Skip to main content

Generation and Characterization of a genetic zebrafish model of SMA carrying the human SMN2gene



Animal models of human diseases are essential as they allow analysis of the disease process at the cellular level and can advance therapeutics by serving as a tool for drug screening and target validation. Here we report the development of a complete genetic model of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in the vertebrate zebrafish to complement existing zebrafish, mouse, and invertebrate models and show its utility for testing compounds that alter SMN2 splicing.


The human motoneuron disease SMA is caused by low levels, as opposed to a complete absence, of the survival motor neuron protein (SMN). To generate a true model of SMA in zebrafish, we have generated a transgenic zebrafish expressing the human SMN2 gene (hSMN2), which produces only a low amount of full-length SMN, and crossed this onto the smn-/- background. We show that human SMN2 is spliced in zebrafish as it is in humans and makes low levels of SMN protein. Moreover, we show that an antisense oligonucleotide that enhances correct hSMN2 splicing increases full-length hSMN RNA in this model. When we placed this transgene on the smn mutant background it rescued the neuromuscular presynaptic SV2 defect that occurs in smn mutants and increased their survival.


We have generated a transgenic fish carrying the human hSMN2 gene. This gene is spliced in fish as it is in humans and mice suggesting a conserved splicing mechanism in these vertebrates. Moreover, antisense targeting of an intronic splicing silencer site increased the amount of full length SMN generated from this transgene. Having this transgene on the smn mutant fish rescued the presynaptic defect and increased survival. This model of zebrafish SMA has all of the components of human SMA and can thus be used to understand motoneuron dysfunction in SMA, can be used as an vivo test for drugs or antisense approaches that increase full-length SMN, and can be developed for drug screening.


Identification of the survival motoneuron gene (SMN) as the genetic cause of the motoneuron disease spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) [1] was a major advance in the motoneuron disease field. It has enabled a way to model the disease in animals as a means to study disease biology and develop therapeutics. The genetics of SMA has been well characterized and supports that SMA arises from a deletion of the SMN1 gene and reliance for production of the SMN protein from the SMN2 gene [24]. The SMN2 gene, however, carries a number of nucleotide differences compared to SMN1 and one of these at position 6 in exon 7 results in a silent mutation that changes the splicing pattern of the gene [5, 6]. The result is that the vast majority (~80-90%) of SMN from the SMN2 gene lacks exon 7 (SMNΔ7) [1]. This yields an unstable protein that cannot substitute for the full-length SMN protein [68].

Based on this information, an animal model of SMA needs both a deletion/dysfunction of the SMN1 gene and the presence of the SMN2 gene. An evolutionary analysis revealed that the SMN1 gene is duplicated in the chimpanzee genome, but only humans have the SMN2 gene [9]. Thus, it has been hypothesized that the human SMN2 gene (hSMN2) evolved from one of the SMN1 alleles. Since only humans have the SMN2 gene, the best way to generate an animal model of SMA is to add the hSMN2 as a transgene to an animal with a deleted/mutated SMN1. To date, this has been done in mice to generate a number of important models of SMA [2, 3, 7, 10]. Models of SMA in drosophila, zebrafish, and Xenopus have relied on maternal Smn contributions [11, 12] or transient Smn knockdown [13, 14]. While these models are useful, they often have Smn levels that change during development and may not fully recapitulate the disease. To generate a complete model of SMA in zebrafish, we have generated transgenic zebrafish expressing the hSMN2 gene with its endogenous promoter. We then crossed this transgene into the previously characterized smnY262stop-/+ line [12]. Here we show that hSMN2 is spliced in zebrafish consistent with what is seen in humans and mice [3]. In addition, we show that disrupting an intronic splicing silencer can increase the levels of full-length SMN from this transgene. The presence of the transgene results in a modest increase in SMN protein, a modest increase in survival compared to mutants lacking the transgene, and a delay in the presynaptic defect seen in smn mutant fish. Together these data show that we have generated a zebrafish model of SMA that has the genetics of human SMA.


