments in EE-mediated proliferation and neuronal differentiation of AHNSCs [12], and that these AHNSC phenotypes are driven by non cell-autonomous mechanisms that require mutant PS1 expression in microglia [12] and excitatory neurons [13].

We now extend these latter observations and demonstrate that EE-induced AHNPC proliferation and neuronal differentiation is also impaired in PS1 M146V KI mice that harbor a germ line M146V mutation [14]. We also report that the conditioned medium of microglia obtained from PS1 M146V KI mice impairs the proliferation of wild type AHNPCs. Finally, we report that the survival of newborn progenitors are diminished in PS1 M146V KI mice exposed to EE-conditions compared to respective enriched wild type control cohorts.

Results

EE-induced AHNPC proliferation in mutant PS1 KI mice

A cohort of one month old male wild type (PS1 +/+ ), heterozygous (PS1 M146V/+ ) or homozygous (PS1 M146V/M146V ) mice were exposed to standard housing (SH) or EE conditions for one month. At the end of one month, animals housed under these two conditions were injected intraperitoneally (i.p) with a single dose of 100 mg/kg of BrdU. Mice were sacrificed 24 hr post injection, and brain sections were subjected to immunofluoresence analysis using a BrdU-specific antibody (Figure 1A), and the number of BrdU+ cells in SGL was quantified. Under SH conditions, no significant difference in BrdU+ cell numbers in the DG were observed between PS1 +/+ and PS1 M146V/+ mice (Figure 1B; P=0.644), or between PS1 +/+ , PS1 M146V/M146V mice (Figure 1B; P=0.266), or between PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice (Figure 1B; P=0.756). Exposure to EE lead to a significant increase in BrdU+ cell numbers in all three genotypes when compared to their respective control cohorts exposed to SH conditions (Figure 1B; P<0.01). However, and in contrast, with the a prominent ~2.2-fold increase in BrdU+ cell numbers that was detected in EE versus SH PS1 +/+ mice, exposure to EE lead to only a modest 1.48- and 1.49-fold increase in BrdU+ cell numbers in PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice, respectively, compared with their SH cohorts. Moreover, the BrdU+ cell numbers in the hippocampus of PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice exposed to EE conditions were significantly lower than the numbers observed in enriched PS1 +/+ mice (Figure 1B; P<0.01, EE PS1 +/+ vs. EE PS1 M146V/+ and EE PS1 +/+ vs. EE PS1 M146V/M146V ).
Figure 1

AHNPC proliferation in PS1 M146V KI mice following exposure to SH or EE housing conditions. (A) Representative images of BrdU+ AHNPCs (yellow) in the SGL of PS1 +/+ , PS1 M146V/+ or PS1 M146V/ M146V mice, exposed to SH or EE conditions for one month, injected with a single i.p dose of 100 mg/kg of BrdU and sacrificed 24 hr later. NeuN, green. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) Quantification of total BrdU+ cells in SGL. Two-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey test; N = 10, 10, 9 for SH animals, and 10, 12, 11 for EE animals (m ± SEM). ** p < 0.01.

EE-mediated differentiation and survival of AHNCPs in mutant PS1 KI mice

To assess the impact of the PS1 M146V KI mutation on EE-induced differentiation of newly-born AHNPC into neuronal or glial lineages, we exposed cohorts of PS1 +/+ , PS1 M146V/+ or PS1 M146V/M146V mice to SH or EE conditions for one month, and then injected these animals with a single dose of BrdU (100 mg/kg). The cohorts of PS1 +/+ , PS1 M146V/+ or PS1 M146V/M146V mice were then returned to respective SH or EE conditions for an additional 2 weeks. We chose the two week time point for analysis because this is an accepted time window to score for neuronal or glial lineage commitment of AHNPCs and their survival efficiency [15]. More specifically, this earlier time point allows us to score the proportion or percentage of AHNPCs that express different neuronal lineage markers, such as the early immature (β-III tubulin), early mature (Prox1), mature (NeuroD1) and terminally differentiated (NeuN) stages. At the end of two weeks, the animals were sacrificed and brain sections were subjected to immunofluorescence staining with anti-BrdU antibodies combined either with antibodies against: TuJ1 (βIII tubulin), a marker of both early immature and mature neurons; Prospero-related homeobox 1 (Prox1), a marker of early and late mature neuronal lineages; NeuroD1, a marker for mature neuronal lineages; NeuN, a marker for mature neurons; or glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and s100β, markers for astrocytes. Representative images are shown in Figure 2A.
Figure 2

EE-induced differentiation of AHNPC in PS1 M146V KI mice. (A) Representative images of BrdU+/Prox1+ (A.i), BrdU+/β-III tubulin+ (A.ii), BrdU+/NeuroD1+ (A.iii), BrdU+/NeuN+ (A.iv), BrdU+/GFAP+ (A.v) or BrdU+/s100β+ (A.vi) co-labeled cells in PS1 +/+ mice exposed to EE condition, injected with a single i.p dose of 100 mg/kg of BrdU and sacrificed 2 weeks later. Scale bar, 25 μm. Inserts inside each panel shows subfield of images captured through individual channels and the respective overlays highlighting cells co-labeling of BrdU and mentioned antigenic marker of differentiation. (B) Quantification of co-labeled cells with BrdU and markers of differentiation in DG of PS1 +/+ , PS1 M146V/+ or PS1 M146V/ M146V mice exposed to SH or EE housing condition. Two-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey test for analyzing multiple groups or T-test; N = 7, 8 (SH vs. EE, PS1 +/+ ); 6, 8 (SH vs. EE, PS1 M146V/+ ); 6, 6 (SH vs. EE, PS1 M146V/ M146V ) (m ± SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, #p = 0.075.

Quantification of BrdU+ cells co-labeled with lineage specific markers showed no significant differences across all the genotypes under SH conditions (Figure 2B.i-vi). Exposure of PS1 +/+ mice to EE resulted in a 1.366-fold increase, albeit insignificant, in the percentage of BrdU+/βIII tubulin+ cells compared with the SH cohort (Figure 2B.i; P=0.075; SH PS1 +/+ vs. EE PS1 +/+ ). Similarly, in comparison with the cohorts maintained in SH conditions, exposure of PS1 M146V/+ or PS1 M146V/M146V mice to EE conditions resulted in an increase in the percentage of BrdU+/βIII tubulin+ cells by 1.364- and 1.267-fold, respectively (Figure 2B.i; P=0.091, SH PS1 M146V/+ vs. EE PS1 M146V/+ ; P=0.0147, SH PS1 M146V/M146V vs. EE PS1 M146V/M146V ).

Exposure of PS1 +/+ mice to EE resulted in a significant, 1.474-fold increase in the percentage of BrdU+/Prox1+ cells compared to SH cohorts (Figure 2B.ii; P=0.04; SH PS1 +/+ vs. EE PS1 +/+ ). In contrast, in comparison with the cohorts maintained in SH conditions, exposure of PS1 M146V/+ or PS1 M146V/M146V mice to EE conditions resulted in resulted in an insignificant 1.316- and 1.15-fold increase in the percentage of BrdU+/Prox1+ cells, respectively (Figure 2B.ii; P=0.078, SH PS1 M146V/+ vs. EE PS1 M146V/+ ; P=0.299, SH PS1 M146V/M146V vs. EE PS1 M146V/M146V ).

Analysis of cells colabeled with BrdU and the late neuronal markers, NeuroD1 and NeuN revealed that exposure of PS1 +/+ mice to EE resulted in a significant increase by 1.62- and 1.37-fold in the percentage of BrdU+/NeuroD1+ or BrdU+/NeuN+ double labeled cells, compared with SH cohorts, respectively (Figure 2B.iii-iv; P=0.012 BrdU+/NeuroD1+ and 0.027 BrdU+/NeuN+; SH PS1 +/+ vs. EE PS1 +/+ ). On the other hand, exposure of PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice to EE conditions resulted in a insignificant increase in the percentage of BrdU+/NeuroD1+ or BrdU+/NeuN+ double labeled cells (Figure 2B.iii-iv; P=0.146, SH PS1 M146V/+ vs. EE PS1 M146V/+ and P=0.703, SH PS1 M146V/M146V vs. EE PS1 M146V/M146V for BrdU+/NeuroD1+; P=0.291, SH PS1 M146V/+ vs. EE PS1 M146V/+ and P=0.091, SH PS1 M146V/M146V vs. EE PS1 M146V/M146V for BrdU+/NeuN+).

Importantly, a significant reduction in the percentage of BrdU+/NeuroD1+ and BrdU+/NeuN+ double labeled cells was observed between PS1 +/+ versus PS1 M146V/+ or PS1 M146V/M146V groups that were exposed to EE conditions (Figure 2B.iii-iv; P=0.03 for BrdU+/NeuroD1+ and P=0.045 for BrdU+/NeuN+ in EE PS1 +/+ vs. EE PS1 M146V/+ mice; and P=0.006 for BrdU+/NeuroD1+ and P=0.024 for BrdU+/NeuN+ in EE PS1 +/+ vs. EE PS1 M146V/M146V mice). Examination of glial lineages revealed no significant changes in the percentage of BrdU+/GFAP+ or BrdU+/s100β+ double-labeled cells between SH versus EE groups or within EE groups, across all three genotypes (Figure 2B.v-vi).