Characterization of transgenic hSMN2zebrafish lines

To generate a complete model of SMA in zebrafish, we generated a transgenic zebrafish line expressing hSMN2. It had previously been shown that the entire human hSMN2 gene including its promoter was on a 35.5 kb BamHI fragment in the genomic clone PAC 215P15 [3]. Recombineering [15] was used to clone the BamHI fragment out of PAC 215P15 and tag the DNA with a 0.6 kb fragment of the zebrafish heat shock 70 promoter (0.6hsp70) [16] driving DsRed into pIndigoBac5. The hsp70:DsRed component was used for screening transgenics (Figure 1). The total construct therefore was Tg(hSMN2;0.6hsp70:DsRed), hereafter referred to as Tg(hSMN2). This DNA construct was microinjected into early one-cell stage embryos. To determine which embryos received a high amount of DNA, injected embryos were heat shocked (37°C for 30 minutes) at 24 hours post fertilization (hpf). Only embryos expressing ubiquitous DsRed were grown for transgenic lines (~0.3-0.5%) thus increasing the chance of these fish having incorporated DNA into their germline. After injecting and screening, 38 F0s were grown to adulthood (~3 months) and then outcrossed to generate F1s. All F1s were heat shocked and those showing DsRed expression, indicative of the transgene, were grown to adulthood (Figure 1C). Approximately, 3% of the F0s gave rise to transgenic F1s. To examine Tg(hSMN2) expression, RNA obtained from 24 hpf transgenic embryos was used for RT PCR. hSMN2 was expressed in 10 transgenic zebrafish lines and 3 lines (os38, os39, os40) showed correct splicing of the hSMN2 gene (Figure 2). These splice products were characterized by both size and sequence. All three splice products, transcripts lacking exon 7 (Δ7), transcripts lacking exon 5 (Δ5), and transcripts lacking both (Δ5, Δ7) were present in all three lines. The splicing pattern was similar to the splicing pattern for endogenous hSMN2 from transgenic mice with low and high hSMN2 copy number [3] and from a human cell line (Figure 2A). The Δ7 and Δ5 forms were consistently present in these transgenic lines, but the Δ5, Δ7 form was more variable. The transgene copy number was estimated by quantitative PCR from DNA isolated from fin tissue. Hemizygous fish from Tg(hSMN2)os38, Tg(hSMN2)os39, and Tg(hSMN2)os40 had 30, 4, and 16 transgene copies respectively. RNA analysis from Tg(hSMN2)os38 revealed that full-length hSMN RNA is expressed as early as 6 hpf with an increase in the full-length hSMN between 6 and 24 hpf (Figure 3).

Figure 1

Strategy for generating Tg(hSMN2) zebrafish. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the hSMN2:0.6hsp70:DsRed DNA construct. Arrows indicate the direction of expression. (B) Digestion of the hSMN2:0.6hsp70:DsRed construct using BamHI on 0.5% agarose gel. Lane 1, high molecular weight DNA ladder (Invitrogen); lane 2-3, two examples of the hSMN2:0.6hsp70:DsRed construct. (C) Transgenic larvae (3 dpf) as revealed by heat shocking.

Figure 2

Expression of hSMN2 RNA in transgenic zebrafish. Representative polyacrylamide gel showing RT-PCR product from hSMN2 RNA in transgenic lines. Lane 1, 1 kb DNA ladder. Lane 2, negative control from a wild-type nontransgenic fish. Lanes 3 and 4, samples from spinal cords of low and high SMN2 copy transgenic mice [3], respectively. Lanes 5-10, single 3 dpf Tg(hSMN2)os38 larva. Lanes 11-13, single 3 dpf Tg(hSMN2)os39 larva. Lane 14, single 3 dpf Tg(hSMN2)os40 larva. Lane 15, human breast cancer cell line as a control.

Figure 3

Expression of hSMN2 RNA during embryonic development in transgenic zebrafish. (A)Representative polyacrylamide gel showing RT-PCR product obtained from Tg(hSMN2)os38 RNA during early development. RNA from three embryos was prepared at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 72 hpf. Lane 1, 1 kb DNA ladder. Human, RNA from a human breast cancer cell line. (B) Quantification of the ratio of full-length hSMN/hSMNΔ7 from three separate experiments shown as mean ± sd.

Blocking an intronic splicing silencer site results in more full-length hSMN in Tg(hSMN2)fish

An important therapeutic approach to SMA is to find methods to increase the amount of full-length SMN generated from the SMN2 gene. One promising approach that has recently been tested in vivo is to use antisense oligonucleotides against an intronic splicing silencer (ISS) site in intron 7 [17] to increase exon 7 inclusion and thus generate more full-length SMN from the SMN2 gene [18]. To test whether the Tg(hSMN2) zebrafish could be used as a tool to test this technology, we injected an antisense ISS-NI morpholino (MO) into 1-cell stage Tg(hSMN2)os38 embryos. At 3 days post fertilization (dpf) RNA was harvested and the human SMN full-length and SMNΔ7 levels generated from the transgene were analyzed by RT-PCR and quantified by measuring band intensity (Figure 4). Uninjected embryos had a full-length SMN/SMNΔ7 ratio of 0.36 ± 0.05 (mean ± sd). When we injected 9 ng of ISS-NI MO, the ratio increased ~5-fold to 1.9 ± 0.13 and the ratio increased ~10-fold (3.45 ± 0.54) with the 15 ng dose. When we injected the highest dose, 18 ng, the ratio increased ~7-fold (2.9 ± 0.34) however the embryos showed some developmental abnormalities suggesting that this dose was too high. This increase was transient, however, and was no longer present at 7 dpf (data not shown). This is not surprising since morpholino perdurance is variable and most reports indicate early phenotypes within 3-5 dpf [19]; although each morpholino is unique and some can affect protein levels into the second week of development [13]. These data show that Tg(hSMN2) zebrafish respond to splicing factors similarly to mice carrying the human transgene and can serve as a fast and easy in vivo system to test approaches to increase full-length SMN from the hSMN2 gene.