To determine whether the observed impairments in neuronal differentiation of AHNPCs in mutant PS1 KI mice (Figure 2), might be a reflection of decreased survival of new born progenitors under EE conditions, we calculated the fraction of surviving BrdU+ cells in the SGL and granule cell layers as a percentage of the BrdU+ cell numbers remaining after 2 weeks compared to the numbers obtained when animals were sacrificed 24 hr after single dose of 100 mg/kg of BrdU (Figure 1B). While 50.56±2.17% of new born, BrdU-labeled AHNPCs survived for 2 weeks in PS1 +/+ mice, a lower percentage of only 45.11±1.76% and 41.59±1.67% survived in PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice, respectively (Figure 3). One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc LSD test revealed a near-significant P value of 0.051 in comparisons of PS1 +/+ vs. PS1 M146V/+ mice and a significant P value of 0.005 in comparisons of PS1 +/+ vs. PS1 M146V/M146V mice. Collectively, these observations lead us to conclude that endogenous PSEN1 promoter-driven expression of mutant PS1 decreases the survival of new born AHNPCs following EE.
Figure 3

Survival of AHNPC from PS1 M146V KI mice following exposure to EE housing conditions. Histogram shows the survival fraction of BrdU+ AHNPCs in SGL and granular cell layers of PS1 M146V KI following exposure to EE housing conditions. Survival fraction, calculated as a percentage of the BrdU+ cell numbers remaining after 2 weeks over the numbers obtained when animals were sacrificed 24 hr after single dose of 100 mg/kg of BrdU. ANOVA followed by post-hoc LSD test; N = 8, 8, 6 for EE PS1 +/+ , PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/ M146V mice, respectively. ** p < 0.01; #p = 0.051.

Conditioned medium (CM) from microglia expressing the PS1 M146V KI variant impairs proliferation of AHNPCs in vitro

In earlier studies, we reported that both proliferation and neuronal cell fate commitment of AHNPCs from wild type mice was impaired by the addition of CM from IL-4-treated microglia obtained from transgenic mice that express PrP-driven FAD-linked PS1 mutants [12]. To test whether the CM from microglia obtained from PS1 M146V/+ mice exhibit similar properties on AHNPCs, we bred either PS1 +/+ or PS1 M146V/M146V mice to Cx3Cr1 GFP/GFP reporter mice in which cDNA encoding enhanced GFP (eGFP) has been knocked-in downstream of the fractalkine receptor Cx3Cr1 promoter [16], leading to eGFP expression exclusively in CNS microglia with ramified processes (Figure 4A), but not in GFAP-expressing astrocytes (Figure 4B). Mixed glial cultures from neonatal PS1 +/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ and PS1 M146V/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ lines were established and eGFP+ microglia fraction was isolated by flow cytometry to establish pure cultures of microglia (Figure 4C and D). The GFP+ microglia established from PS1 +/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ and PS1 M146V/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ mice were activated with IL4 and the CM was incubated with AHNPCs from PS1 +/+ mice that were cultured as neurospheres (Figure 4E). The proliferative capacity of AHNPCs was determined using a BrdU-uptake assay, as described earlier [12]. We observed that the extent of BrdU incorporation was similar across the AHNPCs cultures treated with microglia CM from PS1 +/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ and PS1 M146V/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ mice after 1 or 3 days, but by day 6, the proliferation of AHNPC was significantly reduced in the presence of CM from PS1 M146V/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ microglia (Figure 4F; P<0.01). These results reveal that the impairments in proliferation of cultured AHNPCs observed earlier with CM from transgenic mice overexpressing FAD-linked PSEN1 variants [12], can be recapitulated when an FAD-linked PS1 mutation is expressed at physiological levels when driven by the endogenous PSEN1 promoter.
Figure 4

Microglia conditioned media from PS1 M146V KI mice impairs proliferation of AHNPCs. Representative image eGFP+ microglia (green) with ramified process in DG of PS1 M146V/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ mice (A) and are negative for astrocytic marker, GFAP (red) (B). Bright field (C) and fluorescent (D) images of flow cytometry sorted primary eGFP+ cultures established from neonatal brains of PS1 M146V/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ mice. Scale bar, 25 μm. Bright field image of AHNPCs grown as neurospheres from PS1 +/+ , mice (E). Scale bar, 50 μm. (F) Proliferation achieved by PS1 +/+ AHNPCs following treatment with CM collected from IL-4 activated or PS1 +/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ or PS1 M146V/+ x Cx3Cr1 GFP/+ microglia. Graph shows the extent of BrdU uptake in AHNPCs observed on days 1, 3 and 6. T-test; N = 3 independent cultures, with quadruplicates for each time point (m ± SEM). ** p < 0.01.