Figure 4

Disrupting an intronic splice silencer site increases the amount of full-length hSMN RNA. (A) Representative polyacrylamide gel showing RT-PCR product obtained from hSMN RNA exons 4-8. One-cell Tg(hSMN2)os38 embryos were injected with 9, 15 or 18 ng of ISS-N1 MO. RNA samples were prepared at 3 dpf for RT PCR. (B) Quantification of the ratio of full-length hSMN/hSMNΔ7 RNA from three separate experiments shown as mean ± sd.

We next asked whether this change in splicing increased the amount of full-length protein generated from the transgene. For this we used a human specific SMN antibody [18]. To determine whether hSMN was being made from the transgene, we first analyzed 3 dpf Tg(hSMN2)os38 and found that hSMN was present at low levels (Figure 5). Next, we analyzed protein from 3 dpf Tg(hSMN2)os38 larvae injected with ISS-N1 MO at the 1-2 cell stage. Here we found an ~ 3-fold increase in hSMN protein. These data show that hSMN is made in Tg(hSMN2) and disrupting a splicing motif can increase the levels.

Figure 5

hSMN protein in Tg(hSMN2) larvae. (A) Representative western blot. Lane 1, 10 day old Smn-/-;SMN2+/+;delta7+/+mouse brain (10 μg); Lane 2-4, wt, Tg(hSMN2)os38, and Tg(hSMN2)os38 + 15 ng ISS-N1 MO zebrafish larvae collected at 3 dpf (150 μg of protein per lane). The blot was probed with human SMN [18] and β-actin monoclonal antibodies. (B) Quantification of hSMN band intensity from two experiments shown as mean ± sd.

Tg(hSMN2) extends survival when crossed into smnmutant fish

Small changes in full-length SMN can alter disease phenotypes in patients and in animal models [20, 21]. We therefore asked whether the presence of the hSMN2 transgene and the presence of a small amount of hSMN protein could extend survival of smn mutants, For these experiments we utilized zebrafish smn stop mutation, smnY262stop. We had previously shown that smnY262stop-/- die at 12 dpf (range: 9-16 dpf) [12]. To determine whether the modest increase in hSMN extended survival of smnY262stop-/- mutants, we analyzed survival of Tg(hSMN2)os38;smnY262stop-/- fish. To generate these lines, Tg(hSMN2)os38;smnY262stop-/+ were outcrossed to smnY262stop+/- and embryos were heat shocked at 1 dpf and screened at 2 dpf for DsRed fluorescence indicative of the transgene. DsRed positive embryos and DsRed negative embryos were identified and monitored over 23 days. Any larvae that died were kept and on day 23, all fish were genotyped to identify the smnY262stop-/-larvae from both the positive and negative transgene populations. We found that the hSMN2 transgene slightly extended the survival of smnY262stop-/-from an average of 12 (9-16) to14.7 (10-17) dpf (p < 0.0001) (Figure 6). This increase in survival is consistent with the slight increase in full-length hSMN from the Tg(hSMN2)os38 gene seen by Western blot (Figure 5). We did not, however, see any difference in the survival of Tg(hSMN2)os38; smnY262stop-/- injected with the ISS-N1 MO (n = 120 larvae) (data not shown). This is consistent with our finding that the increase in full-length hSMN in Tg(hSMN2)os38 ISS-NI MO injected embryos was transient and gone by 7 dpf (data not shown). These data suggest that this transient increase in hSMN was not enough to affect later events such as survival.

Figure 6

hSMN2 extends the survival of smnY 262 stop-/-fish. Survival was followed up to 23 dpf and a Kaplan-Meier plot was generated. Tg(hSMN2)os38, purple line, n = 143; Tg(hSMN2)os38; smnY262stop+/-, red line, n = 62; Tg(hSMN2)os38; smnY262stop-/-, green line, n = 25; smnY262stop-/-, blue line, n = 40. The average survival was 12 dpf (range = 7-15 dpf) for smnY262stop-/-larvae and 14.7 dpf (range = 10-17 dpf) for Tg(hSMN2)os38; smnY262stop-/-(p < 0.0001).

hSMN2 rescues the presynaptic NMJ defect

We have shown that presynaptic terminals are present in zebrafish smn mutants, but there is a decrease in SV2 protein at the NMJ [12]. Our hypothesis is that SV2 loss at the NMJ is an indication that the synapse is becoming compromised. To ask whether SV2 loss is observed in Tg(hSMN2)os38;smn-/-larvae, we analyzed SV2 expression (Figure 7). We crossed Tg(hSMN2);smnY262 stop+/-to smnY262stop+/-and larvae carrying the transgene were identified by heat shock and raised to 11 dpf. At this time they were genotyped and immunolabeled with SV2 and α-bgt. In Tg(hSMN2)os38;smnY262-/-at 11 dpf, SV2 and α-bgt were co-localized and no NMJ defects were observed compared to smnY262stop-/-larvae that had an overall reduction in SV2 as compared to wild-types (Figure 7A-B, F). Introduction of hSMN2, however, rescued the SV2 reduction seen in homozygous smn mutants (Figure 7C, F). We repeated the immunolabeling at 14 dpf and observed SV2 defects similar to those seen in the homozygous smn mutants (Figure 7E, F). To quantify the NMJ defects, we plotted the co-localization efficiency of the pre- and postsynaptic regions. These data are consistent with our previous observation [12] indicating that when SMN levels are low, presynaptic NMJ changes occur.