Discussion

Earlier studies have shown that hippocampal neurogenesis declines with age and this reduction has been linked with impaired learning, memory, and deterioration of cognitive ability in the elderly [1719]. In this regard, a recent report revealed that hippocampal neurogenesis is markedly reduced in patients with AD [20], findings which suggest that reductions in the number of new born granule cell neurons might enhance the rate of decline in hippocampal function and cognitive ability, and thereby significantly contribute to AD type dementia. In order to assess the potential role of FAD-linked PS1 variants on adult hippocampal neurogenesis, we and others have examined transgenic mice expressing PS1 variants driven by heterologous promoters [12, 2123]. However, a consensus regarding the role of mutant PS1 on AHNPC phenotypes has not emerged, and likely reflects the impact of overexpressing the transgenes in restricted cellular populations. For example, expression of the FAD-linked PS1P117L mutant driven by the neuron-specific enolase promoter failed to promote neurogenesis under SH conditions [23], and impaired survival of AHNPCs and neuronal differentiation under EE conditions [22]. However, expression of FAD-linked PS1A246E mutant driven by the neuron-specific Thy-1 promoter on a PS1 -/- background resulted in an increase in proliferation and decrease in survival of AHNPCs with no apparent reduction in net neuronal differentiation in animals exposed to SH conditions [21]. On the other hand, we reported that transgenic mice expressing the FAD-linked PS1ΔE9 and PS1M146L variants driven by the ubiquitously active PrP-promoter, fail to exhibit EE-induced AHNPC proliferation or differentiation towards neuronal lineage, with no noticeable changes in these parameters in SH conditions compared to mice expressing hPS1WT [12]. In this regard, PS1 has been shown to be expressed endogenously in AHNPCs [24], neurons [25], cerebral vasculature [26], glia and oligodendrocytes [12, 27]. Thus, while it seems reasonable that ubiquitous, PrP promoter-driven of mutant PSEN1 transgenes reflects the expression patterns of endogenous PSEN1, there remain concerns regarding expression levels and regulation in specific CNS cell types.

In order to address these potential concerns, we asked whether the EE-mediated impairments on AHNPC proliferation and neuronal differentiation that we documented in transgenic mice expressing FAD-linked PS1could be validated in “knock-in” mice harboring an FAD-linked PS1 mutation in the endogenous PSEN1 locus, and we now offer several important insights.

First, we show that EE-induced proliferation of AHNPCs is impaired in both PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V animals, similar to our earlier findings in PrP-driven FAD-linked mutant PSEN1 transgenic mice [12]. Interestingly, under SH conditions, we also observed a moderate reduction in proliferation of AHNPCs in PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice compared with wild type animals.

Second, we failed to detect significant changes in early immature and late neuronal lineages (BrdU+/βIII tubulin or BrdU+/Prox1, respectively) or glial lineages following EE. Instead, we observed a prominent reduction in the percentage of new born progenitors that differentiated towards mature neuronal NeuN+ and NeuroD1+ lineages in PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice. The lack of obvious changes in immature neuronal lineages correlates with the observations reported earlier in FAD-linked PSEN1P264L KI mice [28]. Consistent with the reduction in the number of new born neurons generated under EE conditions, the numbers of BrdU+ cells that survive two weeks post labeling were also diminished in PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice. It should be noted that we chose a two week time point for these latter analysis in order to score neuronal or glial lineage commitment of AHNPCs and their survival efficiency. The limitation of this analysis is that cells expressing mature neuronal markers may not be functionally integrated into the hippocampal network.

It is presently unclear whether the reduction in AHNPC proliferation and mature neuronal differentiation in PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice are a reflection of reductions in PS1 “activity”, but earlier studies by Wang and colleagues offer an important insight [29]. In the latter studies, AHNPC proliferation in standard housed PS1 M146V/- mice, wherein the mutant allele was placed in a PSEN1 KO background, exhibited significant reductions in both proliferation and neurogenic potential of AHNPC compared with PS1 M146V/+ mice [29]. The authors concluded that wild-type PS1 may play a “protective” role over the effects of the mutant M146V variant. While the nature of the PS1-dependent “activity” remains to be ascertained, our demonstration that lowering the levels of wild-type PS1 leads to reduced AHNPC proliferation and neuronal differentiation studies, taken together with the findings reported by Wang and colleagues [29], would be consistent with the idea that mutant PS1 exhibits a partial “loss of function”, as has been proposed earlier [30].