Figure 7

Tg(hSMN2 ) rescues the NMJ defect in smn mutants. Immunolabeling of presynaptic regions (SV2, red) and postsynaptic regions (α-bgt, green) of (A) 11 dpf WT larvae (n = 10); (B) 11 dpf smnY262stop-/-larvae (n = 13); (C) 11 dpf Tg(hSMN2)os38;smnY262stop-/-larvae (n = 12); (D) 14 dpf WT larvae (n = 8) (E) 14 dpf Tg(hSMN2)os38; smnY262stop-/-larvae (n = 12); Merge is the overlay. (F) The coefficients of co-localization were plotted and the means of each group were calculated. Tg(hSMN2)os38; smnY262stop-/-were significantly different compared to the smnY262stop-/-at 11 dpf (p < 0.0001). At 14 dpf, there was a significant difference between the Tg(hSMN2)os38;smnY262stop-/-and wild types. Scale bar, 80 μm.


Here we characterize the generation and characterization of a zebrafish having both genetic components of SMA; that is, a mutation in the endogenous smn gene and the presence of the human SMN2 gene. We show that hSMN2 is spliced correctly in zebrafish and that it contributes a small amount of full-length hSMN. This increase in SMN protein statistically improved survival, albeit by only a few days, and rescued the presynaptic NMJ defect for that same number of days. We also show using the Tg(hSMN2) line that we can modulate the amount of full-length hSMN RNA by disrupting an intronic splicing silencer site with an antisense MO. Thus, this model has utility both as a vertebrate model of SMA and as a way to test approaches to increase full-length SMN from the SMN2 gene in vivo.

The finding that the presence of the Tg(hSMN2)os38 transgene only increased survival by ~2 days is due to the fact that it only increased full-length protein by a small amount. Because we have multiple lines that all express at low levels, this is not likely due to integration sites, but more likely caused by the hSMN promoter not being very efficient in zebrafish or human RNA not being translated efficiently in zebrafish. To further increase the amount of full-length SMN in this model, we can increase the copies of the hSMN2 transgene by crossing in additional copies of the hSMN2 gene. However, it does appear that the human SMN2 promoter is not very robust in zebrafish as our highest expressing line (os38) has 30 copies of the transgene and only a slight increase in SMN protein. It is also possible that some of these copies are silenced [22]. Data from human patients and mouse models of SMA show, however, that even slight increases in SMN increase survival and decrease disease severity. This is supported by data presented here showing that a slight increase in protein can cause a corresponding increase in survival and a delay in presynaptic defects.

In previous experiments, we showed that driving hSMN cDNA only in motoneurons (using the zebrafish hb9/mnx1 promoter) rescued the presynaptic NMJ defect, but not survival [12]. It is not surprising that survival was not rescued since SMN is needed in all cells, even at low levels, or the organism will die [23]. In the model presented here, SMN present at low levels in all cells extended survival and rescued the SV2 presynaptic defect during that extension. However, before the fish died, their SV2 decreased much as it did in mutants lacking the transgene [12] (Figure 7). These data support our earlier conclusion that low levels of SMN lead to changes at the NMJ presynaptic terminal [12]. This is also consistent with mouse models of SMA that show poor presynaptic terminal differentiation [24], decreased density of synaptic vesicles [25], and evidence of unoccupied synapses [26]. Drosophila models also show evidence of NMJ defects [11]. Thus, across species, low levels of SMN result in NMJ defects.

These data show that we have generated a complete genetic model of SMA in zebrafish. This is only the second model organism where this has been accomplished. Having this model in zebrafish complements the mouse models and also provides the ability to perform different types of experiments. For example, it is very standard in zebrafish to generate genetics mosaics to address issues of cell autonomy [27, 28]. Since large numbers of embryos can be collected, this system is also amenable to drug screening [29]. Moreover, as we show here this model can be used to quickly and easily test compounds to determine their affect on hSMN2 splicing in vivo.


Zebrafish maintenance

Adult zebrafish and embryos were maintained by standard protocols [30]. All fish were maintained at temperatures between 27 and 29°C. Zebrafish used for making transgenics were on the *AB/LF background. Characterization of the smnY262stop mutant has been previously described [12].