Third, we report that the survival of BrdU-labeled AHNPCs from PS1 M146V/+ and PS1 M146V/M146V mice exposed to EE were significantly reduced compared with PS1 +/+ mice. While the molecular mechanism(s) underlying this aspect of mutant PS1 function is presently unclear, evidence from several earlier studies have accrued that support our observations [3133]. For example, Guo et al. [14] reported that hippocampal neurons in PS1 M146V/M146V mice exhibit enhanced susceptibility to kianate-induced necrosis and that primary neurons from these mice showed enhanced sensitivity to glutamate-induced excitotoxicity. These results in PS1 M146V/M146V mice were confirmed independently in PrP promoter-driven transgenic mice expressing the L286V variant [31]. At a mechanistic level, it has been reported that reported that PS1 M146V/M146V mice exhibit disrupted intracellular Ca2+ signaling in neurons [33], suggesting that neurons expressing mutant PS1 variants have a lower threshold for excitotoxicity-mediated degeneration (reviewed in [34]). In this regard, we have demonstrated enhanced vulnerability of excitatory neurons in layer 2 (ECL2) of the entorhinal cortex in transgenic mice expressing the FAD-linked PS1ΔE9 variant following perforant pathway (PP) transection, compared with PP-lesioned transgenic mice expressing wild-type human PS1 [35].

Finally, we report that CM of microglia from PS1 M146V/+ mice inhibits proliferation of AHNPCs derived from PS1 +/+ mice. These findings support our earlier observations using CM of microglia from mice expressing PrP-driven PSEN1 transgenes [12]. The identity of the factors in mutant microglia CM and signaling pathways that are responsible for suppression of AHNPC proliferation are not fully understood. However, we showed earlier that eotaxin (or CCL11), Cxcl16, leptin and TIMP-1 (Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloprotease) are factors that were consistently elevated in the CM from microglia expressing FAD-linked PS1ΔE9 and PS1M146L variants [12]. In this regard, Wyss-Coray and colleagues [36] have offered a tantalizing insight. It is well-established that the proliferation and differentiation of AHNPC declines precipitously as a function of age [10], and Villeda et al. [36], sought to identify blood-borne factors in the systemic milieu that inhibit or promote adult neurogenesis in an age-dependent fashion in mice. One factor that was significantly elevated in the plasma of old mice was CCL11 that binds to, and activates the CCR3 chemokine receptor that is expressed by AHNPCs [37]. The nature of signaling pathways in AHNPCs that are activated upon binding of CCL11 or other factors secreted by microglia remain to be determined, and are areas of active investigation.

Conclusion

We have documented that the EE-mediated impairments of proliferation, differentiation and survival of AHNPCs in mice with a knock-in of an FAD-linked PSEN1 mutation fully recapitulates the findings observed in transgenic mice expressing PrP-driven FAD-linked PSEN1 transgenes. These findings lead us to conclude that the memory deficits and cognitive decline in patients harboring PSEN1 variants is a reflection not just of an increase in the ratio of Aβ42 to Aβ40, but to impairments in the self-renewal, survival and differentiation of AHNPCs.

Methods

Animals

PS1 +/+ , PS1 M146V/M146V KI mice [14], and Cx3Cr1 GFP/GFP [16] were maintained in (C3H/HeJ x C57BL/6J F3) x C57BL/6J n1 background. PS1 +/+ were crossed to PS1 M146V/M146V KI mice to obtain PS1 M146V/+ line. The data are reported as mean ± standard error of mean (m ± SEM). Two-way ANOVA test (SPSS ver. 12), were performed for comparisons of quantitative data while analyzing data from multiple groups on AHNPC proliferation or differentiation studies. Tuckey or LSD test were used as a post-hoc analysis. T-test (Unpaired) was performed while comparing data from two independent data sets. Values of p < 0.05 were used as the criterion for statistical significance. Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with institutional and National Institutes of Health guidelines.

EE setting and BrdU injections

For exposure to EE, cohorts of mentioned 1 month old male transgenic, wild type or PS1 M146V KI (heterozygous or homozygous) animals were housed in large cages containing running wheels, tunnels, toys, and chewable materials for 3 h a day for 1 month. Control groups of animals were maintained in standard laboratory housing conditions. Mice received a single i.p. injection of BrdU (100 mg/kg, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) on the last day of the enrichment. Half of the mice in each group were sacrificed 1 day after the injection to determine progenitor proliferation as described earlier [12]. For AHNPC differentiation studies, mice were allowed to continue under standard or EE conditions for 2 weeks and processed to determine survival and neuronal differentiation of the newborn cells.

Tissue processing, estimation of proliferation and differentiation of AHNPCs

Tissue preparation, and immunofluorescent labelling for BrdU, neuronal nuclei (NeuN), β-III tubulin, Prox1, NeuroD1, s100β protein and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) were performed as described previously [12]. The antibodies used were rat anti-BrdU (1:100, Accurate Chemical & Scientific Corporation, Westbury, NY), mouse anti-NeuN (1:500, Chemicon, Temecula, CA), and rabbit anti-GFAP (1:500, Dako, Fort Collins, CO). The fluorescent secondary antibodies used were biotinylated donkey anti-rat IgG; Cy2-conjugated Streptavidin; donkey anti-mouse IgG conjugated with Cy5; donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with Cy3 (all 1:250, Jackson ImmunResearch, West Grove, PA).