Cloning and recombineering

Two 540 bp fragments (arms) from human PAC215p15 (AC004999) were amplified using PCR for recombineering [15]. These arms were complementary to sequences outside of the 35.5 kb fragment that contained SMN2. The 5' arm was amplified by PCR using forward primer: 5'AGTGAGCTCAAGCATTCTTATACACCACCC; reverse primer: 5'GGACACGCGTTGTCAAAGATCAGATAGTTG and digested with Sac I and Mlu I. The 3' arm was amplified using PCR forward primer: 5'ACTACGCGTGATCCTGTGGCTTCAATGTCAT; reverse primer: 5' CAGCAAGCTTCAGGATATGATCTCCATACAG and digested with Mlu I and Hind III. These two digested PCR products were then triple cloned into SacI and Hind III sites of the pBluescriptSK (pBSK) vector which contained two Sce I sites (gift from Dr. Bruce Appel) and referred to as the pBSK arm vector. The EGFP from pEGFP-1 backbone (Clontech) was removed at Sal I and Not I sites and replaced by DsRed. The last 0.6 kb of the zebrafish hsp70 promoter generated from the EcoR1 site inside the full promoter [16] was amplified with DsRed using primer forward 5'ATATAAGCTTACTGGAGGCTTCCAGAACAG and reverse 5'GCCTCGAGCTTAAGATACATTGATGAGTTTG. The PCR product was digested with Hind III and Xho I and cloned into the pBluescript arm vector.

The entire fragment containing two Sce I sites, two arms and 0.6 kb of the Hsp70-DsRed was amplified using PCR with forward primer 5'TAAGGATCCCACGGAAACAGCTATGACC and reverse primer 5'ATAGGATCCCACGACGTTGTAAAACGACG. The entire PCR product was digested with Bam HI and cloned into pIndigoBac5 (Epicentre). This DNA plasmid was digested with Mlu I and 5 ng of digested DNA was used for transformation. One colony of PAC215p15 in SW102 cells was grown overnight at 32°C in 3 ml culture containing kanamycine. The culture was diluted to 1% in 15 ml and grown at 32°C until it reached OD = 0.6 and then shaken at 42°C for 15 minutes. The culture was chilled on ice for 10 minutes and washed twice in ice-cold water. The cell pellet was eluted in 100 μl of water and used for electro transformation with the above digested plasmid and spread onto cloramphenicol agar plates and grown overnight at 32°C. Colonies were cultured at 32°C and plasmids were screened for the 35.5 kb fragment by digesting with Bam HI.

Generation of transgenics

DNA injections were performed as described [31]. Plasmid DNA was prepared (Qiagen Plasmid Midi kit) and diluted to 200 ng/μl in I-SceI buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM MgCl2, pH 8.8, 5 Units of SceI enzyme (New England Biolab) and 0.1% phenol red. Sample was prepared fresh before each injection. DNA (200 ng/μl) was injected into embryos at the early one-cell stage to 10% of the volume of the cell (~ 1 nl). Injected embryos were transferred into fish water containing penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) 1/100. Injected fish (F0s) were heat shocked at 1 dpf at 37°C for 30 minutes and screened at 2 dpf. To increase the likelihood that the transgene would go germline, only F0s expressing DsRed in close to 100% of cells were kept and grown to adulthood. Once they reached adulthood, F0s were outcrossed to wild-type fish and the resulting F1s were heat shocked and screened for DsRed fluorescence. F1s were grown to adulthood and outcrossed to generate transgenic lines. F1s from the same F0 were kept as separate lines since they could arise from transgene insertion into different germ cells. Transgenic lines were designated as: Tg(hSMN2;0.6hsp70:DsRed) followed by the lab designation (os for Ohio State) and a line number.

RNA extraction, RT PCR, and sequencing of SMN2transcripts

Total RNA from zebrafish embryos and larvae was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. RT-PCR was performed on 10 ng of total RNA using a Quigen one-step RT-PCR kit. RNA from the hSMN2 gene was amplified by human specific primers in exon 4 and 8 as in Le et al. [7]: 5'-GTGAGAACTCCAGGTCTCCTGG-3' and 5'-CTACAACACCCTTCTCACAG-3'. Human breast cancer cell line MCF10CA1a was used as a control (gift from the Hai lab). PCR products were run on 8% polyacrylamide gel. Images were captured by Gel Doc 2000 (Bio Rad). The images were scanned and the intensity of the full-length hSMN and hSMN7 bands were determined by Photoshop Element 5.0. The ratios of intensity of full-length hSMN and hSMNΔ7 were reported.

For sequencing hSMN2 transcripts, RT-PCR was performed on total RNA extracted from ten 3 dpf Tg(hSMN2)os38 larvae using human specific primers in exon 4 and 8 [7]. The PCR product was run on a 1% agarose gel and the four bands excised and purified using Qiagen gel extraction kit. Purified PCR products were then cloned into PCR8/GW/Topo vector (Invitrogen) using PCR8/GW/Topo TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). DNA plasmids were sequenced using primer M13F with sequence GTAAAACGACGGCCAG. The sequencing results were blasted to NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_000344.3.

Quantitative PCR

DNA was extracted from adult fish fins using DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed as described in Ramesh et al, 2010 [32]. The hSMN2 transgene was detected with primers to amplify intron2: SMN2F2 5'-GCGATAGAGTGAGACTCCATC and SMN2R1 5'-GACATAGAGGTCTGATCTTTAGCT. Fish β-actin F primers: 5'-CATGAGACCACCTTCAACTCC and fish β-actin R primer: 5'-TGAAATCACTGCAAGCAAACTG were used to amplify the endogenous β-actin gene.

DNA from low and high copy SMN2 transgenic mice [3] and DNA from human breast cancer cell line MCF10CA1a was used as a control. The mouse β-actin gene was amplified using mouse β-actin F 5'-GTATGGAATCCTGTGGCATCC and mouse β-actin R 5'-ATACAAGATGGTGAATGGTGAG primers. The qPCR was performed on the iCycler (Bio-rad) with IqSYBR Green Supermix (BioRad) containing 5 ng of genomic DNA and 10 pmol of each primer. The data was analyzed as described [32].

Antisense oligonucleotides injection

A morpholino directed against an intron splice silencer (ISS-N1) site with sequence ATTCACTTTCATAATGCTGG [18] was purchased from Gene Tools. The stock was diluted to 2 mM in dH2O. One-cell stage Tg(hSMN2)os38 embryos were injected with 9, 15 and 18 ng of the ISS-N1 MO using an MPPI-2 Pressure Injector (Applied Scientific Instrumentation). Injection of these three doses was repeated three times. At 3 dpf total RNA from injected and uninjected zebrafish embryos was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. RT-PCR was performed twice for each sample for a total 6 RT-PCR reactions per treatment. The products were run on 8% polyacrylamide gel and images were captured by Gel Doc 2000 (Bio Rad). The images were scanned and the intensity of the full-length hSMN and hSMNΔ7 bands were determined by Photoshop Element 5.0. The ratios of intensity of full-length hSMN and hSMNΔ7 were reported.

Survival assay and genotyping

The survival assay was performed on progeny from crosses between heterozygote Tg(hSMN2)os38 and smn262+/- fish. Progeny from these crosses were heat shocked at 1 dpf and screened at 2 dpf. Tg(hSMN2)os38 were fluorescent and kept for analysis. Those without a DsRed signal were kept as the control group. Both groups were raised in the same nursery environment. The dead larvae were collected twice a day and frozen. At 23 dpf, the remaining larvae were sacrificed and all larvae, including those that died earlier, were then genotyped as described [12]. For each fish time of death, survival status, and classification were put into SPSS (SPSS version 15; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Kaplan-Meier survival tests were run to generate the survival curve and p-values were calculated by the log-rank test.

Western blotting

Six zebrafish embryos (3 dpf) of wild-type, Tg(hSMN2)os38 and Tg(hSMN2)os38 injected with 15 ng ISS-N1 MO were dissolved in 10 μl of blending buffer (62.6 mM Tris pH 6.8, 5 mM EDTA and 10% SDS) and boiled for 10 minutes. The samples were then diluted with an equal volume of loading buffer (100 mM Tris pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 0.2% Bromophenol Blue, 20% glycerol and 200 mM dithiothreitol), boiled for 2 minutes. The whole amount of each sample from six embryos (~150 μg) and ~10 μg of brain protein from 10 day Smn-/-;SMN2+/+;delta7+/+mice [33] were resolved on a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel. The gel was electrotransfered to the Protran BA 83 Nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman). Membranes were probed with mouse monoclonal antibodies: human specific SMN-KH monoclonal antibody [18] (1/20) or anti-actin (Santa Cruz) (1/5000). Signal was detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (1/5000) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc), ECL reagents and Amersham Hyperfilm ECL (Amersham Bioscience). The images were scanned from two separate experiments and the intensity of the bands determined by Photoshop Element 5.0 and reported as mean ± sd.

Immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy

Zebrafish larvae were anesthetized with tricain (Sigma, A-5040). The head of each larva was removed for genotyping as described [12]. The body was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and 1% DMSO overnight at 4°C. Larvae were then washed in 1XPBS for 10 minutes, distilled H2O for 10 minutes followed by a 15 minute incubation at room temperature with -20°C Acetone. Samples were then washed with distilled H2O for 20 minutes. Postsynaptic regions were immunostained for 1 hour with α-bgt conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen) diluted 1/100 in PBDT buffer (1XPBS, 1% DMSO, 1% BSA, 0.5% TritonX-100) and 2.5% normal goat serum as in [12]. Samples were washed for 10 minutes 5X in PBST (0.5% TritonX-100 in 1XPBS). Samples were then incubated overnight at 4°C with presynaptic antibody SV2 diluted 1/100 in PBDT buffer and 2.5% normal goat serum. Samples were washed 5 × 10 minutes with PBST at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with Alexa Fluor 633 goat-anti mouse IgG (Invitrogen) diluted 1/400 in PBDT and 2.5% normal goat serum. Samples were washed for 5 × 10 minutes in PBST, mounted on a slide with vectashield (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA) and images were captured with the Leica TCS SL scanning confocal microscope system. Neuromuscular junction (NMJ) analysis was performed as described [12]. Changes in the co-localization coefficients and log ratios of pre- and postsynaptic only regions determined by NIH Image J were analyzed using a one-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (R 2.6.0; GNU project).



spinal muscular atrophy


survival motor neuron




hours post fertilization


days post fertilization.