Tissue preparation and immunostaining procedures

45 μM coronal sections of the brain were cut on a dry-ice cooled sliding microtome block (Leica, Wtzlar, Germany), serial sections spanning DG were collected in two rows of 24-well dish and stored at -20°C in a cryoprotective buffer and free floating sections were processed for immunohistochemistry or immunofluoresence as described previously [12], using the following primary antibodies: α-NeuN monoclonal antibody (1:800; Millipore, Temecula, CA), α-Prox1 polyclonal antibody (1:300; Millipore, Temecula, CA), α-BrdU rat monoclonal antibody (1:400; Accurate Chemical, Westbury, NY), α-βIII Tubulin TUJ1 monoclonal antibody (1:500; Covance, Emeryville, CA), α-GFAP polyclonal antibody (1:500; Dako, Fort Collins, CO) or α-s100β rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, MA). To obtain total BrdU+ cell counts or co-labeling of BrdU with lineage specific antigens, every sixth and twelfth well sections from the 24-well plate, spanning the DG were stained with α-BrdU antibodies, and visualized using DyLight-549 conjugated donkey α-rat or α-rabbit antibody, respectively (1:400; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). DNA denaturation, neutralization, blocking and washing steps for BrdU staining were followed as described earlier [12]. For double-labeling, a combination of DyLight-488, 549 or 649 conjugated secondary antibodies were used. Brain sections were visualized and imaged using an Olympus DSU Spinning disk inverted confocal microscope supported with EM-CCD Hamamatsu camera (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan). Images at each wavelength were collected separately (DyLight-549, 555/617 nm), using a separate and specific excitation filter under x10 (0.4 NA, water), x20 (0.7 NA, water) or x40 (1.15 NA, water) objectives. Image acquisition settings were equivalent for all specimens, and were taken and recorded using Slide Book Software (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Denver, CO). For estimating total BrdU+ or total double labeled cells with lineage specific markers, series of systematically selected every sixth section were stained and cells were counted throughout the coronal section in extent of the DG, by collecting images under x40 (1.15 NA, water) objective, equipped with Optronics Microfire CCD camera (Optronics, Goleta, CA) or imported from Slide Book library using DSU Spinning disk inverted confocal microscope. Cells were excluded from being counted when they intersected the top focal plane of the section as per the modified stereological procedure [3840], and the sum of the counts was multiplied by six to obtain an estimate on total numbers. For co-labeling analysis of differentiated BrdU+ cell type, phenotype of 50 BrdU+ cells per animal were determined [12].

AHNPC cultures, primary microglial cultures and proliferation assays

AHNPCs that give rise to neurospheres were cultured from dissected hippocampal tissue of 8 weeks old male PS1 +/+ mice as described, previously [12]. In brief, single cell suspension from hippocampal tissue (~ 4 × 105 viable cells/animal), were seeded in serum free culture media at a cell density of 50 cells/μl (SFM; Neurobasal medium containing 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 μg/ml of heparin, 20 ng/ml of b-FGF, 100 ng/ml of EGF and 2% B-27 supplement (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA)). Cultures were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2/balance air. Proliferating neurospheres started to appear in about 10–12 days. To obtain single cell suspensions, the neurospheres were dissociated by trituration using Neurocult chemical dissociation solution (Stem cell tech, Toronto, Canada) and cultured through multiple passages. Primary cultures of mixed glia cells were prepared from hippocampus of newborn PS1 +/+ or PS1 M146V/+ mice according to previously described procedure [41]. In brief, hippocampal tissue from 8 to 16 days old neonatal pups was dissected under dissecting microscope (Leica GZ6, Germany). Tissues from a minimum of 6 animals were pooled, minced with scissors and incubated in PBS containing 0.25% trypsin and 0.5 mM EDTA, at 37°C for 25 min. The suspension was filtered through 100 μm nylon mesh, washed with cold PBS and plated at a density of 2 × 107 cells in DMEM, 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine. 5 days later microglial cells were shaken off the primary mixed glial cell cultures (250 rpm for 3 hrs at 37°C). Cells were collected by centrifugation, re-suspended in PBS containing 0.2% FBS and eGFP+ microglia were enriched by flow cytometry (BD FACSAria, The University of Chicago Flow Cytometry Facility). Purified microglial cells were plated in culture media supplemented with 5 ng/ml recombinant mouse macrophage-colony stimulating factor (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and used for subsequent studies. 3 × 105 microglial cells/well in a 6 well dish were treated with 10 ng/ml of IL-4 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) for 24 hrs, later washed and CM was collected in SFM for 24 hrs after initial stimulation. Effect of CM on AHNPC proliferation was determined by BrdU uptake assay as described earlier [12].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institute of Health grants AG021494 (S.S.S) and AG027854 (S.S.S), Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (S.S.S), the Edward H. Levi Fund (S.H.C and K.V) and the Adler Foundation (K.V). The authors thank Dr. Vytas Bindokas at the digital microscopy facility at the University of Chicago for expert support with image analysis.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurobiology, The University of Chicago

References

  1. Price DL, Sisodia SS: Mutant genes in familial Alzheimer’s disease and transgenic models. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998, 21: 479-505. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.479.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Selkoe DJ: The cell biology of beta-amyloid precursor protein and presenilin in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8: 447-453. 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01363-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Thinakaran G, Parent AT: Identification of the role of presenilins beyond Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacol Res. 2004, 50: 411-418. 10.1016/j.phrs.2003.12.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kempermann G, Jessberger S, Steiner B, Kronenberg G: Milestones of neuronal development in the adult hippocampus. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27: 447-452. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.05.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Doetsch F, Hen R: Young and excitable: the function of new neurons in the adult mammalian brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005, 15: 121-128. 10.1016/j.conb.2005.01.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kempermann G, Wiskott L, Gage FH: Functional significance of adult neurogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004, 14: 186-191. 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Snyder JS, Soumier A, Brewer M, Pickel J, Cameron HA: Adult hippocampal neurogenesis buffers stress responses and depressive behaviour. Nature. 2011, 476: 458-461. 10.1038/nature10287.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Imayoshi I, Sakamoto M, Ohtsuka T, Takao K, Miyakawa T, Yamaguchi M, Mori K, Ikeda T, Itohara S, Kageyama R: Roles of continuous neurogenesis in the structural and functional integrity of the adult forebrain. Nat Neurosci. 2008, 11: 1153-1161. 10.1038/nn.2185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH: More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature. 1997, 386: 493-495. 10.1038/386493a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH: Experience-induced neurogenesis in the senescent dentate gyrus. J Neurosci. 1998, 18: 3206-3212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. van Praag H, Kempermann G, Gage FH: Running increases cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult mouse dentate gyrus. Nat Neurosci. 1999, 2: 266-270. 10.1038/6368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi SH, Veeraraghavalu K, Lazarov O, Marler S, Ransohoff RM, Ramirez JM, Sisodia SS: Non-cell-autonomous effects of presenilin 1 variants on enrichment-mediated hippocampal progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. Neuron. 2008, 59: 568-580. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.033.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Veeraraghavalu K, Sisodia SS: Mutant presenilin 1 expression in excitatory neurons impairs enrichment-mediated phenotypes of adult hippocampal progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013, 110: 9148-9153. 10.1073/pnas.1302106110.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo Q, Fu W, Sopher BL, Miller MW, Ware CB, Martin GM, Mattson MP: Increased vulnerability of hippocampal neurons to excitotoxic necrosis in presenilin-1 mutant knock-in mice. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 101-106. 10.1038/4789.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisch AJ: Adult neurogenesis: implications for psychiatry. Prog Brain Res. 2002, 138: 315-342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jung S, Aliberti J, Graemmel P, Sunshine MJ, Kreutzberg GW, Sher A, Littman DR: Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 4106-4114. 10.1128/MCB.20.11.4106-4114.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kempermann G, Gast D, Gage FH: Neuroplasticity in old age: sustained fivefold induction of hippocampal neurogenesis by long-term environmental enrichment. Ann Neurol. 2002, 52: 135-143. 10.1002/ana.10262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuhn HG, Dickinson-Anson H, Gage FH: Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. J Neurosci. 1996, 16: 2027-2033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Seki T, Arai Y: Age-related production of new granule cells in the adult dentate gyrus. Neuroreport. 1995, 6: 2479-2482. 10.1097/00001756-199512150-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Crews L, Adame A, Patrick C, Delaney A, Pham E, Rockenstein E, Hansen L, Masliah E: Increased BMP6 levels in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients and APP transgenic mice are accompanied by impaired neurogenesis. J Neurosci. 2010, 30: 12252-12262. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1305-10.2010.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chevallier NL, Soriano S, Kang DE, Masliah E, Hu G, Koo EH: Perturbed neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus associated with presenilin-1 A246E mutation. Am J Pathol. 2005, 167: 151-159. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62962-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wen PH, Hof PR, Chen X, Gluck K, Austin G, Younkin SG, Younkin LH, DeGasperi R, Gama Sosa MA, Robakis NK, Haroutunian V, Elder GA: The presenilin-1 familial Alzheimer disease mutant P117L impairs neurogenesis in the hippocampus of adult mice. Exp Neurol. 2004, 188: 224-237. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.04.