  1. 1.

    Lefebvre S, Burglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, Benichou B, Cruaud C, Millasseau P, Zeviani M, et al: Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995, 80: 155-165. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hsieh-Li HM, Chang JG, Jong YJ, Wu MH, Wang NM, Tsai CH, Li H: A mouse model for spinal muscular atrophy. Nat Genet. 2000, 24: 66-70. 10.1038/71709.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Monani UR, Sendtner M, Coovert DD, Parsons DW, Andreassi C, Le TT, Jablonka S, Schrank B, Rossoll W, Prior TW, et al: The human centromeric survival motor neuron gene (SMN2) rescues embryonic lethality in Smn(-/-) mice and results in a mouse with spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2000, 9: 333-339. 10.1093/hmg/9.3.333.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mailman MD, Heinz JW, Papp AC, Snyder PJ, Sedra MS, Wirth B, Burghes AH, Prior TW: Molecular analysis of spinal muscular atrophy and modification of the phenotype by SMN2. Genet Med. 2002, 4: 20-26. 10.1097/00125817-200201000-00004.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Monani UR, Lorson CL, Parsons DW, Prior TW, Androphy EJ, Burghes AH, McPherson JD: A single nucleotide difference that alters splicing patterns distinguishes the SMA gene SMN1 from the copy gene SMN2. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8: 1177-1183. 10.1093/hmg/8.7.1177.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lorson CL, Hahnen E, Androphy EJ, Wirth B: A single nucleotide in the SMN gene regulates splicing and is responsible for spinal muscular atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 6307-6311. 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6307.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Le TT, Pham LT, Butchbach ME, Zhang HL, Monani UR, Coovert DD, Gavrilina TO, Xing L, Bassell GJ, Burghes AH: SMNDelta7, the major product of the centromeric survival motor neuron (SMN2) gene, extends survival in mice with spinal muscular atrophy and associates with full-length SMN. Hum Mol Genet. 2005, 14: 845-857. 10.1093/hmg/ddi078.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Burnett BG, Muñoz E, Tandon A, Kwon DY, Sumner CJ, Fischbeck KH: Regulation of SMN protein stability. Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 29: 1107-1115. 10.1128/MCB.01262-08.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rochette CF, Gilbert N, Simard LR: SMN gene duplication and the emergence of the SMN2 gene occurred in distinct hominids: SMN2 is unique to Homo sapiens. Hum Genet. 2001, 108: 255-266. 10.1007/s004390100473.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Monani UR, Pastore MT, Gavrilina TO, Jablonka S, Le TT, Andreassi C, DiCocco JM, Lorson C, Androphy EJ, Sendtner M, et al: A transgene carrying an A2G missense mutation in the SMN gene modulates phenotypic severity in mice with severe (type I) spinal muscular atrophy. J Cell Biol. 2003, 160: 41-52. 10.1083/jcb.200208079.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chang HC, Dimlich DN, Yokokura T, Mukherjee A, Kankel MW, Sen A, Sridhar V, Fulga TA, Hart AC, Van Vactor D, Artavanis-Tsakonas S: Modeling spinal muscular atrophy in Drosophila. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3: e3209-10.1371/journal.pone.0003209.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Boon KL, Xiao S, McWhorter ML, Donn T, Wolf-Saxon E, Bohnsack MT, Moens CB, Beattie CE: Zebrafish survival motor neuron mutants exhibit presynaptic neuromuscular junction defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2009, 18: 3615-3625. 10.1093/hmg/ddp310.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    McWhorter ML, Monani UR, Burghes AH, Beattie CE: Knockdown of the survival motor neuron (Smn) protein in zebrafish causes defects in motor axon outgrowth and pathfinding. J Cell Biol. 2003, 162: 919-931. 10.1083/jcb.200303168.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ymlahi-Ouazzani Q, O JB, Paillard E, Ballagny C, Chesneau A, Jadaud A, Mazabraud A, Pollet N: Reduced levels of survival motor neuron protein leads to aberrant motoneuron growth in a Xenopus model of muscular atrophy. Neurogenetics. 2010, 11: 27-40. 10.1007/s10048-009-0200-6.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Warming S, Costantino N, Court DL, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG: Simple and highly efficient BAC recombineering using galK selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: e36-10.1093/nar/gni035.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shoji W, Sato-Maeda M: Application of heat shock promoter in transgenic zebrafish. Dev Growth Differ. 2008, 50: 401-406. 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2008.01038.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Singh NK, Singh NN, Androphy EJ, Singh RN: Splicing of a critical exon of human Survival Motor Neuron is regulated by a unique silencer element located in the last intron. Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 26: 1333-1346. 10.1128/MCB.26.4.1333-1346.2006.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hua Y, Sahashi K, Hung G, Rigo F, Passini MA, Bennett CF, Krainer AR: Antisense correction of SMN2 splicing in the CNS rescues necrosis in a type III SMA mouse model. Genes Dev. 2010, 24: 1634-1644. 10.1101/gad.1941310.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bill BR, Petzold AM, Clark KJ, Schimmenti LA, Ekker SC: A primer for morpholino use in zebrafish. Zebrafish. 2009, 6: 69-77. 10.1089/zeb.2008.0555.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    McAndrew PE, Parsons DW, Simard LR, Rochette C, Ray PN, Mendell JR, Prior TW, Burghes AH: Identification of proximal spinal muscular atrophy carriers and patients by analysis of SMNT and SMNC gene copy number. Am J Hum Genet. 1997, 60: 1411-1422. 10.1086/515465.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Feldkotter M, Schwarzer V, Wirth R, Wienker TF, Wirth B: Quantitative analyses of SMN1 and SMN2 based on real-time lightCycler PCR: fast and highly reliable carrier testing and prediction of severity of spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 70: 358-368. 10.1086/338627.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Akitake CM, Macurak M, Halpern ME, Goll MG: Transgenerational analysis of transcriptional silencing in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2011,

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schrank B, Gotz R, Gunnersen JM, Ure JM, Toyka KV, Smith AG, Sendtner M: Inactivation of the survival motor neuron gene, a candidate gene for human spinal muscular atrophy, leads to massive cell death in early mouse embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 9920-9925. 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9920.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kariya S, Park GH, Maeno-Hikichi Y, Leykekhman O, Lutz C, Arkovitz MS, Landmesser LT, Monani UR: Reduced SMN protein impairs maturation of the neuromuscular junctions in mouse models of spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17: 2552-2569. 10.1093/hmg/ddn156.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kong L, Wang X, Choe DW, Polley M, Burnett BG, Bosch-Marce M, Griffin JW, Rich MM, Sumner CJ: Impaired synaptic vesicle release and immaturity of neuromuscular junctions in spinal muscular atrophy mice. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 842-851. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4434-08.2009.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    McGovern VL, Gavrilina TO, Beattie CE, Burghes AH: Embryonic motor axon development in the severe SMA mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17: 2900-2909. 10.1093/hmg/ddn189.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Carmany-Rampey A, Moens CB: Modern mosaic analysis in the zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol. 2006, 39: 228-238.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    McWhorter ML, Boon KL, Horan ES, Burghes AH, Beattie CE: The SMN binding protein Gemin2 is not involved in motor axon outgrowth. Dev Neurobiol. 2008, 68: 182-194. 10.1002/dneu.20582.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zon LI, Peterson RT: In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005, 4: 35-44. 10.1038/nrd1606.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Westerfield M: The Zebrafish Book. 1995, Eugene: University of Oregon Press, 3

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rembold M, Lahiri K, Foulkes NS, Wittbrodt J: Transgenesis in fish: efficient selection of transgenic fish by co-injection with a fluorescent reporter construct. Nature Protocols. 2006, 1: 1133-1139. 10.1038/nprot.2006.165.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ramesh T, Lyon AN, Pineda RH, Wang C, Janssen PM, Canan BD, Burghes AH, Beattie CE: A genetic model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in zebrafish displays phenotypic hallmarks of motoneuron disease. Dis Model Mech. 2010, 3: 652-662. 10.1242/dmm.005538.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Foust KD, Wang X, McGovern VL, Braun L, Bevan AK, Haidet AM, Le TT, Morales PR, Rich MM, Burghes AH, Kaspar BK: Rescue of the spinal muscular atrophy phenotype in a mouse model by early postnatal delivery of SMN. Nat Biotechnol. 2010, 28: 271-274. 10.1038/nbt.1610.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Halloran MC, Sato-Maeda M, Warren JT, Su F, Lele Z, Krone PH, Kuwada JY, Shoji W: Laser-induced gene expression in specific cells of transgenic zebrafish. Development. 2000, 127: 1953-1960.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shoji W, Sato-Maeda M: Application of heat shock promoter in transgenic zebrafish. Dev Growth Differ. 2008, 50: 401-406. 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2008.01038.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank the fish facility staff for fish care, Dr. Bruce Appel for the pBSK SCE1 vector, Dr. Tsonwin Hai for the human breast cancer cell line (MCF10CA1a) and Dr. Adrian Krainer for the SMN-KH antibody. This work was supported by The SMA Foundation (CEB) and NIH RO1 NS5050414 (CEB) with additional support from NIH P30 NS045758.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine E Beattie.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HL performed all of the experiments and performed data analysis, AHMB helped with the conceptual design of the transgene and supplied reagents and the ISS-NI MO, CEB was involved in the conceptual design of the experiments, data analysis, and data interpretation. CEB and HL wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hao, L.T., Burghes, A.H. & Beattie, C.E. Generation and Characterization of a genetic zebrafish model of SMA carrying the human SMN2gene. Mol Neurodegeneration 6, 24 (2011).

Download citation


  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy
  • Survival Motor Neuron
  • Motoneuron Disease
  • SMN2 Gene
  • Survival Motor Neuron Protein