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wen PH, Shao X, Shao Z, Hof PR, Wisniewski T, Kelley K, Friedrich VL, Ho L, Pasinetti GM, Shioi J, Robakis NK, Elder GA: Overexpression of wild type but not an FAD mutant presenilin-1 promotes neurogenesis in the hippocampus of adult mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2002, 10: 8-19. 10.1006/nbdi.2002.0490.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wen PH, Friedrich VL, Shioi J, Robakis NK, Elder GA: Presenilin-1 is expressed in neural progenitor cells in the hippocampus of adult mice. Neurosci Lett. 2002, 318: 53-56. 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02485-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Elder GA, Tezapsidis N, Carter J, Shioi J, Bouras C, Li HC, Johnston JM, Efthimiopoulos S, Friedrich VL, Robakis NK: Identification and neuron specific expression of the S182/presenilin I protein in human and rodent brains. J Neurosci Res. 1996, 45: 308-320. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19960801)45:3<308::AID-JNR13>3.0.CO;2-#.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lah JJ, Heilman CJ, Nash NR, Rees HD, Yi H, Counts SE, Levey AI: Light and electron microscopic localization of presenilin-1 in primate brain. J Neurosci. 1997, 17: 1971-1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sherrington R, Rogaev EI, Liang Y, Rogaeva EA, Levesque G, Ikeda M, Chi H, Lin C, Li G, Holman K, et al: Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 1995, 375: 754-760. 10.1038/375754a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang C, McNeil E, Dressler L, Siman R: Long-lasting impairment in hippocampal neurogenesis associated with amyloid deposition in a knock-in mouse model of familial Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2007, 204: 77-87. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.09.018.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang R, Dineley KT, Sweatt JD, Zheng H: Presenilin 1 familial Alzheimer’s disease mutation leads to defective associative learning and impaired adult neurogenesis. Neuroscience. 2004, 126: 305-312. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.03.048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelleher RJ, Shen J: Genetics: gamma-secretase and human disease. Science. 2010, 330: 1055-1056. 10.1126/science.1198668.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Grilli M, Diodato E, Lozza G, Brusa R, Casarini M, Uberti D, Rozmahel R, Westaway D, St George-Hyslop P, Memo M, Ongini E: Presenilin-1 regulates the neuronal threshold to excitotoxicity both physiologically and pathologically. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 12822-12827. 10.1073/pnas.97.23.12822.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Guo Q, Sebastian L, Sopher BL, Miller MW, Ware CB, Martin GM, Mattson MP: Increased vulnerability of hippocampal neurons from presenilin-1 mutant knock-in mice to amyloid beta-peptide toxicity: central roles of superoxide production and caspase activation. J Neurochem. 1999, 72: 1019-1029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stutzmann GE, Caccamo A, LaFerla FM, Parker I: Dysregulated IP3 signaling in cortical neurons of knock-in mice expressing an Alzheimer’s-linked mutation in presenilin1 results in exaggerated Ca2+ signals and altered membrane excitability. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 508-513. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4386-03.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mattson MP, Chan SL: Neuronal and glial calcium signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Calcium. 2003, 34: 385-397. 10.1016/S0143-4160(03)00128-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lazarov O, Peterson LD, Peterson DA, Sisodia SS: Expression of a familial Alzheimer’s disease-linked presenilin-1 variant enhances perforant pathway lesion-induced neuronal loss in the entorhinal cortex. J Neurosci. 2006, 26: 429-434. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3961-05.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Villeda SA, Luo J, Mosher KI, Zou B, Britschgi M, Bieri G, Stan TM, Fainberg N, Ding Z, Eggel A, Lucin KM, Czirr E, Park JS, Couillard-Despres S, Aigner L, Li G, Peskind ER, Kaye JA, Quinn JF, Galasko DR, Xie XS, Rando TA, Wyss-Coray T: The ageing systemic milieu negatively regulates neurogenesis and cognitive function. Nature. 2011, 477: 90-94. 10.1038/nature10357.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Krathwohl MD, Kaiser JL: Chemokines promote quiescence and survival of human neural progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2004, 22: 109-118. 10.1634/stemcells.22-1-109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kronenberg G, Reuter K, Steiner B, Brandt MD, Jessberger S, Yamaguchi M, Kempermann G: Subpopulations of proliferating cells of the adult hippocampus respond differently to physiologic neurogenic stimuli. J Comp Neurol. 2003, 467: 455-463. 10.1002/cne.10945.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. van Praag H, Christie BR, Sejnowski TJ, Gage FH: Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 13427-13431. 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13427.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams RW, Rakic P: Three-dimensional counting: an accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material. J Comp Neurol. 1988, 278: 344-352. 10.1002/cne.902780305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Paresce DM, Ghosh RN, Maxfield FR: Microglial cells internalize aggregates of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid beta-protein via a scavenger receptor. Neuron. 1996, 17: 553-565. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80187-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Veeraraghavalu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.